___

• Ahmadi MT, Attarod P, Marvi Mohadjer MR, Rahmani R, Fathi J (2009). Partitioning rainfall into throughfall, stemfow, and interception loss in an oriental beech (Fagus orientalis Lipsky) forest during the growing season. Turk J Agric For 33: 557–568.
• Allison GB, Hughes MW (1972). Comparison of recharge to groundwater under pasture and forest using environmental tritium. J Hydrol 17: 81–95.
• Andrè F, Jonard M, Ponette Q (2008). Precipitation water storage capacity in a temperate mixed oak–beech canopy. Hydrol Process 22: 4130–4141.
• Asadian Y, Weiler M (2009). A new approach in measuring rainfall interception by urban trees in Coastal British Columbia. Water Qual Res J Can 44: 16–25.
• Aston AR (1979). Rainfall interception by eight small trees. J Hydrol 42: 383–396.
• Aussenac G (1968). Interception des précipitations par le couvert forestier. Ann For Sci 25: 135–156 (in French).
• Aussenac G, Boulangeat C (1980). Interception des précipitations et évapotranspiration réelle dans des peuplements de feuillus (Fagus sylvatica L.) et de résineux. Ann For Sci 37: 91–107 (in French).
• Bagheri H, Attarod P, Etemaad V, Sharafeh H, Ahmadi MT (2011). Rainfall interception loss by Cupressus arizonica and Pinus eldarica in an arid zone aforestation of Iran (Biyarjomand, Shahroud). Iranian J For Poplar Res 19: 314–325.
• Bellot J, Maestre FT, Chirino E, Hernandez N, De Urbina JO (2004). Aforestation with Pinus halepensis reduces native shrub performance in a Mediterranean semi-arid area. Acta Oecol 25: 7–15.
• Bouten W, Swart PJF, De Walter E (1991). Microwave transmission, a new tool in forest hydrological research. J Hydrol 124: 119–130.
• Brauman KA, Freyberg DL, Daily GC (2010). Forest structure infuences on rainfall partitioning and cloud interception: a comparison of native forest sites in Kona, Hawai’i. Agric For Meteorol 150: 265–275.
• Bruijnzeel LA, Sampurno SP, Wiersum KF (1987). Rainfall interception by a young Acacia auriculiformis (a. cunn) plantation forest in West Java, Indonesia: application of Gash’s analytical model. Hydrol Process 1: 309–319.
• Bryant M, Bhata S, Jacobs J (2005). Measurement and modeling of throughfall variability for fve forest communities in the southeastern US. J Hydrol 89: 65–71.
• Buttle JM, Farnsworth AG (2012). Measurement and modeling of canopy water partitioning in a reforested landscape: the Ganaraska Forest, Southern Ontario, Canada. J Hydrol 466– 467: 103–114.
• Calder IR, Wright IR (1986). Gamma ray attenuation studies of interception from Sitka spruce: some evidence for an additional transport mechanism. Water Resour Res 22: 409–417.
• Calder IR (1990). Evaporation in the Uplands. New York, NY, USA: Wiley.
• Cao Y, Ouyang ZY, Zheng H, Huang ZG, Wang XK, Miao H (2008). Efects of forest plantations on rainfall redistribution and erosion in the red soil region of southern China. Land Degrad Dev 19: 321–330.
• Carlyle-Moses DE, Flores Laureano JS, Price AG (2004). Troughfall and throughfall spatial variability in Madrean oak forest communities of northeastern Mexico. J Hydrol 297: 124–135.
• Carlyle-Moses DE, Price AG (1999). An evaluation of the Gash interception model in a northern hardwood stand. J Hydrol 214: 103–110.
• Chang M. (2006). Forest Hydrology: An Introduction to Water and Forests. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL, USA: Taylor and Francis.
• Chappell NA, Bidin K, Tych W (2001). Modelling rainfall and canopy controls on net-precipitation beneath selectively- logged tropical forest. Plant Ecol 153: 215–229.
• Crockford RH, Richardson DP (1990). Partitioning of rainfall in a eucalypt forest and pine plantation in southeastern Australia: I. throughfall measurement in a eucalypt forest: efect of method and species composition. Hydrol Process 4: 131–144.
• Crockford RH, Richardson DP (2000). Partitioning of rainfall into throughfall, stemfow and interception: efect of forest type, ground cover and climate. Hydrol Process 14: 2903–2920.
• David TS, Gash JHC, Valente F, Pereira JS, Ferreira MI, David JS (2006). Rainfall interception by an isolated evergreen oak tree in a Mediterranean Savannah. Hydrol Process 20: 2713–2726.
• Deguchi A, Hattori S, Park H (2006). Te infuence of seasonal changes in canopy structure on interception loss: application of the revised Gash model. J Hydrol 319: 80–102.
• De Schrijver A, Geudens G, Augusto L, Staelens J, Mertens J, Wuyts K, Gielis L, Verheyen K (2007). Te efect of forest type on throughfall deposition and seepage fux: a review. Oecologia 153: 663–674.
• Dunkerley DL (2000). Measuring interception loss and canopy storage in dryland vegetation: a brief review and evaluation of available research strategies. Hydrol Process 14: 669–678.
• Dunkerley DL (2008). Intra-storm evaporation as a component of canopy interception loss in dryland shrubs: observations from Fowlers Gap, Australia. Hydrol Process 22: 1985–1995.
• Fathizadeh O, Attarod P, Pypker TG, Darvishsefat AA, Zahedi Amiri G (2013). Seasonal variability of rainfall interception and canopy storage capacity measured under individual oak (Quercus brantii) trees in Western Iran. J Agric Sci Tech 15: 175–188.
• Fink DH, Ehrler WL (1986). Christmas tree production using the runof farming system. HortScience 21: 459–461.
• Fisher JT, Dudoich DJ, Fancher JA (1986). Efcacy of pre- and postemergent herbicides in feld-planted Pinus eldarica. Forest Ecol Manage 16: 253–258.
• Fleischbein K, Wilcke W, Goller R, Boy J, Valarezo C, Zech W, Knoblich K (2005). Rainfall interception in a lower montane forest in Ecuador: efects of canopy properties. Hydrol Process 19: 1355–1371.
• Forgeard F, Gloaguen JC, Toufet J (1980). Interception des précipitations et apports au sol d’éléments minéraux par les eaux de pluie et les pluviolessivats dans une hêtraie atlantique et dans quelques peuplements résineux de Bretagne. Ann For Sci 37: 53–71 (in French).
• Gallis AT, Doulis AG, Papageorgiou AC (2006). Variability of cortex terpene composition in Cupressus sempervirens L. provenances grown in Crete, Greece. Silvae Genet 56: 294–299.
• Gash JHC (1979). An analytical model of rainfall interception by forest. Q J R Meteorol Soc 105: 43–55.
• Gash JHC, Lloyd CR, Lachaud G (1995). Estimating sparse forest rainfall interception with an analytical model. J Hydrol 170: 79–86.
• Gash JHC, Morton AJ (1978). An application of the Rutter model to the estimation of the interception loss from Tetford Forest. J Hydrol 38: 89–105.
• Gash JHC, Wright IR, Lloyd CR (1980). Comparative estimates of interception loss from three coniferous forests in Great Britain. J Hydrol 48: 49–58.
• Geiger R, Aron RH, Todhunter P (2003). Te Climate Near the Ground. Lanham, MD, USA: Rowman and Littlefeld.
• George RJ, Nulsen RA, Ferdowsian R, Raper GP (1999). Interactions between trees and groundwaters in recharge and discharge areas – a survey of Western Australian sites. Agric Water Manage 39: 91–113.
• Gómez JA, Giráldez JV, Fereres E (2001). Rainfall interception by olive trees in relation to leaf area. Agric Water Manage 49: 65–76.
• Guevara-Escobar A, Gonzalez-Sosa E, Ramos Salinas M, Hernandez- Delgado GD (2007). Experimental analysis of drainage and water storage of litter layers. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 11: 1703– 1716.
• Hancock NH, Crowther JM (1979). A technique for the direct measurement of water storage on a forest canopy. J Hydrol 41: 105–122.
• Harrington J, Loveall M, Kirksey R (2005). Establishment and early growth of dryland plantings of Arizona cypress in New Mexico, USA. Agrofor Syst 63: 183–192.
• Helvey JD, Patric JH (1965). Design criteria for interception studies. In: Proceedings of a Symposium on the Design of Hydrological Networks, June 1965; Quebec City, Canada. International Association of Scientifc Hydrology, pp. 131–137.
• Herwitz SR (1985). Interception storage capacities of tropical rainforest canopy trees. J Hydrol 77: 237–252.
• Holmes JW, Colville JS (1970). Forest hydrology in a karstic region of southern Australia. J Hydrol 10: 59–74.
• Huang YS, Chen SS, Lin TP (2005). Continuous monitoring of water loading of trees and canopy rainfall interception using the strain gauge method. J Hydrol 311: 1–7.
• Huber A, Iroumé A (2001). Variability of annual rainfall partitioning for diferent sites and forest cover in Chile. J Hydrol 248: 78–92.
• Hutchings NJ, Milne R, Crowther JM (1988). Canopy storage capacity and its vertical distribution in a Sitka spruce canopy. J Hydrol 104: 161–171.
• Iroumé A, Huber A (2002). Comparison of interception losses in a broadleaved native forest and a Pseudotsuga menziesii (Douglas fr) plantation in the Andes Mountains of southern Chile. Hydrol Process 16: 2347 –2361.
• Jackson IJ (1975). Relationships between rainfall parameters and interception by tropical forests. J Hydrol 24: 215–238.
• Jobbágy EG, Baldi G, Nosetto MD (2012). Tree plantation in South America and the water cycle: impacts and emergent opportunities. In: Schlichter T, Montes L, editors. Forests in Development: A Vital Balance. Berlin, Germany: Springer Science, pp. 53–63.
• Keim RF, Skaugset AE, Weiler M (2006). Storage of water on vegetation under simulated rainfall of varying intensity. Adv Water Resour 26: 974–986.
• Kelliher FM, Whitehead D, Pollock DS (1992). Rainfall interception by trees and slash in a young Pinus radiata D. Don stand. J Hydrol 131: 187–204.
• Klaassen W, Bosveld F, De Water E (1998). Water storage and evaporation as constituents of rainfall interception. J Hydrol 212–213: 36–50.
• Lankreijer HJM, Hendriks MJ, Klaassen W (1993). A comparison of models simulating rainfall interception of forests. Agric For Meteorol 64: 187–199.
• Leyton L, Reynolds ERC, Tompson FB (1967). Rainfall interception in forest and moorland. In: Sopper WE, Lull HW, editors. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Forest Hydrology. New York, NY, USA: Pergamon Press, pp. 163–178.
• Licata JA, Pypker TG, Weigandt M, Unsworth MH, Gyenge JE, Fernández ME, Schichter TM, Bond BJ (2010). Decreased rainfall interception balances increased transpiration in exotic ponderosa pine plantations compared with native cypress stands in Patagonia, Argentina. Ecohydrology 4: 83–93.
• Link TE, Unsworth M, Marks D (2004). Te dynamics of rainfall interception by a seasonal temperate rainforest. Agric For Meteorol 124: 171–191.
• Liu SG (1997). A new model for the prediction of rainfall interception in forest canopies. Ecol Model 99: 151–159.
• Liu SG (1998). Estimation of rainfall storage capacity in the canopies of cypress wetlands and slash pine uplands in North-Central Florida. J Hydrol 207: 32–41.
• Llorens P (1997). Rainfall interception by a Pinus sylvestris forest patch overgrown in a Mediterranean mountainous abandoned area. II. Assessment of the applicability of Gash’s analytical model. J Hydrol 199: 346–359.
• Llorens P, Domingo F (2007). Rainfall partitioning by vegetation under Mediterranean conditions. A review of studies in Europe. J Hydrol 335: 37–54.
• Llorens P, Gallart F (2000). A simplifed method for forest water storage capacity measurement. J Hydrol 240: 131–144.
• Lloyd CR, Gash JHC, Shuttleworth WJ (1988). Te measurement and modeling of rainfall interception by Amazonian rain forest. Agric For Meteorol 43: 277–294.
• Loustau D, Bergiger P, Granier P (1992). Interception loss, throughfall and stemfow in a maritime pine stand. II. An application of Gash’s analytical model of interception. J Hydrol 138: 469–485.
• Mahendrappa MK (1990). Partitioning of rainwater and chemicals into throughfall and stemfow in diferent forest stands. Forest Ecol Manage 30: 65–72.
• Marin TC, Bouten W, Sevink J (2000). Gross rainfall and its partitioning into throughfall, stemfow and evaporation of intercepted water in four forest ecosystems in Western Amazonia. J Hydrol 237: 40–57.
• Motahari M, Attarod P, Pypker TG, Etemad V, Shirvany A (2013). Rainfall interception and canopy storage capacity of a Pinus eldarica plantation in a semi-arid climate zone: an application of the Gash model. J Agric Sci Tech 15: 981–994.
• Muzylo A, Llorens P, Valente F (2009). A review of rainfall interception modeling. J Hydrol 370: 191–206.
• Návar J, Bryan RB (1994). Fitting the analytical model of rainfall interception of Gash to individual shrubs of semi-arid vegetation in northeastern Mexico. Agric For Meteorol 68: 133–143.
• Nosetto MD, Jobbágy EG, Toth T, Di Bella CM (2007). Te efects of tree establishment on water and salts dynamics in naturally salt-afected grasslands. Oecologia 152: 695–705.
• Owens MK, Lyons KR, Alegandro CL (2006). Rainfall partitioning within semiarid juniper communities: efects of event size and canopy cover. Hydrol Process 20: 3179–3189.
• Oxbrough AG, Gittings T, O’Halloran J, Giller PS, Kelly TC (2006). Te initial efects of aforestation on the ground-dwelling spider fauna of Irish peatlands and grasslands. Forest Ecol Manage 237: 478–491.
• Pereira FL, Gash JHC, David JS, David TS, Monteiro PR, Valente F (2009). Modelling interception loss from evergreen oak Mediterranean savannas: application of a tree-based modelling approach. Agric For Meteorol 149: 680–688.
• Pypker TG, Bond BJ, Link TE, Marks D, Unsworth MH (2005). Te importance of canopy structure in controlling the interception loss of rainfall: examples from a young and an old-growth Douglas fr forest. Agric For Meteorol 130: 113–129.
• Renaud V, Rebetez M (2009). Comparison between open-site and below-canopy climatic conditions in Switzerland during the exceptionally hot summer of 2003. Agric For Meteorol 149: 873–880.
• Rowe L (1983). Rainfall interception by an evergreen beech forest, Nelson, New Zealand. J Hydrol 66: 143–158.
• Rutter AJ (1963). Studies in the water relations of Pinus sylvestris in plantation conditions. I. Measurements of rainfall and interception. J Ecol 51: 315–325.
• Rutter AJ, Kershaw KA, Robins PC, Monton AJ (1971). A predictive model of rainfall interception in forests. I. Derivation of the model from observations in a plantation of Corsican pine. Agric Meteorol 9: 367–384.
• Rutter AJ, Morton AJ, Robins PC (1975). A predictive model of rainfall interception in forests. II. Generalization of the model and comparison with observations in some coniferous and hardwood stands. J Appl Ecol 12: 367–380.
• Rutter AJ, Morton AJ (1977). A predictive model of rainfall interception in forests. III. Sensitivity of the model to stand parameters and meteorological variables. J Appl Ecol 14: 567– 588.
• Sardabi H (1998). Eucalypt and pine species trials on the Caspian littoral and lowlands of Iran. Tehran, Iran: Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands, Technical Publication No. 193.
• Shachnovich Y, Berliner PR, Bar P (2008). Rainfall interception and spatial distribution of throughfall in a pine forest planted in an arid zone. J Hydrol 349: 168–177.
• Shi Z, Wang Y, Xu L, Xiong W, Yu P, Gao J, Zhang L (2010). Fraction of incident rainfall within the canopy of a pure stand of Pinus armandii with revised Gash model in the Liupan Mountains of China. J Hydrol 385: 44–50.
• Staelens J, De Schrijver A, Verheyen K, Verhoest N (2006). Spatial variability and temporal stability of throughfall water under a dominant beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) tree in relationship to canopy cover. J Hydrol 330: 651–662.
• Toba T, Ohta T (2005). An observational study of the factors that infuence interception loss in boreal and temperate forests. J Hydrol 313: 208–220.
• Valente F, David JS, Gash JHC (1997). Modelling interception loss for sparse eucalypt and pine forest in central Portugal using reformulated Rutter and Gash analytical models. J Hydrol 237: 40–57.
• Vegas Galdos F, Álvarez C, García A, Revilla JA (2012). Estimated distributed rainfall interception using a simple conceptual model and moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer (MODIS). J Hydrol 468–469: 213–228.
• Vines RA (1960). Trees, Shrubs, and Woody Vines of the Southwest. Austin, TX, USA: University of Texas Press.
• Vose JM, Sun G, Ford CR, Bredemeir M, Ostsuki K, Wei A, Zhang Z, Zhang L (2011). Forest ecohydrological research in the 21st century: what are the critical needs? Ecohydrology 4: 146–158.
• Whelan MJ, Anderson JM (1996). Modelling spatial patterns of throughfall and interception loss in a Norway spruce (Picea abies) plantation at the plot scale. J Hydrol 186: 335–354.
• Xiao QF, McPherson EG (2002). Rainfall interception by Santa Monica’s municipal urban forest. Urban Ecosyst 6: 291–302.
• Xiao Q, McPherson E, Ustin L, Grismer M, Simpson J (2000). Winter rainfall interception by two mature open-grown trees in Davis, California. Hydrol Process 14: 763–784.
• Zhang L, Dawes WR, Walker GR (2001). Response of mean annual evapotranspiration to vegetation changes at catchment scale. Water Resour Res 37: 701–708.