Assessing the impact of azadirachtin application to soil on ureaseactivity and its kinetic parameters

Abstract: The kinetic parameters of soil urease have attracted considerable attention; however, little information is available on its kinetic parameters and behaviors in response to azadirachtin application to the soil. A short (14-day) field experiment was conducted using Albic Luvisol soil (loam texture; pH 6.70; electrical conductivity 0.81 dS m-1; CaCO3 content 0.04%; total organic carbon 0.99%) as the experimental soil in the Perm region of the Russian Federation to investigate the effects of different azadirachtin application doses on soil urease activity and its kinetic behaviors. The results showed that the highest urease activity was found under high azadirachtin application doses (0.6 L ha-1) compared to the control (0 L ha-1), recommended (0.3 L ha-1), and low (0.15 L ha-1) azadirachtin application doses at all different incubation times (1, 2, 3, 6, and 12 h). Soil urease enzymes exhibited typical Michaelis-Menten kinetic behaviors; high azadirachtin application doses increased the substrate affinity constant (KM) and decreased the maximum reaction rates (Vmax) of soil urease. As compared to the control azadirachtin application dose, the low azadirachtin application dose increased the Vmax of soil urease; however, with low and recommended application doses, the Vmax of soil urease decreased. Overall, in this study, all azadirachtin application doses were effective in influencing the kinetic behavior of urease in Albic Luvisol.

Assessing the impact of azadirachtin application to soil on ureaseactivity and its kinetic parameters

Abstract: The kinetic parameters of soil urease have attracted considerable attention; however, little information is available on its kinetic parameters and behaviors in response to azadirachtin application to the soil. A short (14-day) field experiment was conducted using Albic Luvisol soil (loam texture; pH 6.70; electrical conductivity 0.81 dS m-1; CaCO3 content 0.04%; total organic carbon 0.99%) as the experimental soil in the Perm region of the Russian Federation to investigate the effects of different azadirachtin application doses on soil urease activity and its kinetic behaviors. The results showed that the highest urease activity was found under high azadirachtin application doses (0.6 L ha-1) compared to the control (0 L ha-1), recommended (0.3 L ha-1), and low (0.15 L ha-1) azadirachtin application doses at all different incubation times (1, 2, 3, 6, and 12 h). Soil urease enzymes exhibited typical Michaelis-Menten kinetic behaviors; high azadirachtin application doses increased the substrate affinity constant (KM) and decreased the maximum reaction rates (Vmax) of soil urease. As compared to the control azadirachtin application dose, the low azadirachtin application dose increased the Vmax of soil urease; however, with low and recommended application doses, the Vmax of soil urease decreased. Overall, in this study, all azadirachtin application doses were effective in influencing the kinetic behavior of urease in Albic Luvisol.

___

  • Agyaro K, Kwakye P, Bonsu M, Ose BA, Asare Donkor N, Amanor E (2006). Breakdown of azadirachtin A in a tropical soil amended with neem leaves and animal manures. Pedosphere 16: 230–236.
  • Akça I, Kutluk Yılmaz ND, Kızılkaya R (2005). Effects of azadirachtin on beet soilborne pomovirus and soil biological properties on sugar beet. J Environ Sci Heal B 40: 285–296.
  • Akca I, Tuncer C, Guler A, Saryhan, I (2009). Residual toxicity of 8 different insecticides on honey bee (Apis mellifera Hymenoptera: Apidae). J Anim Vet Adv 8: 436–440.
  • Aliev SA, Haciyev DA, Mikayilov FD (1984). Kinetic and thermodynamic characteristics of enzyme–invertase and urease in Azerbaijan soils. Eur Soil Sci 11: 55–66.
  • Bremner JM, Mulvaney RL (1978). Urease activity in soils. In: Burns RG, editor. Soil Enzymes. New York, NY, USA: Academic Press, p. 149–196.
  • Cervelle S, Nanipieri P, Giovanninni G, Perna A (1976). Relationships between substituted urea herbicides and soil urease activity. Weed Res 16: 365–368.
  • Chowdhury A, Pradhan S, Saha M, Sanyal N (2008). Impact of pesticides on soil microbiological parameters and possible bioremediation strategies. Indian J Microbiol 48: 114–127.
  • Cornish-Bowden A (1976). Principles of Enzyme Kinetics. London, UK: Butterworth.
  • Dick RP (1997). Soil enzyme activities as integrative indicators of soil health. In: Pankhurst CE, Double BM, Gupta VVSR, editors. Biological Indicators of Soil Health. Wallingford, UK: CAB International, pp. 121–156.
  • Dick RP, Samdor JA, Eash NS (1994). Soil enzyme activities after 1500 years of agriculture in the Colca Valley, Peru. Agric Ecosys Environ 50: 123–131.
  • Dick WA, Tabatabai MA (1992). Significance and potential uses of soil enzymes. In: Metting Jr, FB, editor. Soil Microbial Ecology: Applications in Agricultural and Environmental Management. New York, NY, USA: Marcel Dekker, pp. 95–225.
  • Ekberli İ, Kızılkaya R, Kars N (2006). Urease enzyme and its kinetic and thermodynamic parameters in clay loam soil. Asian J Chem 18: 3097–3105.
  • FAO (2006). World Reference Base For Soil Resources. A framework for international classification, correlation and communication. World Soil Resources Report No. 103. Rome: FAO.
  • Gianfreda L, Sannino F, Ortega N, Nanipieri P (1994). Activity of free and immobilized urease in soil: effects of pesticides. Soil Biol Biochem 26: 777–784.
  • Gianfreda L, Rao MA (2011). The influence of pesticides on soil enzymes. In: Shukla G, Varma A, editors. Soil Enzymology. Soil Biology Series No. 22. Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: Springer Verlag, pp. 293–312.
  • Gianfreda L, Sannino F, Violante A (1995). Pesticide effects on the activity of free, immobilized and soil invertase. Soil Biol Biochem 27: 1201–1208.
  • Gopal M, Gupta A, Arunachalam V, Magu SP (2007). Impact of azadirachtin, an insecticidal allelochemical from neem on soil microflora, enzyme and respiratory activities. Bioresource Technol 98: 3154–3158.
  • Hoffmann GG, Teicher K (1961). Ein kolorimetrisches verfahren zur bestimmung der urease aktivitat in böden. Z Pflanzenernähr Düng Bodenk 91: 55–63.
  • Jones JB Jr (2001). Laboratory Guide for Conducting Soil Test and Plant Analysis. Washington, DC, USA: CRC Press.
  • Jordan D, Kremer RJ, Stanley L, Bergfield WA, Kim KY, Cacnio VN (1995). An evaluation of microbial methods as indicators of soil quality in long-term cropping practices in historical fields. Biol Fertil Soils 19: 297–308.
  • Khabirov IK (1990). Kinetics and thermodynamics of the hydrolysis reaction of 14C-labelled carbamide in the Pre-Urals soils. Eur Soil Sci 8: 83–94.
  • Khah SJ, Nael M, Sinejani AAS, Asadian, G, Nik KS (2015). The effects of vegetation type on selected soil quality indicators in a semiarid rangeland in Hamedan, Iran. Eurasian J Soil Sci 4: 70–75.
  • Kızılkaya R, Aksoy HM (1999). Determination of the effects of pesticides on the growth of different Bacillus spp. J Agric Fac Ondokuz Mayis Univ 14: 76–87.
  • Kızılkaya R, Arcak S (1996). The effect of trifluraline on nitrification. J Agric Fac Ondokuz Mayis Univ 11: 145–154.
  • Kızılkaya R, Aşkın T, Bayraklı B, Sağlam M (2004). Microbiological characteristics of soils contaminated with heavy metals. Eur J Soil Biol 40: 95–102.
  • Kızılkaya R, Bayraklı B (2005). Effects of N-enriched sewage sludge on soil enzyme activities. Appl Soil Ecol 30: 192–202.
  • Kızılkaya R, Ekberli I (2008). Determination of the effects of hazelnut husk and tea waste treatments on urease enzyme activity and its kinetics in soil. Turk J Agric For 32: 299–310.
  • Kujur M, Kumar Patel A (2014). Kinetics of soil enzyme activities under different ecosystems: an index of soil quality. Chilean J Agric Res 74: 96–104.
  • Lehninger AL, Nelson DL, Cox MM (2005). Lehninger Principles of Biochemistry. New York, NY, USA: WH Freeman.
  • Makoi J, Ndakidemi P (2008). Selected soil enzymes: examples of their potential roles in the ecosystems. Afr J Biotechnol 7: 181–191.
  • Martens DA, Johnson JB, Frankenberger Jr WT (1992). Production and persistence of soil enzymes with repeated addition of organic residues. Soil Sci 153: 53–61.
  • Masciandaro G, Ceccanti B, Ronchi V (2000). Kinetic parameters of dehydrogenase in the assessment of the response of soil to vermicompost and inorganic fertilizers. Biol Fertil Soils 32: 35–48.
  • Megharaj M, Singleton I, Kookana R, Naidu R (1999). Persistence and effects of fenamiphos on native algal populations and enzymatic activities in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 31: 1549–1553.
  • Michaelis L, Menten ML (1913). Kinetik der Invertinwirkung. Biochemische Zeitschrift 49: 333–369.
  • Mikayilov FD (2011). Definition of kinetic parameters of enzymatic processes in soil. Soil Science and Agrochemistry. Proc Azer Nat Acad Sci 20: 74–79.
  • Paulson KN, Kurtz LT (1970). Michaelis constant of soil urease. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 34: 70–72.
  • Powers LE, McSorley R, Dunn RA (1993). Effects of mixed cropping on a soil nematode community in Honduras. J Nematology 25: 666–673.
  • Riethel FJ (1971). Ureases. In: Boyer PD, editor. The Enzymes. Third edition. New York, NY, USA: Academic Press, pp. 1–21.
  • Rowell DL (1996). Soil Science: Methods and Applications. Harlow, Essex, UK: Longman Scientific & Technical.
  • Sannino F, Gianfreda L (2001). Pesticide influence on soil enzymatic activities. Chemosphere 45: 417–425.
  • Sarathchandra SU, Watson RN, Cox NR, DiMenna ME, Brown JA, Burch G, Neville FJ (1996). Effects of chitin amendment of soil on microorganisms, nematodes, and growth of white clover (Trifolium repens L.) and perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) Biol Fertil Soils 22: 221–226.
  • Schmutterer H, Singh RP (2002). List of insect pests susceptible to neem products. In: Schmutterer H, editor. The Neem Tree: Azadirachta indica A. Juss and Other Meliacious Plants; Sources of Unique Natural Products for Integrated Pest Management, Medicine, Industry and Other Purposes. Second edition. Mumbai, India: Neem Foundation, pp. 411–456.
  • Schnell S, Maini PK (2003). A century of enzyme kinetics: reliability of the KM and Vmax estimates. Comments Theor Biol 8: 169–187.
  • Shaffer A (1993). Pesticide effects on enzyme activities in the soil ecosystem. In: Stotzky G, Bollag JM, editors. Soil Biochemistry. Vol. 8. New York, NY, USA: Marcel Dekker, pp. 273–340.
  • Simon-Sylvestre G, Fournier JC (1979). Effects of pesticides on the soil microflora. In: Brady NC, editor. Advances in Agronomy. Vol. 31. New York, NY, USA: Academic Press, pp. 1–92.
  • Sing RP, Sing PP, Nair KPP (1991). Studies on controlled release of N fertilizers and nitrification inhibitors. Indian J Agric Res 25: 59–62.
  • Speir TW, Kettles HA, Parshotam A, Searle PL, Vlaar LNC (1999). Simple kinetic approach to determine the toxicity of As[V] to soil biological properties. Soil Biol Biochem 31: 705–713.
  • Tabatabai MA (1973). Michaelis constants of urease in soil and soil fractions. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 37: 707–710.
  • Tabatabai MA (1994). Soil enzymes. In: Weaver RW, Angle S, Bottomley P, editors. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2. Microbiological and biochemical properties. SSSA Book Ser. 5. Madison, WI, USA: Soil Science Society of America, pp. 775–833.
  • Yang-Fang Y, Hang M, Xiangchi Z (2004). Effects of mefenacet on microbial respiration and enzyme activities in paddy soil. Acta Pedologica Sinica 41: 93–96.
  • Yao X, Min H, Lu Z, Yuan H (2006). Influence of acetamiprid on soil enzymatic activities and respiration. Eur J Soil Biol 42: 120–126.
Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-011X
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

The antioxidant capacity and macroelement content of several onion cultivars

Jiri MLCEK, Magdalena VALSIKOVA, Helena DRUZBIKOVA, Pavel RYANT, Tunde JURIKOVA, Jiri SOCHOR, Marie BORKOVCOVA

Construction of dense genetic linkage maps of apple cultivars Kaşel-41and Williams? Pride by simple sequence repeat markers

Elmira Ziya MOTALEBIPOUR, Salih KAFKAS, Şerif ÖZONGUN, Ayşe Nilgün ATAY

Reaction of some rice cultivars to the white tip nematode, Aphelenchoides besseyi,under field conditions in the Thrace region of Turkey

ADNAN TÜLEK, İlker KEPENEKCİ, Tuğba Hilal ÇİFTÇİGİL, HALİL SÜREK, Kemal AKIN, Recep KAYA

Effect of plant growth-promoting bacteria and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on lipid peroxidation and total phenolics of strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa `San Andreas?) under salt stressAysen KOÇ*Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Sciences, Bozok University, Yozgat, Turkey

Aysen KOÇ

Genotype × environment interaction and stability of grain yield and selected quality traits in winter wheat in Central Asia

Oybek AMANOV, Safar ALIKULOV, Shakhnoza KHAZRATKULOVA, C. Ram SHARMA, Amir AMANOV, Zokhid ZIYADULLAEV, Zafar ZIYAEV, Dinara MUZAFAROVA

Construction of dense genetic linkage maps of apple cultivars Kaşel-41 and Williams' Pride by simple sequence repeat markers

Ayşe Nilgün ATAY, Salih KAFKAS, Elmira MOTALEBIPOUR ZIYA, Şerif ÖZONGUN

Allelopathic effects of decomposed leaf litter from intercropped trees on rape

XIAOXI ZHANG, ZENGWEN LIU, NAN TIAN, NHU TRUNG LUC, BOCHAO ZHU, YUANHAO BING

Genetic diversity and population structure of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) accessions through retrotransposon-based interprimer binding sites (iPBSs) markers

SEDA NEMLİ, TALA KIANOOSH, MUHAMMED BAHATTİN TANYOLAÇ

Effects of different priming applications on seed germination and some agromorphological characteristics of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

Faruk TOKLU, Faheem Shahzad BALOCH, Tolga KARAKÖY, Hakan ÖZKAN

Seasonal variation in amino acid and phenolic compound profiles of three Turkish white wine grapes

Mustafa Ümit ÜNAL, Aysun ŞENER, Kemal ŞEN, Murat YILMAZTEKİN