Futbolda şiddetin erkeklik anlamları

Çalışma; futbolda, sporcuların kendi şiddet eylemlerine hangi anlamları yükledikleri üzerine kurgulanmıştır. Futbol yaşantısını sürdüren sporcular ile futbol antrenör ve yardımcı antrenörlerden oluşan on beş kişi ile yarı-yapılandırılmış derinlemesine bireysel görüşmeler yapılmıştır. Görüşmelerin analizi sonucunda; futbol alanında şiddete, erkeklik değerleri, dayanışma, güç ve heteroseksüellik anlamlarının yüklendiği belirlenmiştir. Oyuncu şiddetini meşrulaştırmada erkekliğin, kültürel kodlar olarak okunduğunu gösteren bu anlamlar; futboldaki erkek hiyerarşisinde, üstünlüğün doğrudan hegemonik erkekliğe verildiğine işaret etmektedir.

Masculine meanings of violence in soccer

This study was structured on the meanings athletes attribute to their own violent actions in soccer. Fifteen people consisting of soccer players, soccer trainers and trainers assistant were individually interviewed with in-depth and semistructured questions. The analysis of interviews suggests that violence in soccer is attributed masculinity, solidarity, power and heterosexuality. These meanings, indicating that masculinity is translated as cultural codes in the justification of players violence, imply that superiority in the male hierarchy at soccer is granted to hegemonic masculinity.

___

  • 1. Acet M. (2001). Futbol Seyircisini Fanatik ve Saldırgan Olmaya Yönelten Sosyal Faktörler, Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  • 2. Baker C. (2003). Cultural Studies: Theory and Practice, Second edit. USA: Sage Pub.
  • 3. Bramham P. (2003). Boys, Masculinities and PE. Sport. Education and Society, 8 (1), 57–71.
  • 4. Bourdieu P. (2002). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste. Londra: Routledge & Kegan.
  • 5. Burgess I, Edwards A, Skinner J. (2003.) Football culture in an Australian school setting: The construction of masculine identity, sport. Education and Society, 8 (2), 199–212.
  • 6. Caudwell J. (2003). Sporting Gender: Women’s footballing bodies as sites/sights for the (re) articulation of sex, gender, and desire. Sociology of Sport Journal, 20, 371-386.
  • 7. Caudwell J. (2007). Queering the Field? The complexities of sexuality within a lesbian-identified football team in England Gender. Place and Culture, 14, (2), 183–196
  • 8. Connell RW. (1995). Masculunities, UK: Polity Press.
  • 9. Connell RW. (2000) Understanding Men: Gender Sociology and the New International Research on Masculinities, Clark Lecture, Department of Sociology, University of Kansas, 02.04.2009, http://toolkit. endabuse.org/Resources/UnderstandingMen.html.
  • 10. Connell RW. (2003). The Role of Men and Boys in Achieving Gender Equality, 02.04.2009, http://www. un.org/womenwatch/daw/egm/men-boys2003/ reports/egm-od-report.pdf.
  • 11. Çağlayan HS, Fişekcioğlu İB. (2004). Futbol seyircisini şiddete yönelten faktörler.
  • 12. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 12, 127-142.
  • 13. Demren Ç. (2003) Erkeklik, ataerkillik ve iktidar ilişkileri, 28.05.2009, http://www.huksam.hacettepe. edu.tr/Turkce/SayfaDosya/erkeklik_ataerkillil.pdf.
  • 14. Donaldson M. (1993). What is hegemonic masculinity? Theory and Society, 22, 643-657.
  • 15. Elias N. Dunning E. (1986) Quest for Excitement: Sport and Leisure in the Civilizing Process. Basil: Blackwell. UK.
  • 16. Fitzclarence L, Hickey C. (2001). Real footballers don’t eat quiche: Old narratives in new times. Men and Masculinities, 4, 118-139.
  • 17. Fraser M, Greco M. (2005) The Body A Reader, (M. Fraser, M. Greco, der.), Londra: Routledge.
  • 18. Foucault M. (2005). Özne ve İktidar, (çev. O. Ergüden, O. Akınhay), İstanbul: Ayrıntı yayınları.
  • 19. Hall MA. (1988). The discourse of gender and sport: From femininity to feminism, Sociology of Sport Journal, 5, 330-340
  • 20. Hargreaves J. (1994). Sporting Females Critical Issues in the History and Sociology of Women’s Sports. Londra: Routledge.
  • 21. Harris J. (2007). Doing gender on and off the pitch: the world of female football players. Sociological Research Online, 12 (1), 25.08.2009 http://www. socresonline.org.uk/12/1/harris.html.
  • 22. Hearn J. (1998). The Violence of Men: How Men Talk about and How Agencies Respond to Men’s Violence to Women, USA: Sage Pub.
  • 23. Hearn J. (2004) From hegemonic masculinity to the hegemony of men. Feminist Theory, 5(1), 49-72.
  • 24. Humberstone B. (2002) Femininity, masculinity and difference: what’s wrong with a sarong? (A. Laker, der.). The Sociology of Sport and Physical Education: An Introductory Reader. Londra: Routledge.
  • 25. Kandiyoti D. (1997). Cariyeler, Bacılar Yurttaşlar Kimlikler ve Toplumsal Dönüşümler. (çev. A. Bora, F. Sayılan, Ş. Tekeli, H. Tapınç, F. Özbay). İstanbul: Metis Yayınları.
  • 26. Kayaoğlu AG. (2000). Futbol Fanatizmi, Sosyal Kimlik ve Şiddet: Bir Futbol Takımının Taraftarlarıyla Yapılan Çalışma, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
  • 27. Kimmel, M. (1987) Rethinking masculinity. (M. S. Kimmel, der.). Changing Men: New Directions in Research on Men and Masculinity, s. 9-24. USA: Sage Publications.
  • 28. Klomsten AT, Marsh H W, Skaalvik EM. (2005). Adolescents’ perceptions of masculine and feminine values in sport and physical education: A study of gender differences. Sex Roles, 52 ( 9-10), 625-636.
  • 29. Kümbetoğlu B. (2005). Sosyolojide ve Antropolojide Niteliksel Yöntem ve Araştırma, İstanbul: Bağlam Yayınları.
  • 30. Labarge S. (1995). Toward an integration of gender into Bourdieu’s concept of cultural capital. Sociology of Sport Journal, 12, 132-146.
  • 31. Light R, Kirk D. (2000). High school rugby, the body and the reproduction of hegemonic masculinity, Sport, Education and Society, 5(2), 163-176.
  • 32. Mean L. (2001). Identity and discursive practice: Doing gender on the football pitch. Discourse & Society, 12, 789-815.
  • 33. Messner MA. (1990). Men studying masculinity: Some epistomological issues in sport sociology. Sociology of Sport Journal, (7), 136-153.
  • 34. Messner MA. (1992). Power at Play: Sports and the Problem of Masculinity. Boston: Beacon Press.
  • 35. Messner M A. (2002). Taking the Field: Women, Men and Sports. USA: University of Minnesota Pres.
  • 36. Messner M A. (2005). Still a man’s world? Studying masculinities and sport (M.S. Kimmel, J. Hearn, R.W. Connell, der.). Handbook of Studies on Men and Masculinities, s. 313-325, USA: Sage Pub.
  • 37. Messner MA, Solomon NM. (2007). Social justice and men’s interest: The case of Title IX. Journal of Sport & Social Issues, 31 (2), 162-178.
  • 38. Naess F D. (2001). Narratives about young men and masculinities in organised sport in Sport. Education and Society, 6, (2) 125–142.
  • 39. Parker A. (2001). Soccer, servitude and subcultural identity: Football traineeship and masculine construction. Soccer and Society, 2, (1), 59–80.
  • 40. Pringle R. (2005). Masculinities, sport and power: A critical comparison of Gramscian and Foucauldian inspired theoretical tools. Journal of Sport & Social Issues, 29, (3), 256-278.
  • 41. Renold E. (1997). All they’ve got on their brains is football, sport, masculinity and the gendered practices of playground relations. Sport, Education and Society, 2 (1), 5-23.
  • 42. Renold E. (2001). Learning the ‘Hard’ Way: Boys, hegemonic masculinity and the negotiation of learner identities in the primary school. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 22 (3), 369-385.
  • 43. Roth A, Basow SA. (2004). Feminity, sports, and feminism developing a theory of physical liberation. Journal of Sport & Social Issues, 28 (3), 245-265.
  • 44. Sancar S. (2009). Erkeklik: İmkansız İktidar, Ailede, Piyasada ve Sokakta Erkekler. İstanbul: Metis Yayınları.
  • 45. Selek P. (2009). Sürüne Sürüne Erkek Olmak. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
  • 46. Skelton C. (2000) ‘A Passion for Football’: Dominant masculinities and primary schooling. Sport, Education and Society, 5 (1), 5–18.
  • 47. Smith J. (2007). Ye’ve got to ‘ave balls to play this game sir!’ Boys, peers and fears: the negative influence of school-based ‘cultural accomplices’ in constructing hegemonic masculinities. Gender and Education. 19 (2), 179–198.
  • 48. Swain J. (2000). The Money’s Good, The Fame’s Good, The Girls are Good’: the role of playground football in the construction of young boys’ masculinity in a junior school. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 21 (1), 95-109.
  • 49. Swain J. (2004). The resources and strategies that 10–11-year-old boys use to construct masculinities in the school setting. British Educational Research Journal. 30 (1), 167-185.
  • 50. Swain J. (2005). Masculinities in education. Handbook of Studies on Men & Masculinities, (M.S.Kimmel, J. Hearn, R.W.Connell, der.), Londra: Sage Publication.
  • 51. Swain J. (2006). The role of sport in the construction of masculinities in an English independent junior school. Sport, Education and Society, 11 (4), 317-335.
  • 52. Şahin HM (2003) Gaziantepspor futbol takımı taraftarlarının şiddet ve saldırganlık olaylarına bakış açılarının sosyolojik boyutu üzerine bir araştırma. Gaziantep, Gaziantepspor Kulübü Spor Eğitim Yayınları, Yayın NO:6.
  • 53. Talimciler A. (2006). Sosyolojik açıdan futbol fanatizmi. Sosyoloji Dergisi, 15, 91-104.
  • 54. Theberge N. (1993). The construction of gender in sport: Women, coaching, and the naturalization of difference. Social Problems, 40, 301-313.
  • 55. Theberge N. (1995) Gender, sport and the construction of community: A case study from women’s ice hockey. Sociology of Sport Journal, 12, 389-402.
  • 56. Yıldırım A ve Şimşek H. (2003). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Tıpkı Basım, Seçkin yayınları.
  • 57. Yıldız M, Fişekçioğlu İB, Çağlayan HS, Tekin M. Şirin EF, Akyüz M. (2007) Futbol seyircisinin sosyoekonomik yapısının şiddete etkisi (Karamanspor örneği). Erzincan Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 9 (2), 145- 157.