Halık Barış KARA, Tevfik YAVUZ, ALİ RIZA TUNÇDEMİR, Rana TURUNÇ

Effects of different concentrations of hydrogen peroxide

Amaç: Bu çalmann amac aartma prosedürleri boyunca dental restoratif materyallerin yüzey pürüzlülük deiimlerinin incelenmesidir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalmada aartma ajanlar, bir düük s porseleni (Vita VM9), bir s ve basnçla ekillendirilen porselen (IPS Empress esthetic), ve iki tip kompozit materyali (Clearfil Majesty Esthetic, Clearfil Photo Posterior) üzerine uygulanmtr. Çalmada kullanlan örnekler 10 mm çapnda, 2 mm kalnlnda hazrlanmtr. Her grup için 10’ar örnek olmak üzere 2 ana grup oluturulmutur. Örnekler deneye balamadan önce 24 saat distile suda bekletilmi ve balangç ölçümleri alnmtr. % 10 Hidrojen peroksit uygulanan örnekler 10 gün süresince günde 1 saat, %40 hidrojen peroksit uygulanan örnekler ise iki defa 20 dk aartma ajanna maruz braklmtr. Ölçümler ilem sonras nda tekrarlanmtr. Yüzey pürüzlülüü ölçümleri için profilometre cihaz (Surftest Analyzer 402, Mitutoyo Corporation, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 213-8533 Japan) kullanlmtr. statistiksel analizler SPSS 20.0 paket program kullanlarak Windows ortamnda gerçekletirildi. Sonuçlar, paired t ve independent samples t istatistiksel analizleri yaplarak deerlendirildi. statistiksel anlaml lk düzeyi p

Farkl Konsantrasyonlardaki Hidrojen Peroksitin Estetik Restoratif Materyallerin Yüzey Pürüzlülüü Üzerine Etkileri

Background: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate surface roughness of four different restorative materials during bleaching procedures. Methods: In this study, the bleaching agents were applied on the low-fusing porcelain (VITA VM9), the heat-pressed glass ceramic (IPS Empress Esthetic), and two types of composites (Clearfil Majesty Esthetic, Clearfil Photo Posterior). A total of 20 disc-shaped specimens were fabricated (with a diameter of 10 mm and a thickness of 2 mm) from each material (n=10). Before the experiment, the samples were steeped in distilled water for 24 hours, and their initial measurements were recorded. The first set of specimens were bleached with 10% hydrogen peroxide (HP) for 1 hour daily, for 10 days. The other set of specimens were bleached with 40 % hydrogen peroxide (HP) bleaching gel for two consecutive applications for 20 minutes each. Surface roughness values were measured prior to and following the bleaching procedures by using a profilometer (Surftest Analyzer 402, Mitutoyo Corporation, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 213- 8533 Japan). Statistical analysis were done on Windows by using SPSS 20.0 programme. Paired-t test was used to analyze the surface roughness values, which were measured before and after bleaching procedure. The independent samples t-test was used to compare the effects of bleaching agents on surface roughness change in each material. Statistical significance criterion was taken as p<0.05. Results: After application of both bleaching agents, surface roughness values of all restorative materials, that were tested, increased significantly (p<0.05). However, there were no significant differences between two bleaching methods for restorative materials (p>0.05). Conclusion: Although clinical effects depend on in-vivo conditions, the effects of office bleaching agents should be known and these agents should be applied consciously when restorative materials are present.

PDF

___

1. de A Silva MF, Davies RM, Stewart B, DeVizio W, Tonholo J, da Silva Júnior JG & Pretty IA (2006) Effect of whitening gels on the surface roughness of restorative materials in situ. Dent Mater 22(10) 919-924..
2. Haywood VB & Heymann HO (1989) Nightguard vital bleaching. Quintessence 20(3) 173-176.
3. Haywood VB (1996) Achieving, maintaining and recovering successful tooth bleaching. J Esthet Dent 8 (1) 31-38.
4. Rodrigues JA, Marchi GM, Ambrosano GMB, Heymann HO, Pimenta LA. (2005) Microhardness evaluation of in situ vital bleaching on human dental enamel using a novel study design. Dent Mater 21(11) 1059-1067.
5. Taher NM. The effect of bleaching agents on the surface hardness of tooth colored restorative materials. J Contemp Dent Pract 2005 6 (2): 18-26.
6. Luca G, Fabio B, Claudia B, Michele N & Daniele SR (2010) A randomized clinical trial comparing at-home and in-office tooth whitening techniques. J Am Dent Assoc. 141(11) 1357-1364.
7. Matis BA, Mousa HN, Cochran MA & Eckert GJ (2000) Clinical evaluation of bleaching agents of different concentrations. Quintessence Int 31(5) 303-310
8. Haywood VB (1992) History, safety, and effectiveness of current bleaching techniques and applications of the nightguard vital bleaching technique. Quintessence Int 23:471–488
9. Moraes RR, Marimon JLM, Schneider LFJ, Sobrinho LC, Camacho GB, & Bueno M (2006) Carbamide peroxide bleaching agents: Effects on surface roughness of enamel, composite, and porcelain Clin Oral Insestig.10(1) 23- 28.
10. Bailey SJ, Swift EJ Jr (1992) Effects of home bleaching products on composite resins. Quintessence Int 23:489– 494
11. Schemehorn B, Cabezas CG, Joiner A (2004) A SEM evaluation of a 6% hydrogen peroxide tooth whitening gel on dental materials in vitro J Dent 32, 35–39
12. Swift EJ Jr. (1997) Restorative considerations with vital tooth bleaching. J Am Dent Assoc. 128(Supplement 4) 60-64.
13. Wattanapayungkul P, Yap AU, Chooi KW, Lee MF, Selamat RS, Zhou RD (2004) The effect of home bleaching agents on the surface roughness of tooth-colored restoratives with time. Oper Dent 29:398–403
14. Langsten RE, Dunn WJ, Hartup GR, Murchison DF (2002) Higher-concentration carbamide peroxide effects on surface roughness of composites. J Esthet Restor Dent 14:92–96
15. Quirynen M, Bollen CM: The influence of surface roughness and surface-free energy on supra- and sub-gingival plaque formation plaque formation in man. A review of the literature. J Clin Periodontol 1995;22:1-14
16. Zaki AA & Fahmy NZ (2009) The effect of a bleaching system on properties related to different ceramic surface textures. J Prosthodont 18(3) 223-229.
17. Inger C, Andre LFB, Luiz AFP & Glaucia A (2003) Effects of bleaching with carbamide peroxide gels on microhardness of restoration materials. J Esthet Restor Dent 15 175-183
18. Turker SB & Biskin T (2003) Effect of three bleaching agents on the surface properties of three different esthetic restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 89(5) 466-473.
19. Cehreli ZC, Yazici R & Garcia-Godoy F (2003) Effect of home-use bleaching gels on fluoride releasing restorative materials. Oper Dent 28(5) 605-609.
20. Sharafeddin F & Jamalipour G (2010) Effects of 35% carbamide peroxide gel on surface roughness and hardness of composite resins. J Dent (Tehran) 7(1) 6-12.
21. Hafez R, Ahmed D, Yousry M, El-Badrawy W & El-Mowafy O (2010) Effect of in-office bleaching on color and surface roughness of composite restoratives. Eur J Dent 4(2) 118-127