Hybrid performance and heterosis in F1 offspring of triticale (× Triticosecale Wittm.)

In this study, the combined ability effects and heterosis were determined for number of days to anthesis (AT), plant height (PH), fertile tillers plant–1 (FT), spike length (SL), spikelets spike–1 (SS) and grains spike–1 (GS), 1000-kernel weight (TW), and grain yield plant–1 (GY) of 4 triticale genotypes [Karma (G1), Presto (G2), Ayşehanım (G3), and Mehmetbey (G4)] and their 6 F1 offspring. The mean squares of general combining ability (GCA) and specific combining ability (SCA) were statistically significant for all traits. According to the GCA/SCA, additive gene effects were found for all traits. According to the desired values for traits on the basis of GCA and SCA, parents G1 were good general combiners for 3 traits, G3 for 6, and G4 for 6. Crosses G1 × G2 were good specific combiners for 3 traits, G1 × G3 for 3, G1 × G4 for 3, G2 × G3 for 5, G2 × G4 for 6, and G3 × G4 for 4. Heterosis and heterobeltiosis were –16.78% and –25.71% for AT, –1.66% and –11.02% for PH, 34.25% and 9.87% for FT, 14.62% and 11.44% for SL, 8.09% and 3.87% for SS, 4.57% and 0.91% for GS, 9.67% and 6.13% for TW, and 30.36% and 9.11% for GY, respectively. The results revealed that G2 × G3 and G2 × G4 combinations could be recommended for improved yield of triticale.

Hybrid performance and heterosis in F1 offspring of triticale (× Triticosecale Wittm.)

In this study, the combined ability effects and heterosis were determined for number of days to anthesis (AT), plant height (PH), fertile tillers plant–1 (FT), spike length (SL), spikelets spike–1 (SS) and grains spike–1 (GS), 1000-kernel weight (TW), and grain yield plant–1 (GY) of 4 triticale genotypes [Karma (G1), Presto (G2), Ayşehanım (G3), and Mehmetbey (G4)] and their 6 F1 offspring. The mean squares of general combining ability (GCA) and specific combining ability (SCA) were statistically significant for all traits. According to the GCA/SCA, additive gene effects were found for all traits. According to the desired values for traits on the basis of GCA and SCA, parents G1 were good general combiners for 3 traits, G3 for 6, and G4 for 6. Crosses G1 × G2 were good specific combiners for 3 traits, G1 × G3 for 3, G1 × G4 for 3, G2 × G3 for 5, G2 × G4 for 6, and G3 × G4 for 4. Heterosis and heterobeltiosis were –16.78% and –25.71% for AT, –1.66% and –11.02% for PH, 34.25% and 9.87% for FT, 14.62% and 11.44% for SL, 8.09% and 3.87% for SS, 4.57% and 0.91% for GS, 9.67% and 6.13% for TW, and 30.36% and 9.11% for GY, respectively. The results revealed that G2 × G3 and G2 × G4 combinations could be recommended for improved yield of triticale.

___

  • Akhter Z, Shamsuddin AKM, Rohman MM, Salim Uddin M, Mohi Uddin M, Alam AKMM (2003). Studies on heterosis for yield and yield components in wheat. Pakistan J Biol Sci 3: 892–897.
  • Aydogan Cifci E, Yagdi K (2007). Heterosis for certain yield and quality traits in winter triticale. Akdeniz University J Fac Agric 20: 83–86.
  • Balcı A, Turgut İ (2002). Studies on combining abilities in some bread wheat varieties and lines (Triticum aestivum var. aestivum). Uludağ University J Fac Agric 16: 225–234 (in Turkish with English abstract).
  • Barary M, Warwick NWM, Jessop RS, Taji AM (2002). Osmotic adjustment and drought tolerance in Australian triticales. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Triticale Symposium; 30 June–5 July 2002; Radzikow, Poland, pp. 135–141.
  • Beche E, Lemes da Silva C, Pagliosa ES, Capelin MA, Franke J, Matei G, Benin G (2013). Hybrid performance and heterosis in early segregant populations of Brazilian spring wheat. Australian J Crop Sci 7: 51–57.
  • Bilgin O, Korkut KZ, Balkan A, Başer B (2011). Assessment of heterosis and heterobeltiosis for spike characters in durum wheat. Pakistan J Agric Res 24: 1–4.
  • Borghi B, Perenzin M (1994). Diallel cross to predict heterosis and combining ability for grain yield, yield components and breadmaking quality in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor Appl Genet 98: 975–981.
  • Budak N, Yıldırım MB (1996). Heterosis in bread wheat. Turk J Agric For 20: 345–347.
  • Chowdhry MA, Rafiq M, Alam K (1992). Genetic architecture of grain yield and certain other traits in bread wheat. Pakistan J Agric Res 13: 216–220.
  • Cui GH, Ni ZF, Wu LM, Li YQ, Sun QX (2002). Study on wheat heterotic group V. relationships between microsatellite markers-based genetic distance and heterosis between T. aestivum and T. spelta. J Triticeae Crops 22: 5–9.
  • Dağüstü B, Bölük M (2002). Heterosis for some agronomic traits in diallel crosses of seven bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Uludağ University J Fac Agric 16: 211–223 (in Turkish with English abstract).
  • Griffing B (1956). Concepts of general and specific combining ability in relation to diallel crossing system. Aust J Biol Sci 9: 463–493.
  • Hassan G, Mohammad F, Afridi SS, Khalil I (2007). Combining ability in the F1 generations of diallel cross for yield and yield components in wheat. Sarhad J Agric 23: 937–942.
  • Inamullah HA, Mohammadi F, Din SU, Hassan G, Gul R (2006). Evaluation of the heterotic and heterobeltiotic potential of wheat genotypes for improved yield. Pakistan J Bot 38: 1159– 1167.
  • Jaiswal KK, Pandey P, Marker S, Anurag PJ (2010). Heterosis studies for improvement in yield potential of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Advan Agric Bot Biol 2: 273–278.
  • Kashif M, Khaliq I (2004). Manifestation of heterosis for some metric characters in intraspecific crosses of Triticum aestivum L. Int J Agric Biol 6: 132–137.
  • Mann MS, Sharma SN, Bhatnagar VK (1995). Combining ability and nature of gene effects for grain yield and harvest index in macaroni wheat. Crop Improvement 22: 65–68.
  • Memon SM, Ansari BA, Balouch MZ (2005). Estimation of genetic variation for agroeconomic traits in spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Indian J Plant Sci 4: 171–175.
  • Mujahid MY, Kisana NS, Ahmad Z, Ahmad I, Mustafa SZ, Majid A (2000). Estimation and utilization of heterosis and heterobeltiosis in some bread wheat crosses derived from diverse germplasm. Pakistan J Biol Sci 3: 1148–1151.
  • Munir I, Swati MS, Muhammad F, Ahmad R, Imtiaz RM (1999). Heterosis in different crosses of wheat. Sarhad J Agric 15: 299–303.
  • Nevado ME, Cross HZ (1990). Diallel analysis of relative growth rates in maize synthetics. Crop Sci 30: 549–552.
  • Oettler G, Becker HC, Hoppe G (2001). Heterosis for yield and other agronomic traits of winter triticale F1 and F2 hybrids. Plant Breeding 20: 351–353.
  • Özcan K (1999). Development of statistical programme for population genetics studies. PhD, Ege University, İzmir, Turkey (in Turkish with English abstract).
  • Özgen M (1989). Hybrid vigor at winter bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Turk J Agric For 13: 1190–1201.
  • Pena RJ (2004). Food Uses of Triticale. Triticale Improvement and Production. Rome, Italy: FAO Plant Production and Protection Paper 179.
  • Pfeiffer WH, Sayre KD, Mergoum M (1998). Heterosis in spring triticale hybrids. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Triticale Symposium; 26–31 July 1998; Red Deer, Alberta, Canada, pp. 86–91.
  • Poehlman JM (1979). Breeding Field Crops. 2nd ed. Westport, CT, USA: Avi Publishing Company, pp. 277–320.
  • Rajaram S (2005). Role of conventional plant breeding and biotechnology in future wheat production. Turk J Agric For 29: 105–111.
  • Sadeque Z, Bhowmik A, Ali MS (1991). Estimates of heterosis in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Annals of Bangladesh Agriculture 1: 75–79.
  • Saleem M, Hussain S (1988). Estimation of heterosis in yield components of wheat. Pakistan J Agric Res 9: 1–5.
  • Seitkhozhaev AI, Balan GI, Ilichev SS (1990). Study of the heritability of quantitative characters in winter wheat varieties and heterosis. Referativnyl Zhurnal 7: 32–57.
  • Sinclair TR, Jamieson PD (2006). Grain number, wheat yield and bottling beer: an analysis. Field Crop Res 98: 60–67.
  • Subhani GM, Chowdhry MA, Gillani SMM (2000). Manifestation of heterosis in bread wheat under irrigated and drought conditions. Pakistan J Biol Sci 3: 971–974.
  • Süzer S (2003). Kıraç arazilere uygun tritikale yetiştiriciliği. Cinetarım 49: 32–33 (in Turkish).
  • Taleei AR, Beigi AH (1996). Study of combing ability and heterosis in bread wheat diallel crosses. Iran J Agric Sci 27: 67–75.
  • Valerio IP, Felix de Carvalho FI, Costa de Oliveira A, Queiroz de Souza V, Benin G, Schmidt DAM, Ribeiro G, Nornberg R, Luch H (2009). Combining ability of wheat genotypes in two models of diallel analyses. Crop Breed App Biol 9: 100–107.
  • Varughese G, Pfeiffer WH, Pena RJ (1996). Triticale (Part 1): A successful alternative crop. Cereal Foods World 41: 474–482.
  • Wynne JC, Emery DA, Rice PH (1970). Combining ability estimation in Arachis hypogaea L. II. Field performance of F1 hybrids. Crop Sci 10: 713–715.
  • Yağbasanlar T (1991). Tritikale (X Triticosecale Wittmack)’de doğal yabancı döllenme ile tohum tutma oranı. Çukurova University J Fac Agric 6: 127–136 (in Turkish).
  • Yao JB, Ma HX, Ren LJ, Zhang PP, Yang XM, Yao GC, Zhang P, Zhou MP (2011). Genetic analysis of plant height and its components in diallel crosses of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Australian J Crop Sci 5: 1408–1418.
  • Yıldırım M (2005). A study on heredity of some agronomical, physiological and quality characteristics in diallel f1 offsprings of selected six bread wheat (Triticum Aestivum L.) cultivars. PhD, Çukurova University, Adana, Turkey (in Turkish with English abstract).
  • Zadoks JC, Chang TT, Konzak CF (1974). A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Research 14: 415–421.
  • Zillinsky FJ (1985). Triticale: an update on yield, adaptation, and world production. In Forsberg RA, editor. Triticale. Madison, WI, USA: Crop Science Society of America, pp. 1–7.
  • Zubair M, Chowdhry AR, Khan IA, Bakhsh A (1987). Combining ability studies in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Pakistan J Bot 19: 75–80.
Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-011X
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Germination and electrical conductivity tests on artifcially aged seed lots of 2 wall-rocket species

Simona Laura LAZAR, Sara MIRA, Doru PAMFIL, Juan Bautista LABORDE MARTÍNEZ

Mehlika ALPER, Hatice GÜNEŞ, Arzu TATLIPINAR, Bekir ÇÖL

Nutrient uptakes and their contributions to yield in peanut genotypes with different levels of terminal drought resistance

Wunna HTOON, Sanun JOGLOY, Nimitr VORASOOT, Banyong TOOMSAN

Effect of cereal cyst nematode Heterodera avenae (Tylenchida: Heteroderidae) on yield of some spring wheat varieties in Adana Province, Turkey

Mustafa İMREN, İbrahim Halil ELEKCİOĞLU

First report of Adoxophyes orana in northwestern Turkey: population fuctuation and damage on diferent host plants

Bilgi PEHLEVAN, Orkun Barış KOVANCI

Occurrence of Botryosphaeriaceae species associated with grapevine dieback in Algeria

Faiza AMMAD, Messaoud BENCHABANE, Mohamed TOUMI, Nesrine BELKACEM

Germination and electrical conductivity tests on artificially aged seed lots of 2 wall-rocket species

Simona-laura LAZAR, Sara MIRA, Doru PAMFIL, Juan Bautista MARTÍNEZ-LABORDE

Optimization of Orius majusculus release: photoperiodic sensitivity at diferent temperatures and storage of diapausing adults

Şerife BAHŞİ ÜNAL, İrfan TUNÇ

Is canopy interception increased in semiarid tree plantations? Evidence from a feld investigation in Tehran, Iran

Seyed Mohammad Moein SADEGHI, Pedram ATTAROD, Tomas GRANT PYPKER, David DUNKERLEY

Characterization for drought resistance at early stages of wheat genotypes based on survival, coleoptile length, and seedling vigor

Ali ÖZTÜRK, Sinan BAYRAM, Kamil HALİLOĞLU, Murat AYDIN, Özcan ÇAĞLAR, Sancar BULUT