INVESTIGATION OF THE LEADERSHIP LEVELS OF STUDENTS OF THE SPORT SCIENCE WHO DOING ACTIVE SPORTS AND NON ACTIVE SPORTS ACCORDING TO DIFFERENT VARIABLES: THE CASE OF ISPARTA

In this study, it is aimed to investigate the leadership orientation of students of sports science who do active sports and do not do active sports at Suleyman Demirel university according to different variables. The data of the study were collected between November 12 and December 24, 2019. This research participated in 177 students, 73 females, and 104 males. As the data collection tool; It was used The Leadership Orientations Scale developed by Bolman and Deal (1990) and adapted to Turkish by Dereli (2003). Parametric tests were used due to the normal distribution of the data. When the data obtained were examined, it is seen that the scale had significant differences in terms of transformational leadership, charismatic leadership sub-dimensions, and gender. It was observed a significant difference in transformational leadership and charismatic leadership according to active doing sports and sports branch. Moreover, it was observed that there was no statistically significant difference in terms of the sub-dimensions of the leadership scale and place of residence and age variables. However, it was determined that the level of leadership of the people living in the villages is higher than those living in the city. Also, it was concluded that the students active doing sports at the university showed above medium level leadership tendency and was at a well-accepted level.

Aktif Spor Yapan ve Aktif Spor Yapmayan Spor Bilimleri Öğrencilerinin Liderlik Düzeylerinin Farklı Değişkenlere Göre İncelenmesi: Isparta Örneği

Bu çalışmada Süleyman Demirel üniversitesinde aktif spor yapan ve aktif spor yapmayan spor bilimleri öğrencilerin liderlik yönelimlerinin farklı değişkenlere göre incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Çalışmanın verileri 12 Kasım-24 Aralık 2019 tarihleri arasında toplanmıştır. Araştırmaya Isparta’da 73 kadın ve 104 erkek olmak üzere 177 öğrenci katılmıştır. Veri toplama aracı olarak Bolman ve Deal (1990) tarafından geliştirilen, Dereli (2003) tarafından Türkçe’ye uyarlanan Liderlik Yönelimleri Ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Verilerin normal dağılımı sebebiyle parametrik testler kullanılmıştır. Elde edilen veriler incelendiğinde ölçeğin dönüşümsel liderlik, karizmatik liderlik alt boyutları ile cinsiyete göre anlamlı farklılıklar olduğu görülmüştür. Spor yapma ve spor branşına göre dönüşümcü liderlik ve karizmatik liderlikte anlamlı bir fark olduğu gözlenmiştir. Ancak liderlik ölçeğinin alt boyutları ile ikamet edilen yer ve yaş değişkenlerine göre istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark olmadığı gözlenmiştir. Ancak köylerde yaşayanların liderlik düzeyinin şehirde yaşayanlardan daha yüksek olduğu belirlenmiştir. Ayrıca Üniversitede spor yapan öğrencilerin orta düzeyin üstünde liderlik eğilimleri gösterdikleri ve kabul edilen bir düzeyde oldukları sonucuna varılmıştır.

PDF

___

Aygün, M. (2018). The effect of emotional intelligence and leadership features of ice hockey players on their sports trait self-confidence. Ph.D. Thesis, Atatürk University Institute of Winter Sports and Sports Sciences, 41-85.

Baltaş, A. (2007). Team Work and Leadership From Change to the Future. Remzi Bookstore.

Baltaş, A. (2012). Managing in Turkish Culture Global Achievements with Local Values. Remzi Bookstore.

Baltaş, A. (2016). Managing in Turkish Culture Global Achievements with Local Values. Remzi Bookstore.

Biçer, T. (2008). Total Quality Management and Football Applications in Sports. Beyaz Yayınları.

Bolman, L. G & Deal T. E. (1990). Leadership Orientations (self). Leadership Frameworks.

Brooks, I. (2006). Organizational Behavior: Individuals, Groups, and Organizations. Pearson Education.

Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2017). Data Analysis Handbook for Social Sciences Statistics, Research Pattern SPSS Applications, and Interpretation. Pegem Akademi Publications.

Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E. K., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş. & Demirel, F. (2012). Methods of Scientific Research. Pegem Academy Publications.

Cengiz, R. & Güllü, S. (2018). Investigation of Leadership Orientation and Physical Respectiveness Levels of Faculty of Sport Sciences Students. Gaziantep University Journal of Sport Science, 3(4), 94-108.

Çetinkaya, G. & İmamoğlu, G. (2018). Research on Leadership Tendency of Students Taking Sports Education According to Difference Variations. The Journal of International Social Research, 11(19),719-725. Doi: 10.17719/ jisr.2018.2681

Daft, R. (2001). Organization Theory and Design. Thomson South-Western, Eighth Edition.

Daft, R. L. (1997). Management. 4th ed. Dryden Press.

Darbaz, T. (2004). Leadership ın the 21st Century. The International Leadership Symposium, Military Academy.

Dereli, M. (2003) A Survey Research of Leadership Styles of Elementary School Principals. Master Thesis, Middle East Technical University Educational Sciences, Science Department of Education.

Dorak, R. F. & Vurgun, N. (2006). The Relation of Empathy and Team Cohesion in Terms of Team Sports. Ankara University Spormetre The Journal of Physical Education And Sport Sciences, 4, 73-77.

Eren, E. (2012). Organizational Behavior and Management Psychology (13th Edition). Beta Publications.

Eren, E. (2013). Management and Organization. Contemporary and global approaches. Beta.

Erol, E. (2016). Management and Organization. Beta Publisher.

Ertürk, M. (1998). The Basic Principles of Business Science. (3rd Edition). Beta Publications.

Güllü, M. & Arslan, C. (2009). Leadership styles of physical education teachers. Mustafa Kemal University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 6(11), 353-368.

Hesselbein, F., Goldsmith, M. & Beckhard, R. (2000). The Leader of The Future (Translation: Hayrettin Tok). Form Publications.

Kandemir, D. (2017). Examination of Leadership Style of Coaches Serving Different Individual Sports Branches in Elazig Province. Master Thesis, Selcuk University, Institute of Health Sciences.

Karasar, N. (2012). Method of Scientific Research. Nobel Publication.

Karasar, N. (2016). Method of Scientific Research. Nobel Publication.

Karkın, N. (2004). Leadership behavior of public and private sector managers. A literature analysis experiment. Turkish Journal of Administration, 445, 43-83.

Koçel, T. (2001). Management of The Business. (8th Edition). Beta Edition.

Koruç, Z. (1995). Coach characteristics and coach personality in volleyball. The Journal of Volleyball Science and Technology, 3-9.

Lindauer, J. R. (2000). A Comparison of Preferred Leadership Behaviour of College Athletes in Individual and Team Sports. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Wisconsin-La Crosse.

McArdle, M. K. (2008) Leadership Orientations of Community College Presidents and the Administrators Who Report to Them: A frame analysis. University of Central Florida Orlando, dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Education.

Ming, F. K. (2003). Relationship Between Perceived Coach Leadership Behaviors and Team Cohesivenens Among Taiwanese Team and Individual Interscholastic Sports Participants. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Dakota.

Özdemir, E. (2003). Leadership and ethics. The Journal Economics and Administrative Sciences of Uludag University, 22(2), 151-168.

Robbins, S. (1984). Management: Concepts and Practices. Prentice-Hall.

Secer, I. (2015). Practical Data Analysis with Spss and Lisrel. Ani publishing.

Senger, K. (2014). Examination of Teachers' Perception of Leadership Orientation: The Case of Kars. Master thesis, The Institute of Social Sciences.

Serin, K. (2016). Determination of Leadership Styles of Boxing Trainers. Master thesis, Selcuk University Institution of Medical Sciences.

Tiryaki, Ş. (1996). Determination of aggression levels of individuals who do sports: A review in terms of team and individual sports. International Symposium of Sport Psychology, 10-12.

http://www.tdk.gov.tr/index.php?option=com_gts&arama=gts&guid=TDK.GTS.5c8e77bfd0d136.19186088, 23 June 2019.