Does Handwriting Speed Influence Pencil Grip Force and Muscular Activity?

Does Handwriting Speed Influence Pencil Grip Force and Muscular Activity?

Handwriting proficiency, or fluent strokes that individualsperform without a large amount of effort and speed in order to produce an output that is readable, is not universal.Approximately 12 to 21 percent of students have difficulties writing at the elementary level (Weintraub, Gilmore- Graul and Weiss, 2010). This outcome is significant as manyhandwriting interventions are made to correct studentpencil grasp and writing mechanics. When these studentsreach university, they may be required to produce quickand efficient handwriting patterns. There is, however, limited information on the muscle activity levels and grippingforce needed to handwrite efficiently during speeded andnon-speeded situations at the university level. This studyexamined the impact of students handwriting speed (characters/min) on their hand muscle activity levels and pencilgrip force. Forty university students (25 females, 15 males)comprising 93% right-handed and 3% left-handed partici- pated in this study. Handwriting speed was measured in characters per minutes. Surface Electromyography (SEMG)was used to assess muscle activity in each participant sdominant hand. The pencil grip force was recorded usinga pen designed to measure lateral forces. A discriminantanalysis compared fast and slow handwriting performancein relation to muscle activity and gripping force. No significant differences were found between fast and slow handwriters in terms of muscle activity and grip force, F (3,36)= 0.580, p>.05. These results reflect the maturity and automaticity of university students handwriting. This uniqueprotocol holds promise for the development of remedialprograms for persons with disabilities. Children with developmental coordination disorder (DCD), adults with carpaltunnel syndrome, and persons recovering from stroke, forexample, could improve coordination of fine motor skillsthrough strengthening of weak muscle patterns, modifications of grasp and modulations of gripping force (Smits- Engelsman, Niemeijer and van Galen, 2001).

___

  • 1. Alston J, Taylor J. (1987). Handwriting: Theory, research and practice. New York: Nichols.
  • 2. Baur B, Schenck T, Furholzer W, Scheuercker J, Marquardt C, Kerkhoff G, Hermsdorfer J. (2006). Modified pen grip in the treatment of writer’s Cramo. Human Movement Science, 25, 464-473.
  • 3. Connors M. (1995). Handwriting performances and GCSE concessions. HandwritingReview, 9, 7-21.
  • 4. Graham S, Berninger VW, Weintraub N, Schafer W. (1998). Development of handwriting speed and legibility in grades 1-9. The Journal of Educational Research, 92, 42-52.
  • 5. Hoare D. (1994). Subtypes of developmental coordination disorder. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 11, 158-169.
  • 6. Linderman M, Lebedev MA, Erlichman JS. (2009). Recognition of handwriting form electromyography, PLoS ONE, 4(8), 1-8.
  • 7. Naider-Steinhart S, Katz-Leurer M. (2007). Analysis of proximal and distal muscle activity during handwrit- ing tasks. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 61, 392-398.
  • 8. Peper CE, Carson RG. (1999). Bimanual coordination between isometric contractions and rhythmic movements: An asymmetric coupling. Experimental Bmin Research, 129, 417-432.
  • 9. Salvesen KA, Undheim JO . (1994). Screening for learning disabilities with teacher rating scales. Journal of Learning Disability, 27, 61-66.
  • 10. Schomaker LRB, Plamondon R. (1990). The relation be- tween pen force and pen-point kinematics in handwriting. Biological Cybernetics, 63, 277-289
  • 11. Suzuki Y, Misue K, Tanaka J. (2010). Interaction tech- nique of combining gripping and pen pressures. KES (4), 440-448.
  • 12. Summers J, Catarro F. (2003). Assessment of handwrit- ing speed and factors influencing written output of university students in examinations. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 50, 148-157.
  • 13. Svensson l, Lundberg l, Jacobson C. (2001). The prevalence of reading and spelling difficulties among inmates of institutions for compulsory care of juvenile delinquents. Dyslexia, 7, 62-76.
  • 14. Van Drempt N, McCluskey A, Lannin NA. (2011). A review of factors that influence adult handwriting performance. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 58, 321-328
  • 15. Van Galen GP, Portier S, Smits-Engelsman BCM, Schomaker L. (1993). Neuromotor noise and poor handwriting in children. Acta Psychologica, 82, 161-178.
  • 16. Wann J, Nimmo-Smith I. (1991). The control of pen pressure in handwriting: A subtle point. Human Movement Science, 10, 223-246.
  • 17. Weintraub N, Gilmour-Grill N, Wiess P. (2010). Relationship between handwriting and keyboarding performance among fast and slow adult keyboarders. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 64, 123-132.