___

• Akcura M, Kaya Y, Taner S & Ayrancı R (2006). Parametric stability analyses for grain yield of durum wheat. Plant Soil Environtment 52 (6): 254–261
• Annicchiarico P (2002). Genotype environment interactions challenge and opportunities for plant breeding and cultivar recommendations. FAO Plant production and protection, pp. 174
• Banik B R, Khaldun A B M, Mondal A A, Islam A & Rohman M M (2010). Assessment of genotype-by- environment interaction using additive main effects and multiplicative interaction model (AMMI) in Maize (Zea mays L.) Hybrids. Academic Journal of Plant Sciences 3 (4): 134-139
• Bantayehu M (2009). Analysis and correlation of stability parameters in malting barley. African Crop Science Journal 17 (3): 145-153
• Ceccarelli S (1996). Positive interpretation of genotype by environment interactions in relation to sustainability and biodiversity. In: Cooper M, Hammer GL (eds) Plant adaptation and crop improvement. CAB International in association with IRRI and ICRISAT, Wallingford, pp. 467-486
• Crossa J, P N Fox, Pfeifer W H, Rajaram S & Gauch H G (1990). AMMI adjustment for statistical analysis of international wheat yield trial. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 81 : 27-37
• DeLacy I H, Basford K E, Cooper M, Bull J K & McLaren C G (1996). Analysis of multi-environment data - An historical perspective .In: M Cooper & G L Hammer (Eds), Plant adaptation and crop improvement, Wallingford, UK, CABI, pp. 39-124
• Ebdon J S & Gauch H G (2002). Additive main effect and multiplicative interaction analysis of national turfgrass performance trials. II cultivar recommendations. Crop Science 42 : 497-506
• Gauch H G & Zobel R W (1996). AMMI analyses of yield trials. In Kang MS and Gauch HG (eds.). Genotype by environment interaction. CRC. Boca Raton, Florida, pp. 85-122
• Hanamaratti N G, Salimath P M, Vijayakumar C H M, Ravikumar R L, Kajjidonı S T & Chetti M B (2009). Genotypic stability of superior near isogenic introgression lines for productivity in upland rice. Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Sciences 22 (4): 736-740
• Ilker E, Tonk F A, Çaylak Ö, Tosun M & Özmen İ (2009). Assessment of genotype x environment interactions for grain yield in maize hybrids using AMMI and gge biplot analyses. Turkish Journal of Field Crops 14 (2): 123–135
• Kaya Y, Palta Ç & Taner S (2002). Additive main effects and multiplicative interactions analysis of yield performances in bread wheat genotypes across environments. Turk Journal of Agricultural Forestry 26 : 275-279
• Mahalingam L, Mahendran S, Chandra B R & Atlin G (2006). AMMI Analysis for stability of grain yield in rice (Oryza sativa L ). International Journal of Botany 2 (2): 104-106
• Mekonnen Z & Mohammed H (2010). Study on genotype x environment interaction of oil content in sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) World Journal of Fungal and Plant Biology 1 (1): 15-20
• Muhe K & Assefa A (2010). Genotypes × environment interaction in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivar development in Ethiopia. International Research Journal of Plant Science 2 (10): 317-322
• Öktem A, Engin A & Çölkesen M (2004). Arpada (Hordeum vulgare L.) genotip x çevre interaksiyonları ve stabilite analizi. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi-Journal of Agricultural Sciences 10 (1): 31-37
• Özcan H, Aydın, N & Bayramoğlu H O (2005). Ekmeklik buğdayda verim stabilitesi ve stabilite parametreleri arasındaki korelasyon. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi- Journal of Agricultural Sciences 11 (1): 21-25
• Purchase J L (1997). Parametric analysis to describe G×E interaction and yield stability in winter wheat. PhD. Thesis, Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, University of the Orange Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa
• Rodriguez M, Rau D, Papa R & Attene G (2007). Genotype by environment interactions in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.): different responses of landraces, recombinant in bred lines and varieties to Mediterranean environment. Euphytica , DOI10.1007/ s10681-007-9635-8
• Sadeghi S M, Samizadeh H, Amiri E & Ashouri M (2011). Additive main effects and multiplicative interactions (AMMI) analysis of dry leaf yield in tobacco hybrids across environments. African Journal of Biotechnology 10 (21): 4358-4364
• SAP (2010). Statistics of agricultural production From: http://www.tarimsal.com/tarim_istatistikleri.htm Vargas M & Crossa J (2000). The AMMI analysis and graphing the biplot. Biometrics and Statistics Unit, CIMMYT
• Voltas J, Van Eeuwijk F A, Igartua E, Garciadel Moral L.F, Molina Cano J L & Romagosa I (2002). Genotype by environment interaction and adaptation in barley breeding: basic concepts and methods of analysis. In: Slafer GA, Molina-Cano JL, Savin R, Araus JL, Romagosa I (eds) Barley science: recent advances from molecular biology to agronomy of yield and quality. New York, Food Product Press, ISBN1- 56022-909-8
• Wieslaw M.S, Gacekb E, Paderewski J, Gozdowski D & Drzazga T (2011). Adaptive yield response of winter wheat cultivars across environments in Poland using combined AMMI and cluster analyses. International Journal of Plant Production 5 (3): 1735-8043
• Wallace D H, Youstone K S, Baudoin J P, Beaver J, Coyne D P, White J W & Zobel R W (1995). Photoperiod × temperature interaction effects on the days to fowering of beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). In: Handbook of Plant and Crop Physiology. Mohammed Pessaraki (Ed.), pp. 863-891
• Yan W, Cornelius P L, Crossa J & Hunt L A (2001). Two types of GGE biplots far analyzing multi-environment trial data. Crop Science 41 : 656-663
• Yan, W & Rajcan I (2002). Biplots analysis of the test sites and trait relations of soybean in Ontario. Crop Science 42 : 11-20
• Zobel R W, Wright M & Gauch H G (1988). Statistical analysis of a yield trial. Agronomy Journal 80 : 388- 393