Demokrasi ve dış ticaret: OECD ve MENA ülkeleri örneği

Demokrasinin ekonomik etkileri uzun zamandan beri araştırmacıların tartıştığı konuların başında gelmektedir. Küreselleşme ve liberalleşme faaliyetlerinin hız kazandığı 1980’li yıllardan sonra ise bu tartışmanın yeniden alevlendiğini görmekteyiz. Tartışma özellikle, demokrasinin ülkeler arasındaki ticaret ve küreselleşmeye olan etkilerine odaklanmıştır. Ancak demokrasinin dış ticaret ve küreselleşme üzerindeki etkilerinin yönü ve derecesi konusunda henüz bir mutabakatın sağlanamadığı görülmektedir. Bu çalışma, demokrasi ve dış ticaret ilişkisini OECD ve MENA ülkeleri için analiz etmektedir. Genişletilmiş çekim modelinin kullanıldığı çalışmada, OECD ve MENA ülkeleri için dış ticaret ve demokrasi ilişkisi 1997- 2006 dönemi için test edilmiştir. Genişletilmiş çekim modeli analizi sonucuna göre; demokrasi, ülkeler arasındaki ikili ticareti önemli ölçüde etkilemektedir. JEL Sınıflaması: P50, F13, F14, C23

Democracy and trade: the case of OECD and MENA countries

Economic effects of democracy have been the major topic the scientists have been discussing for a long time. We consider that this discussion aroused again after 1980s in which globalization and liberalization efforts came to the agenda. The discussion specifically focused on the effects of democracy on the trade between the countries and globalization. However, there is no consensus on the direction and the degree of the effects of democracy on foreign trade and globalization. This study analyses democracy and foreign trade relationship for OECD and MENA countries. In this study, using augmented gravity model, the relationship between foreign trade and democracy analyzed for OECD and MENA countries for the period of 1997-2006. According to the results from augmented gravity analysis, democracy affects the bilateral trades between countries to a large extend. JEL Classification: P50, F13, F14, C23

___

  • Adam, A. ve Filippaios, F. (2007). Foreign Direct Investment and Civil Liberties: A New Perspective. European Journal of Political Economy. 23, 1038-1052
  • Blanchard, O. ve Shleifer, A. (2000). Federalism With and Without Political Centralization; China Versus Russia. NBER Working Paper. No. 7616
  • Clague, C. ve Diğerleri. (1996). Property and Contract Rights in Autocracies and Democracies. Journal of Economic Growth. 1, 243-76
  • Cordova, J.E.L. ve Meissner, C.M. (2005). The Globalization of Trade and Democracy. 1870-2000. NBER Working Paper. No:11117
  • Easton, S.T. ve Walker, M.A. (1997). Income, Growth, and Economic Freedom. American Economic Review. 87, 328-332
  • Decker, J.H. ve Lim, J.J. (2009). Democracy and Trade: An Empirical Study. Economics of Governance. 10, 165-186
  • De Haan, J. ve Sturm, J.E. (2000). On the Relationship between Economic Freedom and Economic Growth. European Journal of Political Economy. 16, 215-241
  • Doucouliagos, H. ve Ulubaşoğlu, M. (2006). Democracy and Economic Growth: A Meta-Analysis. School Working Paper Economic Series 2006. SWP 2006/04
  • Drury, A.C., Krieckhaus, J. ve Lusztig, M. (2006). Corruption, Democracy and Economic Growth. International Political Science Review. 27(2), 121-136
  • EIU. Democracy Index 2010: Democracy in Retreat. A report from the Economist Intelligence Unit. 20 fiubat 2011 tarihinde http://graphics.eiu.com/PDF/Democracy_ Index_2010_web.pdf adresinden erişildi.
  • Fidrmuc, J. (2002). Economic Reform, Democracy and Growth During Post Communist Transition. European Journal of Political Economy. 19, 583-604
  • Freedom House. The Freedom in the World 16 Eylül 2010 tarihinde www.freedomhouse. org/template.cfm?page= 351&ana_page=363&year=2010 adresinden erişildi.
  • Freedom House. Freedom in the World 2011: The Authoritarian Challenge to Democracy. 13 Kasım 2011 tarihinde http://www.freedomhouse. org/images/File/fiw/historical/ CountryStatus RatingsOverview1973-2011.pdf adresinden erişildi.
  • Haggard, S. (1997). Democratic Institutions and Economic Policy. In Christopher Clague (ed.). Institutions and Economic Development. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. 16 Eylül 2010 tarihinde http://www.systemicpeace. org/inscr/p4v2009.xls adresinden erişildi.
  • IMF. Direction of Trade Statistics. 20.05.2010 tarihinde http://www.imfstatistics. org/dot adresinden erişildi.
  • Lipset, S.M. (1959). Some Social Requisites of Democracy. American Political Science Review. 53, 69-105
  • Marshall, M.G. ve Cole, B.R. (2009). Global Report 2009: Conflict, Governance and State Fragility. Center for Systemic Peace.
  • Marshall, M.G. ve Jaggers, K. (2009). Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions 1800-2007-Dataset Users Manual. Center for Systemic Peace.
  • Miner, H.V. ve Kubota, K. (2005). Why the Move to Free Trade? Democracy and Trade Policy in the Developing Countries. International Organization. 59, 107-143
  • Persson, P. ve Tabellini, G. (1992). Growth, Income Distribution and Democracy. European Economic Review. 36, 593-602
  • Polity IV. (2010). Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions 1800-2009. 17 Eylül 2010 tarihinde http://www.systemicpeace.org/polity/polity4. htm adresinden erişildi.
  • Polity IV.(2011). Regime Authority Characteristics and Transitions Datasets. 14 Kasım 2011 tarihinde http://www.systemicpeace. org/inscr/p4v2010d.xls adresinden erişildi.
  • Polterovich, V. ve Popov, V. (2005). Democracy and Growth Reconsidered: Why Economic Performance of New Democracies is not Encouraging. 17 Eylül 2010 tarihinde http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen. de/21606 adresinden erişildi.
  • Rao, V. (1984). Democracy and Economic Development. Studies on Competitive International Development. 19, 67-81
  • Shen, J.G. (2002). Democracy and Growth: An Alternative Empirical Approach. BOFIT Discussion Papers. 13, 1-28
  • Tavares, S.C. (2007). Democracy and Trade Liberalization. Working Paper, Rochester Institute of Technology. 17 Eylül 2010 tarihinde https://editorialexpress.com/cgibin/ conference/download.cgi?db_name= mwit2007&paper_id=87 1-30 adresinden erişildi.
  • Wang, Y. (2005). Democracy and Bilateral Trade Flow: an Empirical Re-investigation, 1886-1992. Chinese Public Affairs Quarterly. 2, 121-142
  • WDI. World Bank Development Indicators. 20 Mayıs 2010 tarihinde www.worldbank. org/data adresinden erişildi.
  • Wu, W. ve Davis, O.A. (1999). The Two Freedoms, Economic Growth and Development: an Empirical Study. Public Choice. 100, 39-64
  • Yu, M. (2010). Trade, Democracy and Gravity Equation. Journal of Development Economics. 91, 289-300