Tomato salt tolerance: impact of grafting and water compositionon yield and ion relations

Abstract: We evaluated the salt tolerance of tomato cv Big Dena under both nongrafted conditions and when grafted on Maxifort rootstock, under a series of 5 salinity levels and 2 irrigation water composition types. The salinity levels of the irrigation water were -0.03, -0.15, -0.30, -0.45, and -0.60 MPa osmotic pressure (corresponding to specific electrical conductivity values of 1.2, 4.0, 8.5, 12, and 15.8 dS m-1, respectively). We salinized the irrigation water with either a mixture of salts with a predominant composition consisting of Na+-Ca2+-Cl- salts, a composition typical of coastal Mediterranean ground waters or, alternatively, a salt composition that was of mixed Na+-Ca2+-SO42--Cl- ions, a water composition more typical of interior continental basin ground waters such as those of the California Central Valley in the US. We determined that there were no statistically significant differences in tomato salt tolerance (fruit yield) relative to water type. This result indicates that in the range of Cl- concentrations tested in our experiment (up to 150 mmol L-1), Cl- is not an important factor in tomato yield reduction associated with salinity. The grafted Big Dena on Maxifort tomato plants exhibited increased yield both under control and elevated salinity levels relative to the nongrafted Big Dena plants. In contrast to absolute yield relationships, expression of salt tolerance in terms of relative yield, as salt tolerance is commonly expressed, provides the conclusion that grafted Big Dena on Maxifort tomato plants are slightly less salt tolerant than nongrafted Big Dena plants. Our data also indicate that, for tomato, decreased yield under saline conditions is well related to increased leaf Na+ concentrations.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Chloride salinity, grafting, irrigation, salt tolerance, sulfate salinity, tomato

Tomato salt tolerance: impact of grafting and water compositionon yield and ion relations

Keywords:

Chloride salinity, grafting, irrigation, salt tolerance, sulfate salinity, tomato,

PDF

___

Ayers R, Westcot D (1985). Water Quality for Agriculture. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 29. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
Biles CL, Martyn RD, Wilson HD (1989). Isozymes and general proteins from various watermelon cultivars and tissue types. HortScience 24: 810–812.
Castillo EG, Tuong TP, Ismail AM, Inubushi K (2007). Response to salinity in rice: comparative effects of osmotic and ionic stresses. Plant Prod Sci 10: 159–170.
Colla G, Rouphael Y, Rea E, Cardarelli M (2012). Grafting cucumber plants enhance tolerance to sodium chloride and sulfate salinization. Sci Hortic 135: 177–185.
Cuartero J, Fernandez-Munoz R (1999). Tomato and salinity. Sci Hortic 78: 83–125.
Di Gioia F, Signore A, Serio F, Santamaria P (2013). Grafting improves tomato salinity tolerance through sodium partitioning within the shoot. HortScience 48: 855–862.
Dorais M, Turcotte G, Papadopoulos AP, Hao X, Gosselin A (2000). Control of tomato fruit quality and flavour by EC and water management. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Report, pp. 18–21.
Edelstein M, Plau Z, Ben-Hur M (2011). Sodium and chloride exclusion and retention by non-grafted and grafted melon and Curcurbita plants. J Exp Bot 62: 177–184.
Estan MT, Martinez-Rodriguez MM, Perez-Alfocea F, Flowers TJ, Bolarin MC (2005). Grafting raises the salt tolerance of tomato through limiting the transport of sodium and chloride to the shoot. J Exp Bot 56: 703–712.
FAO 1995. FAO Production Yearbook 1994. Vol. 48. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
Fernandez-Garcia N, Martinez V, Cerda A, Carvajal M (2004). Fruit quality of grafted tomato plants grown under saline conditions. J Hortic Sci Biotech 79: 995–1001.
Flores FB, Sanchez-Bel P, Estan MT, Martinez-Rodriguez MM, Moyano E, Morales B, Campos JF, Garcia-Abellan JO, Egea MI, Fernandez-Garcia N et al. (2010). The effectiveness of grafting to improve tomato fruit quality. Sci Hortic 125: 211–217.
Flowers TM (2004). Improving crop salt tolerance. J Expt Bot 55: 307–319.
Gawad GA, Arslan A, Gaihbe A, Kadouri F (2005). The effects of saline irrigation water management and salt tolerant tomato varieties on sustainable production of tomato in Syria (1999– 2002). Agric Water Manage 78: 39–53.
Goreta S, Bucevic-Popovic V, Selak GV, Pavel-Vrancıc M, Perica S (2008). Vegetative growth, superoxide dismutase activity and ion concentration of salt-stressed watermelon as influenced by rootstock. J Agri Sci 146: 695–704.
Grattan SR, Maas EV (1985). Root control of leaf phosphorus and chlorine accumulation in soybean under salinity stress. Agron J 77: 890–895.
Grieve CM, Grattan SR, Maas EV (2012). Plant salt tolerance. In: Wallender WW, Tanji KK, editors. ASCE Manual and Reports on Engineering Practice No. 71, Agricultural Salinity Assessment and Management. 2nd ed. Reston, VA, US: ASCE, pp. 405–459.
Huang Y, Tang R, Cao Q, Bie Z (2009). Improving the fruit yield and quality of cucumber by grafting onto the salt tolerant rootstock under NaCl stress. Sci Hortic 122: 26–31.
Khah EM, Kakava E, Mavromatis A, Chachalis D, Goulas C (2006). Effect of grafting on growth and yield of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) in greenhouse and open-Şeld. J App Hortic 8: 3–7.
King SR, Davis AR, Zhang X, Crosby K (2010). Genetics, breeding and selection of rootstocks for Solanaceae and Cucurbitaceae. Sci Hortic 127: 106–111.
Lee JM (1994). Cultivation of grafted vegetables. I. Current status, grafting methods, and benefits. HortScience 29: 235–239.
Maas EV, Grattan SR (1999). Crop yields as affected by salinity, agricultural drainage. In: Skaggs R, van Schilfgaarde J, editors. Agronomy Monograph No. 38. Madison, WI, US: ASA, CSSA, SSSA, pp. 55–108.
Maas EV, Hoffman GJ (1977). Crop salt tolerance. J Irrig Drain Eng- ASCE 3: 115–134.
Marschner H (1995). Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. 2nd ed. Cambridge, UK: Academic Press.
Mizrahi Y, Taleisnik E, Kagan-Zur V, Zohar Y, Offenbach R, Matan E, Golan R (1988). A saline irrigation regime for improving tomato fruit quality without reducing yield. J Amer Soc Hort Sci 113: 202–105.
Munns R, Tester M (2008). Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Ann Rev Plant Biol 59: 651–681.
Santa-Cruz A, Martínez-Rodríguez MM, Bolarín MC, Cuartero J (2001). Response of plant yield and leaf ion contents to salinity in grafted tomato plants. In: Fernández JA, Martínez PF, Castilla N, editors. Proceedings of 5th International Symposium on Protected Cultivation in Mild Winter Climates: Current Trends for Sustainable Technologies, 7–11 March 2000; Cartagena, Spain. Acta Hortic 559: 413–417.
Santa-Cruz A, Martinez-Rodriguez MM, Perez-Alfocea F, Romero- Aranda R, Bolarin MC (2002). The rootstock effect on the tomato salinity response depends on the shoot genotype. Plant Sci 162: 825–831.
Semiz GD, Yurtseven E (2010). Salinity distribution, water use efficiency and yield response of grafted and ungrafted tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) under furrow and drip irrigation with moderately saline water in Central Anatolian condition. GOÜ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 28: 101–111.
Suarez DL, Taber PE Jr (2007). Extract Chem numerical software package for estimating changes in solution composition due to changes in soil water content. Version 2. Riverside, CA, US: USDA Agricultural Research Service US Salinity Laboratory.
Tachibana S (1982). Comparison of effects of root temperature on the growth and mineral nutrition of cucumber cultivars and figleaf gourd. J Jpn Soc Hort Sci 51: 299–308.
Tachibana S (1988). The influence of root temperature on nitrate assimilation by cucumber and figleaf gourd. J Jpn Soc Hort Sci 57: 440–447.
Tachibana S (1989). Respiratory response of detached roots to lower temperatures in cucumber and figleaf gourd grown at 20 °C root temperature. J Jpn Soc Hort Sci 58: 333–337.
Tester M, Davenport RJ (2003). Na+ tolerance and Na+ transport in higher plants. Ann Bot 91: 503–527.
Yurtseven E, Kesmez GD, Ünlükara A (2005). The effects of water salinity and potassium levels on yield, fruit quality and water consumption of a native Central Anatolian tomato species (Lycopersicon esculantum). Agric Water Manage 78: 128–135.
Zhao X, Simonne EH (2008). Introducing grafting technology to the Florida tomato industry: potential benefits and challenges. In: Florida Tomato Institute Proceedings. 3 September 2008; Naples, FL, US.
Zhu J, Bie ZL, Huang Y, Han XY (2008). Effect of grafting on the growth and ion contents of cucumber seedlings under NaCl stress. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 54: 895–902.