Durumsal güdülenme düzeyi ve başarı algısı arasındaki ilişki: takım sporları üzerinde bir çalışma

Bu çalışmanın amacı, takım sporlarına katılan sporcuların başarı algıları ve durumsal güdülenme düzeyleri arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemektir. Çalışmaya, yaşları 16 ile 29 arasında değişen (M = 21.37 and SD = 2.58) toplam 267 sporcu (kadın = 109; erkek = 158) katılmıştır. Sporcuların durumsal güdülenme düzeylerini ve başarı algılarını değerlendirmek için sırasıyla “Durumsal Güdülenme Ölçeği” ve “Başarı Algısı Envanteri” kullanılmıştır. Sonuçlar, görev yöneliminin daha fazla hür iradeli durumsal güdülenme biçimleriyle pozitif; daha az hür iradeli durumsal güdülenme biçimleriyle negatif ilişkili olduğu belirlenmiştir. Ego yöneliminin ise; durumsal güdülenme biçimleriyle ilişkili olmadığı görülmüştür. Oluşturulmuş hedef profilleri ile ilgili sonuçlar incelendiğinde; yüksek görev/düşük ego grubunun özdeşimle düzenleme düzeylerinin düşük görev/düşük ego grubundan anmalı biçimde yüksek olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Yine yüksek görev/düşük ego grubunun güdülenme düzeylerinin düşük görev/düşük ego grubundan anlamlı biçimde düşük olduğu belirlenmiştir. Sonuçlar, yüksek görev yöneliminin sport ortamında hür iradeli durumsal güdülenmeyi beslediğini ortaya koymaktadır.

The relationship between situational motivation level and perception of success: a study on team sports

The purpose of this investigation is to examine the relationship between situational motivation levels and perceptions of success of athletes who participate in team sports. Participants are 267 athletes (female = 109; male = 158) ranging in age from 16 to 29 (M = 21.37 and SD = 2.58). “The Situational Motivation Scale” and “The Perception of Success Questionnaire” were used to assess situational motivation levels and perception of success of participants, respectively. Results indicated that task orientation was found to be positively associated with more self-determined types of situational motivation, and was found to be negatively associated with less self-determined types of situational motivation. Ego orientation was not associated with types of situational motivation. An extreme group split was conducted to create four goal groups and goal profile analyses conducted. Results of MANOVA revealed that high task / low ego group reported higher levels of identified regulation than low task / low ego group. High task / low ego group reported lower levels of a motivation than low task / low ego group. The results suggest that a high level of task orientation singularly fosters self-determined situational motivation in the context of sport.

___

  • 1. Almagro BJ, Conde C, Moreno JA, Sáenz-López P., “Analysis and comparison of adolescent athletes' motivation: basketball players vs. football players” Revista de Psicología del Deporte, 18.pp.353-356, 2009.
  • 2. Ciani KM, Sheldon KM, Hilpert J, Easter MA., “Antecedents and trajectories of achievement goals: A self-determination theory perspective” British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81.pp.223-243, 2011.
  • 3. Deci EL, Ryan RM., “The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality” Journal of Research in Personality, 19.pp.109-134, 1985.
  • 4. Deci EL, Ryan RM., “A motivational approach to self: integration in personality” Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 38.pp.237- 288, 1990.
  • 5. Duda, JL., Goals: a social-cognitive approach to the study of achievement motivation in sport. In R.N. Singer, M. Murphey, & L.K. Tennant (Eds.), Handbook on research on sport psychology, New York: Macmillan, pp.421-436, 1993.
  • 6. Duda JL, Chi L, Newton ML, Walling MD, Catley D., “Task and ego orientation and intrinsic motivation in sport” International Journal of Sport Psychology, 26.pp.40-63, 1995.
  • 7. Fox K, Goudas M, Biddle S, Duda J, Armstrong N., “Children's task and ego goal profiles in sport” British Journal of Educational Psychology, 64.pp.253-261, 1994.
  • 8. Georgiadis MM, Biddle SJH, Chatzisarantis NL., “The mediating role of self determination in the relationship between goal orientations and physical self-worth in greek exercisers” European Journal of Sport Sciences,; 1.pp.1- 8, 2001.
  • 9. Georgiadis MM, Biddle SJH, Vanden Auweele Y., “Cognitive, emotional, and behavioral connotations of task and ego goal orientation profiles: An ideographic approach using hierarchical class analysis” International Journal of Sport Psychology, 32.pp.1-20, 2001.
  • 10. Guay F, Vallerand RJ, Blanchard C., “On the assessment of situational intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: the situational motivation scale (SIMS)” Motivation and Emotion, 24.pp.175–213, 2000.
  • 11. Hom HL, Duda JL, Miller A., “Correlates of goal orientations among young athletes” Pediatric Exercise Science, 5.pp.168-176, 1993.
  • 12. Jagacinski CM, Nicholls JG., “Conceptions of ability and related affects in task involvement and ego involvement” Journal of Educational Psychology, 5.pp.909-919, 1984.
  • 13. Kazak Çetinkalp Z., “Durumsal Güdülenme Ölçeği (Situational Motivation Scale- SIMS)’nin Türkçe Versiyonunun Psikometrik Özellikleri” Türkiye Klinikleri Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 2.pp.86-94, 2010.
  • 14. Kazak Çetinkalp Z, Doğan B., “Başarı Algısı Envanteri’nin (yetişkin versiyonu-BAE-Y) Türk sporcuları için geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması“ Performans Dergisi, 13.pp.69-74, 2007.
  • 15. Lonsdale C, Hodge K, Rose EA., “The Behavioral Regulation in Sport Questionnaire (BRSQ): Instrument development and initial validity evidence” Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 30.pp.323-355, 2008.
  • 16. Mageau GA, Vallerand RJ., “The coach-athlete relationship: A motivational model”. Journal of Sports Science, 21.pp.883-904, 2003.
  • 17. McNeill MC, Wang CKJ., “Psychological profiles of elite school sports players in Singapore” Psychology of Sport & Exercise, 6.pp.117-128, 2005.
  • 18. Newton M, Duda JL., “Elite adolescent athletes' achievement goals and beliefs concerning success in tennis” Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 15.pp.437-448, 1993.
  • 19. Nicholls JG., The general and the specific in the development and expression of achievement motivation. In G.C. Roberts (Ed.), Motivation in 8sport and exercise Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, pp.31-56, 1992.
  • 20. Ntoumanis N., “Empirical links between achievement goal theory and self-determination theory in sport” Journal of Sports Sciences, 19.pp.397-409, 2001.
  • 21. Ntoumanis N, Biddle S., “The relationship between achievement goal profile groups and perceptions of motivational climates in sport” Scandinavian Journal of Medicine Science and Sport, 8.pp.120-124, 1998.
  • 22. Pelletier LG, Fortier MS, Vallerand RJ, Tuson KM, Brière NM, Blais MR., “Toward a new measure of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, and amotivation in sports: The Sport Motivation Scale (SMS)” Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 17.pp.35-53, 1995.
  • 23. Roberts GC, Spink KS, Pemberton CL., Learning experiences in sport psychology. 2nd ed. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, pp.115-118, 1999.
  • 24. Roberts GC, Treasure DC, Ballague G., “Achievement goals in sport: The development and validation of the Perception of Success Questionnaire” Journal of Sport Sciences, 16.pp.337- 347, 1998.
  • 25. Standage M, Treasure DC., “Relationship among achievement goal orientations and multidimensional situational motivation in physical education” British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72.pp.87-113, 2002.
  • 26. Sun Y, Wang CK, Biddle SJH., “Goal orientation and self-determination theories in youth physical activity: Age and gender differences” Journal of Tianjin Institute of Physical Education, 16.pp.10-14, 2001.
  • 27. Thøgersen-Ntoumani C, Ntoumanis N., “The role of self-determined motivation in the understanding of exercise-related behaviors, cognitions and physical self-evaluations” Journal of Sports Sciences, 24.pp.393-404, 2006.
  • 28. Vallerand RJ, Bissonnette R., “Intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivational styles as predictors of behavior: A prospective study” Journal of Personality, 60.pp.599- 620, 1992.
  • 29. Wang CKJ, Chatzisarantis NLD, Spray CM, Biddle SJH., “Achievement goal profiles in school physical education: Differences in self-determination, sport ability beliefs, and physical activity” British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72.pp.433-445, 2002.
  • 30. Wann DL., Sport psychology. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey:Pretice-Hall, 158-183, 1997.
  • 31. Zahariadis P, Biddle S., “Goal orientations and participation motives in physical education and sport: Their relationships in English schoolchildren” Athletics Insight. Online Journal of Sport Psychology, 2.pp.1-11, 2000.
Selçuk Üniversitesi Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilim Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-9915
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yıllık
  • Başlangıç: 2018
  • Yayıncı: -