Agricultural Credit Market and Farmers’ Response: A Case Study of Turkey

Agriculture is an important sector in Turkey’s economy. Access to credit financing is critical for timely acquisition of different inputs, farm productivity, and ultimately farmers’ financial well-being. Historically, Ziraat Bank and Agricultural Credit Cooperatives, supported by Turkish government, have been the principle supplier of loanable funds in the agricultural sector. However, since 2000, many private banks have discovered the potential of this market and entered the competition. This study was designed to investigate the structure of the agricultural credit market in Turkey and identify factors that influence farmers’ preference among alternative lenders. It was found that although the 550 Turkish farmers surveyed had several options among lenders, low interest rates and attainable eligibility criteria emerged as the most important differentiators among banks. Results from the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) demonstrate the rising role of private banks’ credit. However, Ziraat Banks’ subsidized credits still dominant and its composite weight is 30.74% of total amount of agricultural credit market

___

AAT. 2016. http://www.allaboutturkey.com/agriculture.htm (Accessed by 22.11.2016)

Anonymous. 2009. Ekonomik GostergelerleT urkiye’de Tarim 2008. Tarımsal Ekonomi ve Politika Gelistirme Enstitusu. Ankara.

AP. 2016. Agricultural Policy. http://countrystudies.us/turkey/ 57.htm (Accessed by 22.11.2016)

BBDK. 2015. Financial Indicators, http://www.bbdk.com(Accessed by 11/ 07/ 2016).

BDDK. 2016. http://ebulten.bddk.org.tr/finturk (Accessed by 10.08.2016).

Borlu Y. 2015. A story of post-fordistexploitation: Financialization and small-scale maize farmers in Turkey.Rural Sociology.DOI: 10.1111/ruso.12061.

Chen MK, Wang SC. 2010. The critical factors of success for information service industry in developing international market: Using analytic hierarchyprocess (AHP) approach. Expert Systems with Applications., 37: 694–704.

CJCU. 2016. http://web.cjcu.edu.tw/~lcc/Courses/TUTORIAL /AHP%20Tutorial.doc (Accessed by 07/11/ 2016)

DIISM. 2016. http://www.dii.unisi.it/~mocenni/Note_AHP.pdf (Accessed by 01/08/2016)

Forman E, Gass S. 2001. The analytic hierarchy process-An exposition. Operations Research, 49(4): 469–486.

Gunes E. 2011. Tarim Isletmelerinin Finansmani, Tarım ekonomisi. Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayını No: 2266, Eskisehir.

Gunes E, Artukoglu MM. 2010. Agricultural Credit Efficiency and Applications in Turkey during Global Financial Crisis. Turkey IX. Agricultural Economics Congress,pp.795-801, Sanlurfa, (In Turkish).

Gunes E, Movassaghi H. 2016. Agricultural Credit System in US and Suggestions for Turkish Farming, Turkish XII. Agricultural Economics Congress, pp. 1713-1722.Isparta (In Turkish).

Haghighi M, Divandari A, Keimasi M. 2010. The impact of 3D ereadiness on e-banking development in Iran: A fuzzy AHP analysis. Expert Systems with Applications, 37: 4084-4093.

Heidenberger K, Stummer C. 1999. Research and development project selection and resource allocation: a review of quantitative modelling approaches. International Journal of Management Reviews, 1: 197–224.

Kose MA. 2012. Agricultural Policy Reforms and Their Implications on Rural Development: Turkey and The EU, Ankara Avrupa Çalışmaları Dergisi Cilt: 11, No: 2: 75-98.

Li S, Li JZ. 2009. Hybridizing human judgment, AHP, simulation and a fuzzy expert system for strategy formulation under uncertainty. Expert Systems with Applications, 36: 5557–5564.

Liberatore M, Nydick R. 2008. The analytic hierarchy process in medical and health care decision making: A literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 189(1): 194–207.

Limam MS, Reijers H, Ounnar F. 2009. Development of a decisionmaking strategy to improve the efficiency of BPR. Expert Systems withApplications, 36: 3248–3262.

Mark D. 2001. Adaptive AHP: a review of marketing applications with extensions. European Journal of Marketing, 35 (7/8): 872– 894.

Oskam A, Bursell A, Temel T, Beckum SV, Longworth N, Vilchez M. 2004. Turkey in EU, Consequences for Agriculture. Food, Rural Areas and Structural Policy Report, Holland.

Pohekar SD, Ramachandran M. 2004. Application of multi-criteria decision making to sustainable energy planning - a review. Renewable and Sustainable EnergyReviews,8: 365–381.

Saaty T. 1972. An Eigenvalue Allocation Model for Prioritization and Planning. Energy Management and Policy Center. University of Pennsylvania, Working Paper.

Saaty T.L. 1990. How to make a decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. European Journal of Operational Research, 48: 9-26.

Saaty TL. 1980. The Aanalytic Hierarchy Process. In NewYork. Secme NY, Bayrakdaroglu A, Kahraman C. 2009. Fuzzy performance evaluation in Turkish banking sector using analytic hierarchy process and TOPSIS. Expert Systems with Applications, 36: 11699–11709.

Sipahi S, Timor M. 2010. The analytic hierarchy process and analytic network process: an overview of applications. Management Decision, 48 (5): 775–808.

Unluer M, Gunes E. 2016. Development in Turkish Agricultural Credit Markets and its impact on the agricultural holdings. Turkish XII. Agricultural Economics Congress, pp.319-329, Isparta (In Turkish).

Vaidya O, Kumar S. 2006. Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 169(1): 1–29.

Wind Y, Saaty TL. 1980. Marketing applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Management Science, Vol.26 (7): 641–658.

Wu CR, Lin CT, Lin YF. 2009. Selecting the preferable ban assurance alliance strategic by using expert group decision technique. Expert Systems withApplications, 36: 3623-3629.

Yildiz M, Kocoglu E. 2014. A different view on agricultural banking, Agrotime. 8-15.

Yilmaz E. 1999. Solving multiple criteria decision making problems using the analytic hierarchy process. Eastern Mediterranean Forestry Research Institute, The journal of Eastern Mediterranean Forestry, 5: 95-122.

Zahedi F. 1986. The analytic hierarchy process: A survey of the method and its applications. Interface, 16(4) : 96–108.

Zhu B, Xu Z, Zhang R, Hong M. 2016. Hesitant analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 250: 602– 614.

ZiraatBankasi. 2013. More Than a Bank for a Hundred and Fifty Years, http://www.ziraat.com.tr/ en/ InvestorRelations/ Documents/ AnnualReports/ AnnualReport2013.pdf, annual report 2013.
Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 2148-127X
  • Yayın Aralığı: Aylık
  • Başlangıç: 2013
  • Yayıncı: Turkish Science and Technology Publishing (TURSTEP)