Farklı Toprak İşleme Yöntemlerinin Killi Toprağın Bazı Fiziksel Özellikleri Üzerine Etkilerinin Jeoistatistiksel Yöntemle Değerlendirilmesi

Bu çalışmada, ağır killi tekstüre sahip bir toprakta farklı toprak işleme uygulamalarının toprakların havalanma ve su iletimi ile ilişkili fiziksel toprak özellikleri üzerine etkilerinin jeoistatistiksel yöntemle araştırılması amaçlanmıştır. Deneme, 2011 ve 2012 yıllarında Samsun ilinde Karadeniz Tarımsal Araştırma Enstitüsü arazilerindeki 11 m x 50 m boyutlarında hazırlanan parsellerde iki yıl süreyle yürütülmüştür. İlk yıl tüm toprak işleme uygulamalarının toplam porozite, mikropor, hacim ağırlığı ve organik madde içeriği üzerine etkileri istatistiksel olarak önemli bulunmuştur. Toprakların toplam porozite ve mikropor içeriği, toprak işleme uygulamarıyla artış gösterirken, toprakların hacim ağırlığı ve organik madde içeriklerinde toprak işlemeye bağlı azalmaların meydana geldiği görülmüştür. İkinci yıl ise toprak işleme uygulamalarının yalnızca makropor ve mikropor içeriğine etkileri istatistiksel olarak önemli bulunmuş, ancak mikropor içeriğindeki etkiler yıllara göre ters yönde değişkenlik göstermiştir. İkinci yılda toprak işleme uygulamalarının etkilerindeki değişkenlikler, 2012 yılındaki yağış miktarlarındaki artış ile açıklanmıştır. Toprakların her iki yılda da genelde toprak işleme uygulamalarıyla birlikte bitki gelişimi ve iyi drenaj için uygun makropor içeriklerine sahip olamadığı görülmüştür. Ayrıca Duncan çoklu karşılaştırma sonuçları ile Krigleme haritalarının önemli benzerlikler gösterdiği ve jeoistatistiksel yöntemlerin toprak yönetim uygulamalarına bağlı olarak toprak özelliklerindeki değişkenliklerin haritalanmasında başarılı bir şekilde kullanılabildiği görülmüştür.

Assessment with Geostatistical Method for Effects of Different Soil Tillage Systems on Clay Soil's Some Physical Properties

The main aim of this research is to investigate effects of different soil tillage applications on soil physical properties related to soil aeration and water conductivity in soils having heavy soil texture using geostatistical method. Experiment was conducted on 11 m x 50 m sized plots located in Black Sea Agricultural Research Institute-Samsun between 2011 and 2012 years. It was found significant as statistically effects of all soil tillage applications on total porosity, micropore, bulk density and organic matter content for first year. It was showed that total porosity and micropore content of soils increased with applications of soil tillage whereas, bulk density and organic matter content decreased with the same applications. As for in second years, it was found statistically significant only for micro and macropore contents of soils under these applications. On the other hand, effects on micropore content of soils were showed inversely by taking into consideration of time. Variability of soil tillage effects for second years on it were explained with increasing amount of precipitation in 2012. It was determined that soils have not suitable macrospores for plant growth and for drainage under soil tillage applications in for both years. In addition, it was found the similarity between Duncan multiple comparison results and Kriging maps. Therefore, geostatistic methods can be used successfully for mapping of variations of soil properties depending at some soil management applications

___

  • Al-Kaisi M, Yin X, Licht M A (2005). Soil carbon and nitrogen changes as affected by tillage system and crop biomass in a corn-soybean rotation. Applied Soil Ecology, 30: 174–191.
  • Allison L E, Moodie C D (1965). Carbonate. In: C A Black, D D Evans, J L White, L E Ensminger and F E Clark (Eds.), Methods of Soil Analysis, Part II, American Society of Agronomy Inc., No: 9, Madison, Wisconsin, pp. 1379-1400.
  • Alves M C (1992). Cultivation rotation systems with direct drilling on a red latosol: effect on soil physical and chemical properties. PhD Thesis, Escola Superior Agricultura ‘‘Luiz de Queiroz’’, University of Sao Paulo, Piracicaba, Brazil.
  • Ankeny M D, Kaspar C K, Horton R (1990). Characterization of tillage effects on unconfined infiltration measurements. Soil Science Society America Journal, 54: 837–840.
  • Arshad M A, Franzluebbers A J, Azooz R H (1999). Components of surface soil structure under conventional and no-tillage in northwestern Canada. Soil Tillage Research, 53: 41–47.
  • Arzeno J L (1990). Physical evaluation of different soil management systems on a red distrophic latosol. PhD Thesis, Escola Superior Agricultura ‘‘Luiz de Queiroz’’, University of Sao Paulo, Piracicaba, Brazil.
  • Blake G R, Hartge K H (1986). Bulk Density and Particle Density. In: A Klute (Eds.), Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 1, Physical and Mineralogical Methods (2nd ed.), ASA and SSSA Agronomy Monograph, No: 9, Madison, Wisconsin, pp. 363- 381.
  • Campos M C C, Marques Júnior J, Pereira G T, Montanari R, Siqueira D S (2007). Variabilidade espacial da textura de solos de diferentes materiais de origem em Pereira Barreto, SP. Revista Ciência Agronômica, 38: 149-157.
  • Campos M C C, Soares M D R, Oliveira A, Santos L A C, Aquino R E (2013). Spatial variability of physical attributes in Alfissol under agroforestry, Humaitá region, Amozonas state, Brazil. Revista Ciência Agronômica, 56 (2): 149-159.
  • Castro O M (1995). Physical and chemical characteristics on a red latosol as a function of seedbed preparation for maize _Zea mays L. PhD Thesis, Escola Superior Agricultura ‘‘Luiz de Queiroz’’, University of Sao Paulo, Piracicaba, Brazil.
  • Çetin M, Akbaş T, Şimşek E (2009). Farklı Toprak İşleme Alet ve Makinalarının Toprağın Penetrasyon Direncine Etkilerinin Belirlenmesi. 25. Tarımsal Mekanizasyon Ulusal Kongresi, Isparta.
  • Danielsen R E, Sutherland P L (1986). Soil porosity. In: A Klute (Ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 1, Physical and Mineralogical Methods (2nd ed.), ASA and SSSA Agronomy Monograph, No. 9, Madison, Wisconsin, pp. 443-461.
  • Fabrizzi K P, Garcia F O, Costa J L, Picone L I (2005). Soil water dynamics, physical properties and corn and wheat responses to minimum and no-tillage systems in the southern Pampas of Argentina. Soil Tillage Research, 81: 57–69.
  • Farkas C, Csaba Gyuricz C, Birkas M (2006). Seasonal changes of hydraulic properties of a Chromic Luvisol under different soil management. Biologia, Bratislava, 61/Suppl., 19: 344-348.
  • Fernandez-Rueda Ma J, Paz-Gonzalez A (1998). Influence of organic matter content on soil physical properties. Cad. Lab. Xeol. Laxe, 23: 101–120.
  • Ferreras L A, Costa J L, Garcia F O, Pecorari C (2000). Effect of no-tillage on some soil physical properties of a structural degraded Petrocalcic Paleudoll of the southern Pampa of Argentina. Soil Tillage Research, 54: 31–39.
  • Filipovic D, Husnjak S, Kosutic S, Gospodaric Z (2006). Effects of tillage systems on compaction and crop yield of Albic Luvisol in Croatia. Journal of Terramech, 43: 177–189.
  • Franzluebbers A J, Hons F M, Zuberer D A (1995). Tillage and crop effects on seasonal soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics. Soil Science Society America Journal, 59: 1618–1624.
  • Freebarin D M, Wockner G H, Silburn D M (1986). Effects of catchment management on runoff, water quality and yield potential from Vertisols. Agricultural Water Management, 12: 1– 19.
  • Gantzer C J, Blake G R (1978). Physical characteristics of Le Sueur clay loam soil following no-till and conventional tillage. Agronomy Journal, 70: 853–857.
  • Gee G W, Bauder J W (1986). Particle-Seize Analysis. In: A Klute (Ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis, Part I, Physical and Mineralogical Methods (2nd ed.), ASA and SSSA Agronomy Monograph, No. 9, Madison, Wisconsin, pp. 388-409.
  • Gomez J A, Giraldez J V, Pastor M, Fereres E (1999). Effects of tillage methods on soil physical properties, infiltration and yield in an olive orchard. Soil Tillage Research, 52: 167–175.
  • Hao X, Chang C, Lindwall C W, Bergen P, Conner R L (1999). Crop sequence and reduced tillage to maximize crop production and promote soil conservation under irrigation. Canada-Alberta Environmentally Sustainable Agriculture Agreement Research Program. Final Technical Report Project Number RES-077-94. AAFC Lethbridge Research Centre, Lethbridge, Alta.
  • Havlin J L, Kissel D E, Maddux L D, Claasen M M, Long J H (1990). Crop rotation and tillage effects on soil organic carbon and nitrogen. Soil Science Society America Journal, 54: 448– 452.
  • Hendershot W H, Lalande H, Duquette M (1993). Soil Reaction and Exchangeable Acidity. In: M R Carter (Ed.), Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis, Canadian Society of Soil Science, pp. 141-145.
  • Jackson M L (1958). Soil chemical analysis. Prentice Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
  • Kay B D, Vanden Bygaart A J (2002). Conservation tillage and depth stratification of porosity and soil organic matter. Soil Tillage Research, 66: 107–118. Kirişçi V, Keskin M, Say S M, Keskin S G (1999). Hassas uygulamalı tarım teknolojisi.
  • Klute A (1986). Water retention: Laboratory methods. In: A Klute (Eds.) Methods of soil analysis, Part 1, Physical and Mineralogical Methods (2nd ed.), ASA and SSSA Agronomy Monograph, No. 9, Madison, Wisconsin, pp. 635-662.
  • Korucu T (2002). Çukurova Bölgesinde İkinci Ürün Mısırın Doğrudan Ekim Olanaklarının Araştırılması. Doktora Tezi. Çukurova Üniviversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Adana. Lal R, Stewart B A (1990). Soil degradation: a global threat. In: R Lal and B A Stewart (Eds.), Advances in Soil Science, vol. 11, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 12-17.
  • Lal R (1989). Conservation tillage for sustainable agriculture: tropics versus temperate environments. Advances in Agronomy, 42: 85–197.
  • Lal R, Mahboubi A, Fausey N R (1994). Long-term tillage and rotation effects on properties of central Ohio soils. Soil Science Society America Journal, 58: 517–522.
  • Lipiec J, Kus J, Slowinska-Jurkiewicz A, Nosalewicz A (2006). Soil porosity and water infiltration as influenced by tillage methods. Soil Tillage Research, 89: 210–220.
  • Logsdon S D, Karlen D L (2004). Bulk density as a soil quality indicator during conversion to no-tillage. Soil Tillage Research, 78: 143–149.
  • Mahboubi A, Lal R, Fausey N R (1993). Twenty-eight years of tillage effects on two soils on Ohio. Soil Science Society America Journal, 57: 506–512.
  • Mc Vay K A, Budde J A, Fabrizzi K, Mikha M M, Rice C W, Schlegel A J, Peterson D E, Sweeney D W, Thompson C (2006). Management effects on soil physical properties in long-term tillage studies in Kansas. Soil Science Society America Journal, 70: 434–438.
  • McGarry D, Bridge B J, Radford B J (2000). Contrasting soil physical properties after zero and traditional tillage of an alluvial soil in the semi-arid subtropics. Soil Tillage Research, 53: 105– 115.
  • Mulla D J, McBratney A B (2000). Soil Spatial Variability. In: M E Summer (Ed. in chief), Handbook of Soil Science, CRS Press, A-321-A-351.
  • Oliver R, Douzet J M, Scopel E, Blanchart E, Curmi P, Alves Moreira J A, Minette S, Guerin P, Fortier M, Maraux F (2002). Medium term impact of no tillage on some physical properties of a Brazilian oxisol of Cerrados (tropical humid savannah of central Brazil). In: F Maraux (Ed.), Confronting New Realities in the 21st Century. Proceedings of the 17th World Congress of Soil Science.
  • Paz-Gonzalez A, Guerif J (1993). Texture dependent physical and mechanical properties of soil containing small amounts of swelling material. Invest Agrar., 8(3): 387–410.
  • Rasmussen K J (1999). Impact of ploughless soil tillage on yield and soil quality: a Scandinavian review. Soil Tillage Research, 53: 3–14. Rhoades J D (1986). Soluble Salts. In: A Klute (Ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis, Part II, Chemical and Microbiological Properties (2nd ed.), ASA and SSSA Agronomy Monograph, No. 9, Madison, Wisconsin, pp. 167-179.
  • Salinas-Garcıa J R, Hons F M, Matocha J E (1997). Long-term effects of tillage and fertilization on soil organic matter dynamics. Soil Science Society America Journal, 61: 152–159.
  • Sarvasi F O C (1994). Water dynamics, water erosion and crop productivity as a function of soil preparation. MS Thesis, Escola Superior Agricultura ‘‘Luiz de Queiroz’’, University of Sao Paulo, Piracicaba, Brazil.
  • Schjønning P, Rasmussen K (2000). Soil strength and soil pore characteristics for direct drilled and ploughed soils. Soil Tillage Research, 57: 69–82.
  • Singh K K, Colvin T S, Erach D C, Mughal, A Q (1992). Tilth index: an approach quantifying soil tilth. Transactions of American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 35(6): 1777-1784.
  • Sparling G P, Schipper L A (2002). Soil quality at a national scale in New Zealand. Journal of Environmental Quality, 31: 1848–1857.
  • Strudley M W, Green T R, Ascough II J C (2008). Tillage effects on soil hydraulic properties in space and time: state of the science. Soil Tillage Research ,99: 4–48.
  • Tebrügge F, Düring R A (1999). Reducing tillage intensity: a review of results from a long-term study in Germany. Soil Tillage Research, 53: 15–28.
  • Vidal C M (1997). EvaluacioÂn de algunas propiedades fõÂsicas en sistemas de siembra directay labranza reducida. Tesis de Grado. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias de Balcarce. UNMdP.
  • Webster R (2001). Statistics to support soil research and their presentation. European Journal Soil Science, 52: 331-340.
  • Wilding L P, Bouma J, Goss D W (1994). Impact of Spatial Variability on Interpretative Modelling In: R B Bryant, R W Arnold (Eds.), Quantitative Modelling of Soil Forming Processes. Soil Science Society of American Special Publication Number 39, Soil Science Society of American Inc., Madison, Wisconsin.
  • Witkowska-Walczak B, Turski M (2004). Porosity and water useful for plants in Luvisols created from sandy silt and silt. International Agrophysics, 18: 189-194.
Toprak Su Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 2146-7072
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 2 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: Toprak Gübre ve Su Kaynakları Merkez Araştırma Enstitüsü