Comparison of PCR tests for the detection of Mycoplasmaagalactiae in sheep and goats
Comparison of PCR tests for the detection of Mycoplasmaagalactiae in sheep and goats
The aim of this study was to compare PCR tests for the detection of Mycoplasma agalactiae in sheep and goats. Samples obtained from sheep and goats in Turkey were tested to determine the presence of M. agalactiae. Mycoplasma culture and two direct PCR methods based on the uvrC gene and polC gene were compared with PCR of the 16S rRNA gene followed by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (PCR/DGGE) on DNA extracted from clinical samples (following culture enrichment). A total of 234 samples were examined: 9.4% and 13.2% were positive for M. agalactiae based onthe uvrC gene and polC gene PCRs, respectively, while the culture method revealed that 12.8% of the samples were mycoplasma-positive. The PCR/DGGE method identified M. agalactiae in 15.0% of the samples; it also detected and identified other Mycoplasma species in the samples. M. agalactiae was only detected in goats in this study. This is the first time 16S rRNA PCR/DGGE was performed on various samples from sheep and goats in Turkey. This study confirmed that M. agalactiae and other Mycoplasma species are present in goats, indicating a requirement for effective control strategies for contagious agalactia and Mycoplasma speciesin Turkey.
___
- 1. World Organisation for Animal Health. Contagious agalactia. In: Terrestrial Manual, Chapter 2.7.5., Office International des Epizootes, OIE 2012.
- 2. Bergonier D, Berthelot X, Poumarat F. Contagious agalactia of small ruminants: current knowledge concerning epidemiology, diagnosis and control.Rev Sci Tech 1997; 16: 848-873.
- 3. Hudson JR, Cottew GS. Diseases of goats caused by Mycoplasma: a review of the subject with some new findings. Ann NY Acad Sci 1967: 287-297.
- 4. Cottew GS, Watson WA, Arisoy F, Erdag O, Buckley LS. Differentiation of Mycoplasma agalactiae from other mycoplasmas of sheep and goats.J Comp Pathol 1968; 78: 275-282.
- 5. Özdemir U, Türkaslan J. Bulaşıcı agalaksi salgınlarından izole edilen Mycoplasma türleri. Pendik Vet Mikrobiyol Derg 2003; 34: 1-2 (article in Turkish with an abstract in English).
- 6. Cetinkaya B, Karahan M, Kalin R, Atil E. Biodiversity of ruminant mycoplasmas in eastern Turkey: application for vaccines and control strategies. In: Proceedings of the IX. National Congress of Veterinary Microbiology, Nicosia, North Cyprus; 2010. pp. 9-12.
- 7. McAuliffe L, Ellis R, Lawes J, Ayling RD, Nicholas RAJ. 16S rDNA and DGGE: a single generic test for detecting and differentiating Mycoplasma species. J Med Microbiol 2005; 54: 1-9.
- 8. Fisher SG, Lerman LS. DNA fragments differing by single base-pair substitutions are separated in denaturing gradient gels: correspondence with theory.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA1983; 80: 1579-1583.
- 9. Muyzer G, Waal ECD, Uitterlinden AG. Profiling of complex microbial populations by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of polymerase chain reaction-amplified genes coding for 16S rRNA. Appl Environ Microbiol1993;59: 695-700.
- 10. McAuliffe L, Ellis R, Lawes J, Ayling RD, Nicholas RAJ. Differentiation of Mycoplasma species by 16S ribosomal DNA PCR and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis fingerprinting. J Clin Microbiol2003; 41: 4844-4847.
- 11. Nicholas RAJ, Ayling RD, McAuliffe L. Detection and differentiation of Mycoplasma species using PCR/denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. In: Mycoplasma Diseases of Ruminants: Disease, Diagnosis and Control. Wallingford, Oxon, UK: CABI Publishing; 2008. pp. 15-27.
- 12. Marenda MS, Sagne E, Poumarat F, Citti C. Suppression subtractive hybridization as a basis to assess Mycoplasma agalactiae and Mycoplasma bovis genomic diversity and species-specific sequences. Microbiology 2005; 151: 475-489.
- 13. Subramaniam S, Bergonier D, Poumarat F, Capual S, Schlatter Y, Nicolet J, Frey J. Species identification of Mycoplasma bovisand Mycoplasma agalactiae based on the uvrC gene by PCR. Mol Cell Probes 1998; 12: 161-169.
- 14. Lambert M. Contagious agalactia in sheep and goats. In: Mycoplasmoses of Ruminants. Rev Sci Tech OIE 1987; 6: 699-711.
- 15. Nicholas R, Baker S. Recovery of mycoplasmas from animals. In: Miles RJ, Nicholas RAJ, editors. Mycoplasma Protocols, Methods in Molecular Biology, 1st ed. UK: Humana Press; 1998. pp. 37-43.
- 16. Garnica MLD, Rosales RS, Gonzalo C, Santos JA, Nicholas RAJ. Isolation, molecular characterization and antimicrobial susceptibilities of isolates of Mycoplasma agalactiae from bulk tank milk in an endemic area of Spain. J Appl Microbiol 2013; 114: 1575-1581.
- 17. Florkowski CM. Sensitivity, specificity, receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves and likelihood ratios: communicating the performance of diagnostic tests. The Clin Biochem Rev 2008; 29: 83-7.
- 18. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.Biometrics 1977; 33: 159-174.
- 19. Schnee C, Schulsse S, Hotzel H, Ayling RD, Nicholas RAJ, Schubert E, Heller M, Ehricht R, Sachse K. A novel rapid DNA microarray enables identification of 37 mycoplasma species and highlights multiple mycoplasma infectious. Plos One 2012; 7: e33237.
- 20. Khezri M, Pourbakhsh SA, Ashtari A, Rokhzad B, Khanbabaie H. Isolation and prevalence of Mycoplasma agalactiae in Kurdish sheep in Kurdistan, Iran. Vet World 2012; 5: 727-731.
- 21. Ariza-Miguel J, Rodriguez-Lazaro D, Hernandez M. A survey of Mycoplasma agalactiae in dairy sheep farms in Spain.BMC Vet Res 2012; 8: 1-6.
- 22. Ongor H, Kalin R, Acik MN. Detection of Mycoplasma ovipneumoniae from goats with nasal discharge by culture and polymerase chain reaction. Pak Vet J 2011; 31: 244-248.
- 23. Turkaslan J. Control of important mycoplasma diseases in Turkey with special emphasis on CCPP and contagious agalactia.IOM Letters 1990; 1: 184-185.