Relationship between dead pupa removal and season and productivity of honey bee (Apis mellifera, Hymenoptera: Apidae) colonies

This study was conducted to evaluate the dead pupae removal behaviour of 90 honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) colonies during the beekeeping season and the relationships between removal and colony productivity. The liquid nitrogen technique was used in May, June, July, August, and September. The number of removed pupae was significantly (P < 0.01) correlated with the month and changed throughout the season. The highest cleaning efficiency of the colonies were recorded in July and September, and the lowest were in May and August. While the average dead pupae removal was 83.75% in the 90 colonies, the percentage of removed pupae varied between 56.4% and 99.3% during the 5 months. There were significant positive correlations between dead pupae removal and honey yield (P < 0.01; r = 0.295), bee wax production (P < 0.01; r = 0.334), and adult worker bee population (P < 0.05; r = 0.233). No correlation was found between dead pupae removal and brood production and average temperature. Although hygienic behaviour has positive effects on many characters relating to productivity in untreated breeding populations, it is affected by many biotic and abiotic factors. This behaviour decreases with many stressful conditions (wasps, Merops sp., predators, honey harvesting) and increases with colony strength during the season.

Relationship between dead pupa removal and season and productivity of honey bee (Apis mellifera, Hymenoptera: Apidae) colonies

This study was conducted to evaluate the dead pupae removal behaviour of 90 honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) colonies during the beekeeping season and the relationships between removal and colony productivity. The liquid nitrogen technique was used in May, June, July, August, and September. The number of removed pupae was significantly (P < 0.01) correlated with the month and changed throughout the season. The highest cleaning efficiency of the colonies were recorded in July and September, and the lowest were in May and August. While the average dead pupae removal was 83.75% in the 90 colonies, the percentage of removed pupae varied between 56.4% and 99.3% during the 5 months. There were significant positive correlations between dead pupae removal and honey yield (P < 0.01; r = 0.295), bee wax production (P < 0.01; r = 0.334), and adult worker bee population (P < 0.05; r = 0.233). No correlation was found between dead pupae removal and brood production and average temperature. Although hygienic behaviour has positive effects on many characters relating to productivity in untreated breeding populations, it is affected by many biotic and abiotic factors. This behaviour decreases with many stressful conditions (wasps, Merops sp., predators, honey harvesting) and increases with colony strength during the season.

___

  • Oldroyd, B.P.: Evaluation of Australian commercial honey bees for hygienic behaviour, a critical character for tolerance to chalkbrood. Australian J. Exper. Agri., 1996; 36: 625–629.
  • Boecking, O., Bienefeld, K., Drescher, W.: Heritability of the Varroa-specific hygienic behaviour in honey bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae). J. Anim. Breeding Gen., 2000: 117: 417–424.
  • Rinderer, T.E., de Guzman, L.I., Delatte, G.T., Stelzer, J.A., Lancaster, V.A., Kuznetsov, V., Beaman, L., Watts, R., Harris, J.W.: Resistance to the parasitic mite Varroa destructor in honey bees from far-eastern Russia. Apidologie, 2001; 32: 381–399.
  • Tarpy, D.R., Summers, J., Keller, J.J.: Comparison of parasitic mites in Russian-hybrid and Italian honey bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae) colonies across three different locations in North Carolina. J. Econ. Entomol., 2007; 100: 258–266.
  • Spivak, M., Gilliam, M.: Facultative expression of hygienic behaviour of honey bees in relation to disease resistance. J. Apic. Res., 1993; 32: 147–157.
  • Spivak, M., Reuter, G.S.: Performance of hygienic colonies in a commercial apiary. Apidologie, 1998; 29: 291–302.
  • Ibrahim, A., Spivak, M.: The relationship between hygienic behavior and suppression of mite reproduction (SMR) as honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) mechanisms of resistance to Varroa destructor. Apidologie, 2006; 37: 31–40.
  • Harris, J.W., Danka, R.G., Villa, J.D.: Honey bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) with the trait of Varroa sensitive hygiene remove brood with all reproductive stages of Varroa mites (Mesostigmata: Varroidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am., 2010; 103: 146–152.
  • Arathi, H.S., Burns, I., Spivak, M.: Ethology of hygienic behaviour in the honey bee Apis mellifera L. (Hymenoptera: Apidae): behavioural repertoire of hygienic bees. Ethology, 2000; 106: 365–379.
  • Spivak, M., Masterman, R., Ross, R., Mesce, K.A.: Olfactory and behavioural response thresholds to odours of diseased brood differ between hygienic and non-hygienic honey bees (Apis mellifera L.). J. Com. Phys., 2001; 187: 441–452.
  • Spivak, M., Masterman, R., Ross, R., Mesce, K.A.: Hygienic behavior in the honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) and the modulatory role of octopamine. J. Neurobiol., 2003; 55: 341–354.
  • Swanson, J.A.I., Torto, B., Kells, S.A., Mesce, K.A., Tumlinson, J.H., Spivak, M.: Odorants that induce hygienic behavior in honeybees: identification of volatile compounds in chalkbroodinfected honeybee larvae. J. Chem. Ecol., 2009; 35: 1108–1116.
  • Oxley, P.R., Spivak, M., Oldroyd, B.P.: Six quantitative trait loci influence task thresholds for hygienic behavior in honeybees (Apis mellifera). Mol. Ecol., 2010; 19: 1452–1461.
  • Harbo, J.R., Harris, J.W.: Selection honey bees for resistance to Varroa jacobsoni. Apidologie, 1999; 30: 183–196.
  • Rinderer, E.T., Harris, J.W., Hunt, G.J., de Guzman, L.I.: Breeding for resistance to Varroa destructor in North America. Apidologie, 2010; 41: 409–424.
  • Büchler, R., Berg, S., Le Conte, Y.: Breeding for resistance to Varroa destructor in Europe. Apidologie, 2010; 41: 393–408.
  • Moritz, R.F.A., de Miranda J., Fries, I., Le Conte, Y., Neuman, P., Paxton, R.J.: Research strategies to improve honeybee health in Europe. Apidologie, 2010; 41: 227–242.
  • Spivak, M., Reuter, G.R., Lee, K., Ranum, B.: The future of the MN hygienic stock of bees is in good hands. Am. Bee J., 2009; 149: 965–967.
  • Sammataro, D., Avitabile, A.: The Beekeeper’s Handbook. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, USA. 1998; 5–8.
  • Guler, A.: The effects of the shook swarm technique on honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) colony productivity and honey quality. J. Apic. Res., 2008; 47: 27–34.
  • Thompson, V.C.: Behaviour genetics of nest cleaning in honey bee. III. Effect of age of bees of a resistance line on their response to disease-killed brood. J. Apic. Res., 1964; 3: 25–30.
  • Panasiuk, B., Skowronek, W., Gerula, D.: Effect of period of the season and environmental conditions on rate of cleaning cells with dead brood. J. Apic. Sci., 2009; 53: 95–102.
  • Winston, M.L.: The Biology of the Honey Bee. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, USA. 1987.
  • Lensky, Y., Golan, Y.: Honey bee populations and honey production during drought years in a subtropical climate. Hebrew Univ., 1966; 18: 27–42.
  • Güler, A.: The effects of narrowed area and additional feeding on some physiological characteristics of honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) colonies. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci., 2000; 24: 1–6.
  • Bilash, G.D., Makarov, I.I., Sedikh, A.V.: Zonal distribution of bee races in USSR. In: Colibaba, S., Townsend, G.F., Eds. Genetics, Selection and Reproduction of the Honeybee Symposium on Bee Biology. Apimondia Publishing House, Moscow. 1976; 134–142.
  • SPSS Inc. SPSS 13.0 User’s Guide. SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA. Palacio, M.A., Figini, E.E., Ruffinengo, S.R., Rodriguez, E.M., Del Hoyo, M.L., Bedascarrasbure, E.L.: Changes in a population of Apis mellifera L. selected for hygienic behavior and its relation to brood disease tolerance. Apidologie, 2000; 31: 471–478.
  • Ibrahim, A., Reuter, G.S., Spivak, M.: Field trial of honey bee colonies bred for mechanisms of resistance against Varroa destructor. Apidologie, 2007; 38: 67–76.
  • Rothenbuhler, W.C., Momot, J.P.: Behavior genetics of nest cleaning in honeybees. VI. Interactions of age and genotype of bees, and nectar flow. J. Apic. Res., 1971; 10: 11–21.
Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-0128
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

The effect of flashed light on the ultrastructure of the retinal photoreceptor cells in rabbit: a transmission electron microscope study

Arash ESFANDIARI, İraj POSTI, Asghar DEHGHAN, Nasser HADJIPOUR

Fertility issues in Simmental cows in Central Croatia: a 5-year study

Robert ZOBEL, Suzana TKALCIC, Wendell COLE

Relationship between dead pupa removal and season and productivity of honey bee (Apis mellifera, Hymenoptera: Apidae) colonies

Ahmet GÜLER, Hakan TOY

Immunokinetics of Theileria equi specific antibodies: a comparison in serial and single dilution ELISA antibody end titres

Yogesh KUMAR, Dharam Vir MALHOTRA, Anil Kumar NICHANI, Ashok KUMAR, Shruti DHAR, Sanjay KUMAR

Functional anatomy and biomechanics of the equine thoracolumbar spine: a review

Hafsa ZANEB, Christian PEHAM, Christian STANEK

Vertical transmission of porcine circovirus 2b (PCV2b) to mouse fetuses in maternal uterus by artificial insemination with semen from PCV2b-infected male mouse

Deng ZHIBANG, Gong QIANLONG, Wang NAIDONG, Yuan ANWEN, Yu Xing LONG

Effects of different Fasciola hepatica recombinant proteins on the biochemical and serological responses of experimentally infected sheep

Diana WESSELINOVA

Factors affecting colostrum quality of ewes and immunostimulation

Özge YILMAZ, Güven KAŞIKÇI

Fungal peritonitis in dog caused by Candida albicans - a case report and literature overview

Kamila GLINSKA, Marcin JANKOWSKI, Krzysztof KUBIAK, Jolanta SPUZAK, Maciej GRZEGORY, Stanislaw DZIMIRA

An anatomical and histochemical examination of the pituitary gland of carp (Cyprinus carpio)

Aygül EKİCİ, Metin TİMUR