Fazlı YANIK, Ali Cevat KUTLUK, Celalettin KOCATÜRK, Ozan USLUER, Serdar, Berkant ÖZPOLAT, Altemur KARAMUSTAFAOĞLU, Hüseyin Ulaş ÇINAR, Cem Emrah KALAFAT, Refik, Burçin ÇELİK, Recep DEMİRHAN, Ezgi CESUR

Plevral hastalıkların tanısında uyanık ve entübasyonlu video-yardımlı torakoskopik cerrahinin karşılaştırılması: Prospektif çok merkezli randomize bir çalışma

Amaç: Bu çalışmada, plevral hastalıkların tanısında uyanık ve entübasyonlu video-yardımlı torakoskopik cerrahinin güvenliği ve tanısal doğruluğu karşılaştırıldı.Ç a l ı ş m a p l a n ı :Bu prospektif randomize çalışma Ekim 2016 ve Nisan 2018 tarihleri arasında yapıldı ve çalışmaya video-yardımlı torakoskopik cerrahide deneyimli beş tıbbi merkezden 293 hasta (201 erkek, 92 kadın; ort. yaş 53.59 yıl; dağılım, 18-90 yıl) dahil edildi. Hastalar sedoanaljezi ile uyanık video-yardımlı torakoskopik cerrahi (entübasyonsuz) ve genel anestezi ile video-yardımlı torakoskopik cerrahi (entübasyonlu) olarak iki gruba randomize edildi. Tanısı konulmamış plevral efüzyonları ve nodüller, kitleler gibi plevral patolojileri olan hastalar dahil edildi. Ağrı, ajitasyon ve hipoksi gibi durumlar entübasyon için endikasyon idi. Gruplar demografik veriler, ameliyat sonrası ağrı, ameliyat süresi, komplikasyonlar, işlemlerin tanısal doğruluğu ve maliyet açısından karşılaştırıldı. Tüm hastalar nonspesifik, malignite şüpheli veya yetersiz örnekler için en az 12 aylık takip süresini tamamladı.Bul gu lar: Uyanık video-yardımlı torakoskopik cerrahi 145, entübasyonlu video-yardımlı torakoskopik cerrahi 148 hastada uygulandı. Hastaların %83’ünde (243/293) plevral hastalık tek taraflı iken %17’sinde (50/293) iki taraflı idi. Gruplar arasında komorbidite varlığı açısından farklılık yoktu (p=0.149). Uyanık video-yardımlı torakoskopik cerrahi grubunda bir hasta (0.6%) dirençli ağrı ve ajitasyon nedeniyle genel anesteziye geçirildi. Ameliyat sonrası komplikasyonlar olarak uyanık video-yardımlı torakoskopik cerrahi grubunda bir hastada sıvı drenajı ve pnömoni gözlemlendi (0.6%) ve video-yardımlı torakoskopik cerrahi grubunda bir hastada sıvı drenajı saptandı (0.6%). Ameliyat sonrası 4, 8, 12. veya 24. saatte görsel analog ölçeği ile ölçülen ağrı yoğunluğunda farklılık yoktu (p>0.05). Ameliyat sonrası patolojik tanıların dağılımı ve oranları da benzerdi (p=0.171). Hem ameliyat maliyeti hem de toplam hastane maliyeti uyanık video-yardımlı torakoskopik cerrahi grubunda daha düşük idi (p

Comparison of awake and intubated video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in the diagnosis of pleural diseases: A prospective multicenter randomized tria

Background:This study aims to compare the safety and diagnostic accuracy of awake and intubated video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in the diagnosis of pleural diseases.Methods: This prospective randomized study was conducted between October 2016 and April 2018 and included 293 patients (201 males, 92 females; mean age 53.59 years; range, 18 to 90 years) from five medical centers experienced in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. The patients were randomized into two groups as awake video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery with sedoanalgesia (non-intubated) and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery with general anesthesia (intubated). Patients with undiagnosed pleural effusions and pleural pathologies such as nodules and masses were included. Conditions such as pain, agitation, and hypoxia were indications for intubation. The groups were compared in terms of demographic data, postoperative pain, operative time, complications, diagnostic accuracy of the procedures, and cost. All patients completed a follow-up period of at least 12 months for samples that were non-specific, suspicious for malignancy or inadequate.Results:Awake video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery was performed in 145 and intubated video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery was performed in 148 patients. Pleural disease was unilateral in 83% (243/293) and bilateral in 17% (50/293) of the patients. There was no difference between the groups in terms of presence of comorbidity (p=0.149). One patient in the awake video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery group (0.6%) was converted to general anesthesia due to refractory pain and agitation. As postoperative complications, fluid drainage and pneumonia were observed in one patient in the awake video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery group (0.6%) and fluid drainage was detected in one patient in the video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery group (0.6%). There were no differences in pain intensity measured with visual analog scale at postoperative 4, 8, 12, or 24 hours (p>0.05). Distribution and rates of postoperative pathological diagnoses were also similar (p=0.171). Both operative cost and total hospital cost were lower in the awake video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery group (p

PDF

___

1. Vischnevski AA. Local anesthesia in thoracic surgery: lungs, heart and esophagus. Minerva Anestesiol 1954;20:432-5. [Abstract]
2. Buckıngham WW, Beatty AJ, Brasher CA, Ottosen P. The technique of administering epidural anesthesia in thoracic surgery. Dis Chest 1950;17:561-8.
3. Carlens E. Endobronchial intubation. Nord Med 1952;47:1090-3.
4. Al-Abdullatief M, Wahood A, Al-Shirawi N, Arabi Y, Wahba M, Al-Jumah M, et al. Awake anaesthesia for major thoracic surgical procedures: an observational study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2007;32:346-50.
5. Katlic MR, Facktor MA. Video-assisted thoracic surgery utilizing local anesthesia and sedation: 384 consecutive cases. Ann Thorac Surg 2010;90:240-5.
6. Pompeo E, Tacconi F, Mineo D, Mineo TC. The role of awake video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in spontaneous pneumothorax. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007;133:786-90.
7. Liu J, Cui F, Li S, Chen H, Shao W, Liang L, et al. Nonintubated video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery under epidural anesthesia compared with conventional anesthetic option: a randomized control study. Surg Innov 2015;22:123-30.
8. Pompeo E, Sorge R, Akopov A, Congregado M, Grodzki T. Non-intubated thoracic surgery-A survey from the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Ann Transl Med 2015;3:37.
9. Rahman NM, Ali NJ, Brown G, Chapman SJ, Davies RJ, Downer NJ, et al. Local anaesthetic thoracoscopy: British Thoracic Society Pleural Disease Guideline 2010. Thorax 2010;65:54-60.
10. DePew ZS, Wigle D, Mullon JJ, Nichols FC, Deschamps C, Maldonado F. Feasibility and safety of outpatient medical thoracoscopy at a large tertiary medical center: a collaborative medical-surgical initiative. Chest 2014;146:398-405.
11. Tıpta uzmanlık kurulu müfredat oluşturma ve standart belirleme sistemi (TUKMOS). Göğüs hastalıkları uzmanlık eğitimi ve çekirdek müfredatı. Available at: https://tuk. saglik.gov.tr/TR,53295/gogus-hastaliklari.html. [Accessed: February 26, 2019].
12. Medford AR, Bennett JA, Free CM, Agrawal S. Current status of medical pleuroscopy. Clin Chest Med 2010;31:165-72.
13. Metintas M, Ak G, Yildirim H, Danacioglu S, Dundar E, Metintas S. The safety of medical thoracoscopy in a group at high risk for complications. J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol 2013;20:224-31.
14. Pompeo E, Mineo D, Rogliani P, Sabato AF, Mineo TC. Feasibility and results of awake thoracoscopic resection of solitary pulmonary nodules. Ann Thorac Surg 2004;78:1761-8.
15. AlGhamdi ZM, Lynhiavu L, Moon YK, Moon MH, Ahn S, Kim Y, et al. Comparison of non-intubated versus intubated video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy for lung cancer. J Thorac Dis 2018;10:4236-43.
16. Akopov A, Egorov V, Deynega I, Ionov P. Awake videoassisted thoracic surgery in acute infectious pulmonary destruction. Ann Transl Med 2015;3:100.
17. Mineo TC, Tacconi F. From “awake” to “monitored anesthesia care” thoracic surgery: A 15 year evolution. Thorac Cancer 2014;5:1-13.
18. Karadayi S, Findikcioglu A, Kilic D, Akin S, Canpolat ET, Aribogan A, et al. The role of VATS performed in awake patients for the diagnosis and the treatment of pleural effusions. Turk Toraks Derg 2013;14:103-5.
19. Pompeo E, Tacconi F, Frasca L, Mineo TC. Awake thoracoscopic bullaplasty. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2011;39:1012-7.
20. Metintas M, Ak G, Cadirci O, Yildirim H, Dundar E, Metintas S. Outcome of patients diagnosed with fibrinous pleuritis after medical thoracoscopy. Respir Med 2012;106:1177-83.
21. Silomon M, Claus T, Huwer H, Biedler A, Larsen R, Molter G. Interpleural analgesia does not influence postthoracotomy pain. Anesth Analg 2000;91:44-50.
22. Tacconi F, Pompeo E. Non-intubated video-assisted thoracic surgery: where does evidence stand? J Thorac Dis 2016;8:364-75.
23. Pompeo E, Rogliani P, Tacconi F, Dauri M, Saltini C, Novelli G, et al. Randomized comparison of awake nonresectional versus nonawake resectional lung volume reduction surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2012;143:47-54.
24. Vanni G, Tacconi F, Sellitri F, Ambrogi V, Mineo TC, Pompeo E. Impact of awake videothoracoscopic surgery on postoperative lymphocyte responses. Ann Thorac Surg 2010;90:973-8.
25. McDonald CM, Pierre C, de Perrot M, Darling G, Cypel M, Pierre A, et al. Efficacy and Cost of Awake Thoracoscopy and Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery in the Undiagnosed Pleural Effusion. Ann Thorac Surg 2018;106:361-7.
26. Pompeo E. State of the art and perspectives in non-intubated thoracic surgery. Ann Transl Med 2014;2:106.