İŞGÜCÜ PİYASASINDA GÜVENCELİ-ESNEKLİK MODELİ VE PİYASA ARAÇLARININ İSTİHDAMA ETKİLERİ

Bu çalışmayla; esnek, katı ve güvenceli-esnek işgücü piyasası modellerinin ortaya koydukları ekonomik performanslar ışığında, güvenceli-esnek işgücü piyasası modelinin, esnek ve katı piyasa yapılarına göre avantajları ve bu avantajları sağlayan faktörler ortaya konulmuştur. Bu kapsamda ilk olarak, işgücü piyasalarının sınıflandırılması için kümeleme analizi yapılarak, farklı işgücü piyasası yapılarının ortaya koydukları ekonomik performanslar karşılaştırmalı olarak değerlendirilmiş ve böylece, güvenceli-esneklik modelinin diğer yapılar karşısındaki avantajları ortaya konulmuştur. Daha sonra, çeşitli işgücü piyasası politika ve uygulamalarının işsizlik ve istihdam oranlarına etkilerinin incelendiği panel veri regresyon analizleri yapılarak, bu avantajları sağlayan faktörler belirlenmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

İşgücü piyasası, güvenceli-esneklik, işsizlik, istihdam

PDF

___

ACOSS (2016), Poverty in Australia, Australian Council of Social Service and the Social Policy Research Centre, 5th Edition, ISSN: 1326 7124, Strawberry Hills.
ALGAN, Yann, Pier CAHUC (2006), “Job Protection: The Macho Hypothesis”, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Vol.22, No.3, pp.390-410.
EUROPEAN COMISSION (EC) (2006), Employment in Europe, Cornell University ILR School, Brussels.
EC (2013), Flexicurity in Europe, Administrative Agreement, Final Report, European Union.
EUROSTAT (2017a), “Gini Coefficient of Equivalised Disposable Income”, http://appsso.eurostat.ec. europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=ilc_di12, Erişim Tarihi: 20.05.2017.
EUROSTAT (2017b), “At-Risk-of-Poverty Rate”, http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/gdp-and-beyond/ quality-of-life/at-risk-of-poverty-rate, Erişim Tarihi: 01.05.2017.
ILSOE, Anna (2007), The Danish Flexicurity Model-A Lesson for the US?, Employment Relations Research Center, Department of Sociology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen.
INDEX MUNDI (IM) (2017a), “Australia Gini Index (World Bank)”, http://www.indexmundi.com/facts/australia/indicator/SI.POV.GINI, Erişim Tarihi: 01.05.2017.
IM (2017b), “United States Gini Index (World Bank)”, http://www.indexmundi.com/facts/united-states/indicator/SI.POV.GINI, Erişim Tarihi: 01.05.2017.
KEUNE, Marteen, Maria JAPSEN (2007), Not Balanced and Hardly New: The European Commission Quest for Flexicurity, European Trade Union Institude for Research, Education and Health and Safety (ETUI-REHS), WP2007.01.
KEUNE, Marteen (2008), “Between Innovation and Ambiguity-The Role of Flexicurity in Labour Market Analysis and Policy Making”, European Trade Union Institude for Research, Education and Health and Safety Department (ETUI-REHS), WP2008.04, pp.1-20.
MADSEN, Per Kongshoj (2005), How Can It Possible Fly? The Paradox of a Dynamic Labour Market in a Scandinavian Welfare State, Center of Labour Market Research, Department of Economics, Politics and Public Administration University of Aalborg, Denmark, Research Paper. MADSEN, Per Kongshoj (2007), “Flexicurity-Towards a Set of Common Principles”, The International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations, Vol.23, No.4, pp.525-542. MADSEN, Per Kongshoj (2008), “Flexicurity in Danish-A Model for Labour Market Reform in Europe”, Intereconomics, Vol.43, No.2, pp.74-78.
NICKELL, S. (1997), “Unemployment and Labour Market Regidities: Europe Versus North America”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol.11, No.3, pp.55-74.
OECD (2015), OECD Employment Outlook 2015, OECD Publishing, Paris.
OECD (2017a), “Strictness of Employment Protection, Temporary Contracts”, https://stats.oecd.org/ Index.aspx?DataSetCode=EPL_OV#, Erişim Tarihi: 14.01.2017.
OECD (2017b), “Public Expenditure on Active Labour Market Policies”, http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/employment/public-expenditure-on-active-labour-market-policies_20752342-table9, Erişim Tarihi: 14.01.2017.
OECD (2017c), “Employment Rate”, https://data.oecd.org/emp/employmentrate.htm, Erişim Tarihi: 19.04.2017.
OECD (2017d), “Unemployment Rate”, https://data.oecd.org/unemp/unemployment-rate.htm, Erişim Tarihi: 20.04.2017.
OECD (2017e), “Income Inequality”, https://data.oecd.org/inequality/incomeinequality.htm, Erişim Tarihi: 01.05.2017.
OECD (2017f), “Poverty Rate”, https://data.oecd.org/inequality/poverty-rate.htm, Erişim Tarihi: 01.05.2017.
OECD (2017g), “Long-term Unemployment Rate”, https://data.oecd.org/unemp/long-term-unemploy ment-rate.htm, Erişim Tarihi: 20.04.2017.
OECD (2017h), “Benefits and Wages: Statistics”, http://www.oecd.org/els/benefits-and-wages-statistics.htm, Erişim Tarihi: 20.04.2017.
OECD (2017i), “Trade Union Density”, https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=UN_DEN, Erişim Tarihi: 20.04.2017.
OECD (2017j), “Taw Wedge”, https://data.oecd.org/tax/tax-wedge.htm, Erişim Tarihi: 20.04.2017.
OECD (2017k), “Inflation (CPI)”, https://data.oecd.org/price/inflation-cpi.htm, Erişim Tarihi: 20.04.2017.
PBS (2017), “How The U.S. Compares on Income Inequality and Poverty”, http://www.pbs.org/ newshour/rundown/u-s-compares-income-inequality-poverty, Erişim Tarihi: 01.05.2017.
PHILIPS, Kaia, Raul EAMETS (2007), Approaches to Flexicurity: EU Models, European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, Denmark.
TANGIAN, Andranik S. (2005), Monitoring Flexicurity Policies in the EU with Dedicated Composite Indicators, WSI in der Hans Böckler Stiftung, WSI Diskussionspapier Nr. 137, ISSN 1861-0625.
TANGIAN, Andranik S. (2006), “European Flexicurity: Concepts and Consisten Policies”, Düsseldorf, ISSN 1861-0633, WSI-Diskussionpapier-148, http://www.global-labour-university.org/fileadmin/ Papers_Wits_conference_2007/Group_A1/tangian_paper.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 04.07.2017.
WILTHAGEN, Tom, Frank TROS, Harm VAN LIESHOUT (2003), “Towards Flexicurity?: Balancing Flexibility and Security in EU Members States”, September, https://ssrn.com/abstract=1133940, Erişim Tarihi: 11.02.2017.
ZHOU (2008), Jianping, ‘Denmark’s Flexicurity Model: The Answer for Europe?’, Intereconomics, Vol.43, Iss.2, pp.78-82.