Mustafa ÜNLÜ, Rıza KANBER, D. Levent KOÇ, Bülent ÖZEKİCİ, Uğur KEKEÇ

Irrigation scheduling of grapefruit trees in a Mediterranean environment throughout evaluation of plant water status and evapotranspiration

In this study, 1 full irrigation regime (100% of crop evapotranspiration, I100) and 2 deficit irrigation regimes (70%, I70, and 50%, I50) were evaluated in a Rio Red grapefruit (Citrus paradisi Macfad. 'Rio Red') orchard in Adana, Turkey. Fruit yield, leaf water potential (LWP), and soil water depletion (SWD) were measured among trees from each treatment. Actual evapotranspiration was calculated in 3 ways, using 2 energy balance methods (eddy correlation and Bowen's ratio) and water balance. Evapotranspiration rates of I70 and I50 treatments were 10% and 18% less than I100, respectively. Average irrigation amount for I50 was less than half of the average irrigation amount for I100. Considering that yield for the experimental treatments did not change statistically significantly, the I50 treatment provided about 50% more irrigation water savings than full irrigation conditions. Grapefruit tree LWP was highly correlated to soil water status and significantly associated with irrigation treatment. Average LWP values for treatments were 2.70 MPa for I100, 2.96 MPa for I70, and 3.28 MPa for I50. LWP increased up to a threshold level equivalent to 60%66% of SWD, above which LWP decreased linearly with a continuous increase of SWD. This indicates that an average LWP of 3.28 MPa can be allowed for grapefruit under these experimental conditions while keeping the crop yield at that of full irrigation levels. The research findings showed that an enhanced understanding of physiological parameters is essential for irrigation scheduling of fruit plants. These will result in obtaining the optimum yield of fruit while conserving water.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Grapefruit, evapotranspiration, leaf water potential, soil water status, energy balance methods, deficit irrigation

Irrigation scheduling of grapefruit trees in a Mediterranean environment throughout evaluation of plant water status and evapotranspiration

Keywords:

Grapefruit, evapotranspiration, leaf water potential, soil water status, energy balance methods, deficit irrigation,

PDF

___

Al-Yahyai R (2012). Managing irrigation of fruit trees using plant water status. Agric Sci 3: 35–43.
Al-Yahyai R, Schaffer B, Davies FS (2005). Physiological response of carambola to soil water depletion. Hort Sci 40: 2145–2150.
Assaf R, Levin I, Brawdo B (1982). Apple fruit growth as a measure of irrigation control. Hort Sci 17: 59–61.
Bowen IS (1926). The ratio of heat losses by conduction and by evaporation from any water surface. Phys Rev 27: 779–787.
Ebel RC, Proebsting EL, Evans RG (1995). Deficit irrigation to control growth in apple and monitoring fruit growth to schedule irrigation. Hort Sci 30: 1229–1232.
Ertek A, Kanber R (2003). Effects of different irrigation programs on boll number and abscission percentage of cotton. Agric Water Manage 60: 1–11.
Fereres E (1997). Irrigation scheduling of horticultural crops. Acta Hortic 449: 253–258.
Garcia-Tejero IF, Duran-Zuazo VH, Muriel-Fernandez JL, Jimenez- Bocanegra JA (2011). Linking canopy temperature and trunk diameter fluctuations with other physiological water status tools for water stress management in citrus orchards. Functional Plant Biol 38: 106–117.
Genuchten M, Hoffman GJ (1984). Analysis of crop salt tolerance data. In: Shainberg I, Shalhevet J, editors. Soil Salinity Under Irrigation: Processes and Management. New York, NY, USA: Springer-Verlag, pp. 258–271.
Goldhamer DA, Fereres E (2004). Irrigation scheduling of almond trees with trunk diameter sensor. Irrig Sci 23: 11–19.
Held AA, Steduto P, Orgaz F, Matista A, Hsiao TC (1990). Bowen ratio energy-balance technique for estimating crop net CO2 assimilation, and comparison with a canopy chamber. Theor Appl Climatol 42: 203–213.
Hsiao TC, Acevedo E, Fereres E, Henderson DW (1976). Stress metabolism. Water stress, growth and osmotic adjustment. Philos T Roy Soc B 273: 479−500.
Hsiao T (1990). Measurements of plant water status. In: Steward B, Nielsen D, editors. Irrigation of Agricultural Crops. Agronomy Monographs No. 30. Madison, WI, USA: ASA, pp. 243–279.
Jones HG (2004). Irrigation scheduling advantages and pitfalls of plant-based methods. J Experi Bot 55: 2227–2436.
Kanber R, Köksal H, Yazar A, Özekici B, Önder S (1999). Effects of different irrigation programs on fruit, trunk growth rates, quality and yield of grapefruit trees. Turk J Agric For 23: 401– 411.
Kanber R, Yazar A, Köksal H, Oguzer V (1992). Evapotranspiration of grapefruit in the eastern Mediterranean region of Turkey. Hort Sci 52: 53–62.
Larson K, Schaffer B, Davies FS (1989). Effect of irrigation on leaf water potential growth and yield of mango trees. Proc Florida State Hort Soci 102: 226–228.
Naor A (2000). Midday stem water potential as a plant water stress indicator for irrigation scheduling in fruit trees. Acta Hortic 537: 447–454.
Naor A, Cohen S (2003). Sensitivity and variability of maximum trunk shrinkage, midday stem water potential, and transpiration rate in response to withholding irrigation from field-grown apple trees. Hort Sci 38: 547–551.
Ortuño MF, Alarcon JJ, Nicolas E, Torrecillas A (2004). Interpreting trunk diameter changes in young lemon trees under deficit irrigation. Plant Sci 227: 275–280.
Ortuño MF, Garcia-Orellana Y, Conejero W, Ruiz-Sanchez MC, Alarcon JJ, Torrecillas A (2006). Stem and leaf water potentials, gas exchange, sap flow, and trunk diameter fluctuations for detecting water stress in lemon trees. Trees 20: 1–8.
Özbek H, Dinç U, Kapur S (1974). Çukurova üniversitesi yerleşim sahası topraklarının detaylı etüd ve haritası. Adana, Turkey: Ç. Ü. Ziraat Fakültesi, Yay. 73, Bilimsel Araştırmalar ve İncelemeler (in Turkish).
Pereira AR, Villa Nova NA (2009). Transpiration of irrigated Tahiti acid lime trees with different canopy areas, reference evapotranspiration and water balance for precision irrigation schemes. Tree Fores Sci Biotec 3: 87–91.
Remorini D, Massai R (2003). Comparison of water status indicators for young peach trees. Irrig Sci 22: 39–46.
Ruiz-Sanchez MC, Domingo R, Morales D, Torrecillas A (1996). Water relations of Fino lemon plants on two rootstocks under flooded conditions. Plant Sci 120: 119–125.
Shackel KA, Ahmadi H, Biasi W, Buchner R, Goldhamer D, Gurusinghe S, Hasey J, Kester D, Krueger B, Lampinen B et al. (1997). Plant water status as an index of irrigation need in deciduous fruit trees. Hort Tech 7: 23–29.
Silva CR, Folegatti MV, Silva TJA, Alves J, Souza CF, Ribeiro RV (2005). Water relations and photosynthesis as criteria for adequate irrigation management in Tahiti lime trees. Sci Agric 62: 415–422.
Steduto P, Katerji N, Puertos-Molina H, Ünlü M, Mastrorilli M, Rana G (1997). Water use efficiency of sweet sorghum under water stress conditions. Gas exchange investigations at leaf and canopy scales. Field Crops Res 54: 221–234.
Stull RB (1988). An Introduction to Boundary Layer Meteorology. Boston, MA, USA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.