Lider davranışları algıları ve örgütsel kimliklenme boyutları arasında çalışanın kişilik özelliklerinin düzenleyici rolü

Bu çalışmanın amacı, lider davranışları algıları ve örgütsel kimliklenme boyutları arasındaki ilişkide çalışanın/ öğretmenlerin kişilik özelliklerinin düzenleyici rolünü incelenmektedir. Çalışmaya, Bolu ili içinde bulunan 6 farklı okuldan, 104 kadın, 76 erkek toplam 180 öğretmen katılmıştır. Çalışmada veriler Lider Davranışları Ölçeği, Türkçe Büyük Beşli Kişilik Ölçeği ve Çoklu Örgütsel Kimliklenme Ölçeği yardımıyla toplanmıştır. Araştırma sonunda hiç bir lider davranışı algısının, duygusal mesleki kimliklenmeyi yordamadığı; buna karşılık hiyerarşik ve işe odaklı ve takip ve kontrol eden lider davranışı algılarının takım kimliklenmesini yordadığı bulunmuştur. Bulgular takım kuran ve paylaşan, hiyerarşik ve işe odaklı ve babacan lider davranışı algıları ile duygusal mesleki kimliklenme arasındaki ilişkide dışadönüklük özelliğinin düzenleyici bir rolü olduğunu göstermiştir. Öte yandan takım kuran ve paylaşan, hiyerarşik ve işe odaklı ve takip ve kontrol eden lider davranışı algıları ile takım kimliklenmesi arasındaki ilişkide uzlaşılabilirlik kişilik özelliğinin düzenleyici bir rolü olduğu gözlenmiştir. Araştırmanın sonunda, örgütün içinde bulunduğu durum dışında çalışanın kişilik özelliklerinin de farklı örgütsel kimliklenme odaklarını belirginleştirebileceği ve farklı kimliklenme boyutları ile kimliklenmeye etki edebileceği yorumu yapılabilir. Örneğin, dışadönüklük kimliklenmenin mesleki odağını belirginleştirirken, uzlaşılabilirlik takım odağını belirginleştiriyor olabilir.

Moderator role of employees' personality factors in relationship between leader behavior perceptios and dimensions of organizational identity

The purpose of this study was to examine the moderator role of employees’/ teachers’ personality factors between leader behaviour perceptions and dimensions of organizational identity. A total of 180 teachers including 104 females and 76 males were recruited from 6 different schools in Bolu. Data were collected by the Leader Behaviour Scale the Turkish Big Five Personality Scale and the Multi Faced Organizational Identification Scale. Findings of this study showed that leader behaviour perceptions did not predict affective occupational identity. On the other hand, hierarchical and task oriented leader behaviour and following and controlling leader behaviour perceptions predicted team identity. The results revealed that extraversion had a moderator role in the relationship between team constructed and sharing, hierarchical and task oriented, and paternal leader behaviour perceptions and affective occupational identity. On the other hand, agreeableness had a moderator role in relationship between the team constructed and sharing, hierarchical and task oriented and following and controlling leader behaviour perceptions and team identity. At the end of the study, it can be interpreted that except the situation in organization, personality factors of employees may make clear the different foci of organizational identity and affect the identification with different identification dimensions. For example, as extraversion refi nes occupational focus of identification, agreeableness refi nes team focus of identification.

___

  • Abrams, D., Ando, K. ve Hinkle, S. (1998). Psychological attachment to the group: Cross-cultural differences in organizational identification and subjective norms as predictor of workers’ turnover intentions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1027-1039.
  • Aiken, L. S. ve West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpretin interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Ashforth, B. E. ve Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14, 20–39.
  • Bhattacharya, C. B., Rao, H. ve Glynn, M. A. (1995). Understanding the bond identification: An investigation of its correlates among art museum members. Journal of Marketing, 59, 46-64.
  • Brewer, M. B. ve Silver, M. D. (2000). Group distinctiveness, social identification, and collective mobilization. S. Stryker, T. Owens ve R. White, (Ed.), Self, identity, and social movements içinde (153-171). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Pres.
  • Christ, O., van Dick, R., Wagner, U. ve Stellmacher, J. (2003). When teachers go the extra-mile: Foci of organizational identification as determinants of different forms of organizational citizenship behavior among school teachers. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 329-341.
  • Conger, J. A. ve Kanungo R. N. (1987). Towards a behavioral theory of charismatic leadership in organizational settings. Academy of Management Review, 12, 637-647.
  • Conger , J. A. ve Kanungo, R. N. (1998). Charismatic leadership in organizations. Newburry Park, CA: Sage.
  • Conger, R. N., Kanungo, R. N. ve Menon, S. T. (2000). Charismatic leadership and follower effects. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 747-767.
  • Coşkun, H. (2005). Sosyal kimlik ile rol üstlenmenin bireysel beyin fırtınasında üretkenliğe etkisi. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 20(56), 119-132.
  • Deux, K. (1996). Social identification, social psychology. E. T. Higgens ve A. W. Kruglanski, (Ed.), Handbook of basic principles içinde (777-798). New York: Guilford.
  • Dukerich, J. M., Golden, B. R. ve Shortell, S. M. (2002). Beauty is in the eye of the beholder: The impact of organizational identification, identity, and image on cooperative behaviors of physicians. Administative Science Quarterly, 47, 507-534.
  • Dutton, J. E., Dukerich, J. M. ve Harquail, C. V. (1994). Organizational images and member identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 239-263.
  • Ellemers, N., de Gilder, D. ve van den Heuvel, H. (1998). Career-oriented versus team-oriented commitment and behaviour at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83,717-730.
  • Epitropaki, O. (2003). Tranformational leadership, psychological contract breach and organizational identification. Academy of Management Conference Best Paper Proceedings, OB, M1-M6.
  • Epitropaki, O. ve Martin, R. (2005). The moderating role of individual differences in the relation between transformational /transactional leadership perceptions and organizational identification. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(4), 569-589.
  • Evinç, Ş. G. (2004). Maternal personality characteristics, affective state, and psychopathology in relation to children’s attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder and comorbid symptomps. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi, Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Ankara.
  • Göregenli, M. (1997). Individualistic-collectivistic tendencies in a Turkish sample. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 28, 787-794.
  • Haslam, S. A. (2001). Psychology in organizations: The social identity approach. London: Sage.
  • Haslam, S. A. ve Turner, J. C. (2001). Social identity, organizations, and leadership. M. E. Turner, (Ed.), Groups at work: Theory and research içinde (25-65). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Haslam, S. A., van Knippenberg, D., Platow, M. J. ve Ellemers, N. (2003). Social Identity at work: Developing theory for organizational practice. New York, Psychology Pres.
  • Hinkle, S., Taylor, L. A., Fox-Cardamone, D. L. ve Crook K. F. (1989). Intragroup identification and intergroup differentiation: A multicomponent approach. British Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 305- 317.
  • Hogg, M. A ve Abrams, D. (1988). Social identifications: A social ssychology of intergroup relations and group processes. London: Routledge.
  • Hogg, M. A. ve Terry, D. J. (2000). Social identity and self categorization processes in organizational contexts. Academy of Management Review, 25, 121-140.
  • Hogg, M. A. ve Terry, D. J. (2001). Social idendtity theory and organizational processes. M A. Hogg ve D. J. Terry, (Ed.), Social Identity Processes in Organizational Context içinde (1-12). Philadelphia, US: Psychology Press.
  • Hogg, M. N. ve van Knippenberg, D. (2003). Social identity and leadership processes in groups. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 35, Academic Press.
  • House, R. J., Delbecq, A. ve Taris, T. W. (1998). Values-based leadership: An integrated theoyr and an empirical test. Technical report for center for leadership and change management içinde. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania.
  • İmamoğlu, O., Küller, R., İmamoğlu, V. ve Küller M. (1993). Social psychological worlds of Swedes and Turks in around retirement. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 24, 26-41.
  • Jackson, J. W. (2002). Intergroup attitudes as a function of different dimensions of group identification and perceived intergroup confl ict. Self and Identity, 1, 11-33.
  • Jackson, J. W. ve Smith, E. R. (1999). Conceptualizing social identity: A new framework and evidence for the impact of different dimensions. Personality and Social Psychology Buletin, 25, 120-135.
  • John, O. P., Donahue, E. M. ve Kentle, R. L. (1991). The “Big Five” Inventory-Version 4a and 54. Berkeley, University of California: Institute of Personality and Social Research.
  • Johnson, W. L., Johnson, A. M. ve Heimberg, F. (1999). A primary-and second-order component analysis of the organizational identification questionnaire. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59, 159-170.
  • Kark, R. ve Shamir, B. (2002). The infl uence of transformational leadership on followers’ relational versus collective selfconcept. Academy of Management Proceedings, OB: D1-D6.
  • Kark, R., Shamir, B. ve Chen, G. (2003). The two faces of transformational leadership: Empowerment and dependency. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(1), 246-255.
  • Kramer, R. M. (1991). Inter-group relations and organizational dilemmas: The role of categorization processes. Research in Organizational Behavior, 13, 191-228.
  • Kreiner, G. E. ve Ashford, B. E. (2004). Evidence toward an expanded model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizaitonal Behavior, 25, 1-27.
  • Lipponen, J., Helkama, K. ve Juslin M. (2003). Subgroup identification, superordinate identification and intergroup bias between the subgroups. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 6, 239-250.
  • Mael, F. A. ve Ashforth, B. E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 103-123.
  • Mael, F. A. ve Ashford, B. E. (1995). Loyal from day one: Biodata, organizational identification, and turnover among newcomers. Personel Psychology, 48, 309-333.
  • Mael, F. A. ve L. E. Tetrick (1992). Identifying organizational identification. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 813-824.
  • Mamatoğlu, N. (2008). Öğretmenlerde kimliklenme ve kimliklenmenin işe yönelik tutum ve algıları yordayıcılığı. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 11(22), 47-62.
  • Moreland, R. L., Levine, J. M. ve McMinn, J. G. (2001). Self-categorization and work group socialization. M. A. Hogg ve D. J. Terry, (Ed.), Social identity processes in organizational contexts içinde (87-100). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
  • Newman, J., Logan, M., O’Leary-Kelly, A. ve Whitener, E. (2002). Why would a person like you identify with a place like this? Antecedents to organizational identification. Academy of Management Conference, 9-14 Ağustos, Denver.
  • Olkkonen, M. E. ve Lipponen, J. (2006). Relationships between organizational Justice, identification with organization and work unit, and group-related outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 100(2), 202-215.
  • Ouwerkerk, J. W., Ellemers, N. ve de Gilder, D. (1999). Group commitment and individual effort in experimental and organizational context. N. Ellemers, R. Spears ve B. Doosje, (Ed.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content içinde (184-204). Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Paşa, S. F. (2000). Türkiye ortamında liderlik özellikleri, Türkiye’de yönetim, liderlik ve insan kaynakları uygulamaları. Türk Psikologlar Derneği, 21, 225-241.
  • Pratt, M.G. (1 998). To be or not to be? Central questions in organizational identification. D. A. Whetten ve P. C. Godfrey, (Ed.), Identity in organizations: Building theory through conversations içinde (171-207). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Pratt, M. G. (2001). Social identity dynamics in modern organizations: An organizational psychology/organizational behavior perspective. M. A Hogg ve D. J. Terry, (Ed.), Social identity processes in organizational context içinde (13-30). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
  • Reade, C. (2001). Dual identification in multinational corporations: Local managers and their psychological attachment to the subsidiary versus the global organization. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 12, 405-424.
  • Rotondi, T. (1975). Organizational identification: Issues and implications. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13, 95-109.
  • Shamir, B., House, R. J. ve Arthur, M. B. (1993). The motivational effects of charismatic leadership: A self concept based theory. Organizational Science, 4, 577- 594.
  • Smidts, A., Pruyn, A. ve Riel, C. B. M. (2001). The impact of employee communication and perceived external prestige on organizational identification. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 1051-1062.
  • Snape, E., Redman, T. ve Chan, A. W. (2000). Commitment to union: A survey of research and the implication for industrial relations and trade unions. International Journal of Management Review, 2, 205-230.
  • Tajfel, H. (1978). Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. London: Academic Pres.
  • Tajfel, H. ve Turner, J. (1979). An integrative theory of confl ict. W. G. Austin ve S. Worschel, (Ed.), The social psychology of intergroup relations içinde (33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
  • Tajfel, H. ve Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. S. Worchel ve W. G. Austin, (Ed.), Psychology of intergroup relations içinde (7-24). Chicago, IL: Nelson.
  • Turner, J. C. (1982). Towards a cognitive redefinition of the social group. H. Tajfel, (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations içinde (15-40). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Turner, J. C. (1985). Social categorization and the self concept: A social cognitive theory of group behaviour. E. J. Lawler, (Ed.), Advances in group processes (2. cilt) içinde (77- 122). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  • Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D. ve Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
  • Tyler, T. R. ve Blader, S. L. (2000). Cooperation in groups: Procedural justice, social identity and behavioral engagement. Philadelphia: Psychology Pres.
  • Tyler, T. R. ve Blader, S. L. (2001). Identity and cooperative behavior in groups. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 4, 207-226.
  • Tyler, T. R. ve Smith, H. J. (1997). Social justice and social movements. D. Gilbert, S. Fiske ve G. Lindzey, (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (4. Baskı, 2. cilt) içinde (595-629).
  • Van Dick, R. (2001). Identification in organizational contexts: Linking theory and search from social and organizational psychology. International Journal of Management Reviews, 3, 265-283.
  • Van Dick, R. (2004). My job is my castle: Identification in organizational contexts. C. L. Cooper ve I. T. Robertson, (Ed.), International review of ındustrial and organizational psychology (19. cilt) içinde (171-203). Wiley, Chichester.
  • Van Dick, R., Christ, O., Stellmacher, J., Wagner, U., Ahlswede, O., Grubba, C., Hauptmeier, M., Höhfeld, C., Moltzen, K. ve Tissington, P. A. (2004). Should I stay or should I go? Explaining turnover intentions with organizational identification and job satisfaction. British Journal of Management, 15, 351-360.
  • Van Dick, R. ve Wagner, U. (2002). Social identification among school teachers: Dimensions, foci, and correlates. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 11(2), 129-149.
  • Van Dick, R., Wagner, U., Stellmacher, J. ve Christ, O. (2004). The utility of a broader conceptualization of organizational identification: Which aspects really matter? Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, 171- 191.
  • Van Knippenberg, D. (2000). Work motivation and performance: A social identity perspective. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 4, 357-371.
  • Van Knippenberg, D., van Knippenberg, B., De Cremer, D. ve Hogg, M. A. (2004). Leadership, self and identity: A review and research agenda. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 825-856.
  • Van Knippenberg, D. ve van Schie, E. C. M. (2000). Foci and correlates of organizational identification. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 137-147.