Comparative learning global particle swarm optimization for optimal distributed generations' output

The appropriate output of distributed generation (DG) in a distribution network is important for maximizing the benefit of the DG installation in the network. Therefore, most researchers have concentrated on the optimization technique to compute the optimal DG value. In this paper, the comparative learning in global particle swarm optimization (CLGPSO) method is introduced. The implementation of individual cognitive and social acceleration coefficient values for each particle and a new fourth term in the velocity formula make the process of convergence faster. This new algorithm is tested on 6 standard mathematical test functions and a 33-bus distribution system. The performance of the CLGPSO is compared with the inertia weight particle swarm optimization (PSO) and evolutionary PSO methods. Since the CLGPSO requires fewer iterations, less computing time, and a lower standard deviation value, it can be concluded that the CLGPSO is the superior algorithm in solving small-dimension mathematical and simple power system problems.

Comparative learning global particle swarm optimization for optimal distributed generations' output

The appropriate output of distributed generation (DG) in a distribution network is important for maximizing the benefit of the DG installation in the network. Therefore, most researchers have concentrated on the optimization technique to compute the optimal DG value. In this paper, the comparative learning in global particle swarm optimization (CLGPSO) method is introduced. The implementation of individual cognitive and social acceleration coefficient values for each particle and a new fourth term in the velocity formula make the process of convergence faster. This new algorithm is tested on 6 standard mathematical test functions and a 33-bus distribution system. The performance of the CLGPSO is compared with the inertia weight particle swarm optimization (PSO) and evolutionary PSO methods. Since the CLGPSO requires fewer iterations, less computing time, and a lower standard deviation value, it can be concluded that the CLGPSO is the superior algorithm in solving small-dimension mathematical and simple power system problems.

___

  • M.R. Haghifam, O.P. Malik, “Genetic algorithm-based approach for fixed and switchable capacitors placement in distribution systems with uncertainty and time varying loads”, IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution, Vol. 1, pp. 244–252, 2007.
  • B. Venkatesh, R. Ranjan, H.B. Gooi, “Optimal reconfiguration of radial distribution systems to maximize loadabil- ity”, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 19, pp. 260–266, 2004.
  • C.T. Su, C.F. Chang, J.P. Chiou, “Distribution network reconfiguration for loss reduction by ant colony search algorithm”, Electric Power Systems Research, Vol. 75, pp. 190–199, 2005.
  • E.J. De Oliveira, J.W. Marangon Lima, K.C. De Almeida, “Allocation of FACTS devices in hydrothermal systems”, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 15, pp. 276–282, 2000.
  • M.M. El Metwally, A.A. El Emary, F.M. El Bendary, M.I. Mosaad, “Optimal allocation of FACTS devices in power system using genetic algorithms”, 12th International Middle-East in Power System Conference, pp. 1–4, 2008.
  • G. Carpinelli, C. Noce, D. Proto, A. Russo, P. Varilone, “Single-objective probabilistic optimal allocation of capacitors in unbalanced distribution systems”, Electric Power Systems Research, Vol. 87, pp. 47–57, 2012.
  • G. Carpinelli, F. Mottola, D. Proto, A. Russo, “Optimal allocation of dispersed generators, capacitors and dis- tributed energy storage systems in distribution networks”, Proceedings of the International Symposium in Modern Electric Power Systems, pp. 1–6, 2010.
  • S. Ghosh, S.P. Ghoshal, S. Ghosh, “Optimal sizing and placement of distributed generation in a network system”, International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, Vol. 32, pp. 849–856, 2010.
  • S.G.B. Dasan, S.S. Ramalakshmi, R.P.K. Devi, “Optimal siting and sizing of hybrid Distributed Generation using EP”, International Conference on Power Systems, pp. 1–6, 2009.
  • S.M.H. Nabavi, S. Hajforoosh, M.A.S. Masoum, “Placement and sizing of distributed generation units for congestion management and improvement of voltage profile using particle swarm optimization”, IEEE PES in Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Asia, pp. 1–6, 2011.
  • T. G¨ozel, M.H. Hocaoglu, “An analytical method for the sizing and siting of distributed generators in radial systems”, Electric Power Systems Research, Vol. 79, pp. 912–918, 2009.
  • E. Haesen, J. Driesen, R. Belmans, “A long-term multi-objective planning tool for distributed energy resources”, IEEE PES in Power Systems Conference and Exposition, pp. 741–747, 2009.
  • M.H. Moradi, M. Abedini, “A combination of genetic algorithm and particle swarm optimization for optimal DG location and sizing in distribution systems”, International Journal of Electrical Power Energy Systems, Vol. 34, pp. 66–74, 2012.
  • V. Hengsritawat, T. Tayjasanant, N. Nimpitiwan, “Optimal sizing of photovoltaic distributed generators in a dis- tribution system with consideration of solar radiation and harmonic distortion”, International Journal of Electrical
  • Power & Energy Systems, Vol. 39, pp. 36–47, 2012.
  • L. Bo, Y. Zhiqiang, B. Hailong, “Intelligent optimization algorithm for the locating and sizing of distributed generation planning”, China International Conference on Electricity Distribution, pp. 1–6, 2010.
  • J.J. Jamian, M.W. Mustafa, H. Mokhlis, M.N. Abdullah, “Comparative study on distributed generator sizing using three types of particle swarm optimization”, International Conference on Intelligent Systems, Modelling and Simulation, pp. 131–136, 2012.
  • A.M. El-Zonkoly, “Optimal placement of multi-distributed generation units including different load models using particle swarm optimization”, Swarm and Evolutionary Computation, Vol. 1, pp. 50–59, 2011.
  • M. Mohammadi, S.H. Hosseinian, G.B. Gharehpetian, “GA-based optimal sizing of microgrid and DG units under pool and hybrid electricity markets”, International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, Vol. 35, pp. 83–92, 2012.
  • F.S. Abu-Mouti, M.E. El-Hawary, “Optimal distributed generation allocation and sizing in distribution systems via artificial bee colony algorithm”, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, Vol. 26, pp. 2090–2101, 2011.
  • M.P. Lalitha, V.C.V. Reddy, V. Usha, “Optimal DG placement for minimum real power loss in radial distribution systems using PSO”, Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, Vol. 13, pp. 107–116, 2010.
  • S.M. Moghaddas-Tafreshi, E. Mashhour, “Distributed generation modeling for power flow studies and a three-phase unbalanced power flow solution for radial distribution systems considering distributed generation”, Electric Power Systems Research, Vol. 79, pp. 680–686, 2009.
  • T. Niknam, S.I. Taheri, J. Aghaei, S. Tabatabaei, M. Nayeripour, “A modified honey bee mating optimization algorithm for multiobjective placement of renewable energy resources”, Applied Energy, Vol. 88, pp. 4817–4830, 2011.
  • H.J. Lee, G.T. Son, J.W. Park, “Study on wind-turbine generator system sizing considering voltage regulation and overcurrent relay coordination”, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 26, pp. 1283–1293, 2011.
  • J. Kennedy, R. Eberhart, “Particle swarm optimization”, IEEE Proceedings of the International Conference on Neural Networks, Vol. 4, pp. 1942–1948, 1995.
  • S. Yuhui, R.C. Eberhart, “Fuzzy adaptive particle swarm optimization”, Proceedings of the Congress on Evolution- ary Computation, Vol. 1, pp. 101–106, 2001.
  • J.J. Jamian, M.W. Mustafa, H. Mokhlis, M.A. Baharudin, “Implementation of evolutionary particle swarm opti- mization in distributed generation sizing”, International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Vol. 2, pp. 137–146, 2012.
  • V. Miranda, N. Fonseca, “EPSO - best-of-two-worlds meta-heuristic applied to power system problems”, Proceedings of the Congress on Evolutionary Computation, pp. 1080–1085, 2002.