Induction motor parameter estimation using metaheuristic methods

The steady-state equivalent circuit parameters of an induction motor can be estimated using the operation characteristics that are provided by manufacturers. The characteristics of the motor used in estimation methods are the starting, maximum, and nominal torque values; the power factor; and efficiency. The operation characteristics of a motor given in data sheets are generally based on design parameters and are not suitable with real values. For this reason, in this paper, the data used in the parameter estimation for induction motors are taken from the literature. Using an optimization method for parameter estimation is useful for comparing the manufacturer values and values at the end of estimation, as well as minimizing the error in between. There are many methods in the literature for the parameter estimation of induction motors. In this study, the estimation is made using the charged system search (CSS), differential evolution algorithm (DEA), particle swarm optimization, and genetic algorithm optimization techniques. The CSS algorithm is first applied for estimation of the parameters of an induction motor. The results obtained from all of the methods show that the CSS algorithm is suitable with the DEA. From the obtained results, it is understood that an exact approach can be made to equivalent circuit parameters in case the values given by the manufacturer model the motor properly.

Induction motor parameter estimation using metaheuristic methods

The steady-state equivalent circuit parameters of an induction motor can be estimated using the operation characteristics that are provided by manufacturers. The characteristics of the motor used in estimation methods are the starting, maximum, and nominal torque values; the power factor; and efficiency. The operation characteristics of a motor given in data sheets are generally based on design parameters and are not suitable with real values. For this reason, in this paper, the data used in the parameter estimation for induction motors are taken from the literature. Using an optimization method for parameter estimation is useful for comparing the manufacturer values and values at the end of estimation, as well as minimizing the error in between. There are many methods in the literature for the parameter estimation of induction motors. In this study, the estimation is made using the charged system search (CSS), differential evolution algorithm (DEA), particle swarm optimization, and genetic algorithm optimization techniques. The CSS algorithm is first applied for estimation of the parameters of an induction motor. The results obtained from all of the methods show that the CSS algorithm is suitable with the DEA. From the obtained results, it is understood that an exact approach can be made to equivalent circuit parameters in case the values given by the manufacturer model the motor properly.

___

  • V.P. Sakthivel, R. Bhuvaneswari, S. Subramanian, “Multi-objective parameter estimation of induction motor using
  • particle swarm optimization”, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 23, pp. 302–312, 2010.
  • S. Kumar, J. Prakash, P. Kanagasabapathy, “A critical evaluation and experimental verification of extended Kalman
  • filter, unscented Kalman filter and neural state filter for state estimation of three phase induction motor”, Applied
  • Soft Computing, Vol. 11, pp. 3199–3208, 2011.
  • Y. Koubaa, “Application of least-squares techniques for induction motor parameters estimation”, Mathematical
  • and Computer Modelling of Dynamical Systems, Vol. 12, pp. 363–375, 2006.
  • J. Zheng, Y. Wang, X. Qin, X. Zhang, “An offline parameter identification method of induction motor”, Proceedings
  • of the 7th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation, pp. 8898–8901, 2008.
  • M.T. Wishart, R.G. Harley, “Identification and control of induction machines using artificial neural networks”,
  • IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, Vol. 31, pp. 612–619, 1995.
  • M. Arslan, M. C¸ unka¸s, T. Sa˘g, “Determination of induction motor parameters with differential evolution algorithm”,
  • Neural Computing and Applications, Vol. 21, pp. 1995–2004, 2012.
  • L.A. De Souza Ribeiro, C.B. Jacobina, A.M.N. Lima, “Linear parameter estimation for induction machines consid
  • ering the operating conditions”, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, Vol. 14, pp. 62–73, 1999.
  • L. Rajaji, C. Kumar, “Adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems into squirrel cage induction motor drive: modeling,
  • control and estimation”, 5th International Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering, pp. 162–169, 2008.
  • M.A. Alwan, “Online tuning of stator resistance in DTC drive based on wavenet theory”, Journal of Basrah
  • Researches (Sciences), Vol. 37, pp. 27–41, 2011.
  • M.H. Shin, D.S. Hyun, “Online identification of stator transient inductance in rotor-flux-oriented induction motor
  • drive”, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, Vol. 54, pp. 2018–2023, 2007.
  • S.H. Jeon, K.K. Oh, J.Y. Choi, “Flux observer with online tuning of stator and rotor resistances for induction
  • motors”, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, Vol. 49, pp. 653–664, 2002.
  • Y. Koubaa, M. Boussak, “Adaptive rotor resistance identification for indirect stator flux oriented induction motor drive”, Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Signals, Systems Decision and Information Technology, 2003.
  • S. Jangjit, P. Laohachai, “Parameter estimation of three-phase induction motor by using genetic algorithm”, Journal of Electrical Engineering & Technology, Vol. 4, pp. 360–364, 2009.
  • K. Kampisios, P. Zanchetta, C. Gerada, 13th International A. Trentin, O. Jasim, “Induction motor parameters identification using genetic algorithms for varying flux levels”, Power Electronics and Motion Control Conference, pp. 887–892, 2008.
  • R. Giri, A. Chowdhury, A. Ghosh, B.K. Panigrahi, S. Das, “Offline parameter estimation of induction motor using
  • a meta heuristic algorithm”, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 6466, pp. 523–530, 2010. V.P. Sakthivel, R. Bhuvaneswari, S. Subramanian, “An improved particle swarm optimization for induction motor parameter determination”, International Journal of Computer Applications, Vol. 1, pp. 62–67, 2010.
  • Z. Chen, Y. Zhong, J. Li, “Parameter identification of induction motors using ant colony optimization”, IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence, pp. 1611–1616, 2008. Z.W. Geem, J.H. Kim, G.V. Loganathan, “A new heuristic optimization algorithm; harmony search”, Simulation, Vol. 76, pp. 60–68, 2001.
  • O.K. Erol, I. Eksin, “New optimization method: big bang-big crunch”, Advances in Engineering Software, Vol. 37, pp. 106–111, 2006.
  • P.C. Sen, Principles of Electric Machines and Power Electronics, New York, NY, Wiley & Sons, 1997.
  • A. Kaveh, S. Talatahari, “A novel heuristic optimization method: charged system search”, Acta Mechanica, Vol.
  • 213, pp. 267–289, 2010.
  • A. Kaveh, S. Talatahari, “Optimal design of skeletal structures via the charged system search algorithm”, Structural
  • and Multidisciplinary Optimization, Vol. 41, pp. 893–911, 2010.
  • A. Kaveh, S. Talatahari, “Charged system search for optimum grillage systems design using the LRFD-AISC code”,
  • Journal of Constructional Steel Research, Vol. 66, pp. 767–771, 2010.
  • A. Kaveh, S. Talatahari, “Geometry and topology optimization of geodesic domes using charged system search”,
  • Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, Vol. 43, pp. 215–229, 2011.
  • S. Talatahari, A. Kaveh, R. Sheikholeslami, “An efficient charged system search using chaos for global optimization problems”, International Journal of Optimization in Civil Engineering, Vol. 2, pp. 305–325, 2011.
  • A. Kaveh, S. Talatahari, “A charged system search with a fly to boundary method for discrete optimum design of truss structures”, Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 11, pp. 277–293, 2010.
  • A. Kaveh, S. Talatahari, “Optimization of large-scale truss structures using modified charged system search”, International Journal of Optimization in Civil Engineering, Vol. 1, pp. 15–28, 2011.
  • A. Kaveh, S. Talatahari, “Charged system search for optimal design of frame structures”, Applied Soft Computing,
  • Vol. 12, pp. 382–393, 2012.
  • A. Kaveh, K. Laknejadi, “A novel hybrid charge system search and particle swarm optimization method for multi
  • objective optimization”, Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 38, pp. 15475–15488, 2011. A. Kaveh, S. Talatahari, “Hybrid charged system search and particle swarm optimization for engineering design problems”, International Journal for Computer-Aided Engineering and Software, Vol. 28, pp. 423–440, 2011.
  • R. Storn, K. Price, “Differential evolution: a simple and efficient adaptive scheme for global optimization over continuous spaces”, Technical Report TR-95-012, International Computer Science Institute, Berkeley, CA, USA, 1995.
  • T. Keskint¨urk, “Differential evolution algorithm”, ˙Istanbul Commerce University Journal of Science, Vol. 9, pp. 85–99, 2006.
  • T. Keskint¨urk, “Differential evolution algorithm”, YA/EM–Operational Research/Industrial Engineering–XXVI, National Congress, pp. 214–217, 2006. R. Thangaraj, M. Pant, C.T. Raj, A.K. Nagar, “In situ efficiency determination of induction motor: a comparative study of evolutionary techniques”, Applied Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 25, pp. 116–140, 2011.
  • M. Ali, M. Pant, A. Abraham, V. Snasel, “Modified differential evolution algorithm for parameter estimation in mathematical models”, IEEE International Conference on Systems Man and Cybernetics, pp 2767–2772, 2010.
  • C. Ya¸sar, H. Temurta¸s, S. ¨Ozy¨on, “Differential evolution algorithm applied to environmental economic power dispatch problems consisting of thermal units”, 6th National Electrical & Electronics and Computer Engineering Symposium, pp. 108–112, 2010.
  • T. Keskint¨urk, “The traveling salesman problem solution by using differential evolution algorithm”, 6th National Symposium on Production Research, pp. 651–657, 2006. D. Zoua, H. Liu, L. Gao, S. Li, “A novel modified differential evolution algorithm for constrained optimization problems”, Computers and Mathematics with Applications, Vol. 61, pp. 1608–1623, 2011.
  • C. Ya¸sar, S. ¨Ozy¨on, “Solution to scalarized environmental economic power dispatch problem by using genetic algorithm”, Electrical Power and Energy Systems, Vol. 38, pp. 54–62, 2012.
  • S. ¨Ozy¨on, C. Ya¸sar, H. Temurta¸s, “Particle swarm optimization algorithm for the solution of nonconvex economic dispatch problem with valve point effect”, 7th International Conference on Electrical and Electronics Engineering, pp. 101–105, 2011.
  • M. Ojaghi, M. Mardani, “Parameter estimation of induction motor using shuffled frog leaping and imperialistic competitive algorithms”, 26th International Power System Conference, pp. 1–9, 2011.
Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-0632
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK