Mekânsal otokorelasyon ve kümeleme analizi yaklaşımı ile Göksu Çayı Havzası’nın (Sakarya Nehri Havzası) bütünleşik ve sürdürülebilir havza yönetim modeli
Doğal ve beşeri ortam koşullarının yoğun etkileşim halinde olduğu havzalarda birçok kapsamdaçeşitli modellerle yönetim çalışmaları uygulanmaktadır. Bu araştırmanın amacı, coğrafi çeşitliliği,etkileşimleri ve potansiyel riskleri barındıran Göksu Çayı Havzası’nın farklı değişkenler üzerindenmekânsal otokorelasyon ve kümeleme analizine dayalı havza yönetim modelinin oluşturulmasıdır.Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemlerinin (CBS) etkin kullanıldığı çalışmada, deterministik, kantitatif,korelasyon ve dağılış analizi yöntemleriyle çok basamaklı sistematik oluşturulmuştur. Havzanınbütün coğrafi unsurlarını, etkileşimleri, doğal dinamik işleyiş yapısını ortaya koymak ve ilişkiselolarak kümelenme dağılışını oluşturmak için birçok parametrenin analizleri ile dört ana değişken(alt model) üretilmiştir. Ana değişkenler, jeomorfolojik uygunluk-elverişlilik, yağış akış, çoklu-riskve arazi kullanım modellerinden oluşur. Her bir model karşılıklı olarak mekansal korelasyona tabitutulmuş ve havzanın kümeleme analizi dağılış verisi üretilmiştir. Beş farklı kümenin tespit edildiğiveri, sorun-risk potansiyeli ve sürdürülebilir-uygun kullanım potansiyeli açısından da analizedilmiştir. Daha sonra dağılış verisi, Lokal Moran’s I-Anselin testi ve Getis-Ord Gİ istatistiği ile anlamlılıkve kümelenme açısından test edilmiştir. Analizlerden, havzanın yüksek çerçevesini oluşturansahaların sürdürülebilir-uygun kullanım potansiyeline sahip kümelenme gösterdiği, İnegölOvası, Yenişehir kuzeyi ve Göksu Vadisi’nde sorun-risk potansiyeli yüksek kümelenmenin olduğutespit edilmiştir. Havzada sürdürülebilirliğin sağlanması için, ekolojik sahaların korunması, sel,taşkın, erozyon, heyelan tedbirlerin arttırılması, akarsulardaki su kalitesinin kontrol edilmesi veantropojenik baskı yoğunlaşmasının daha uygun alanlara yönlendirilmesi gerekmektedir.
Integrated and sustainable watershed management model of Göksu River Basin (Sakarya River Basin) with spatial autocorrelation and cluster analysis approach
In the basins where natural and human environmental conditions are in intense interaction,management studies are carried out with various models in many contexts. In this study, itis aimed to create a watershed management model based on spatial auto correlation andclustering analysis over different variables of the Göksu River Basin, which has geographicaldiversity, interactions and potential risks. In the study, in which Geographical InformationSystems (GIS) was used effectively, a multi-step system was created with deterministic, quantitative,correlation and distribution analysis methods. Four main variables (sub-models) wereproduced by analyzing many parameters in order to reveal all the geographical elements,interactions, natural dynamic functioning of the basin and to establish the cluster distributionas relation. The main variables consist of the geomorphological suitability-availability model,the precipitation runoff model, the multi-risk model, and the land use model. Each model wassubjected to spatial correlation and cluster analysis distribution data of the basin were produced.The data, in which 5 different clusters were identified, were also analyzed in terms ofproblem-risk potential and sustainable-appropriate use potential. Then, the distribution datawas tested for significance and clustering with the Local Moran’s I-Anselin test and the Getis-Ord GI statistic. From the analyzes, it has been determined that the areas forming the highframe of the basin show a cluster with sustainable-appropriate use potential, and there is acluster with high problem-risk potential in İnegöl Plain, north of Yenişehir and Göksu Valley. Inorder to ensure sustainability in the basin, it is necessary to protect ecological areas, increaseflood, overflow, erosion, landslide measures, control water quality in streams and direct anthropogenicpressure concentration to more suitable areas.
___
- Adeli, Z., & Khorshiddoust, A. (2011). Application of geomorphology
in urban planning: case study in landfill site selection. Procedia,
Social and Behavioral Sciences, 19, 662-667. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.05.183
- Anselin, L. (1995). Local indicators of spatial association LISA.
Geographical Analysis, 27(2), 93-115. https://doi.org/
10.1111/j.1538-4632.1995.tb00338.x
- Anselin, L. (2019). A local indicator of multivariate spatial association:
Extending Geary’s C. Geographical Analysis, 51(2), 133-150.
https://doi.org/10.1111/gean.12164
- Asgari, M. A. (2021). Critical review on scale concept in GIS-based
watershed management studies. Spatial Information Research,
29, 417–425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41324-020-00361-7
- Atasoy, F., & Sarış, F. (2021). Kümeleme analizi ile Türkiye’nin biyoiklim
bölgelerinin sınıflandırılması. Türk Coğrafya Dergisi, 77, 67-
76. https://doi.org/10.17211/tcd.835964
- Bremer, L. L., Hamel, P., Ponette‐González, A. G., Pompeu, P. V.,
Saad, S.I., & Brauman, K. A. (2020). Who arewe measuring
and modeling for? Supporting multilevel decision‐makingin
watershed management. Water Resources Research, 56, 1-18.
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR026011
- Cooper, A., H. Farrant, A. R., & Price S. (2011). The use of
Kkarst geomorphology for planning, hazard avoidance and
development in Great Britain. Geomorphology, Elsevier, 134(1-
2), 118-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2011.06.004
- Daeghouth, S., Ward, C., Gambarelli, G., Styger, E., & Roux, J. (2008).
Havza Yönetim Yaklaşımları, Politikaları ve Faaliyetleri: Ölçek Büyütmeye
Yönelik Dersler. Su Sektörü Kurulu Kararı Belge Serisi
Belge No.11, Dünya Bankası, Washington, DC.
- Evans, I. S. (1980). An integrated system of terrain analysis and slope
mapping. Zeitschrift für Geomorphologie, Supplementband, 36,
274-295.
- Garcia, P. M. B., Augustin, C. H. R. R., & Casagrande, P. R. (2020).
Geomorphological index as support to urban planning, Mercator,
Fortaleza, 19, 1-25 https://doi.org/10.4215/rm2020.e19003
- Garipağaoğlu N., & Uzun, M. (2019). İznik Gölü Havzası’nda doğal
ortam koşulları, değişimler ve muhtemel risklerin havza yönetimi
ve planlamasına etkisi. Doğu Coğrafya Dergisi, 24(42), 1-15.
https://doi.org/10.17295/ataunidcd.621776
- Gareth, S., & Wheeler, D. (1998). Statistical methods in geographical
analysis, David Fulton Publishers Ltd, London.
- Grigg, N.S. (1999). Integrated water resources management:
Who should lead, who should pay? Journal of the American
Water Resources Association, 35(3), 527-534. https://doi.
org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.1999.tb03609.x
- Gupta, Α., & Ahmad, R. (1999). Geomorphology and the urban
tropics: building an interface between research and usage.
Geomorphology, 31, 133-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-
555X(99)00076-8
- Han, J., Lee, J.G., & Kamber, M., (2009). An overview of clustering
methods in geographic data analysis, In Miller H.J., Han H. (Eds.)
Geographic Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, Taylor &
Francis Group, LLC.
- He, C., (2003). Integration of geographic information systems and
simulation model for watershed management. Environmental
Modelling & Software, 18(8-9), 809-813. https://doi.
org/10.1016/S1364-8152(03)00080-X
- Karataş, A. (2017). Karasu Çayı Havzasının Hidrografik Planlaması,
Çantay Kitabevi, İstanbul.
- Karataş, A. (2018). Identifying surface runoff distribution and amount
in stream basins: Ergene River Basin. Turkish Journal of Water
Science & Management, 2(2), 40-83. https://doi.org/10.31807/
tjwsm.364011
- Katusiime J, & Schütt B. (2020). Linking land tenure and ıntegrated
watershed management-a review. Sustainability, 12(4), 1667-
1678. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041667
- Koontz, T. M., & Newig, J. (2014). From planning to implementation:
Top-Down and Bottom-Up approaches for collaborative
watershed Mmanagement. Policy Studies Journal, 42(3), 416-
442. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12067
- Lee, J., & Wong, D.W. (2001). Statistical analysis with ArcView GIS.
John Wiley & Sons.
- Liu, Z., Nadim, F., Garcia-Aristizabal, A., Mignan, A., Fleming, K.,
& Luna, B. Q. (2015) A Three-level framework for multi-risk
assessment. Georisk: Assessment and Management of Risk for
Engineered Systems and Geohazards, 9(2), 59-74, https://doi.or
g/10.1080/17499518.2015.1041989
- Mark, D. M. (1975). Geomorphometric Parameters: A Review And
Evaluation. Geographical Annals, 57(1), 165-177.
- Montgomery, D.R., Grant, G.E., & Sullivan, K. (1995). Watershed
analysis as a framework for implementing ecosystem
management. Water Resources Bulletin, 31, 369-85.
- Mudliar, P., & Koontz, T. M. (2021). Locating power in Ostrom’s
design principles: watershed management in India and the
United States, Society & Natural Resources, 34(5), 35-45 https://
doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2020.1864535
- Neil T.H. (2002). Applied Multivariate Analysis. Secaucus, Springer-
Verlag New York.
- Nir, D. (1957). The ratio of relative and absolute altitude of Mt. Carmel.
Geographical Review, 27, 564–569.
- Ord, J.K., & Getis, A. (1995). Local spatial autocorrelation statistics:
distributional ıssues and an application. Geographical Analysis,
27, 286-306. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.1995.
tb00912.x
- Özdemir, H. (2007). SCS-CN yağış-akış modelinin cbs ve uzaktan algılama
yöntemleriyle uygulanması: Havran Çayı Havzası örneği
(Balıkesir). Coğrafi Bilimler Dergisi, 5(2), 1-12. https://doi.
org/10.1501/Cogbil_0000000078
- Pande, C.B. (2020). Watershed Management and Development.
In: Sustainable Watershed Development. SpringerBriefs in
Water Science and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.
org/10.1007/978-3-030-47244-3_2
- Prodanovic, P., & Simonovic, S.P. (2010). An operational model for
support of ıntegrated watershed management. Water Resour
Manage 24, 1161–1194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-009-
9490-6
- Requia, W., & Roig, H., (2015). Analyzing spatial patterns of cardiorespiratory
diseases in The federal district, Brazil, Health, 7(10),
1283-1290. https://doi.org/10.4236/health.2015.710143
- Riley, S. J., DeGloria S. D., & Elliot R. (1999). A terrain ruggedness
ındex that quantifies topographic heterogeneity. Intermountain
Journal of Sciences, 5, 1-4.
- Saaty, T. L. (2004). Decision making - the Analytic Hierarchy and
Network Processes (AHP/ANP). Journal of Systems Science and
Systems Engineering, 13(1), 1-35.
- Selva, J. (2013). Long-term multi-risk assessment: statistical treatment
of interaction among risks. Natural Hazards 67, 701–722.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0599-9
- Swain, S.S., Mishra, A., Sahoo, B., & Chatterjee, C. (2020). Water
scarcity-risk assessment in data-scarce river basins under decadal
climate change using a hydrological modelling approach.
Journal of Hydrology, 590, 1-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.
2020.125260
- Tağıl, Ş. (2007). Balıkesir’de hava kirliliğinin solunum yolu hastalıklarının
mekânsal dağılışı üzerine etkisini anlamada jeo-istatistik
teknikler. Coğrafi Bilimler Dergisi, 5(1), 37-56. https://doi.
org/10.1501/Cogbil_0000000070
- Tobler, W.R.A. (1970). Computer model simulating urban growth in
the Detroit region, Economic Geography, 46, 234-240.
Türkeş, M. (2018), Genel klimatoloji: Atmosfer, hava ve iklimin temelleri,
(3. baskı) Kriter yayınevi.
- Vojtek, M., & Vojtekova, J. (2016). GIS-Based approach to estimate
surface runoff in small catchments: a case study. Quaestiones
Geographicae 35(3), 97-116. https://doi.org/10.1515/quageo-
2016-0030
- Vulević, T., & Dragović, N. (2017). Multi-criteria decision analysis for
sub-watersheds ranking via the PROMETHEE method. International
Soil and Water Conservation Research, 5, 50–55. https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.iswcr.2017.01.003
- Wang, L., Meng, W., Guo, H., Zhang, Z., Liu, Y,. & Fan, Y. (2006). An
interval fuzzy multiobjective watershed management model for
the Lake Qionghai Watershed, China. Water Resour Manage 20,
701–721. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-005-9003-1
- Youssef, A.M., Pradhan, B., Sefry, S.A., & Abdullah, M. M. (2015).
Use of geological and geomorphological parameters in potential
suitability assessment for urban planning development At
Wadi Al-Asla. Arab Journal Geoscience 8, 5617-5630. https://
doi.org/10.1007/s12517-014-1663-9
- Zhang, C., Luo, L., Xu, W., & Ledwith, V., (2008). Use of Local Moran’s
I and GIS to identify pollution hotspots of Pb in urban soils of
Galway, Ireland. Science of the total environment, 398(1-3), 212-
221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.03.011
- Zhang, H., & Liu, D. (2006). Fuzzy modeling and fuzzy control. Springer
Science & Business Media. Boston.