Farklı Organik Gübrelerin Mısır-Buğday Ekim Nöbetinde Buğdayın Verimine Bakiye Etkileri

Bu araştırma, arazi şartlarında, tesadüf blokları deneme deseninde, dört tekerrürlü olarak iki farklı lokasyonda yürütülmüştür. Taze tavuk gübresi (TTG), olgun tavuk gübresi (OTG) ve zeolitin (Z) buğday verimine bakiye etkileri araştırılmıştır. Araştırmadaki deneme konuları; kontrol, Z (150 kg da-1), TTG (1000 kg da-1), OTG (1000 kg da-1), TTG+Z (1000 kg da-1+150 kg da-1) ve OTG+Z (1000 kg da-1+150 kg da-1) şeklinde olmuştur. Gübre uygulanan parsellerde ilk yıl mısır yetiştirilmiş, mısır hasadından hemen sonra aynı parsellere buğday ekilmiştir. Her iki yılda da uygulamaların buğday verimini istatistiksel olarak önemli ölçüde etkilediği saptanmıştır. İlk yıl en yüksek buğday verimi (108,44 kg da-1) OTG+Z uygulamasında, ikinci yıl (240,36 kg da-1) TTG uygulamasında elde edilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Buğday, buğday verimi, organik gübre, zeolit, Wheat, wheat yield, organic manure, zeolite,

Residual Effect of Different Organic Manure Application on Wheat Yield in Corn-Wheat Rotation

This investigation was carried out under field conditions and designed as randomised complete blocks with for replications and two locations. On wheat yield, residual effects of fresh poultry manure (FPM), composted poultry manure (CPM) and zeolite (Z) were investigated. The treatments were Z (150 kg da-1), FPM (1000 kg da-1), CPM (1000 kg da-1), FPM+Z (1000 kg da-1+150 kg da-1), CPM+Z (1000 kg da-1+150 kg da-1). At the first year of experiment, corn was grown in all of the plots. Wheat plant was grown at the same plots after corn harvesting. In both years, applications affected significantly wheat yield. At the first and second years, the highest wheat yield occurred at the application of CPM+Z and FPM as 108,44 kg da-1 and 240,36 kg da-1,respectively.

PDF

___

Bayraklı F (1987). Toprak ve Bitki Analizleri. 19 Mayıs Üniv., Ziraat Fak., Kitap No:17, Samsun.
Bhattacharyya P, Chakrabarti K, Chakraborty A (2003). Residual Effects of Municipal Solid Waste Compost on Microbial Biomass and Activities in Mustard Growing Soil. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 49, 585-592.
Bremner J, Mulvaney C S (1982). Nitrogen-total. In Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2. Agronomy 9. Physical and Microbiological Properties. Eds. A L Page, R R Miller, DR Keeney. ASA, Madison WI. Pp. 596-622.
Chakrabarti V, Sarkar B, Chakrabarti A, Banik P, Bagchi D K (2000). Organic Recycling for Soil Quality Consevation in Subtropical Plateu Region. J.Agron. Crop Sci., 184,137-142.
Demiralay İ (1993). Toprak Fiziksel Analizleri. A. Ü. Ziraat Fak. Yay. No, 143, Erzurum.
Dinç U, Şenol S, Kapur S, Cangir C, Atalay İ (2001). Türkiye Toprakları. Ç.Ü. Ziraat Fak. Genel Yayın No:51, Adana. Entry J A, Wood B H, Edwards J H, Wood C W (1997).
Influence of Organic by- products and Nitrogen Source on Chemical and Microbiological Status of an Agricultural Soil. Biol. Fertil. Soil, 24: 196-204.
FAO (1990). Statistical database. Available : http://www. fao.org
Gezgin S, Dursun N, Hamurcu M, Harmankaya M, Önder M, Sade ., Topal A, Soylu S, Akgün N, Yorgancılar M, Ceyhan E, Çiftçi N, Acar B, Gültekin E, Hızalan E., Ünal H (1966). Toprağın Kimyasal Analizleri. A.Ü. Ziraat Fak. Yay. No, 278, Ankara.
Jackson M L (1962). Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice-Hall, Inc. New York.
Kütük C, Çaycı G, Barab A, Başkan O, Hartmann R (2003). Effects of Beer Factory Sludge on Soil Properties and Growth of Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris saccharifera L.) Bioresource Techonology, 90, 75-80.
Lindsay W L, Norvell W A (1978). Development of a DTPA Soil Test For Zn, Fe, Mn and Cu. Soil Amer. J. 42 (3): 421-428.
Madejon E, Lopez R, Murillo J M, Cabera F (2001). Agricultural Use of Three (sugar-beet) Vinasse Composts: Effect on Crops and Chemical Properties of A Cambisol Soil in The Guadauquivir River Valley (SW Spain) Agriculture, Ecosystem and Environment 84, 55-65.
Minitab (1995). Minitab Reference Manuel (Release 7.1). Minitab Inc., State Coll. PA. 16801. USA.
Noori M, Zendehdel M, Ahmadi A (2006). Using Natural Zeolite for İmprovement of Soil Salinity and Crop Yield. Toxicol. Environ. Chem. 88: 77-84.
Pascual J.A, Ayuso M, Hernandez T, Garcia (1997). Phytotoxicity and Fertilizer Value of Different Organic Materials. Agrochemical, 41: 50-62.
Schmitt M, Rehm G (2005). Fertilizing Cropland with Poultry Manure. Available : www.extension.umn.edu/ copyrigt.html.
Sloan D R, Kider G, Jacobs R D (2005). Poultry Manure as Fertilizer.Available:http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/AA205≠beginning.html. Şeker C, Karakaplan S (1999). Konya Ovasında Toprak Özellikleri ile Kırılma Değerleri Arasındaki İlişkiler. Tr. J. of Agriculture and Forestry, 29: 183-190.
Şeker C, Turhan M (2004). Effects of Some Organic and Mineral Fertilisers on Yield and Quality of Sugar Beet, International Soil Congress (ISC) Natural Resource Managament for Sustainable Development, 7-10 June Erzurum- Turkey; 43-50.
Şeker C, Turhan M (2006). Bazı Organik ve İnorganik Gübrelerin Şeker Pancarı- Buğday Ekim Nöbetinde Buğdayın Verimine Bakiye Etkileri. S.Ü. Zir. Fak. Der., 19 (20), 43-48.
Tüzüner A (1990). Toprak ve Su Analiz Laboratuarı El Kitabi. Tarım Orman ve Köy İşleri Bakanlığı Köy Hizmetleri Genel Müdürlüğü.
U.S. Salinity Lab.Staff. (1954). Diagnosis and İmprovement of Saline and Alkali Soils. U.S. Goverment Handbook No: 60, Printing Office, Washington.