Adapted Physical Education in Middle East Countries

Most countries in the Middle East consider education tobe crucial for development and progress. Governmentsof these countries strive to provide an organized educational setting for their citizens and offer free education for both students with and without disabilities atall educational levels, which include elementary, middle,and high schools. However, the vast majority of maleand female students with disabilities in the Middle Eaststill receive their education in separate schools. In addition, many world educational experts (Bursuck & Friend,2002; Gouveia, 1997; Sharpe, 2003; Starr, 2001) andlocal specialists (Alkhateb & Alhadedy, 2011; Alromeh,2010, Alsalhe, 2011; AlZahrani, 2008) have stated that including students with disabilities in general classes, even in physical education, will generate both educational andsocial benefits for both students with and without disabilities. Some countries in the Middle East such as SaudiArabia are still in the initial stage of considering theimplementation of the inclusion concept in their publicschools, including physical education. A country like theUnited States has implemented this concept for at least30 years in the public schools under the labels of main- streaming (Halvorsen & Neary, 2002), the Regular Education Initiative (D Alonzo, 1990), and now inclusion (Block& Vogler, 1994). This presentation seeks to address someimportant issues regarding the inclusion situation in theMiddle East. It will discuss weaknesses, strengths, laws,teachers and communities attitudes, etc

PDF

___

1. Al Ahmadi, N. (2009). Teachers' perspectives and attitudes towards integrating students with learning disabilities in regular Saudi public schools. PhD. dissertation, Ohio University, United States. Retrieved August 3, 2010, from Dissertations & Theses: Full Text. (Publication No. AAT 3371476).
2. Barrette, G., Holland, L., & Kowalski, E. (1993). Physical education teacher education (PETE): Innovation through infusion and integration. Physical Educator, 50, 69-76.
3. Bartoòová, R., Kudláèek M., & Bressan, L. (2007). Attitudes of future physical educators toward teaching children with disabilities in physical education in the Republic of South Africa. Acta Universitatis. Palackianae Olomu- censis., Gymnica, 37, 69-74.
4. Blinde, E.M., & McCallister, S. G. (1998). Listening to the voices of students with physical disabilities. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 69, 64-68.
5. Block, M.E., & Vogler, E.W. (1994). Inclusion in regular physical education: The research base. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 65, 40-44.
6. Campbell, J., & Gilmore, L. (2003). Changing student teachers attitudes toward disability and inclusion. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 28, 369-379.
7. Chen, S., & Jin, M., (2006). Students attitudes toward including students with disabilities in regular PE settings in Hong Kong and Taiwan. Innovations in inclusive school development: Proceedings of Second International Conference on Inclusive Education. Hong Kong: The Hong Kong Institute of Education.
8. Craft, D. (1994). Inclusion: Physical education for all [special education future]. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 65, 1-10.
9. DePauw, K.P., & Goc Karp, G. (1990). Attitudes of selected college students toward including disabled individuals in integrated settings. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 17, 135-143.
10. DePauw, K., & Goc Karp, G. (1994a). Integrating knowledge of disability throughout the physical education curriculum: An infusion approach. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 11, 1-13.
11. Doll-Tepper, G., Schmidt-Gotz, E., Lienert, C., Döen, U., & Hecker, R. (1994). Attitudes of university students and teachers toward integrating students with disabilities in regular physical education classes. Physical Education Review, 17(1), 45-57.
12. Downs, P., & Williams, T. (1994). Student attitudes toward integration of people with disabilities in activity settings. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 11, 32-43.
13. Gladnet Collection, (2002). Country profile on disability: Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Retrieved July 6, 2010, from digital commons .ilr.cornell.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?art.
14. Goodwin, D.L., & Watkinson, E.J. (2000). Inclusive physical education from the perspective of students with physical disabilities. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 17,144-160.
15. Hodge, S.R., & Ammah, J. (2005). Secondary physical education teachers‟ beliefs and practices in teaching students with severe disabilities: A descriptive analysis. University of North Carolina Press, 6, 40-51.
16. Hodge, S.R., Davis, R., Woodard, R., & Sherrill, C. (2002) Comparison of practicum types in changing preservice teachers‟ attitudes and perceived competence. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 19, 155-172.
17. Hutzler, Y., Fliess, O., Chacham, A., & van den Auwe- ele, Y. (2002). Perspectives of children with physical di- sabilities on inclusion and empowerment: Supporting and limiting factors. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 19, 300-317.
18. Jansma, P., & Schultz, B. (1984). Validation and use of a mainstreaming attitude inventory with physical educators. American Corrective Therapy Journal, 36, 150-158.
19. Karper, W. B., & Martinek, T.J. (1983). Motor performan- ce and self-concept of handicapped and nonhandicapped children in integrated physical education classes. American Corrective Therapy Journal, 37, 91-95.
20. Kodish, S., Hodges Kulinna, P., Martin, J., Pangrazi, R. & Darst P. (2006). Determinants of physical activity in an inclusive setting. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 23, 390-409.
21, Kowalski, E., & Rizzo, T.L. (1996). Factors influencing preservice student attitudes toward individuals with disa- bilities. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 13, 180-196.
22. Lepore, M., & Kowalski, E. (1992). Infusion: A new look at an old idea. Paper Presented at the North American Federation of Adapted Physical Activity (NAFAPA) Con- ference, Montreal.
23. Mdaa (2008). Culture, Religion & Disability. Retrieved September 2, 2010, from http://www.mdaa.org.au/publi- cations/ethnicity/information.html
24. Ministry of Education. (2003). The develop of education. Retrieved July 6, 2010, from http://www.ibe.unesco.org/Int- rnational/ICE47/ English/Natreps/reports/sarabia_en.pdf
25. Papadopoulou, D., Kokaridas, D., Papanikolaou, Z., & Patsiaouras, A. (2004). Attitudes of Greek physical education teachers toward inclusion of students with di- sabilities. International Journal of Special Education, 19, 104-111. Retrieved from EBSCOhost.
26. Patrick, G. (1987). Improving attitudes toward disabled persons. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 4, 316-325.
27. Reid, G., & Broadhead, G.D. (1995). APAQ at ten: A do- cumentary analysis. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 12, 103-112.
28. Rizzo, T.L. (1984). Attitudes of physical educators to- wards teaching handicapped pupils. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 1, 267-274
29. Rizzo, T.L., & Kirkendall, D.R. (1995). Teaching students with mild disabilities: What affects attitudes of future physical educators?. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 12, 205-216. Retrieved from EBSCOhost.
30. Rizzo, T.L., & Vispoel, W.P. (1991). Physical educators' attributes and attitudes toward teaching students with handicaps. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 8, 4-11.
31. Sadler, W.C., Tenting, L.G., & Widow, G.A. (1993). America 2000: Implications for physical education. Physical Educator, 50, 77-86.
32. Saudi Arabian Cultural Mission. (2006). Educational System in Saudi Arabia Retrieved July 21, 2010 from www.sacm.org/Publications/58285_Edu_complete.pd
33. Selway, D., & Ashman, F. (1998). Disability, religion and health: A literature review in search of the spiritual dimensions of disability. Disability and Society, 13, 429 439.
34. Shaver, J.P., Curtis, C.K., Jesunathadas, J., & Strong, C.J. (1989). The modification of attitudes toward persons with disabilities: Is there a best way? International Journal of Special Education, 4, 33-57.
35. Silverman, S., Dodds, P., Placek, J., Shute, S., & Rife, F. (1984). Academic learning time in elementary school physical education (ALT-PE) for student subgroups and instructional activity units. Research Quarterly for Exer- cise and Sports, 55, 365-370.
36. Slininger, D., Sherrill, C., & Jankowski, C.M. (2000). Children‟s attitudes toward peers with severe disabiliti- es: Revisiting contact theory. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 17, 176-196.
37. Stewart, C. (1990). Effects of practica types in preser- vice adapted physical education curriculum on attitudes toward disabled populations. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 10, 76-83.
38. Thinkquest, (2009). Midea and Attitudes. Retrieved Sebetember 11, 2010, from http://library.thinkquest. org/C007405/themedia/medatt.shtml
39. Verderber, J.M.S., Rizzo, T.L., & Sherrill, C. (2003). Assessing student intention to participate in inclusive physical education. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 20, 26-45.
40. Vogler, E.W., van der Mars, H., Cusimano, B., & Darst, P. (1992). Relationship of presage, context, and process variables to ALT-PE of elementary level main- streamed students. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 7, 298-313.
41. Xafopoulos, G., Kudlácek, M., & Christina, E. (2009). Effect of the Intervention Program "Paralympic School Day" On Attitudes of Children Attending International School Towards Inclusion of Students With Disabilities. / Vliv Intervencního Programu, Paralympijský kolní Den Na Postoje Detí Navtevujících Mezinárodní kolu Vuci Zaclenení Studentu Spostižením. Acta Universitatis Palackianae Olomucensis. Gymnica, 39(4), 63-71.
42. Zamzami, M.S. (2005). Attitudes of preservice physical education teachers toward teaching movement skills to students with disabilities in inclusive classrooms in Saudi Arabia. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Arkansas, United States, Arkansas. Retrieved August 3, 2010, from Dissertations & Theses: Full Text. (Publication No. AAT 3207137).