E7 Ülkelerinde CO2 Emisyonu, Enerji Tüketimi, Ekonomik Büyüme ve Kentleşme Arasındaki İlişki

En eski çağlardan günümüze kadar fosil yakıtların kullanılıyor olması ve ülkelerin giderek daha küresel hale gelmesi karbondioksit (CO2) emisyonu sorununu önemli hale getirmektedir. Bu sorun en hızlı ekonomik gelişme gösteren ülkeler olarak adlandırılan E7 (Çin, Hindistan, Brezilya, Rusya, Endonezya, Meksika, Türkiye) ülkeleri açısından da oldukça önemli bir konudur. Çalışmanın amacı, E7 ülkelerinde, CO2 emisyonu, enerji tüketimi, ekonomik büyüme ve kentleşme arasındaki nedensellik ilişkisini araştırmaktır. 1992-2014 dönemini kapsayan ampirik çalışmada değişkenler arasındaki nedensellik ilişkisi Emirmahmutoglu ve Kose (2011) tarafından geliştirilen panel granger nedensellik testi ile analiz edilmiştir. Analiz sonucuna göre panel bazında kentleşmeden CO2 emisyonuna, enerji tüketiminden kentleşmeye ve ekonomik büyümeden kentleşmeye doğru tek yönlü nedensellik ilişkisi tespit edilmiştir. Ülke bazında elde edilen sonuçlarda ise karma bulgular elde edilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Karbondioksit Emisyonu, Enerji, Ekonomik Büyüme, Kentleşme, E7

The Relationship Between CO2 Emission, Energy Consumption, Economic Growth and Urbanization In E7 Countries

The fact that fossil fuels have been used since the earliest times and that the countries become more global makes the issue of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions important. This problem, called the E7 countries showing the most rapid economic growth (China, India, Brazil, Russia, Indonesia, Mexico, Turkey) will be a crucial issue in terms of countries. The aim of this study is to investigate the causality relationship between CO2 emission, energy consumption, economic growth and urbanization in E7 countries. In empirical study covering the period1992-2014, the causality relationship between variables is analyzed by panel granger causality test developed by Emirmahmutoglu ve Kose (2011). According to the results of the analysis, unidirectional causality from urbanization to CO2 emission, from energy consumptionto urbanization and from economic growth to urbanization is determined on a panel basis. In the results obtained by country are obtained mixed findings

Keywords:

Carbon Dioxide Emission, Energy, Economic Growth, Urbanization, E7,

PDF

___

Acaravci, A., & Ozturk, I. (2010). On the relationship between energy consumption, CO2 emissions and economic growth in Europe. Energy, 35(12), 5412-5420.
Ahmad, M., Zhao, Z. Y., & Li, H. (2019). Revealing stylized empirical interactions among construction sector, urbanization, energy consumption, economic growth and CO2 emissions in China. Science of the Total Environment, 657, 1085-1098.
Al-Mulali, U., Sab, C. N. B. C., & Fereidouni, H. G. (2012). Exploring the bi-directional long run relationship between urbanization, energy consumption, and carbon dioxide emission. Energy, 46(1), 156-167.
Al-Mulali, U., & Ozturk, I. (2015). The effect of energy consumption, urbanization, trade openness, industrial output, and the political stability on the environmental degradation in the MENA (Middle East and North African) region. Energy, 84, 382-389.
Apergis, N., & Payne, J. E. (2009). CO2 emissions, energy usage, and output in Central America. Energy Policy, 37(8), 3282-3286.
Asif, M., Sharma, R. B., & Adow, A. H. E. (2015). An empirical investigation of the relationship between economic growth, urbanization, energy consumption, and CO2 emission in GCC countries: a panel data analysis. Asian Social Science, 11(21), 270.
Aslanidis, N., & Iranzo, S. (2009). Environment and development: is there a Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions?. Applied Economics, 41(6), 803-810.
Azam, M., & Khan, A. Q. (2016). Testing the Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis: A comparative empirical study for low, lower middle, upper middle and high income countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 63, 556-567.
Borhan, H. B., Hitam, M. B., Mohamed, R. N., & Muda, M. (2012). “Income And CO2 In Chına And Malaysia From Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) Perspectıve”. In Cambridge Business & Economics Conference, Murray Edwards College, Cambridge.
Breusch, T. & Pagan, A. (1980). The LM Test and Its Application To Model Specification In Econometrics. Review of Economic Studies 47, 239–254.Cai, Y., Sam, C. Y., & Chang, T. (2018). Nexus Between Clean Energy Consumption, Economic Growth and CO2 Emissions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 182, 1001-1011.
Cole M.A., Rayner A.J., Bates J.M. (1997). The Environmental Kuznets curve: An Empirical Analysis. Environ Dev Econ, 2(4):401–16.
Dijkgraaf, E., & Vollebergh, H. R. (2001). A Note On Testing For Environmental Kuznets Curves With Panel Data (No. 63.2001). Nota di Lavoro.
Doğan, E., & Turkekul, B. (2016). CO 2 Emissions, Real Output, Energy Consumption, Trade, Urbanization And Financial Development: Testing The EKC Hypothesis For The USA. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 23(2), 1203-1213.
Doğan, B., & Değer, O. (2018). The Role Of Economic Growth And Energy Consumption on CO2 emissions in E7 countries. Theoretical and Applied Economics, 25(2 (615), Summer), 231-246.
Ekins, P. (1997). The Kuznets Curve For The Environment And Economic Growth: Examining The Evidence. Environment and planning a, 29(5), 805-830.
Emirmahmutoglu, F. & Kose, N. (2011). Testing For Granger Causality In Heterogeneous Mixed Panels. Economic Modelling, 28(3), 870-876.
Grossman, G. M. & Krueger, A. B. (1991). Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement (No. w3914). National Bureau of Economic Research.
Heidari, H., Katircioğlu, S. T., & Saeidpour, L. (2015). Economic growth, CO2 emissions, and energy consumption in the five ASEAN countries. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 64, 785-791.
Hossain, M. S. (2011). Panel Estimation For CO2 Emissions, Energy Consumption, Economic Growth, Trade Openness And Urbanization Of Newly Industrialized Countries. Energy Policy, 39(11), 6991-6999.
IEA (2015), Energy Climateand Change, World Energy Outlook Special Report, https://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/WEO2015SpecialReportonEnergyandClimateChange.pdf (08.07.2019).
Kasman, A. & Duman, Y. S. (2015). CO2 Emissions, Economic Growth, Energy Consumption, Trade And Urbanization In New EU Member And Candidate Countries: A Panel Data Analysis. Economic Modelling, 44, 97-103.
Liddle, B., & Lung, S. (2014). Might Electricity Consumption Cause Urbanization Instead? Evidence From Heterogeneous Panel Long-Run Causality Tests. Global Environmental Change, 24, 42-51.
Liu, Y., Yan, B., & Zhou, Y. (2016). Urbanization, Economic Growth, And Carbon Dioxide Emissions In China: A Panel Cointegration And Causality Analysis. Journal Of Geographical Sciences, 26(2), 131-152.
Martínez-Zarzoso, I. & Maruotti, A. (2011). The impact of urbanization on CO2 emissions: evidence from developing countries. Ecological Economics, 70(7), 1344-1353.
Omri, A. (2013). CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth nexus in MENA countries: Evidence from simultaneous equations models. Energy economics, 40, 657-664.
Özokcu, S., & Özdemir, Ö. (2017). Economic growth, energy, and environmental Kuznets curve. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 72, 639-647.
Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A Simple Panel Unit Root Test In The Presence of Cross-Section Dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22, 265-312.
Pesaran, M.H. ve Yamagata, T. (2008). Testing Slope Homogeneity in Large Panels. Journal of Econometrics, 142, 50–93.
PwC (2006). The World İn 2050: Implications Of Global Growth For Carbon Emissions And Climate Change Policy. Price Waterhouse Coopers.
PwC (2014), Two Degrees Of Separation: Ambition And Reality Low Carbon Economy Index 2014, https://www.pwc.co.uk/assets/pdf/low-carbon-economy-index-2014.pdf (22.06.2019).
PwC (2017). The long view: how will the global economic order change by 2050. URL: https://www. pwc. com/gx/en/world-2050/assets/pwc-the-world-in-2050-full-report-feb-2017. pdf (22.06.2019).
Sarafidis, V. & Wansbeek, T. (2012). Cross-sectional dependence in panel data analysis. Econometric Reviews, 31(5), 483-531.
Say, N. P., & Yücel, M. (2006). Energy consumption and CO2 emissions in Turkey: empirical analysis and future projection based on an economic growth. Energy policy, 34(18), 3870-3876.
Shahbaz, M., Sbia, R., Hamdi, H., & Ozturk, I. (2014). Economic growth, electricity consumption, urbanization and environmental degradation relationship in United Arab Emirates. Ecological Indicators, 45, 622-631.
Swamy, P.A.V.B. (1970). Efficient Inference In A Random Coefficient Regression Model. Econometrica, 38 (2), 311–323.
UNFCCC, U. N. (2009). “Kyoto Protocol Reference Manual On Accounting Of Emissions And Assigned Amount”, eSocialSciences, https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/publications/08 _unfccc_kp_ref_manual.pdf (14.06.2019).
Wang, K. M. (2012). Modelling the nonlinear relationship between CO2 emissions from oil and economic growth. Economic Modelling, 29(5), 1537-1547.
Wang, S., Li, Q., Fang, C., & Zhou, C. (2016). The Relationship Between Economic Growth, Energy Consumption, and CO2 emissions: Empirical evidence from China. Science of the Total Environment, 542, 360-371.
Wang, S., Li, G., & Fang, C. (2018). Urbanization, economic growth, energy consumption, and CO2 emissions: Empirical evidence from countries with different income levels. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 81, 2144-2159.
World Bank (2019). Databank / World Development Indicators. https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators (12.07.2019).
Yang, G., Sun, T., Wang, J., & Li, X. (2015). Modeling the nexus between carbon dioxide emissions and economic growth. Energy Policy, 86, 104-117.
Yavuz, N. Ç. (2014). CO2 emission, energy consumption, and economic growth for Turkey: Evidence from a cointegration test with a structural break. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy, 9(3), 229-235.
Zhang, X. P., & Cheng, X. M. (2009). Energy consumption, carbon emissions, and economic growth in China. Ecological Economics, 68(10), 2706-2712.