Determination of forage yield performance of some promising narbon vetch (Vicia narbonensis L.) lines under rainfed conditions in Southeastern Turkey

Bu çalışma, bazı ümitvar koca fiğ (Vicia narbonensis L.) hatlarının Güneydoğu Anadolu Bölgesi ekolojik koşullarındayeşil ot ve kuru madde verimleri ile bu verimler üzerinde etkili bazı önemli verim unsurlarını saptamak amacıylayürütülmüştür. Bu amaçla; 2008-09, 2009-10 ve 2010-11 ekim sezonlarında Diyarbakır GAP Uluslararası TarımsalAraştırma ve Eğitim Merkezi Müdürlüğü deneme arazisinde, tesadüf blokları deneme desenine göre üç tekrarlamalıolarak tarla denemeleri yürütülmüştür. Araştırmada yeşil ot verimi ve kuru madde veriminin de aralarında bulunduğubeş özellik bakımından genotip × yıl interaksiyonu 0.01 düzeyinde istatistiki olarak önemli bulunurken, ana sap sayısıözelliği bakımından 0.05 düzeyinde önemli bulunmuştur. Doğal bitki boyu özelliği bakımından ise genotip × yılinteraksiyonu istatistiki olarak önemsiz bulunmuştur. Araştırmada denemenin yürütüldüğü yıllar ve genotipler arasındaincelenen özellikler aşağıdaki gibi değişim göstermiştir. Yeşil ot verimi 19.42-37.95 t ha -1; kuru madde verimi 4.07-7.16t ha -1; % 50 çiçeklenme gün sayısı 142.3-171.0 gün; doğal bitki boyu 63.8-79.3 cm; ana sap uzunluğu 79.3-133.3 cm;ana sap sayısı 1.93-3.40 sap bitki -1; ana sap kalınlığı 3.32-4.97 mm. Korelasyon analizi sonucuna göre; yeşil ot verimiile kuru madde verimi arasında istatistiki olarak çok önemli ve olumlu ilişki belirlenirken (P

Bazı ümitvar koca fiğ (Vicia narbonensis L.) hatlarının Güneydoğu Anadolu Bölgesi yağışa dayalı koşullarında ot verim performanslarının belirlenmesi

This study was conducted to determine fresh forage yield, dry matter yield, and their affecting components in promisingnarbon vetch lines (Vicia narbonensis L.) under rainfed conditions in the Southeastern Anatolia region of Turkey. Fieldtrials were performed in the research areas of GAP International Agricultural Research and Training Center (GAP IARTC)in Diyarbakir, Turkey during the 2008-09, 2009-10 and 2010-11 growing seasons with winter sowings. Experiments wereestablished according to randomized blocks design with three replications. Although the genotype × year interaction for thenatural plant height trait was not found to be signifcant, the interaction was statistically signifcant (P

PDF

___

Açıkgöz E, Turgut I & Ekiz H (1986). Variation of seed yield and its compenents in Common Vetch under Different Conditions. XVI. International Grassland Congress, Nice-France, pp. 641-642
Açıkgöz E (2001). Forage Crops. Uludag Univ Publ no: 182, Bursa, Turkey, pp. 584
Albayrak S, M Güler & Tongel M O (2004a). Effects of seed rates on forage production and hay quality of vetch-triticale mixtures. Asian Journal of Plant Science 3 (6): 752-756
Albayrak S, Sevimay C S & Tongel M O (2004b). The effects of inoculation with Rhizobium on forage yield and yield components of common vetch (Vicia sativa L.). Turkish Journal of Agriculture & Forestry 28 : 405-411
Altınok S (2002). The effects of different mixture of hairy vetch (Vicia villosa L.) and narbonne vetch (Vicia narbonensis L.) seeded with barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) on silage quality. Tarim Bilimleri Dergisi-Journal of Agricultural Sciences 8 (3): 232-237
Altınok S & Hakyemez H (2002). The effects on forage yields of different mixture rates of hairy vetch (Vicia villosa L.) and narbonne vetch (Vicia narbonensis L.) seeded with barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Tarim Bilimleri Dergisi-Journal of Agricultural Sciences 8 (1): 45-50
Anlarsal A E (1996). The effect of different cutting stages and seeding rates on forage and seed yields of narbonne vetch (Vicia narbonensis L.). Turkish Journal of Agriculture & Forestry 20 (6): 529-534
Avcıoğlu R, Kavut Y T & Okkaoğlu H (2009). Narbonne vetch (Vicia narbonensis L.). In Avcioglu, R. et al (eds). Forages-Legume Forages II. Publication of Turkish Ministry of Agricultural and Rural Affairs, Izmir, pp. 421-425
Babat S & Anlarsal A E 2011. A study about the determination of yield and yield components of some common vetch (Vicia sativa L.) on ecological conditions of Diyarbakir. Journal of Science and Engineering of Çukurova University 26 (3): 37-46
Ball D M, Collins M, Lacefeld G D, Martin N P, Mertens D A, Olson K E, Putnam D H, Undersander D J & Wolf M W (2001). Understanding forage quality. American Farm Bureau Federation Publication 1-01, Park Ridge, IL. Available at:http://forages. oregonstate.edu/resources/publications/foragequality. pdf (Access date: 15 November 2013)
Berger J D, Robertson, L D & Cocks P S (2002). Genotype x environment interaction for yield and other plant attributes among undomesticated Mediterranean Vicia species. Euphytica 126 : 421-435
Büyükburç U, İptaş S & Yılmaz M (1994). A research on determination of annual some forage the legumes which will be adaptabtable in Tokat region. Gaziosmanpasa University Journal of Agriculture Faculty 11 : 145-156
Büyükburç U & İptaş S (2001). The yield and yield components of some narbon vetch (Vicia narbonensis L.) lines in Tokat ecological conditions. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 25 : 79-88
Ceçen S, Oten M & Erdurmuş C (2005). Evaluation of some annual forage legumes as second crop in the coastal region of West Mediterranean Belt of Turkey. Akdeniz University Journal of Agriculture Faculty 18 (3): 331-336.
Gramsh E S (1982). Variation in the quantitative characters of Vicia sativa L. Plant Breeding Absract 52 (5)
Fırıncıoğlu H K, Unal S, Pank Z & Beniwal S P S (2012). Growth and development of narbon vetch (Vicia narbonensis L.) genotypes in the semi-arid central Turkey. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research 10 (2): 430-442
Iptaş S, Büyükburç U & Yılmaz M (1996). A research on determining the yield and adaptable of narbon vetch (Vicia narbonensis L.) lines in Tokat conditions. Turkey 3rd Pasture-Meadow and Forage Crops Congress, 17-19 June, Erzurum-Turkey, pp. 301-307
Iptaş S & Karadağ Y (2009). Determination of the yield and yield components of narbon vetch (Vicia narbonensis L.) lines grown in spring. 1st International Symposium on Sustainable Development, June 9-10 2009, Sarajevo, pp. 83-88
Karadağ Y & Buyukburç U (2004). Effect of Different Seed Ratios on forage and Seed Yield of Some Common Vetch Cultivars Under Tokat-Kazova Conditions. Tarim Bilimleri Dergisi-Journal of Agricultural Sciences 10 (2): 149-157
Lindsey R & Reynold C (2003). A modern agricultural revolution in Fertile Cresent. (http://earthobservatory. nasa.gov/Features/Harran Plains)
Larbi A, Abd El-Moneim A M, Nakkul H, Jammal B & Hassan S (2010). Intra-species variations in yield and quality determinants in Vicia species: 2. Narbon vetch (Vicia narbonensis L.). Animal Feed Science & Technology 162 : 20-27
Nizam I, Orak A, Kamburoglu I, Cubuk M G & Moralar E (2011). Yield potentials of narbonne vetch (Vicia narbonensis L.) genotypes in different environmental conditions. Journal of food Agriculture & Environment 9 (1): 314-318
Rahmati T, Azarfar A, Mahdavi A, Khademi K, Fatahnia F, Shaikhahmadi B & Darabighane B (2012). Chemical composition and forage yield of three Vicia varieties (Vicia spp.) at full blooming stage. Italian Journal of Animal Science 11 : e57: 309-311
SAS Institute (2002). JMP Statistics. Cary, NC, USA: SAS Institute, Inc. pp.707
Sabancı C O, Eginlioğlu G & Ozpinar H (1996). A study on adaptations of narbon vetch (Vicia narbonensis L.) and grasspea (Lathyrus sativus L.). Turkey 3rd Pasture-Meadow and Forage Crops Congress, 17-19 June, Erzurum, Turkey, pp. 287-292
Sabancı C O, Özpınar H & Eginlioğlu G (1998). Adaptations of forage crops to Menemen Conditions I. Narbon vetch (Vicia narbonensis L.). Anadolu Journal of AARI. 8 (2): 42 - 50
Sayar M S, Anlarsal A E & Basbağ M (2010). Current situation, problems and solutions for cultivation of forage crops in the Southeastern Anatolian Region. Harran University Journal of Agriculture Faculty 14 (2): 59-67
Sayar M S (2011). Some Important Forage Crops Species in Pasture and Meadow Spaces of Southeastern Anatolia Region. Publication of GAP International Agricultural Research and Training Center (GAP IARTC) Diyarbakir, Turkey, pp. 53
Sayar M S, Anlarsal A E Basbağ M & Açıkgöz E (2011). Determination of forage yield, its affecting components and relationships among traits of some forage pea (Pisum arvense L.) genotypes in Hazro ecological conditions. Turkey IX. Field Crops Congress, 12-15 September 2011, Bursa, Turkey, 3 : 1716-1721
Steel G D & Torrie J H (1960). Principles and procedures of statistics with special reference to biological sciences. New York; McGraw-Hill
Tan M, Koç A, Dumlu Gül Z, Elkoca E & Gul I. 2013. Determination of dry matter yield and yield components of local forage pea (Pisum sativum ssp. arvense L.) ecotypes. Tarim Bilimleri Dergisi-Journal of Agricultural Science 19 (4): 289-296
TIRTAFLS (2001). Technical Instruction for Registration Trials in Annual Forage Legumes Species. Publication of Seed Registration and Certifcation Centre, Ankara, Turkey, pp.36
TMF (2011). Diyarbakır Regional Directorate of Meteorology records, Turkish Meteorological Forecast of Turkey
Türk M, Albayrak S and Yüksel O (2007.) Effects of phosphorus fertilisation and harvesting stages on forage yield and quality of narbon vetch. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 50 : 457-462
Uzunmehmetoğlu B & Kendir H (2006). Effects of winter and spring sowings on grain yields of narbon vetch (Vicia narbonensis L.). Tarim Bilimleri Dergisi- Journal of Agricultural Sciences 12 (3):294-300
Van De Wouw M, Maxted N & Ford-Lyod B V (2003). Agromorphological characterisation of common vetch and its close relatives. Euphytica 130 : 281-292
Yılmaz S (2008). Effects of increased phosphorus rates and plant densities on yield and yield-related traits of narbon vetch lines. Turkish Journal of Agriculture & Forestry 32: 49-56
Yolcu H & Tan M. 2008. General view to Turkey forage crops cultivation. Tarim Bilimleri Dergisi-Journal of Agricultural Sciences 14 (3): 313-312
Yücel C, Hızlı H, Firincioğlu H K, Cil A & Anlarsal A E (2009). Forage yield stability of common vetch (Vicia sativa L.) genotypes in the Cukurova and GAP Regions of Turkey. Turkish Journal of Agriculture & Forestry 33 : 119-125