Influence of Limited Water Stress on Yield and Fruit Quality of Melon under Soil-Borne Pathogens

This study was carried out to determine crop response to limited water under biotic stress that was soil-borne pathogens caused of Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. melonis and Macrophomina phaseoli. The experiment was established in a naturally infected field as in a randomized block design with four replications at Çumra in the Konya Plain, Turkey. Irrigation treatments were consisted of four levels: Water amount applied to replenish the water deficit of 0-90 cm soil depth to field capacity (I1), water supply reductions of 0.25 and 50 percent were applied for the other treatments. The highest yield (2.42 and 3.14 t da-1) was obtained from I1 treatment in both years. Other fruit quality parameters were significantly affected by the treatments. The total irrigation water amount and water consumptive use of the same application were 260 and 470 mm in 2011, respectively. In the second year, the total irrigation water amount and water consumptive use of the same treatment were 334 and 501 mm, respectively. The higher disease incidence (50.0-54.7 %) was observed in the plants subjected to drought in two-year.

Influence of Limited Water Stress on Yield and Fruit Quality of Melon under Soil-Borne Pathogens

This study was carried out to determine crop response to limited water under biotic stress that was soil-borne pathogens caused of Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. melonis and Macrophomina phaseoli. The experiment was established in a naturally infected field as in a randomized block design with four replications at Çumra in the Konya Plain, Turkey. Irrigation treatments were consisted of four levels: Water amount applied to replenish the water deficit of 0-90 cm soil depth to field capacity (I1), water supply reductions of 0.25 and 50 percent were applied for the other treatments. The highest yield (2.42 and 3.14 t da-1) was obtained from I1 treatment in both years. Other fruit quality parameters were significantly affected by the treatments. The total irrigation water amount and water consumptive use of the same application were 260 and 470 mm in 2011, respectively. In the second year, the total irrigation water amount and water consumptive use of the same treatment were 334 and 501 mm, respectively. The higher disease incidence (50.0-54.7 %) was observed in the plants subjected to drought in two-year.

___

  • Alizadeh K A, Baghani J M, Haghnia G M (1999). Effect of deficit irrigation by drip and furrow systems on yield and quality of melon at Mashad, Iran. In: 17th 212 ICID International Congress on Irrigation and Drainage, 1:263-269.
  • Al-Mefleh N K, Samarah N, Zaitoun S, Al-Majeed Al-Ghzawi A (2012). Effect of irrigation levels on fruit characteristics, total fruit yield and water use efficiency of melon under drip irrigation system. Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment, 10: 540-545.
  • Anonymous (2012). Agricultural structure and production. Goverment Statistic Institute of Prime Minister Publication. Available from: http://www.tuik.gov.tr (in Turkish).
  • Ben-Yephet Y, Frank Z R (1985). Effect of soil structure on penetration by metham-sodium and of temperature on concentrations required to kill soil-borne pathogens. Phytopatlogy, 75: 403-406.
  • Cabello M J, Castellanos M T, Romojaro F, Martinez-Madrid C, Ribas F (2009). Yield and quality of melon grown under different irrigation and nitrogen rates. Agricultural Water Management, 96: 866-874.
  • Dogan E, Kirnak H, Berekatoglu K, Bilgel L, Surucu A (2008). Water stress imposed on muskmelon (Cucumis melo L.) with subsurface and surface drip irrigation systems under semi-arid climatic conditions. Irrigation Science, 26: 131-138.
  • Ekinci M, Dursun A (2006). The effects of different mulch materials on plant growth some quality properties and yield in melon. VI. Vegetable Agriculture Symposium.pp. 320-324, 19- 22 September, K.Maraş, Turkey, (in Turkish).
  • Estrella F S, Vargas-Garcia M C, Lopez M J, Moreno J (2003). Survival of Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. melonis on plant waste. Crop Production. 23 (2): 127-133.
  • Fabeiro C, Martin De Santa Olalla F, De Juan J A (2002). Production of muskmelon (Cucumis melo L.) under controlled deficit irrigation in a semi-arid climate. Agricultural Water Management, 54: 93-105.
  • Hartz T K (1997). Effects of drip irrigation scheduling on muskmelon yield and quality. Scientia Horticulturae, 69: 117- 122.
  • Howell T A (2006). Challenges in increasing water use efficiency in irrigated agriculture. In: The Proceedings of International Symposium on Water and Land Management For Sustainable Irrigated Agriculture, April 4-8, Adana-Turkey.
  • Howell T A, Cuenca R H, Solomon K H (1990). Crop yield response. Management of Farm Irrigation Systems (Ed. Hoffman et al.). ASAE, pp:311- 312.
  • James L G (1988). Principles of farm irrigation system design. John Wiley and Sons. Inc, New York, p.543.
  • Kirnak H, Higgs D, Kaya C, Tas I (2005). Effects 246 of irrigation and nitrogen rates on growth, yield, and quality of muskmelon in semiarid regions. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 28: 621-638. Lei T W, Xiao J, Wang J P, Liu Z Z, Li G Y, Zhang J G, Mao J M (2003). Experimental investigation into effects of drip irrigation with saline ground water on water use efficiency and quality of honeydew melons in Hetao region Inner Mongolia. Transactions of the Chinese Soc. Agric. Eng., 19: 80-84.
  • Martyn R D, Gordon T R (1998). Compendium of cucurbit diseases. APS Press. 87: 14-15.
  • Sensoy S, Ertek A, Gedik I, Kucukyumuk C (2007). Irrigation frequency and amount affect yield and quality of field-grown melon (Cucumis melo L.). Agricultural Water Management, 88: 269-274.
  • Yıldırım O, Halloran N, Çavuşoğlu Ş, Şengül N (2009). Effects of different irrigation programs on the growth, yield, and fruit quality of drip-irrigated melon. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 33:243-255.
  • Yücel S, Pala H, Sarı N, Abak K (1994). Determination of Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. melonis races in the East Mediterranean Region of Turkey and response of some melon genotypes to the disease. 9th Congress of the Mediterranean Phytopathological Union, pp:87-89, September 18-24, Kuşadası-Aydın, Türkiye.
  • Yurtsever N(1984). Experimental statistics methods. Republic of Turkey, Ministry of Agriculture the Former General Directorate of Rural Service, Soil-Fertilizer Research Institute. Publication No.121, Techniques Publication No.56, Ankara, Turkey (in Turkish).
Toprak Su Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 2146-7072
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 2 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: Toprak Gübre ve Su Kaynakları Merkez Araştırma Enstitüsü