Spor hizmeti sunan kamu kurumlarında lider üye etkileşimi ve örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı ilişkisi

Bu araştırma, spor hizmeti sunan kamu kurumlarında lider üye etkileşimi ile örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı arasındaki ilişkinin belirlenmesi amacıyla gerçekleştirilmiştir. Veriler Gençlik ve Spor Genel Müdürlüğü merkez ve taşra teşkilatı çalışanlarından (N=156) elde edilmiştir. Yapılan analizler sonucunda, lider üye etkileşimi ile örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı arasında anlamlı ve pozitif ilişki bulunmuştur. Bu sonuç çerçevesinde, iş tanımının ötesinde davranış sergileyen çalışanlara sahip olmak isteyen spor işletmelerinin lider üye etkileşimi kalitesini artırmaları yönünde öneriler verilmiştir.

The relationship between leader member exchange and organizational citizenship behavior in public organizations providing sports services

The aim of this study was to determine the effects of leader member exchange on organizational citizenship behavior. Data for the study were obtained from employees (N=156) in Youth and Sports General Directorate through questionnaires. The analysis indicated that there were a significant and positive relationship between leader member exchange and organizational citizenship behavior. In this framework, the recommendations were given related to increase leader member exchange for sport organizations.

PDF

___

1. Aoyagi MW, Cox RH, McGuire RT. Organizational citizenship behavior in sport: Relationships with leadership, team cohesion, and athlete satisfaction. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 2008; 20, 25-41.
2. Baş T, Keskin N, Mert İS. Lider üye etkileşimi modeli ve ölçme aracının Türkçe’de geçerlik ve güvenirlik analizi. Ege Akademik Bakış, 2010; 10(3), 1013-1039.
3. Bauer TN, Green, SG. Development of leadermember exchange: A longitudinal test. Academy of Management Journal, 1996; 39(6), 1538-1567.
4. Bolat Oİ, Bolat T, Seymen, OA. Güçlendirici liderlik davranışları ve örgütsel vatandaşlık arasındaki ilişkilerin sosyal mübadele kuramından hareketle incelenmesi. Balıkesir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 2009; 12(21), 215-239.
5. Burton JP, Sablynski CJ. Linking justice, performance, and citizenship via leader–member exchange. Journal of Business and Psychology, 2008; 23, 51-61.
6. Case R. Leader member exchange theory and sport: Possible applications. Journal of Sport Behavior, 1998; 21(4), 387-396.
7. Chen CHV, Wang SJ, Chang WC, Hu, CS. The effect of leader-member exchange, trust, supervisor support on organizational citizenship behavior in nurses. Journal of Nursing Research, 2008; 16, 321-328.
8. Deluga RJ, Perry JT. The relationship of subordinate upward influencing behaviour, satisfaction and perceived superior effectiveness with leader-member exchanges. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 1991; 64, 239-252.
9. Deluga RJ, Perry JT. The role of subordinate performance and ingratiation in leader-member exchanges. Group & Organization Management, 1994; 19(1), 67-86.
10. Dienesch RM, Liden RC. Leader-member exchange model of leadership: A critique and further development. Academy of Management Review, 1986; 11(3), 618-634.
11. Dockery TM, Steiner DD. The role of the initial interaction in leader-member exchange. Group & Organization Studies, 1990; 15(4), 395-413.
12. Eren, V. Personel rejiminde bürokratik modelden işletmeci anlayışa geçiş. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal ve Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 2006; 6(11), 131-153.
13. Graen GB, Uhl-Bien M. Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leadermember exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain approach. Leadership Quarterly, 1995; 6, 219-247.
14. Gerstner CR, Day DV. Meta-analytic review of leader-member exchange theory: Correlates and construct issues. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 1997; 22, 789-808.
15. Gouldner AW. The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 1960; 25, 161-178.
16. Gürbüz S. Örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı ile duygusal bağlılık arasındaki ilişkilerin belirlenmesine yönelik bir araştırma. Ekonomik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 2006; 3(2), 48-75.
17. Hofmann DA, Morgeson FP, Gerras SJ. Climate as a moderator of the relationship between leader– member exchange and content specific citizenship: Safety climate as an exemplar. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2003; 88(1), 170-178.
18. Ilies R, Nahrgang JD, Morgeson FP. Leader-member exchange and citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2007; 92(1), 269-277.
19. Janssen O, Van Yperen NW. Employees' goal orientations, the quality of leader-member exchange, and the outcomes of job performance and job satisfaction. The Academy of Management Journal, 2004; 47(3), 368-384.
20. Karriker JH, Williams ML. Organizational justice and organizational citizenship behavior: A mediated multifoci model. Journal of Management, 2007; 35(1), 112-135.
21. Kinicki AJ, Vecchio RP. Influences on the quality of supervisor – subordinate relations: The role of timepressure, organizational commitment, and locus of control. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 1994; 15, 75- 82.
22. Lambe CJ, Wittmann CM, Spekman RE. Social exchange theory and research on business-tobusiness relational exchange. Journal of Business-to- Business Marketing, 2001; 8(3), 1-36.
23. Le Blanc PM, Jong RD, Geersing J, Furda J, Komproe IH. Leader member exchanges: Distinction between two factors. European Work and Organizational Psychologist, 1993; 3(4), 297-309.
24. Lee HR, Murrmann SK, Murrmann KF, Kim K. Organizational justice as a mediator of the relationships between leader-member exchange and employees’ turnover intentions. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 2010; 19, 97-114.
25. Podsakoff PM, Ahearne M, MacKenzie SB. Organizational citizenship behavior and the quantity and quality of work group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1997; 82, 262-270.
26. Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Paine JB, Bachrach DG. Organizational citizenship behaviours: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 2000; 26, 513-563.
27. Scandura TA, Graen GB. Moderating effects of initial leader-member exchange status on the effects of a leadership intervention. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1984; 69(3), 428-436.
28. Scandura TA, Pellegrini EK. Trust and leadermember exchange: A closer look at relational vulnerability. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 2008; 15(2), 101-110.
29. Schriesheim CA, Neider LL, Scandura TA. (1998). Delegation and leader–member exchange: Main effects, moderators, and measurement issues. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 298-318.
30. Schriesheim CA, Castro SL, Cogliser CC. Leadermember exchange (LMX): A comprehensive review of theory, measurement, and data-analytic practices. Leadership Quarterly, 1999; 10(1), 63-113.
31. Truckenbrodt YB. The relationship between leadermember exchange and commitment and organizational citizenship behavior. Acquisition Review Quarterly, 2000; 233-244.
32. Ural A, Kılıç İ. Bilimsel araştırma süreci ve SPSS ile veri analizi. Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık, 2006.
33. Wang H, Law KS, Hackett RD, Wang D. Leadermember exchange as a mediator of the relationship between transformational leadership and followers’ perfromance and organizational citizenship behavior. The Academy of Management Journal, 2005; 48(3), 420- 432.
34. Wayne SJ, Liden RC, Sparrowe RT. Developing leader-member exchanges: The influence of gender and ingratiation. The American Behavioral Scientist, 1994; 37(5), 697-714.
35. Wilhelm CC, Herd AM, Steiner DD. Attributional conflict between managers and subordinates: An investigation of leader-member exchange effects. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 1993; 14, 531-544.
36. Williams LJ, Anderson SE. Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 1991; 17(3), 601-617.
37. Van Breukelen W, Schyns B, Le Blanc P. Leader– member exchange theory and research: Accomplishments and future challenges. Leadership, 2006; 2(3), 295-316.
38. Vondey M. The relationships among servant leadership, organizational citizenship behavior, person-organization fit, and organizational identification. International Journal of Leadership Studies, 2010; 6(1), 3-27.
39. Yıldız SM. An importance-performance analysis of fitness center service quality: Empirical results from fitness centers in Turkey. African Journal of Business Management, 2011; 5(16), 7031-7041.
40. Yukl G, O’Donnell M, Taber T. Influence of leader behaviors on the leader-member exchange relationship. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 2009; 24(4), 289-299.
41. Yücel C, Samancı G. Örgütsel güven ve örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı. Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 2009; 19(1), 113-132.
42. Zhang JS, Du S, Ma SM, Wang XY. Research on leader- member exchange and work performance. International Conference on Information Management, Innovation Management and Industrial Engineering, 2009; 389-391.