Bitki patojenlerinin kontrolünde kullanılan biyokontrol ürünler ve özellikleri

Son günlerde sağlık ve çevre güvenliğine artan ilgiden dolayı toksik, kanserojen ve çevresel açıdan zararlı kimyasalla¬rın kullanım isteği kırılmaktadır. Bu bakımdan, gelişmiş ülkelerde güvenilir, biyolojik kaynaklı ürünlere karşı artan bir talep vardır. Ülkemizde konvensiyonal ve organik tarım yapan yetiştiricilerimiz ile ilgili son gelişmeler biyokontrol ürünlerindeki kullanıma olan ilginin arttığını işaret etmekte olup, bu da önümüzdeki yıllarda biyokontrol ürünlerinin pazar potansiyelinin artacağını göstermektedir. Bu derlemenin amacı bu ürünler hakkında hem bilgi vermek ve hem de özelliklerini sunmaktır.

Biocıontrol products for control of plant pathogens and their feature

Because of growing concerns about health and environmental safety, the use of toxic, carcinogenic, and environmentally damaging chemicals is recently being discouraged. In this respect, there is a growing demand for sound, biologically-based biocontrol products in developed countries. Recent advances of both conventional and organic growers indicate an interest in using biocontrol products in our country, suggesting that the market potential of biocontrol products will increase in coming years. Aim of this review is to both give knowledge about these products and to present their features.

___

  • Anonymous, 2004a. Integrated plant protection center, Database of microbial biopesticides (DMB), American Phytopathological Society, http://www.ippc.orst.edu/biocontrol/biopesticides/
  • Anonymous, 2004b. Commercial biocontrol products available for against plant pathogens. http://www.oardc. ohio-state. edu/ apsbcc/ productlist
  • Budge, S.P., McQuilken M.P., Fenlon, J.S. and Whipps J.M., 1995. Use of Coniothyrium minitans and Gliocladium virens for biological control of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in glasshouse lettuce. Biol. Control 5:513-22
  • Cook, R. J. and Baker, K.F. 1983. The Nature and Practice of Biological Control of Plant Pathogens. American Phytopathological Society, St. Paul, MN.
  • Anonymous, 2004c. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Topics: Biopesticides. Online. Office of Pesticide Programs (www.epa.gov/pesticides/biopesticides)
  • Datnoff L.E., Nemec, S., Pernezny, K. 1995. Biological control of Fusarium crown and root rot of tomato in Florida using Trichoderme harzianum and Glomus intraradices. Biol. Control 5:427-31.
  • Datnoff LE, Nemec S, Pernezny, K. 1995. Biological control of Fusarium crown and root rot of tomato in Florida using Trichoderma harzianum and Glomus in-traradices. Biol. Cont. 5:427-31
  • Delen, N., Özbek, T. 1993. Pestisitlerin çevre kirlenmesindeki rolleri. I. Ulusal Ekolojik ve Çevre Kongresi, 5-7 Ekim, İzmir
  • Delen, N., Tosun, N. 1997. Türkiye’de pestisit kullanımının toksikolojik değerlendirilmesi. II. Ulusal Toksikoloji Kongresi, 3-6 Nisan 1997, Antalya
  • Elad Y, Zimand G, Zaqs Y. Zuriel S and Chet I. 1993. Use of Trichoderma harzianum in combination or alternation with fungicides to control cucumber grey mould (Botrytis cinerea) under commercial greenhouse conditions. Plant Pathol.42:324-32
  • Feldman K, Keren-Zur M, Hofstein R. and Fridiender B. 1993. Ampelomyces quisqualis,an important component of an IPM program for the control of powdery mildew. Int. Congr. Plant Pathol. 6th, Abstr. 3 . 2 .11, p. 58
  • Lemanceau P. and Alabouvette, C. 1991. Biological control of fusarium diseases by fluorescent Pseudomonas and non-pathogenic Fusariunm. Crop Prot. 279-86
  • Lewis, J.A., Lumsden, R.D. 2001. Biocontrol of damping- off greenhouse-grown crops caused by Rhizoctonia solani with a formulation of Trichoderma spp. Crop Protection 20:49-56.
  • Maplestone, P., Whipps, A., Lynch, J.M. 1991. Effect of peat-bran inoculum of Trichoderma species on biological control of Rhizoctonia solani in lectuce. Plant Soil 136, 257-263.
  • McQuilken M.P. and Mohammadi, O. 1997. Evaluation of a commercial formulation of Gliocladium catenulatwnm (J1446) for biocontrol of damping-off in bedding plants. Mededc. Rijksfac. Landbouwwet. Univ. Gent. 62:987-92
  • MCQuilken M.P. and Wipps J.M. 1995. Production, survival and evaluation of solid-substrate inocula of Coniothyrium minitans against Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 101:101-10
  • McSpadden B.B. and Fravel, D.R. 2002. Biological control of plant pathogens: Research, commercialization, and application in the USA. Plant Management Network.
  • Nemec S., Datnoff, L.E. and Strandberg, J. 1996. Efficacy of biocontrol agents ir planting mixes to colonize plant roots and perparasite Ampelomyces quisqualis Ces. Z. Pflanzenkr. Pflanzensschutz 97: 120-32
  • Paulitz, T.C. and Belanger, R.R. 2001. Biological control in greenhouse systems. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 39:103-33.
  • Paulitz, T.C. and Belanger, R.R. 2001. Biological control in greenhouse systems. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 39:103-33.
  • Vyas, S.C. 1988. Nontarget effects of Agricultural Fungicides.CRC Pres, Inc. Boca Raton, Florida, USA
Selçuk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi (:Selçuk Tarım ve Gıda Bilimleri Dergisi)-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-5774
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 3 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2018
  • Yayıncı: Selçuk Üniv. Ziraat Fak.