Sustainable approach to produce bioethanol from Karanja (Pongamia pinnata) oilseed residue

Agricultural biomass is the world's largest, most sustainable, and most promising renewable energy source. This study investigated the potential of Karanja (Pongamia pinnata) oilseed residual waste (defatted kernel, hull, and their mixture) as a source of ethanol. The pretreatment of the finely ground samples was carried out using dilute sulfuric acid (0.5%) hydrolysis at a higher temperature of 121 °C and 15 psi pressure for 90 min. The pretreatment usually removes the lignin and facilitates the hydrolysis of cellulose and hemicelluloses. They were further hydrolyzed using 5% H2SO4 at 50 °C for 70 h. The analyses of hydrolyzed products have shown the presence of 66.06-67.12 mg g-1 of total reducing sugars, 0.41-0.47 mg g-1 of glucose, and 0.36-0.45 mg g-1 of xylose, from which the rate of hydrolysis and conversion percentage of cellulose to glucose (44.44%-55.16%) and hemicelluloses to xylose (53.76%-67.17%) was obtained. The hydrolyzed product of complex polysaccharide was further converted into ethanol by fermentation at 32 °C on an orbital shaker using commercial yeast. The results showed ethanol yield of about 10.3%, 8.3%, and 3.3%, respectively in fermentation broths of kernel, mixture, and hull samples, thus indicating Karanja oilseed wastes as potential sources for ethanol production.

Sustainable approach to produce bioethanol from Karanja (Pongamia pinnata) oilseed residue

Agricultural biomass is the world's largest, most sustainable, and most promising renewable energy source. This study investigated the potential of Karanja (Pongamia pinnata) oilseed residual waste (defatted kernel, hull, and their mixture) as a source of ethanol. The pretreatment of the finely ground samples was carried out using dilute sulfuric acid (0.5%) hydrolysis at a higher temperature of 121 °C and 15 psi pressure for 90 min. The pretreatment usually removes the lignin and facilitates the hydrolysis of cellulose and hemicelluloses. They were further hydrolyzed using 5% H2SO4 at 50 °C for 70 h. The analyses of hydrolyzed products have shown the presence of 66.06-67.12 mg g-1 of total reducing sugars, 0.41-0.47 mg g-1 of glucose, and 0.36-0.45 mg g-1 of xylose, from which the rate of hydrolysis and conversion percentage of cellulose to glucose (44.44%-55.16%) and hemicelluloses to xylose (53.76%-67.17%) was obtained. The hydrolyzed product of complex polysaccharide was further converted into ethanol by fermentation at 32 °C on an orbital shaker using commercial yeast. The results showed ethanol yield of about 10.3%, 8.3%, and 3.3%, respectively in fermentation broths of kernel, mixture, and hull samples, thus indicating Karanja oilseed wastes as potential sources for ethanol production.

___

  • AOAC (1975) Official Methods of Analysis. 12th ed. AOAC, Washington DC.
  • Arthe R, Rajesh R, Rajesh EM, Rajendran R, Jeyachandran S (2008) Production of bio-ethanol from cellulosic cotton waste through microbial extracellular enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation. EJEAFChe 7: 2984–2992.
  • Bisaria VS (1991) Bioprocessing of agro-residue to glucose and chemicals. In: Bioconversion of Waste Materials to Industrial Products. (Ed. AM Martin). Elsevier, London, pp. 187–223.
  • Caputi A Jr, Ueda M, Brown T (1968) Spectrophotometric determination of ethanol in wine. J Enol Vitic 19: 160–165.
  • Chandel KA, Silvio S, da Silva, Singh OV (2011) Detoxification of lignocellulosic hydrolysates for improved bioethanol production. In: Biofuel Production – Recent Developments and Prospects (Ed. MAS Bernardes). In Tech, Rijeka, Croatia, pp. 225–246.
  • Chandrashekhar B, Mishra MS, Sharma K, Dubey S (2011) Bioethanol production from textile cotton waste via dilute acid hydrolysis and fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Ecobiotechnol 3: 41–47.
  • Chang V, Holtzapple M (2005) Fundamental factors affecting biomass enzymatic reactivity. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 84: 5–37.
  • Dowe N, McMillan J (2001) Lignocellulosic biomass hydrolysis and fermentation. In: SSF Experimental Protocols, Laboratory
  • Analytical Procedure (LAP) (Ed. Department of Energy). National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Golden, CO, USA, pp. 1– Dubosis M, Gilles KA, Hamilton JK, Rebers PA, Smith F (1956)
  • Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal Chem 28: 350–356. Duff SJ, Murray WD (1996) Bioconversion of forest products industry waste cellulosics to fuel ethanol. Bioresour Technol 55: 1–33.
  • Fink R, Medved S (2011) Global perspective on first generation liquid biofuel production. Turk J Agric For 35: 453–459.
  • Goering HD, Van Soest PJ (1975) Forage Fiber Analysis. US
  • Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service, Washington DC. Gomez LD, Steele-King CG, McQueen-Mason SJ (2008) Sustainable liquid biofuels from biomass. New Phytol 178: 473–485.
  • Kim S, Dale BE (2004) Global potential of bioethanol production from wasted crops and crop residues. Biomass Bioenerg 26: 361–375.
  • Krishnaveni S, Theymoli Balasubramanian, Sadasivam S (1984) Determination of reducing sugars. Food Chem 15: 229.
  • Kumar S (2010) Analysis: India’s New Biofuel Policy. Available at http//www.india.carbon-outlook.com.
  • Lavarack BP, Giffin GJ, Rodman D (2002) The acid hydrolysis of sugarcane bagasse hemicellulose to produce xylose, arabinose, glucose, and other products. Biomass Bioenerg 23 : 367–380.
  • Lynd LR, Laser MS, Bransby D, Dale BE, Davison B, Hamilton R, Himmel M, Keller M, McMillan JD, Sheehan J, Wyman CE (2008) How biotech can transform biofuels? Nat Biotechnol 26: 169–172.
  • Lynd LR, van Zyl WH, McBride JE, Laser M (2005) Consolidated bioprocessing of cellulosic biomass: An update. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 16: 577–583.
  • Malik CP, Singh MB (1980) Extraction and estimation of amino acids and keto acids. In: Plant Enzymology and Histo-Enzymology (Eds. CP Malik, MB Singh). Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi.
  • Mishra MS, Chandrashekhar B, Chatterjee T, Singh K (2011) Production of bio-ethanol from Jatropha oilseed cakes via dilute acid hydrolysis and fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Int J Biotechnol Appl 3: 41–
  • Moiser N, Wyman C, Dale B, Elander R, Lee YY, Holtzapple M, Ladisch M (2005) Features of promising technologies for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour Technol 96: 673–686.
  • Mussatto SI, Roberto IC (2004) Alternatives for detoxification of diluted-acid lignocellulosic hydrolysates for use in fermentative processes: A review. Bioresour Technol 93: 1–10.
  • Nagalakshmi D, Dhanalakshmi K, Himabindu D (2011) Replacement of groundnut cake with sunflower and Karanj seed cakes on performance, nutrient utilisation, immune response and carcass characteristics in Nellore lambs. Small Rumin Res 97: 12–
  • Nutawan Y, Phattayawadee P, Pattranit T, Mohammad N (2010) Bioethanol production from rice straw. Energy Res J 1: 26–31.
  • Padhi SK, Singh RK (2011) Non-edible oils as the potential source for the production of biodiesel in India. J Chem Pharm Res 3: 39–49.
  • Parawira W (2010) Biodiesel production from Jatropha curcas: A review. Scientific Research and Essays 5: 1796–1808.
  • Planning Commission (2003) Report of the Committee on Development of Biofuels. Planning Commission, Government of India. Available at http://planningcommission. nic.in/ reports/genrep/cmtt_bio.pdf.
  • Prajapati NS, Purohit SS, Shara AK (2003) A Handbook of Medicinal
  • Plants. Agrobios India, Jodhapur. Radhakrishna P (2003). Candidates for biodiesel and perspective shareholders to accelerate program specific economic activity.
  • In: Tree Borne Oilseeds as a Source of Energy for Decentralized Planning (Ed. P Radhakrishna). Renewable Energy Sci Series XII: 63–78. Ray S, Miglani S, Goldar A (2011) Ethanol Blending Policy in India: Demand and Supply Issue. Indian Council for Research on
  • International Economic Relation, Policy Series, No. 9. Sadasivam S, Balasubramanian T (1985) Practical Manual (Undergraduate). Tamilnadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, India.
  • Sadasivam S, Manickam A (1996) Biochemical Methods. 2nd ed.
  • New Age International Publishers, New Delhi. Salvachua D, Prieto A, Lopez-Abelairas M, Lu-Chau T, Martinez AT, Martinez MJ (2011) Fungal pretreatment - An alternative in second-generation ethanol from wheat straw. Bioresource Technol 102: 7501.
  • Saxena A, Garg SK, Verma J (1992) Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of waste newspaper to ethanol. Bioresource Technol 39: 13–15.
  • Somogyi M (1952) Estimation of sugars by colorimetric method. J Biol Chem 200: 245.
  • Subbarao PMV (2006) A study on biogas generation from non-edible oil seed cakes: potential and prospects in India. In: Proceedings of 2nd Joint International Conference on “Sustainable Energy and Environment (SEE 2006)”. Bangkok, Thailand.
  • Sukumaran RK, Surender VJ, Sindhu R, Parameshwaran B, Kanakambaran UJ, Kuttavan VS, Kuni PR, Pandey A (2010)
  • Lignocellulosic ethanol in India: Prospects, challenges and feedstock availability. Bioresource Technol 101: 4826–4833.
  • Taherzadeh MJ, Karimi K (2008) Pretreatment of lignocellulosic wastes to improve ethanol and biogas production: A review. Int J Mol Sci 9: 1621–1651.
  • Updegroff DM (1969) Semi-micro determination of cellulose in biological material. Anal Biochem 32: 420–424.
  • Visser J, Adriaans T (2007) Anaerobic Digestion of Jatropha curcas Press Cake. FACT Fuels Foundation, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
  • Wyman CE (2007) What is (and is not) vital to advancing cellulosic ethanol? Trends Biotechnol 25: 153–157.
  • Zheng Y, Pan Z, Zhang R (2009) Overview of biomass pretreatment for cellulosic ethanol production. Int J Agric Biol Eng 2: 51–68.
Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-011X
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Sustainable approach to produce bioethanol from Karanja (Pongamia pinnata) oilseed residue

Pooja DOSHI, Gopal SRIVASTAVA

Comparative study on the prebleaching of bamboo and hardwood pulps produced in Kharnaphuli Paper Mills

Md. Sarwar JAHAN, Md. Milton HOSEN, Md. Mostafizur RAHMAN

In vitro rooting and biochemical parameters in the cherry rootstocks CAB-6P and Gisela 6 using L-methionine

Virginia SARROPOULOU, Kortessa DIMASSI-THERIOU, İoannis THERIOS

Rice cultures and nitrogen rate effects on yield and quality of rice (Oryza sativa L.)

Muhammad MAQSOOD, Muhammad Asif SHEHZAD, Syed N. Azam ALI, Munawar IQBAL

Physicochemical and sensory properties of mulberry products: Gümüşhane pestil and köme

Oktay YILDIZ

Susceptibility of winter rape cultivars to fungal diseases and their response to fungicide application

İrena BRAZAUSKIENE, Egle PETRAITIENE, Gintaras BRAZAUSKAS, Antanas RONIS

Modeling temporal variability of soil CO2 emissions from an apple orchard in the Harran Plain of southeastern Turkey

Ali Volkan BİLGİLİ, Güzel YILMAZ, Ali İKİNCİ

Survey of Apple mosaic virus in apple-growing provinces of East Anatolia (Malatya and Van) by RNA probe hybridization assay and RT-PCR

Gülüstan KORKMAZ, Hikmet Murat SİPAHİOĞLU, Mustafa USTA

Mustafa Fatih ERTUGAY, Mehmet BAŞLAR, Fatih ORTAKCI

Salinity-induced structural and functional changes in 3 cultivars of Alternanthera bettzickiana (Regel) G.Nicholson

Adnan YOUNIS, Atif RIAZ, Sana IKRAM, Tahira NAWAZ, Mansoor HAMEED