Effects of Feeding Genetically Modified Crops to Domestic Animals: A Review

Genetically modified (GM) crops are being planted at large scale worldwide. In most of the countries, GM crops are processed into livestock feed. The land is used for cultivation of GM plants has been increased in recent years; in 2012 GM plants were grown on over 170 million hectares in 28 countries by 17.3 million farmers and extended to 185.1 million hectors in 2016 worldwide. GM plants have been used as feed for animals and the number of studies has proved their safety for animal and public health. This paper reviews the possible effects of GM crops on livestock, poultry, and aquatic animals by reviewing different type of studies, in which parameters such as performance, reproductive and health assessment were investigated. The most of peer-reviewed papers evaluating the effects of feeding animals with transgenic crops were based on GM plants with improved agronomic traits i.e. herbicide-tolerant plants and pets-tolerant plants; however, in some cases GM plants with boosted nutritional properties assessed. In most experiments, either Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis) maize, Roundup Ready (RR) soybean or both fed to animals. Measurable differences in various parameters were mostly observed in Bt maize and soybean fed separately or simultaneously to animals. In this review, scientific studies showing the effects of the use of GM products in the nutrition of domestic animals on performance, health and reproductive parameters are investigated.

___

Aumaitre A. 2004. Safety assessment and feeding value for pigs, poultry and ruminant animals of pest protected (Bt) plants and herbicide tolerant (glyphosate, glufosinate) plants: interpretation of experimental results observed worldwide on GM plants. Italian Journal of Animal Sciences; 3, 107e121.

Chen L, Sun Z, Liu Q, Zhong R, Tan S, Yang X, Zhang H. 2016. Long-term toxicity study on genetically modified corn with cry1Ac gene in a Wuzhishan miniature pig model. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture; 96, 4207–4214.

Conard U. 2005. Polymers from plants to develop biodegradable plastics. Trends in Plant Sciences; 10, 511-2.

Czerwinski J, Bogacki M, Jalali BM, Konieczka P, Smulikowska S. 2015a. The use of genetically modified Roundup Ready soyabean meal and genetically modified MON 810 maize in broiler chicken diets. Part 1. Effects on performance and blood lymphocyte subpopulations. Journal of Animam and Feed Sciences; 24, 134e143.

Czerwinski J, Slupecka-Ziemilska M, Wolinski J, Barszcz M, Konieczka P, Smulikowska S. 2015b. The use of genetically modified Roundup Ready soyabean meal and genetically modified MON 810 maize in broiler chicken diets. Part 2. Functional status of the small intestine. Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences; 24, 144e152.

Czerwiński J, Śliżewska K, Korwin-Kossakowska A, Bachanek I, Smulikowska S. 2017. Effects of genetically modified maize and soybean meal on the diversity and activity of gut microbiota in broiler chicken. Animal Science Papers and Reports; 35, 279-299.

EFSA, 2011. Scientific opinion. Guidance for risk assessment of food and feed from genetically modified plants. EFSA panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO). EFSA Journal; 9, 2150.

EFSA, 2015. Scientific opinion. Guidance on the agronomic and phenotypic characterization of genetically modified plants. EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO). EFSA Journal; 13, 4128

Flachowsky G, Aulrich K, B€ohme H, Halle I. 2007. Studies on feeds from genetically modified plants (GMP) e Contributions to nutritional and safety assessment. Animal Feed Sciences and Technology; 133, 2e30.

Flachowsky G, Schafft H, Meyer U. 2012. Animal feeding studies for nutritional and safety assessments of feeds from genetically modified plants: a review. Journal für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit; 7(3), 179- 194.

Furgal-Dierżuk I, Strzetelski J, Kwiatek K, Twardowska M, Mazur M, Sieradzki Z, Kozaczyński W, Reichert M. 2014. The effect of genetically modified maize (MON 810) and soyabean meal (Roundup Ready) on rearing performance and transfer of transgenic DNA to calf tissues. Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences; 23, 13–22.

Furgal-Dierżuk I, Strzetelski J, Twardowska M, Kwiatek K, Mazur M. 2015. The effect of genetically modified feeds on productivity, milk composition, serum metabolite profiles and transfer of tDNA into milk of cows. Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences; 663, 127.

Gao C, Ma Q, Zhao L, Zhang J, Ji C. 2014. Effect of dietary phytase transgenic corn on physiological characteristics and the fate of recombinant plant DNA in laying hens. Asian- Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences; 27, 77.

Gao YJ, Zhu HJ, Chen Y, Li YH, Peng YF, Chen XP. 2018. Safety assessment of Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidal proteins Cry1C and Cry2A with a zebrafish embryotoxicity test. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry; 66, 4336- 4344.

Gu J, Bakke AM, Valen EC, Lein I, Krogdahl Å. 2014. Bt-maize (MON810) and non-GM soybean meal in diets for Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) juveniles–impact on survival, growth performance, development, digestive function, and transcriptional expression of intestinal immune and stress responses. PloS One; 9, e99932.

Halle I, Flachowsky G. 2014. with genetically modified (Bt) maize in laying hens. Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences; 23, 58–63.

Hameed A, Nasir IA, Tabassum B, Qamar Z, Zameer M, Younus M, Rao AQ, Rashid B, Tariq M, Khan GA, Ali M, Anjum MS, Ahmed A, Bhatti JA, Samiullah TR, Husnain T. 2016. Biosafety assessment of locally developed transgenic sugarcane. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences; 26, 1124- 1132.

James C. 2011. Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops. Ithaca, New York: ISAAA. Vol. 44.

Kim IH. 2019. Non-GMO and GMO (maize-soybean) diet effects on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, carcass weight and meat quality of broiler chicken. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences; 32, 849-855

Korwin-Kossakowska A, Sartowska K, Tomczyk G, Prusak B, Sender G. 2016. Health status and potential uptake of transgenic DNA by Japanese quail fed diets containing genetically modified plant ingredients over 10 generations. British Poultry Science; 57, 415–423.

Li Z, Gao Y, Zhang M, Feng J, Xiong Y. 2015. Effects of a diet containing genetically modified rice expressing the Cry1Ab/1Ac protein (Bacillus thuringiensis toxin) on broiler chickens. Achieves of Animal Nutrition; 69, 487-498.

Lili G, Deng X, Minhong Z, Changlong S, Jinghai F, Fuping S, Fan L, Jie Z. 2017. High-throughput Sequencing-based Analysis of the Intestinal Microbiota of Broiler Chickens Fed Genetically Modified Rice Expressing Cry1Ac/Cry1Ab Chimeric Bacillus thuringiensis Protein. The Journal of Poultry Science; 0170029.

Liu R, Zhao G, Zheng M, Jie Liu, Zhang J, Peng Li, Li Q, Feng J, Zhang M, Jie WEN. 2016. Effect of feeding transgenic cry1Ab/cry1Ac rice on indices of immune function in broilers. Journal of Integrative Agriculture; 15, 1355–1363.

Liu, Q, Wu S, Li M, Yang W, Wang Y, Wu Y, Gao H, Han Y, Feng S, Zeng S. 2018a. Effects of long-term feeding with genetically modified Bt rice on the growth and reproductive performance in highly inbred Wuzhishan pigs. Food Control; 90, 382–391.

Liu, Q, Yang W, Li M, Wang Y, Zhang H, Wu Y, Gao H, Han Y, Bu X, Zeng S. 2018b. Effects of Transgenic Bt Rice Containing the Cry1Ab Protein on the Gastrointestinal Health of Highly Inbred Wuzhishan Pigs after Two Generations of Feeding. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry; 66, 10575–10587.

Liu, Q, Yang W, Li M, Wu Y, Wang Y, Wu S, Gao H, Han Y, Yang F, Feng S. 2017. Effects of 60-week feeding diet containing Bt rice expressing the Cry1Ab protein on the offspring of Inbred Wuzhishan pigs fed the same diet. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry; 65, 10300–10309.

Ma JKC, Drake PMW, Christou P. 2003. The production of recombinant pharamaceticals proteins in plants. Nature; 4, 794-805.

McNaughton J, Roberts M, Rice D, Smith B, Hong B, Delaney B, Iiams C. 2014. Comparison of broiler performance and carcass yields when fed diets containing genetically modified canola meal from event DP-Ø73496-4, near-isogenic canola meal, or commercial canola meals. Poultry Science; 93, 1713–1723.

Papineni S, Fletcher DW, Cromwell GL, Ekmay RD. 2017. Comparative performance of broilers fed diets containing DAS-44406-6 and non-transgenic soybean meal. Poultry Science; 96, 1244-1249.

Rayan AM, Nigussie F, Abbott LC. 2015. Safety Evaluation of Stacked Genetically Modified Corn Event (MON89034× MON88017) Using Zebrafish as an Animal Model. Food and Nutrition Sciences; 6, 285.

Sartowska KE, Korwin-Kossakowska A, Sender G. 2015. Genetically modified crops in a 10-generation feeding trial on Japanese quails—Evaluation of its influence on birds’ performance and body composition. Poultry Science; 94, 2909–2916.

Schnepf E, Crickmore N, Van Rie J, Lereclus D, Baum J, Feitelson J, Zeigler DR, Dean DH. 1998. Bacillus thuringiensis and its pesticidal crystal proteins. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews; 62, 775e806.

Sieradzki Z, Walczak M, Kwiatek K. 2006. Occurrence of genetically modified maize and soybean in animal feedingstuffs. Bulletin of the Veterinary Institute in Pulawy; 52, 567–570.

Southgate EM, Davey MR, Power JB, Merchant R. 1995. Factor Affecting the Genetic Engineering of plants by Micro projectile Bombardment. Biotechnology Advances; 13, 631- 57.

Sticklen M. 2005. Plant genetic engineering to improve biomass characteristics for biofuels. Current Opinion in Biotechnology; 17, 315-9.

Tudisco R, Calabrò S, Cutrignelli MI, Moniello G, Grossi M, Mastellone V, Lombardi P, Pero ME, Infascelli F. 2015. Genetically modified soybean in a goat diet: Influence on kid performance. Small Ruminant Research; 126, 67–74.

Yalçin E, Acar A, Seven B, Taşli B, Çavuşoğlu K. 2018. Effects of feeding genetically modified (GM) maize on oxidative stress parameters in New Zealand rabbit. Global Nest Journal; 20, 173–176.

Zhong RQ, Chen L, Gao LX, Zhang LL, Yao B, Yang XG, Zhang HF. 2016. Effects of feeding transgenic corn with mCry1Ac or maroACC gene to laying hens for 12 weeks on growth, egg quality and organ health. Animal; 10, 1280–1287.

Zhu HJ, Chen Y, Li YH, Wang JM, Ding JT, Chen XP, Peng YF. 2015. A 90 day safety assessment of genetically modified rice expressing Cry1Ab/1Ac protein using an aquatic animal model. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry; 63, 3627-3633.
Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 2148-127X
  • Yayın Aralığı: Aylık
  • Başlangıç: 2013
  • Yayıncı: Turkish Science and Technology Publishing (TURSTEP)