İbrahim Şevki BAYRAKDAR, Hümeyra TERCANLI ALKIŞ, Sevcihan Günen YILMAZ, Büşra TANRIKOL

15-35 Yaş Arası Güney Türk Popülasyonunda Gömülü Diş Sıklığının Değerlendirilmesi: Epidemiyolojik Çalışma

Amaç: Bu retrospektif çalışmada üçüncü molar dişler hariç diğer dişlerin gömülü kalma sıklığının araştırılması amaçlanmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu çalışmaya 2674 erişkin birey (Erkek/Kadın:1146/1528) (% 42.8/ %57.2) dahil edildi. Hastaların panoramik radyogramları gömülü dişlerin varlığı açısında üç oral ve maksillofasiyal radyoloji uzmanı tarafından değerlendirildi. Gömülü dişlerin; cinsiyet ve çenelerdeki dağılımlarını karşılaştırmak için ki-kare testi kullanıldı. P

Evaluation Of The Incidence Of Impacted Tooth In Southern Turkish Populatıon Aged Between 15 And 35 Years: An Epidemiological Study

Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate the incidence of teethother than the third molar teeth to remain impacted. Material & Methods: Atotal of 2674 adult persons (Male/Female: 1146/1528; 42.8%/57.2%) wereincluded in this study. Panoramic radiograms of the patients were evaluatedby three oral and maxillofacial radiology specialists for the presence ofimplanted teeth. Chi-square test was used to compared the distribution ofthe impacted teeth to genders and localization in the maxilla and mandible. P

PDF

___

Dural S, Avcı N, Karabıyıkoğlu T. Gömük dişlerin görülme sıklığı, çenelere göre dağılımları ve gömülü kalma nedenleri. Sağ Bil Arş Derg 1996;7:127-33.
Sanu OO,TA,MC. Incidence ofmandibularand associated pathologies in an orthodontic patient population in Lagos, Nigeria. Nig Q J Hosp Med;22(4):291-5.
Grover PS, Lorton L. The incidence of unerupted permanent teeth and related clinical cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1985;59:420-5.
Yavuz MS, Aras MH, Büyükkurt MC, Tozoglu S. Impacted mandibular canines. J Contemp Dent Pract 2007;8:78-85.
Ezoddini AF, Sheikhha MH, Ahmadi H. Prevalence of dental developmental anomalies: a radiographic study. Community Dent Health 2007;24:140-4.
Rozsa N, Fabian G, Szadeczky B, Kaan M, Gabris K, Tarján I. Prevalence of impacted permanent upper canine and its treatment in 11-18-year-old orthodontic patients. Fogorv Sz 2003;96:65-9.
Kramer RM, Williams AC. The incidence of impacted teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1970;237-41.
Stanley HR, Alattar M, Collett WK, Stringfellow HR Jr, Spiegel EH. Pathological sequelae of “neglected” impacted third molars. J Oral Pathol 1988;17:113-7.
Shah RM, Boyd MA, Vakil TF. Studies of permanent tooth anomalies in 7,886 Canadian individuals I: impacted teeth. Dent J 1978;44:262-4.
Chu FC, Li TK, Lui VK, Newsome PR, Chow RL, Cheung LK. Prevalence of impacted teeth and associated pathologies-a radiographic study of the Hong Kong Chinese population. Hong Kong Med J 2003;9:158-63.
Schersten E, Lysell L, Rohlin M. Prevalence of impaced thırd molars in dental students. Swed Dent J 1989;13:7-13.
Brown LH, Berkman S, Cohen D, Kaplan AL, Rosenberg M. A radiological study of the frequency and distribution of impacted teeth. J DentAssoc S Afr 1982;37:627-30.
Lima CJ, Silva LC, Melo MR, Santos JA, Santos TS. Evaluation of the agreement by examiners according to classifications of third molars. Med Oral Patol Oral CirBucal 2012;17:281-6.
Singh H, Lee K, Ayoub AF. Management of Asymptomatic Impacted Wisdom Teeth: A Multicenter Comparison. Br J Oral and Maxillofac Surg 1996;34:389-93
Maaita J, Alwrikat A. Is the mandibular third molar a risk factor for mandibular angle fracture? Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000;89: 143-6.
Alling CC, Catone GA. Management of impacted teeth. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1993;51:3-6.
Rasmussen P, Kotsaki A: Inherited primary failure of eruption in the primary dentitions report. J of Dent for Child 1997;64:43-47.