Yemeklik dane baklagillerde doku kültürü ve bitki regenerasyonu çalışmaları

Yemeklik dane baklagillerde türler ve cinsler arası uyuşmazlıklar mevcut gen havuzunu sınırlamaktadır. Bu nedenle genetik manipulasyon ve in vitro teknikleri konvansiyonel ıslaçıya yeni varyasyonlar ortaya koymak için büyük öneme sahiptir. Ayrıyca, bu tür bir yaklaşım yine ıslatıcıya süre bakımından büyük kazançlar sağlayacaktır. Yemeklik dane baklagiller, manipüle edilmesi ve iyileştirilmesi gereken bir çok karakterleri olmasına rağmen in vitro tekniklerine gösterdikleri tepki bakımından oldukça büyük zorluklar arz etmektedirler. Fakat istenmeyen karakterlerin azaltılması ve çeşitli dayanıklılık genlerinin ilgili genotipe aktarılabilmesi için tekrar edilebilir bir bitki regenerasyon metoduna ihtiyaç vardır. Bu çalışmada yemeklik dane baklagillerin genetik manipülasyonu üzerine yapılan çalışmaların en önemli köşe taşlarını oluşturan araştırmalar tablo halinde verilmiştir. Burada amaç, yemeklik dane baklagillerde çalışmaya başlamış veya yeni başlayacak olan araştırmacılara yol göstermek ve özellikle belirtilen cins, tür veya varyetelerde in vitro tekniklerinde kullanılması gereken en uygun bitki kısımları, besin ortamları ve bitki büyüme regülatörleri kombinasyonları konularında rehberlik etmektir.

Tissue culture and plant regeneration in grain legumes: A review

The available gene pool in grain legumes is restricted by the sexual incompatibility of many interspecific and intergeneric crosses. Genetic manipulation and in vitro cultures provide substantial advantages in broadening the genetic variability and reducing the time required for introgression of new traits. Grain legumes are generally recalcitrant crops with respect to their in vitro responses and require manipulation for undesirable characters they possess. Similarly, genetic transformation of any species necessitates a reproducible plant regeneration system. This study was intended to give an initial guidance, to researchers on grain legumes, about the most appropriate explant, medium and plant growth regulator combination for a given species. All previous works were summarised in table.

___

  • Babaoğlu M. (1996). Genetic manipulation of lupins. PhD. Thesis. University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
  • Ball E (1946). Development in sterile culture of stem tips and subjacent regions of Tropaeolum majus L. and of Lupinus albus L. American Journal of Botany 33:301-318.
  • Barna KS, Wakhlu AK (1995). Modified single node culture method- a new mlcropropagation method from chickpea. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol-Plant 31:150-152.
  • Böhmer P, Meyer B, Jacobsen H-J (1995). Thldiazuron-induced high frequency of shoot induction and plant regeneration in protoplast derived pea callus. Plant Cell Rep. 15:26-29.
  • Brandt EB, Hess D (1993). In vitro regeneration and propagation of chickpea [Cicer arietinum L) from meristem tips and cotyledonary nodes. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. 30P:75-80.
  • Cheng T, Saka H, Voqui-dinh TH (1980). Plant regeneration from soybean cotyledonary node segments In culture. Plant Sci. Lett. 19:91-99.
  • Chrispeels M J. Sadava DE (1994). Plants, Genes and Agriculture. Jones and Barlett Publishers, London, UKp 142-143.
  • Christou P (1992). Genetic engineering and in vitro culture of crop legumes. Technomlc Publishing Co., Inc. Lancaster, USA pp. 132-299.
  • Daza A, Chamber MA (1993). Plant regeneration from hypocotyl segments of Luptnus luteus cv. L. Aurea. Plant Cell, Tissue Org. Cult 34:303-305.
  • Delplancke D (1993). Grain legumes in the GATT. Grain Legumes 3:27. Finer J J (1994). Plant regeneration via embryogenic suspension cultures. In Plant Cell Culture- a practical approach (RA Dixon, RA Gonzales, eds.). Second edition pp. 99-125.
  • Franklin CI. Trieu TN, Gonzales RA, Dixon RA (1991). Plant regeneration from seedling explants of green bean [Phaseolus vulgaris L.) via organogenesis. Plant Cell, Tiss. Org. Cult. 24:199-206.
  • Gamborg OL, Miller RA, Ojima K (1968). Nutrition requirements of suspension cultures of soybean root cells. Exper. Cell Res. 50:151-159.
  • George EF (1993). Plant propagation by tissue culture. Part I. The Technology, Second edition. Exegetics Ltd., England.
  • Hammatt N, Jones B, Davey MR (1989). Plant regeneration from seedlings explants and cotyledon protoplasts of Glycine argyrea Tind. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. 25:669-672.
  • Jackson JA and Hobbs SLA. (1990) Rapid multiple shoot production from cotyledonary node explants of pea (Pisum sativum L.). In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. 26: 835-838.
  • Kartha KK, Gamborg OL, Constabel F (1974). Regeneration of pea (Pisum sativum L.) plants from shoot apical meristems. Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 72:172-176.
  • Kartha KK, Pahl K, Leung NL, Mroginski LA (1981). Plant regeneration from meristems of grain legumes: Soybean, cowpea, peanut, chickpea and bean. Can .J. Bot. 59:671-679.
  • Linsmaier EM, Skoog F (1965). Organic growth factor requirements of tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant 18:100-127.
  • Malik KA, Saxena PK (1992a). Somatic embryogenesls and shoot regeneration from intact seedlings of Phasealus acutifoliusA., P. aureus (L.) Wilczek, P. cocineus L. and P. wrightu L. Plant Cell Rep. 11:63-68.
  • Malik KA, Saxena PK (1992b). Regeneration in Phaseolus vulgaris L.: High-frequency induction of direct shoot formation in intact seedlings by N benzylaminopurine and thidiazuron. Planta 186:384-389.
  • Malik KA, Saxena PK (1992c). Thidiazuron induces high-frequency shoot regeneration in intact seedlings of pea {Pisum sativum}, chickpea [Cicer ariettnum) and lentil [Lens cultnaris). AusL J. Plant Physiol. 19:731-740.
  • McCabe DE, Swain WF, Martinell BJ, Chrtstou P (1988). Stable transformation of soybean [Glycine mwd) by particle acceleration. Bio/Technology 6:923: 926.
  • Medford JI (1992). Vegetative apical meristems. The Plant Cell 4:1029-1039.
  • Mohamed FM, Read PE. Coyne DP (1992). Dark preconditioning, CPPU, and Thidiazuron promote shoot organogenesis on seedling node explants of Common and Faba Beans. J. Amer. Soc. Hort Sci. 117(4):668-672.
  • Muel F (1995). Economic status and potential of grain legumes. Grain Legumes 10:16.
  • Murashige T, Skoog F (1962). A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 15:473-497.
  • Nadolska-Orcyzk A (1992). Somatic embryogenesis of agriculturally important lupin species [Lupinus angustifolius, L. albus, L. mutabilis). Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult 28:19-25.
  • Nauerby B, Madsen M, Christiansen J, Wyndaele R (1991). A rapid and efficient regeneration system for pea [Pisum sativum), suitable for transformation. Plant Cell Rep. 9:676-679.
  • Ozcan S, Barghci M, Firek S, Draper J (1993). Efficient adventitious shoot regeneration and somatic embryogenesis in pea. Plant Cell, Tiss. Org. Cult. 34:271-277.
  • Pickardt T. Meixner M, Schade V, Schelder O (1991). Transformation of Vicia narbonensis via Agrobacterium -mediated gene transfer. Plant Cell Rep. 9:535-538.
  • Ranalli P (1995). Improvement of pulse crops İn Europe. Eur. J. Agron. 4(2): 151-166.
  • Sagare AP, Suhasini K, Krishnamurthy KV (1995). Hlstology of somatlc embryo initiation and development İn chick-pea (Cicer arietinum L.). Plant Selence 109:87-93.
  • Şato S, Newell C, Kolacz K, Tredo L, Flner J, Hlnchee M (1993). Stable transformatlon via partlele bombardment İn two different soybean regeneration systems. Plant Celi Rep. 12:408-413.
  • Sator C (1990). Luplns (Lupinus s pp.) in Blotechnology in Agrlculture and Forestry. Legumes and Oilseed Crops I (Bajaj YPS ed.), Vol. 10. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg pp. 288-311.
  • Spaink HP (1992). Rhizobial lipo-oligosaceharides: answers and questions. Plant Mol. Biol. 20:977-986.
  • Sroga GE (1987). Plant Regeneration of two Luptnus spp. from callus cultures via organogenesis. Plant Sci. 51:245-249.
  • Tegeder M, Schieder O, Pickardt T (1995). Breakthrough in the plant regeneration from protoplasts {Viciafaba and V. narbonensis). in Current issues in plant molecular and cellular biology (M. Terzi et al., eds.). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands pp. 85-80.
  • Upadhyaya A, Davls TD, Sankhla D, Sankhla N (1992). Micropropagation of Lupinus texensis from coryledonary node explants. Hort Science 27(11): 1222-1223.
  • Van Doorne L, Marshall G, Kirkwood RC (1995). Somatic embryogenesis in pea {Pisum sativum L.) effect of explant, genotype and culture conditions. Ann. Appl. Biol. 126:169-179.
  • White PR (1963). The cultivaüon of animal and plant cells (2nd edn.), Ronald Press, New York pp. 57-63.
  • Williams D, McHughen A (1986). Plant regeneration of the legume Lens culinaris Medik. (Lenül) in vitro . Plant Cell, Tiss. Org. Cult 7:149-153.
  • Williams W (1986). The current status of the erop lupins. in Proc. IVth Int. Lupin Conf., Geraldton, Western Australia pp. 1-13.