Nutrient uptakes and their contributions to yield in peanut genotypes with different levels of terminal drought resistance

Different peanut yields under terminal drought might be due to the different nutrient uptakes among peanut genotypes. Nutrient uptake was presumed to be a drought-resistant trait and might involve drought tolerance mechanisms. The aims of this study, therefore, were to characterize the effect of terminal drought on peanut nutrient uptake and to investigate the genotypic variability of nutrient uptake and its interactions with terminal drought. Field experiments were conducted at the Field Crop Research Station of Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand, from October 2010 to January 2011 and October 2011 to January 2012. Six peanut genotypes were tested under well-watered and terminal drought conditions. Data were recorded for N, P, K, Ca, and Mg uptake and biomass (BM) and pod yield (PY); the ratio of nutrient uptake under stress condition was calculated. Terminal drought significantly reduced nutrient uptake in both years, and peanut genotypes differed considerably with respect to nutrient uptakes under well-watered and terminal drought conditions. ICGV 98324 and ICGV 98348 were the best genotypes for nutrient uptake under terminal drought. Tainan 9 and Tifton 8 had low nutrient uptake under both conditions. ICGV 98308 and Tifton 8 had medium uptake and Tainan 9 had the lowest. Significant correlations between nutrient uptakes and BM and PY were mostly observed under well-watered and drought conditions. Based on nutrient uptake, ICGV 98324 and ICGV 98348 were identified as drought-tolerant lines. These genotypes could maintain high nutrient uptakes across water regimes; consequently, these traits can also be used as efficient tools for selecting peanut genotypes with terminal drought tolerance.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Arachis hypogaea L., water stress, genotype, drought tolerance, mineral nutrients, relationship

Nutrient uptakes and their contributions to yield in peanut genotypes with different levels of terminal drought resistance

Keywords:

Arachis hypogaea L., water stress, genotype, drought tolerance, mineral nutrients, relationship,

PDF

___

Al-Karaki GN, Al-Raddad A (1997). Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and drought stress on growth and nutrient uptake of two wheat genotypes differing in drought resistance. Mycorrhiza 7: 83–88.
Arunyanark A, Jogloy S, Akkasaeng C, Vorasoot N, Kesmala T, Nageswara Rao RC, Wright GC, Patanothai A (2009). Association between aflatoxin contamination and drought tolerance traits in peanut. Field Crops Res 114: 14–22.
Baligar VC, Fageria, NK, He ZL (2001). Nutrient use efficiency in plants. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 32: 921–950.
Barber SA (1985). Potassium availability at the soil-root interface and factors influencing potassium uptake. In: Munson RD, editor. Potassium in Agriculture. Madison, WI, USA: American Society of Agronomy, pp. 309–324.
Boote KJ (1982). Growth stage of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Peanut Sci 9: 35–40.
Bricker AA (1989). MSTAT-C User’s Guide. East Lansing, MI, USA: Michigan State University.
Clavel D, Diouf O, Khalfaoui JL, Braconnier S (2006). Genotypes variations in fluorescence parameters among closely related groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) lines and their potential for drought screening programs. Crop Sci 34: 92–97.
Doorenbos J, Pruitt WO (1992). Guidelines for predicting crop water requirements. In: Doorenbos J, Pruitt WO, editors. Calculation of Crop Water Requirement: FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No 24. Rome, Italy: FAO, pp. 1–65.
Fageria NK, Baligar VC, Clark RB (2002). Micronutrients in crop production. Adv Agron 77: 185–268.
Garg BK (2003). Nutrient uptake and management under drought: nutrient–moisture interaction. Curr Agric 27: 1–8.
Girdthai T, Jogloy S, Vorasoot N, Akkasaeng C, Wongkaew S, Holbrook CC, Patanothai A (2010). Associations between physiological traits for drought tolerance. Plant Breeding 129: 693–699.
Gomez KA, Gomez AA (1984). Statistical Procedures for Agricultur- al Research. 2nd ed. New York, NY, USA: John Wiley and Sons.
Gunes A, Cicek N, Inal A, Alpaslan M, Eraslan F, Guneri E, Guzelordu T (2006). Genotypic response of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars to drought stress implemented at pre- and post-anthesis stages and its relations with nutrient uptake and efficiency. Plant Soil Environ 52:368–37.
Htoon W, Jogloy S, Toomsan B, Sanitchon J (2009). Response to early drought for traits related to nitrogen fixation and their correlation to yield and drought tolerance traits in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Asian J Plant Sci 8: 138–145.
Jongrungklang N, Toomsan B, Vorasoot N, Jogloy S, Boote KJ, Hoogenboom G, Patanothai A (2012). Classification of root distribution patterns and their contributions to yield in peanut genotypes under mid-season drought stress. Field Crops Res 127: 181–190.
Jongrungklang N, Toomsan B, Vorasoot N, Jogloy S, Boote KJ, Hoogenboom G, Patanothai A (2011). Rooting traits of peanut genotypes with different yield responses to pre-flowering drought stress. Field Crops Res 120: 262–270.
Junjittakarn J, Pimratch S, Jogloy S, Htoon W, Singkham N, Vorasoot N, Toomsan B, Holbrook CC, Patanothai A (2013). Nutrient uptake of peanut genotypes under different water regimes. Int J Plant Prod 7: 677–692.
Kaewpradit W, Toomsan B, Cadisch G, Vityakon P, Limpinuntana V, Saenjan P, Jogloy S, Patanothai A (2009). Mixing groundnut residues and rice straw to improve rice yield and N use efficiency. Field Crops Res 110: 130–138.
Kambiranda DM, Vasanthaiah HKN, Katam R, Ananga A, Basha SM, Naik K (2012). Impact of drought stress on peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) productivity and food safety. In: Vasanthaiah HKN, Kambiranda DM, editors. Plants and Environment. Rijeka, Croatia: InTech, pp. 249–272.
Kolay AK (2008). Soil moisture stress and plant growth. In: Kolay AK, editor. Water and Crop Growth. New Delhi, India: Atlantic, pp. 43–48.
Koolachart R, Jogloy S, Vorasoot N, Wongkaew S, Holbrook CC, Jongrungklang N, Kesmala T, Patanothai A (2013). Rooting traits of peanut genotypes with different yield responses to terminal drought. Field Crops Res 149: 366–376.
Kramer PJ (1980). Drought stress and the origin of adaptation. In: Turner NC, Kramer PJ, editors. Adaptation of Plants to Water and High Temperature Stress. New York, NY, USA: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 7–20.
Kuchenbuch R, Claassen N, Jungk A (1986). Potassium availability in relation to soil moisture. II. Calculations by means of a mathematical simulation model. Plant Soil 95: 221–231.
Kulkarni JH, Ravindra V, Sojitra VK, Bhatt DM (1988). Growth, nodulation and N uptake of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) as influenced by water deficits stress at different phenophase. Oleagineus 43: 415–419.
Marschner H (1986). Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. London, UK: Academic Press.
Nageswara Rao RC, Singh S, Sivakumar MVK, Srivastava KL, Wil- liams JH (1985). Effect of water deficit at different growth phase of peanut. I Yield responses. Agron J 77: 782–786.
Nautiyal PC, Ravinda V, Zala PV, Joshi YC (1999). Enhancement of yield in peanut following the imposition of transient soil- moisture-deficit stress during the vegetative phase. Exp Agric 35: 371–385.
Nigam SN, Chandra S, Sridevi RK, Bhukta M, Reddy AGS, Nageswara Rao RC, Wright GC, Reddy PV, Deshmukh MP, Mathur RK et al. (2005). Efficiency of physiological trait-based and empirical selection approaches for drought tolerance in groundnut. Ann App Biol 146: 433–439.
Pimratch S, Jogloy S, Vorasoot N, Toomsan B, Kesmala T, Patanothai A, Holbrook CC (2008). Effect of drought stress on traits related to N2-fixation in eleven peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) genotypes differing in degrees of resistance to drought. Asian J Plant Sci 7: 334–342.
Ravindra V, Nautiyal PC, Joshi YC (1990). Physiological analysis of drought resistance and yield in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L). Trop Agric Trinidad 67: 290–296.
Reddy TY, Reddy VR, Anbumozhi V (2003). Physiological responses of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) to drought stress and its amelioration: a critical review. Plant Growth Regul 41: 75–88.
Richards RA, Condon AG, Rebetzke GJ (2001). Traits to improve yield in dry environments. In: Reynolds MP, Ortiz-Monasterio IJ, McNab, A, editors. Application of Physiology in Wheat Breeding. Mexico City, Mexico: CIMMYT, pp. 89–100.
Samarah N, Mullen R, Cianzio S (2004). Size distribution and mineral nutrients of soybean seeds in response to drought stress. J Plant Nutr 27: 815–835.
Schuman GE, Stanley MA, Knudson D (1973). Automated total nitrogen analysis of soil and plant samples. Soil Sci Amer Proc 37: 480–481.
Singh S, Russell MB (1981). Water use by maize/pigeonpea intercrop on a deep Vertisol. In: Singh S, Russell MB, editors. Proceed- ings of International Workshop on Pigeonpeas, 15–19 Decem- ber 1980. Patancheru, India: ICRISAT Center, pp. 271–282.
Songsri P, Jogloy S, Vorasoot N, Akkasaeng C, Patanothai A, Holbrook CC (2008). Root distribution of drought-resistant peanut genotypes in response to drought. J Agron Crop Sci 194: 92–103.
Suther DM, Patel MS (1992). Yield and nutrient absorption by groundnut and iron availability in soil as influenced by lime and soil water. J Indian Soc Soil Sci 40: 594–596.
Vorasoot N, Songsri P, Akkasaeng C, Jogloy S, Patanothai A (2003). Effect of water stress on yield and agronomic characters of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). J Sci Tec 25: 283–288.
Wallace DH, Baudoin JP, Beaver J, Coyne DP, Halseth DE, Masaya PN, Munger HM, Myers JR, Silberrnagel M, Yourstone KS et al (1993). Improving efficiency of breeding for higher crop yield. Theor Appl Genet 86: 27–40.
Wright GC, Nageswara Rao RC (1994). Groundnut water relations. In: Smartt J, editor. The Groundnut Crop. London, UK: Chap- man and Hall, pp. 281–325.
Wright GC, Nageswara Rao RC, Basu MS (1996). A physiological approach to the understanding of genotype by environment interactions - a case study on improvement of drought adaptation in groundnut. In: Cooper M, Hammer GL, editors. Plant Adaptation and Crop Improvement. Wallingford, UK: CAB International, pp. 365–380.
Xia MZ (1997). Effects of soil drought during the generative development phase on seed yield and nutrient uptake of faba bean (Viciafaba). Aust J Agric Res 48: 447–452.