Evlilikte bağışlama: Evlilik uyumu ve yüklemelerin rolü

Bu çalışmada, Türk evli çiftlerin evlilik ilişkilerinde yaşadıkları tek bir ihlali bağışlamalarını yordayan değişkenler hakkında bilgi edinilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Bu amaçla, 80 evli çifte Evlilikte Uyum Ölçeği, İlişkilerde Yükleme Ölçeği ve Suça İlişkin Kişilerarası Motivasyonlar Ölçeği uygulanmıştır. Bulgular, yüklemelerin özellikle sorumluluk yüklemelerinin, bağışlamanın en iyi yordayıcısı olduğunu göstermiştir. Evli kadınlar için sadece sorumluluk yüklemeleri bağışlamanın en iyi yordayıcısı olarak görülürken, evli erkeklerde sorumluluk yüklemeleri ile evlilik uyumu bağışlamayı en iyi yordayan değişkenler olarak bulunmuştur. Ayrıca sadece incinme derecesi yönünden cinsiyetler arasında bir farklılık gözlenmiştir. Diğer bir deyişle, evli kadınlar evli erkeklere göre zararı daha incitici bulmuşlardır. Son olarak, zararın şiddeti arttıkça bağışlamanın zorlaştığı bulunmuştur.

Forgiveness in marriage: The role of marital adjustment and attributions

The purpose of this study was to obtain information related to the predictive variables of forgiveness among Turkish married couples who had experienced a specifi c offense in their marriage. In accordance with this purpose, Marital Adjustment Test, Relationship Attribution Measure and Transgression-Related Interpersonal Motivations Inventory were administered to 80 married couples. The results demonstrated that attributions especially responsibility attributions were the best predictor of forgiveness. For wives, responsibility attributions were seen to predict forgiveness, for husbands responsibility attributions and marital adjustment were the best predictors of forgiveness. In addition, sexes were differ only among transgression severity. In other words, wives found the transgression more hurtful than their husbands. Finally, it was found that the more severe the transgression increased, the more diffi cult the forgiveness became.

___

  • Al-Mabuk, R. H., Enright, R. D. ve Cardis, P.A. (1995). Forgiveness education with parentally love-deprived late adolescents. Journal of Moral Education, 24, 427-444.
  • Boon, S. D. ve Sulsky, L. M. (1997). Attributions of blame and forgiveness in romantic relationships: A policy-capturing study. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 12, 19-44.
  • Bradbury, T. N. ve Fincham, F. D. (1992). Attributions and behavior in marital interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 613-628.
  • Bradfield, M. ve Aquino, K. (1999). The effects of blame attributions and offender likableness on forgiveness and revenge in the workplace. Journal of Management, 25, 607-631.
  • DiBlaiso, F. A. (2000). Decision-based forgiveness treatment in cases of marital infidelity. Psychotherapy, 37, 149-158.
  • Doğan, E. (1998). Evli ve boşanmışlarda yalnızlık, depresyon, benlik saygısı ve denetim odağı inancı. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi, Ankara.
  • Exline, J. J., Baumeister, B. J., Bushman, B. J., Campbell, W. K. ve Finkel, E. J. (2004). Too proud to let go: Narsissistic entitlement as a barrier to forgiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 894-912.
  • Faulkner, R. A., Davey, M., ve Davey, A. (2005). Gender-related predictors of change in marital satisfaction and marital conflict. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 33, 61-83.
  • Fenell, D. L. (1993). Characteristics of long-term first marriages. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 15, 446-460.
  • Fincham, F. D. (2000). The kiss of the porcupines: From attributing responsibility to forgiving. Personal Relationships, 7, 1-23.
  • Fincham, F. D. ve Beach, S. R. H. (2007). Forgiveness and marital quality: Precursor or consequence in well established relationships? Journal of Positive Psychology, 2, 260-268.
  • Fincham, F. D. ve Bradbury, T. N. (1992). Assessing attributions in marriage: The relationship attribution measure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 457-468.
  • Fincham, F. D., Hall, J. H. ve Beach, S. R. H. (2005). “Till lack of forgiveness do us part”: Forgiveness in Marriage. E. L. Worthington, (Ed.), Handbook of Forgiveness içinde (207-226). New York: Wiley.
  • Fincham, F. D., Hall, J. H. ve Beach, S. R. H. (2006). Forgiveness in marriage: Current status and future directions. Family Relations, 55, 415-427.
  • Fincham, F. D., Jackson, H. ve Beach, S. R. H. (2005). Transgression severity and forgiveness: Different moderators for objective and subjective severity. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 24, 860-875.
  • Fincham, F. D., Paleari, F. G. ve Regalia, C. (2002). Forgiveness in marriage: The role of relationship quality, attributions, and empathy. Personal Relationships, 9, 27-37.
  • Finkel, E. J., Rusbult, C. E., Kumashiro, M. ve Hannon, P. (2002). Dealing with betrayal in close relationships: Does commitment promote forgiveness? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 956-974.
  • Gauche, M. ve Mullet, E. (2005). Do we forgive physical aggression in the same way that we forgive psychological aggression? Aggressive Behavior, 31, 559-570.
  • Girard, M. ve Mullet, E. (1997). Forgiveness in adolescents, young, middle-aged, and older adults. Journal of Adult Development, 4, 209-220.
  • Gordon, K. C. ve Baucom, D. H. (2003). Forgiveness and marriage: Preliminary support for a measure based on a model of recovery from a marital betrayal. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 31, 179-199.
  • Hall, J. H. ve Fincham, F. D. (2006). Relationship dissolution following infidelity: The roles of attributions and forgiveness. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 25, 508- 522.
  • Hammond, W. P., Banks, K. H. ve Mattis, J. S. (2006). Masculinity ideology and forgiveness of racial discrimination among African Americam men: Direct and inteactive relationships. Sex Roles, 55, 679-692.
  • Hovardaoğlu, S. (2000). Karşılıklı bağımlılık içeren koşullar için korelasyon analizleri. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 3, 41- 48.
  • Kachadourian, L. K., Fincham, F. ve Davila, J.(2004). The tendency to forgive in dating and married couples: The role of attachment and relationship satisfaction. Personal Realtionships, 11, 373-393.
  • Karremans, J. C., Van Lange, P. A. M., Ouwerkerk, J. W. ve Kluwer, E. S. (2003). When forgiving enhances psychological well-being: The role of interpersonal commitment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 1011-1026.
  • Kearns, J. N. ve Fincham, F. D. (2005). Victims and perpetrator accounts of interpersonal transgressions: Self-serving or relationship-serving biases? Personality and Social Psychology, XX, 1-13.
  • Kitson, G. C. ve Morgan, L. A. (1990). The multiple consequences of divorce: A decade review. Journal of Marriage and Family, 52, 913-924.
  • Kurdek, L. A. (2005). Gender and marital satisfaction early in marriage: A growth curve approach. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 68-84.
  • Locke, H. J. ve Wallace, K. M. (1959). Short marital-adjustment and prediction tests: Their reliability and validity. Marriage and Family Living, 21, 251-255.
  • McCullough, M. E. (2000). Forgiveness as human strenght: Theory, measurement, and links to well-being. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 19(1), 43-55.
  • McCullough, M. E., Bellah, C. G., Kilpatrick, S. D. ve Johnson, J. L. (2001). Vengefulness: Relationships with forgiveness, rumination, well-being, and the Big Five. Personality and Social Psychology, 27(5), 601-610.
  • McCullough, M. E., Fincham, F. D. ve Tsang, J. A. (2003). Forgiveness, forbearance, and time: The temporal unfolding of transgression–related interpersonal motivations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(3), 540-557.
  • McCullough, M. E. ve Hoyt, W. T. (2002). Transgressionrelated motivational dispositions: Personality substrates of forgiveness and their links to the Big Five. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(11), 1556-1573.
  • McCullough, M. E., Hoyt, W. T. ve Rachal, K. C. (2000). What we know (and need to know) about assesing forgiveness constructs. M. E. McCullough, K. I. Pargament ve C. E. Thoresen, (Ed.), Forgiveness: Theory, research and practice içinde (65-91). NY: Guilford Press.
  • McCullough, M. E., Pargament, K. I. ve Thoresen, C. E. (2000). The Psychology of forgiveness. M. E. McCullough, K. I. Pargament ve C. E. Thoresen, (Ed.), Forgiveness: Theory, research and practice içinde (1-14). NY: Guilford pres.
  • McCullough, M. E., Rachal, K. C., Sandage, S. J., Worthington, E. L., Brown, S. W. ve Hight, T. L. (1998). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships: II. Theoretical elaboration and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1586-1603.
  • McCullough, M. E. ve Witvliet, C. V. (2002). The psychology of forgiveness. C. R. Snyder ve S. J. Lopez, (Ed.), Handbook of positive psychology içinde (446-458). New York: Oxford University Pres.
  • McCullough, M. E., Worthington, E. L. ve Rachal, K. C. (1997). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 321-336.
  • Miller, A. J., Worthington, E. ve McDaniel, M. A. (2008). Gender and forgiveness: A meta-analytic review and research agenda. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 27(8), 843-876.
  • Ohbuchi, K., Kameda, M. ve Agarie, N. (1989). Apology as aggression control: Its role in mediating appraisal of and response to harm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(2), 219-227.
  • Paleari, F. G., Regalia, C. ve Fincham, F. D.(2005). Marital quality, forgiveness, empathy and rumination: A longitudinal analysis. Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 368-378.
  • Ripley, J. S. ve Worthington, E. L. (2002). Hope-focused and forgiveness-based group interventions to promote marital enrichment. Journal of Counseling and Development, 80, 452-463.
  • Sakallı-Uğurlu, N. (2002). Çelişik duygulu cinsiyetçilik ölçeği: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 17, 47-58.
  • Shackelford, T. K., Buss, D. M. ve Bennett, K. (2002). Forgiveness or breakup: Sex differences to a partner’s infidelity. Cognition and Emotion, 16, 299-307.
  • Struthers, C. W., Eaton, J., Santelli, A. G., Uchiyama, M. ve Shirvani, N. (2008). The effects of attributions of intent and apology on forgiveness: When saying sorry may not help the story. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 983-992.
  • Subkoviak, M. J., Enright, R. D., Wu, C., Gassin, E. A., Freedman, S., Olson, L. M. ve ark. (1995). Measuring interpersonal forgiveness in late adolescence and middle adulthood. Journal of Adolescence, 18, 641-655.
  • Tabachnick, B. G. ve Fidel, L. S. (1989). Using multivariate statistics. Harper Collins, New York.
  • Taysi, E. (2007). Suça ilişkin kişilerarası motivasyonlar ölçeğinin Türk kültürüne uyarlama çalışması. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 10, 63-74.
  • Thompson, L. Y., Snyder, C. R., Hoffman, L., Micheal, S. T., Rasmussen, H. N., Billings, L. S. ve ark. (2005). Dispositional forgiveness of self, others, and situations. Journal of Personality, 73, 313-359.
  • Toussaint, L. ve Webb, J. R. (2005). Gender differences in the relationship between empathy and forgiveness. The Journal of Social Psychology, 145(6), 673-685.
  • Tsang, J. A. ve Stanford, M. S. (2007). Forgiveness for intimate partner violence: The infl uence of victim and offender variables. Personality and Individual Differences, 42,653-664.
  • Tutarel-Kışlak, Ş. (1995). Cinsiyet, evlilik uyumu, depresyon ile nedensel ve sorumluluk yüklemeleri arası ilişkiler üzerine bir araştırma. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi, A.Ü. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  • Tutarel-Kışlak, Ş. (1999a). Evlilikte uyum ölçeğinin (EUÖ) güvenirlik ve geçerlik çalışması. 3P Psikiyatri, Psikoloji, Psikofarmakoloji Dergisi, 7, 50-57.
  • Tutarel-Kışlak, Ş. (1999b). İlişkilerde yükleme ölçeğinin (İYÖ) güvenirlik ve geçerlik çalışması. 3P Psikiyatri, Psikoloji, Psikofarmakoloji Dergisi,7, 193-199.
  • Yılmaz, A. E. (2002). The prediction of divorced parents’ emotional/social adjustment and psychological distress from perceived power/control over child-related concerns, perceived social support, and demographic characteristics. Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Middle East Technical University, Ankara.
  • Wade, N. G. ve Worthington, E. L. (2003). Overcoming interpersonal offenses: Is forgiveness the only way to deal with unforgiveness? Journal of Counseling and Development, 81, 343-353.
  • Wade, S. H. (1989). The development of a scale to measure forgiveness. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi, Fuller Graduate School of Psychology, Pasadena, CA.
  • Worthington, E. L. (1998). An empathy-humility-commitment model of forgiveness applied within family dyads. Journal of Family Therapy, 20, 59-76.
  • Worthington, E. L. ve DiBlasio, F. A. (1990). Promoting mutual forgiveness within the fractured relationship. Psychoterapy, 27, 219-223.
  • Worthington, E. L. ve Wade, N. G. (1999). The psychology of unforgiveness and forgiveness and implications for clinical practice. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 18, 385-418.