Ahmed AWAD, Salah HAFIZ, Mohammed Sabry HAMMADA, Azza EL-NOUBY, Salah El-hendawy -

Grain yield production of Sudan grass (Sorghum sudanense (Piper) Stapf) as influenced by cutting numbers, potassium rates, and intrarow spacing in a semiarid environment

The seed scarcity of Sudan grass plagues the pasture industry in the livestock sector, especially in arid and semiarid regions. The current study was initiated to tackle this challenge. The study evaluates the response of the grain yield and yield components of Sudan grass to cutting numbers, potassium rates, and intrarow spacing over 2 years. A field experiment was conducted using a randomized complete block split-split design with 2 cutting numbers (no cutting and cut 1 time), 2 potassium rates (60 and 120 kg K2O ha-1), and 3 intrarow spacings (15, 20, and 25 cm between hills) as the main plot, split plot, and split-split plot, respectively. The results showed that the zero-cut treatment produced, as averaged over the 2 seasons, 52.3% and 74.5% higher grain yield and hay yield per hectare than the one-cut treatment, respectively. However, the latter treatment had harvest index and sum of hay and green forage yield values that were 17.0% and 19.9% higher than those of the zero-cut treatment, respectively. The application of potassium at a rate of 120 kg ha-1 resulted in the maximum grain yield and yield components as compared to the lower potassium rate (60 kg ha-1), with the exception of 1000-grain weight, hay yield, and sum of hay and green forage yield, which were not significantly different from each other. Averaged over 2 seasons, as the intrarow spacing between hills was increased from 15 cm to 20 and 25 cm, grain weight per panicle decreased by 11.3% and 25.7%, grain yield per hectare decreased by 6.6% and 15.7%, and harvest index decreased by 12.0% and 23.5%, respectively. The interaction among 3 factors had a significant effect on yield and yield components; the highest values for grain and hay yields per hectare were obtained by growing Sudan grass at 15 or 20 cm intrarow spacing under the zero-cut treatment with the application of potassium at rate of 120 kg ha-1. At 15 or 20 cm intrarow spacing, the values for grain yield per hectare under the one-cut treatment and high potassium rate were occasionally comparable to those for the zero-cut treatment and low potassium rate. Finally, when seed production is desired, Sudan grass should not be cut. If growers are interested in producing green forage and grain simultaneously, Sudan grass can be cut 1 time; however, it should be grown at 15 cm intrarow spacing with application of potassium at a rate of 120 kg ha-1.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Key words: Competition, green forage yield, harvest index, hay yield, potassium nutrition, yield components

Grain yield production of Sudan grass (Sorghum sudanense (Piper) Stapf) as influenced by cutting numbers, potassium rates, and intrarow spacing in a semiarid environment

Keywords:

Key words: Competition, green forage yield, harvest index, hay yield, potassium nutrition, yield components,

PDF

___

Akash M, Saoub H (2002) Grain yield of three sorghum varieties as influenced by seeding rate and cutting frequency. Pak J Agron 1: 101–104.
Bahrani M, Ghenateghestani A (2004) Summer forage sorghum yield, protein and prussic acid contents as affected by plant density and nitrogen topdressing. J Agric Sci Techno 6: 73–83.
Ball R, Purcell L, Vories E (2000) Short-season soybean yield compensation in response to population and water regime. Crop Sci 40: 1070–1078.
Bednarz C, Oosterhuis D (1999) Physiological changes associated with potassium deficiency in cotton. J Plant Nutr 22: 303–313.
Bisson P, Cretenet M, Jallas E (1994) Nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium availability in the soil physiology of the assimilation and use of these nutrients by the plant: challenging the future. In: Proceedings of the World Cotton Research Conference 1, Brisbane, Australia, 14–17 February (Eds. GA Constable, NW Forrester), CSIRO, Melbourne, pp. 115–124.
Board JE, Harville BG (1996) Growth dynamics during the vegetative period affects yield narrow-row late-planted soybean. Agron J 88: 567–572.
Brar GS, Steiner JL, Unger PW, Prihar SS (1992) Modeling sorghum seedling establishment from soil wetness and temperature of drying seed zones. Agron J 84: 905–910.
Brown AR, Carlisle C, Wood EH (1964) Effects of irrigation and row spacing on grain sorghum in Piedmont. Agron J 56: 506–509.
Cakmak I, Hengeler C, Marschner H (1994) Partitioning of shoot and root dry matter and carbohydrates in bean plants suffering from phosphorus, potassium and magnesium deficiency. J Exp Bot 45: 1245–1250.
Caravetta GJ, Cherney JH, Johnson KD (1990) Within-row spacing influences on diverse sorghum genotypes. II. Dry matter yield and forage quality. Agron J 82: 210–215.
Cross HZ (1990) Selecting for rapid leaf expansion in early maturing maize. Crop Sci 30: 1029–1032.
Hashemi AM, Herbert SJ, Putnam DH (2005) Yield response of corn to crowding stress. Agron J 97: 839–846.
Howell TA, Evett SR, Tolk JA, Copeland KS, Colaizzi PD, Gowda P (2008) Evapotranspiration of corn and forage sorghum for silage. In: Proceedings of the Environmental and Water Resources Institute World Congress, 12–16 May 2008. Honolulu, Hawaii, CD-ROM.
Hussain A, Mohammad D, Bhatti M, Zahid M (1991) Response of sudangrass to various levels of nitrogen in combination with phosphorus under rainfed conditions. Pak J Agric Res 12: 158–164.
Joseph H, Evangeline M, Paterson OE (1980) Sorghum and millets: their production and nutritive value. ICARDA, Aleppo, Syria.
Kiziloglu FM, Sahin U, Kuslu Y, Tunc T (2009) Determining water– yield relationship, water use efficiency, crop and pan coefficients for silage maize in a semiarid region. Irrig Sci 27: 129–137.
López-Bellido FJ, López-Bellido L, López-Bellido RJ (2005) Competition, growth and yield of faba bean (Vicia faba L.). Eur J Agron 23: 359–378.
Marsalisa MA, Angadi SV, Contreras-Govea FE (2010) Dry matter yield and nutritive value of corn, forage sorghum, and BMR forage sorghum at different plant populations and nitrogen rates. Field Crop Res 116: 52–57.
Merrill SD, Tanaka DL, Krupinsky JM, Liebig MA, Hanson JD (2007) Soil water depletion and recharge under ten crop species and application to the principles of dynamic cropping systems. Agron J 99: 931–938.
Rafiei M (2009) Influence of tillage and plant density on mungbean. Am-Eurasian J Sustain Agric 3: 877–880.
Sangakkara UR, Frehner M, Nösberger J (2000) Effect of soil moisture and potassium fertilizer on shoot water potential, photosynthesis and partitioning of carbon in mungbean and cowpea. J Agron Crop Sci 185: 201–207.
Sowiński J, Szydełko E (2011) Growth rate and yields of a sorghumsudangrass hybrid variety grown on a light and a mediumheavy soil as affected by cutting management and seeding rate. Polish J Agron 4: 23–28.
Stevovic V, Stanisavljevic R, Djukic D, Djurovic D (2012) Effect of row spacing on seed and forage yield in sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.) cultivars. Turk J Agric For 36: 35–44.
Taleb-nejat A (1995) Determining the optimum row spacing and seeding rate of speed feed forage sorghum. Central Province Exp Stn Iran (in Farsi).
Türk M, Çelik N (2006) The effects of different row spaces and seeding rates on the hay and crude protein yields of sainfoin (Onobrychis sativa Lam.). Tarim Bilimleri Dergisi 12: 175–181.