Özbekistan’da Tarih Yazıcılığı ve Millî Kimlik:Özbeklerin Göçü ve Timur Örneğinde

Bu çalışmada Özbekistan’ın bağımsızlık sonrasında kurmaya giriştiği tarih anlayışı ve millî ideoloji üstünde durulmuştur. Bağımsız Özbekistan Cumhuriyeti’nin kuruluş dönemi olarak adlandırılabilecek Kerimov yılları Özbekistan’ın meşruiyetini tarihten alan millî ideolojisinin şekillendiği dönemdir ve bugün de bu temel üstünden devam edilmektedir. Özbekistan’ın toplumsal zihniyetinin ve reflekslerinin kavranması için Kerimov döneminde tarih yardımıyla oluşan millî kimliğin anlaşılması gereklidir. Özbekistan’da tarih yazıcılığının yaklaşımının en temel unsurlarından biri teritoryal (toprak) tarih anlayışıdır. Burada SSCB döneminde başlayan bu yaklaşımın süreklilik kazanmasında kuruluş yıllarında karşılaştığı sorunların da etkisi olduğu iddia edilmektedir. Bu nedenle çalışmada Kerimov’un kendi değerlendirmelerine dayanarak, bağımsızlık sonrasında karşılaşılan sorunlar ve bunlara çözüm olarak ortaya koyduğu devlet milliyetçiliği, tarih yazıcılığıyla ile bağı çerçevesinde incelenecektir. Söz konusu teritoryal tarih anlayışının Özbekistan’daki tarih yazıcılığına etkisini örneklemek için göçebe Özbeklerin günümüz Özbekistan’ına göçlerinin ve göç öncesinde bölgede hâkimiyet kuran Emir Timur’un günümüzde nasıl ele alındığı gösterilecektir. Teritoryal tarih yazıcılığı, tarihin başlangıcından günümüze bir ülkenin sınırları içinde yaşanmış olanları o ülkenin tarihinin parçası olarak kabul ettiğinden, bu anlayış içinde bugün Özbekistan kültürü Türk ve Fars kültürünün bileşimi, Emir Timur ve Timurîler devri altın çağ olarak benimsenmekte, 16. yüzyıl başında günümüz Özbekistan’ına göç eden Özbekler ve geçmişleri ise önemsiz kabul edilmektedir. Bunun önümüzdeki yıllarda da bu şekilde devam etmesi beklenebilir.

Historiography and National Identity in Uzbekistan: On the Example of the Migration of Uzbeks and Timur

This article is about the Uzbekistan’s understanding of history and national ideology, which was sought to be established after the independence. During the Karimov era, what can be categorized as the foundational period of the independent Republic of Uzbekistan, the national ideology was shaped with legitimization through history, and it is pursued on this very foundation today. In order to comprehend Uzbekistan’s social mentality and reflexes, the national identity established during the Karimov era with the support of history needs to be understood. One of the fundamental issues of Uzbekistan’s historiography is the territorial understanding of history. Here, it is argued that one of reasons of the continuity of this understanding - dating back to the Soviet period - is related to the problems Uzbekistan has faced on its foundation. Thus, in this study the problems faced by Uzbekistan on its foundation and solutions will be summarized, as they were represented by Islam Karimov himself in his state nationalism and its relation with historiography. For the purpose of illustrating the effect of the territorial understanding of history onto the historiography in Uzbekistan, it will be exemplified, how the migration of nomadic Uzbeks to recent Uzbekistan, and the rule of Amir Timur – before the migration of Uzbeks – are being presented in recent Uzbekistan. Because the territorial historiography accepts everything from the dawn of history to contemporary times within the boundaries of Uzbekistan as part of its history, the culture of Uzbekistan is to evaluated as an amalgamation of Persian and Turkic cultures and the era of Amir Timur and Timurids as the golden age, while the migration of the Uzbeks, who have migrated to recent Uzbekistan in the 16th century, and their past are considered as insignificant. It can be expected that this acceptance will continue in the future.

___

  • Abashin, Sergei. “The Transformation of Ethnic Identity in Central Asia: A Case Study of the Uzbeks and Tajiks.” Russian Regional Perspectives Journal 1. 2 (2003): 32-35.
  • Akbarzadeh, Sh. “A Note on Shifting Identities in the Ferghana Valley.” Central Asian Survey 16 (1997): 65-68.
  • Akhmetov, E. Republic of Uzbekistan: Reference Book. Taşkent: Ozbekiston NMİU, 2006.
  • Alimova, D., Z. Arifkhanova ve Sh. Kamoliddin. “Kakim ne doljen bıt etniçeskii atlas Uzbekistana.” O’zbekiston Tarihi 4 (2004): 72–85.
  • Allworth, Edward. The Modern Uzbeks: From the Fourteenth Century to the Present: A Cultural History. Stanford: Hoover Institution, 1990.
  • Arat, Reşit Rahmeti (Çev.). Vekayi Babur’un Hatıratı. Gazi Zahiruddin Mumammed Babur. Ankara: TTK, 1987.
  • Atkin, Muriel. “Tajiks and the Persian World.” Central Asia in Historical Perspective. Ed. Beatrice F. Manz. Oxford: Westview, 1994: 127-143.
  • Balım, Çiğdem ve Yunus Emre Gürbüz. “O’zbekiston Respublikasi: ‘Özbek Modeli.” Bağımsızlıklarının Yirminci Yılında Orta Asya Cumhuriyetleri: Türk Dilli Halklar - Türkiye ile İlişkiler. 1. Cilt. Der. Ayşegül Aydıngün ve Çiğdem Balım. Ankara: AKM, 2012: 221-311.
  • Bauman, Zigmunt. Retrotopia. Cambridge: Polity, 2017.
  • Bennigsen, Alexandre ve Marie Broxup. The Islamic Threat to the Soviet State. London: Croom Helm, 1983.
  • Coldoşov, Altınbek. “Kabilecilik, Bölgecilik ve Etnisite Kırgız Kimliği Üzerine Çalışmalar.” OAKA 8. 15 (2013): 101-133.
  • Collins, Kathleen. Clan Politics and Regime Transition in Central Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University, 2009.
  • Critchlow, James. Nationalism in Uzbekistan: A Soviet Republic's Road to Sovereignty. San Francisco: Westview, 1991.
  • di Cosmo, Nicola. “Ancient Inner Asian Nomads: Their Economic Basis and Its Significance in Chinese History”, The Journal of Asian Studies 53. 4 (1994): 1092-1126.
  • Dale, Stephen F. The Garden of the Eight Paradises. Babur and the Culture of Empire in Central Asia, Afghanistan and India (1483-1530). Leiden: Brill, 2004.
  • Elias, N. A History of the Moghuls of Central Asia Being the Tarikh-i Rashidi of Mirza Muhammed Haidar Dughlat. London: Curzon, 1972.
  • Finke, Peter. “On A. Ilkhamov’s ‘Archeology of Uzbek Identity’.” Anthropology & Archeology of Eurasia 44. 4 (Spring 2006): 75–79.
  • Golden, Peter. “I will give the People unto thee: The Chinggisid Conquest and Their Aftermath in the Turkic World.” JRASS Series 3. 10. 1 (2000): 2141.
  • Gullette, David. “The Problems of the “Clan” Politics Model of Central Asian Statehood: A Call for Alternative Pathways for Research.” Stable Outside, Fragile Inside?: Post-Soviet State in Central Asia. Ed. Emilian Kavalski. Burlington: Ashgate, 2010: 53-69.
  • Gürbüz, Yunus Emre. “One Migration Two Different Historiographies: The Migration of the Uzbeks and Kazakhs in the 15th Century.” Turkish Studies 8. 5 (Bahar 2013): 321-329.
  • Hirsch, Francine. “Toward an Empire of Nations. Border-Making and the Formation of Soviet National Identities.” The Russian Review 59. 2 (2000): 201226.
  • Ilkhamov, Alisher (Ed). Etniçeski Atlas Uzbekistana. Taşkent: İnstitut “Otkrıtoe Obşestvo”, 2002.
  • Ilkhamov, Alisher. “The National and the Ethnic as Construct and/or Phenomena of Civil Society: A Prepons to Opponents.” Anthropology & Archeology of Eurasia 44. 4 (Spring 2006): 92–102.
  • Ilkhamov, Alisher. “Archaeology of Uzbek Identity.” Central Asian Survey 23. 3-4 (December 2004): 289-326.
  • Ilkhamov, Alisher. “Archeology of Uzbek Identity.” Anthropology & Archeology of Eurasia 44. 4 (Spring 2006): 10-36.
  • Jacquesson, Svetlana. “From Clan Narratives to Clan Politics.” Central Asian Survey 31. 3 (2012): 277-292.
  • Kamoliddin, Sh. “The Notion of Ethnogenesis in The Ethnic Atlas of Uzbekistan.” Anthropology & Archeology of Eurasia 44. 4 (Spring 2006): 42-46.
  • Kara, Abdulvahap. Türkistan Ateşi: Mustafa Çokay’ın Hayatı ve Mücadelesi. İstanbul: Da, 2002.
  • Karasar, Hasan Ali. “Chicherin on the Delimitation of Turkestan Native Bolsheviks versus Soviet Foreign Policy. Seven Letters from the Russian Archives on Razmezhevanie.” Central Asian Survey 21. 2 (2002): 199–209.
  • Karasar, Hasan Ali. “The Partition of Khorezm and the Positions of Turkestanis on Razmezhevanie.” Europe-Asia Studies 60. 7 (September 2008): 1247-1260.
  • Kerimov, İslam. Özbekistan 21. Yüzyılın Eşiğinde. Ankara: Bilig, 1997.
  • Kumekov, B. “Problems of the Kazak Statehood.” History of Kazakhstan Essays, Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Kazakstan. Ed. M. K. Kozybaev. Almaty: Gylym, 1998: 62-70.
  • Laurelle, Marlene. “The Ethnic Atlas of Uzbekistan in the Context of the Contemporary Institutional Situation in Post-Soviet Uzbek Ethnology.” Anthropology & Archeology of Eurasia 44. 4 (Spring 2006): 70–74.
  • Manz, Beatrice Forbes. “Tamerlane’s Career and Its Uses.” Journal of World History 13. 1 (Spring 2002): 1-25.
  • Manz, Beatrice Forbes. The Rise and Rule of Tamerlane. Boston: Cambridge University, 1999. Martin, Terry. The Affirmative Action Empire: Nations and Nationalism in the Soviet Union, 1923–1939. Ithaca: Cornell University, 2001.
  • Martin, Terry. The Affirmative Action Empire: Nations and Nationalism in the Soviet Union, 1923–1939. Ithaca: Cornell University, 2001.
  • Muhammadjonov, A. ve Q. Usmonov. O’zbekiston Tarixi (Milodning IV Asrıdan XVI Asr Boshlarigacha), 7-Sinif. Toshkent: Devlet İlmiy Nashriyoti, 2005.
  • Özkırımlı, Umut. Milliyetçilik Kuramları: Eleştirel Bir Bakış. Ankara: DoğuBatı, 2008.
  • Pipes, Richard. The Formation of the Soviet Union: Communism and Nationalism, 1917- 1923. Cambridge: Harvard University, 1954.
  • Saray, Mehmet. Rus İşgali Devrinde Osmanlı Devleti ile Türkistan Hanlıklari Arasındakı Siyasi Münasebetler (1775-1985). Ankara: TTK, 1994.
  • Schatz, Edward. Modern Clan Politics: The Power of “Blood” in Kazakhstan and Beyond. Seattle: University of Washington, 2004.
  • Schoeberlein-Engel, John. "The Prospects for Uzbek National Identity." Central Asia Monitor 2 (1996): 12-20.
  • Smith, Jeremy. The Bolsheviks and the National Question: 1917-1923. London: Macmillan, 1999.
  • Subtelny, M. E. “The Symbiosis of Turk and Tajik.” Central Asia in Historical Perspective. Ed. Beatrice Manz. Boulder: Westview, 1994: 45-61.
  • Togan, Isenbike. Flexibility and Limitations in Steppe Formations. Leiden: Brill, 1998.
  • Togan, Isenbike. “Second Wave of Islam and Özbek Khan: Strategies for Conflict Resolution.” Proceedings of the International Symposium on Islamic Civilization in the Volga-Ural Region. Kazan, İstanbul: IRCICA, 2004: 15-33.
  • Yakubovskiy, A. Yu. Altın Ordu ve Çöküşü. Ankara: TTK, 1992.
  • CIA World Factbook. “Afghanistan.” https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/af.html. (E.T. 11.07.2019).
  • CIA World Factbook. “Uzbekistan.” https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/uz.html (E.T. 24.07.2019).
  • Demoskop Weekly 1897. “Pervaya vseobşçaya perepis naseleniya Rossiskoy İmperii 1897”. http://demoscope.ru/weekly/ssp/rus_lan_97.php. (E.T. 10.06.2019).
  • Demoskop Weekly 1926. “Vsesoyuznaya perepis haseleniya 1926 goda”. http://demoscope.ru/weekly/ssp/ussr_nac_26.php. (E.T. 10.06.2019).
  • Demoskop Weekly 1989. “Vsesoyuznaya Perepis’ Naseleniya 1989 Goda”. http://demoscope.ru/weekly/ssp/sng_nac_89.php?reg=4. (E.T. 10.06.2019).
  • http://aral-progress.com/index.php/aral-sea.html. (E.T. 20.06.2019).
  • http://www.stat.kg/kg/statistics/download/dynamic/316. (E.T. 24.07.2019).
  • https://joshuaproject.net/countries/TX. (E.T. 24.07.2019).
  • International Culture Center of Uzbekistan. http://www.icc.uz/ (E.T. 02.01.2018).
  • Kamp, Marianne. “Karimov’s Economy. a Memoir from 25 Years of Periodic Observation.” Central Asian Survey, Uzbekistan Forum and Virtual Special Issue (2016). http://explore.tandfonline.com/page/pgas/cas-uzbekistan-forum. (E.T. 18.11.2016).
  • Kazakstan Respublikası Statiska Agenttigi. “2012 Jılı basına Kazakstan Resoblikası Halkınıng Jekelegen Etnostarı boyınşa Sanı.” http://www.stat.gov.kz. (E.T. 18.11.2019).
  • Renan, Ernest. “What is a Nation?” 1882. 3. https://www.humanityinaction.org/files/569-E.Renan-WhatisaNation.pdf. (E.T. 17.07.2019).
  • Renee, Ruth. Afghanistan in 2010: Survey of the Afghan People. Kabul: The Asia Foundation, 2010. http://asiafoundation.org/resources/pdfs/Afghanistanin2010survey.pdf. (E.T. 11.07.2019).
  • Şokirov, Ş.Ş. ve A.R. Asoev ve ark. Baruyhatgirii Aholiy va Fondi Manzili Cumhurii Tocikistan Dar Soli 2010: Hayati Milliy, Donistani Zabonho va Şahrvandii Aholii Cumhurii Tocikiston Cildi III. Agentii Omori Nazdi Prezidenti Cumhurii Tocikistan, 2012. 7. http://oldstat.ww.tj/ru/img/526b8592e834fcaaccec26a22965ea2b_1355501132.pdf. (E.T. 17.07.2019).