Examination of User Experiences and Needs for the Web Page and Learning Environment Used by Students with Special Needs in Open and Distance Learning: The Case of Anadolu University *

Examination of User Experiences and Needs for the Web Page and Learning Environment Used by Students with Special Needs in Open and Distance Learning: The Case of Anadolu University *

E-learning systems with its flexible structure offer learning environments independent of time and place for students with special needs. The effectiveness of these environments for students with special needs depends on the creation of designs that consider their individual needs. The aim of this research is to reveal the needs, difficulties, and solution suggestions by determining the user experiences for the "e-Campus" system as the web page of the Anadolu University Open Education System "Barrier-Free Open Education Faculty (OEF)", which provides services to most university students with special needs in Turkey, and the online learning environment. For this purpose, a case study design, in which qualitative and quantitative data collection techniques are used together, was used. A total of 9533 students, including 9513 students with special needs and 20 visually impaired students, participated in the quantitative stage of the study. According to the findings of the research, students with special needs reported that the web page and e-Campus system they use are easy to use, they can easily find the content they are looking for, they can access other services from the web page and offer useful content. On the other hand, difficulties in using the mobile application login screen, accessing the call center, and accessing some content on the e-Campus were mentioned among the issues encountered. The visually impaired participants requested support for facilitating access to live lectures, enlarging the texts in online exams, and giving additional time, adding voice prompts to the entry page, and increasing audio narrations. In line with these supports required by the participants and the literature, solution suggestions to overcome the difficulties were discussed.

___

  • Anderson, G. (1990). Fundamentals of educational research. Bristol: The Falmer Press.
  • Baird, D. E., & Fisher, M. (2005). Neomillennial user experience design strategies: Utilizing social networking media to support “always on” learning styles. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 34(1), 5-32.
  • Boeije, H. (2010). Analysis in qualitative research. SAGE Publication.
  • Bozkurt-Sani, S. (2017). Özel eğitimde dijital destek: Yardımcı teknolojiler [Digital support in special education: Assistive technologies]. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(2), 37-60.
  • Bühler, C., & Fisseler, B. (2007). Accessible e-learning and educational technology-extending learning opportunities for people with disabilities. Conference ICL2007, September 26 -28, 2007, Villach, Austria.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2005). Anket geliştirme [Survey Development]. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 3(2), 133-151.
  • Carneiro, L., Rebelo, F., Filgueiras, E., & Noriega, P. (2015). Usability and user experience of technical aids for people with disabilities? A preliminary study with a wheelchair. Procedia Manufacturing, 3, 6068-6074.
  • Chmiliar, l. (2010). Multiple-case designs. In A. J. Mills, G. Eurepas & E. Wiebe (Eds.), Encyclopedia of case study research (pp 582-583). USA: SAGE Publications.
  • Cho, J. D. (2021). A study of multi-sensory experience and color recognition in visual arts appreciation of people with visual impairment. Electronics, 10(4), 470-507.
  • Cooper, M., Colwell, C., & Jelfs, A. (2007). Embedding accessibility and usability: considerations for e-learning research and development projects. ALT-J, 15(3), 231-245.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach. (4th Edition). SAGE Publications.
  • Demetriadis, S., & Pombortsis, A. (2007). E-lectures for flexible learning: A study on their learning efficiency. Educational Technology & Society, 10(2), 147–157.
  • Durmuş, S., & Çağıltay, K. (2012). Kamu kurumu web siteleri ve kullanılabilirlik [Public agency websites and usability]. M. Z. Sobacı ve M. Yıldız (Ed.) E-devlet kamu yönetimi ve teknoloji ilişkisinde güncel gelişmeler (s. 293-322.).
  • Edyburn, D. L. (2001). Models, theories, and frameworks: Contributions to understanding special education technology. Special Education Technology Practice, 4(2), 16-24.
  • Ekren, G., & Kumtepe, E. G. (2018). Yükseköğrenim düzeyinde uzaktan eğitimde “açıklık” kavramına yönelik içerik analizi [Content analysis for the concept of “openness” in distance education at higher education level]. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(2), 112-128.
  • Emiroğlu, B. G. (2015). Üniversitelerin engelli destek ofislerinin web sayfalarının erişilebilirlikleri [Accessibility of the web pages of the disability support offices of the universities]. Journal of Educational Sciences & Practices, 14(27), 43-55.
  • Emre, İ. E., Akadal, E., & Gülseçen, S. (2018). Örgün ve uzaktan eğitim öğrencileri için kullanılabilirlik araştırması: Marmara Üniversitesi web sitesi [Usability research for formal and distance education students: Marmara University website]. Uluslararası Yönetim Bilişim Sistemleri ve Bilgisayar Bilimleri Dergisi, 2(1), 12-22.
  • Erlandson, D. A., Harris, E. L., Skipper, B. L., & Allen, S. D. (1993). Doing naturalistic inquiry: A guide to methods. SAGE Publication.
  • Furat, E. (2012). Görme engelli öğrencilerin üniversite giriş sınavında karşılaştığı sorunlar ve çözüm önerileri [Problems faced by visually impaired students in the university entrance exam and suggestions for solutions]. III. Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Kongresi. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi. Bolu.
  • Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. SAGE Publication.
  • Güler, E. (2018). Açık ve uzaktan öğrenme ortamlarında esneklik [Flexibility in open and distance learning environments]. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(3), 75-95.
  • Hamilton, D., & Keten, B. (2011). Görme Engelli Kullanıcılar İçin Erişilebilir Kütüphaneler: Kütüphanecilere Yönelik Pratik Öneriler [Accessible Libraries for Visually Impaired Users: Practical Advice for Librarians]. Türk Kütüphaneciliği, 25(4), 509-518.
  • Hassenzahl, M. (2013). User experience and experience design. The encyclopedia of human- computer interaction, 2. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Marc- Hassenzahl/publication/259823352_User_Experience_and_Experience_Design/links/56a7 352d08ae997e22bbc807/User-Experience-and-Experience-Design.pdf
  • Henry, S. L., Abou-Zahra, S., & Brewer, J. (2014, April). The role of accessibility in a universal web. In Proceedings of the 11th Web for all Conference. MIT Open Access Articles.
  • Heward, W. L., Alber, S. R., & Konrad, M. (2006). Exceptional children: An introduction to special education. Pearson Education/Merrill/Prentice Hall.
  • International Standards Organization (ISO): Standard 924 (2000). Ergonomic Requirements for Office Work with Visual Display Terminals. ISO, Geneva (1992–2000)
  • Kılınç, H. (2021). Opinions of Field Experts on Practices That Will Increase the Motivation Levels of Learners During the COVID-19 Pandemic Process. In Handbook of Research on Emerging Pedagogies for the Future of Education: Trauma-Informed, Care, and Pandemic Pedagogy (pp. 191-208). IGI Global.
  • King, A., Evans, D. G., & Blenkhorn, P. (2005). The evaluation of a web browser for blind people. In Pruski, A., Knops, H. (Eds.) Assistive Technology: From Virtuality to Reality (pp. 637–641). IOS Press, Amsterdam.
  • Kuniavsky, M. (2010). Smart things: ubiquitous computing user experience design. Elsevier.
  • Küçükönder, N., & Kır, İ. (2014). Uzaktan eğitim uygulamalarında açık kaynak kodlu öğrenme yönetim sistemlerinin yeniden yapılandırılmasının incelenmesi [Examining the restructuring of open source learning management systems in distance education applications]. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 13(1), 295- 304.
  • Lee, M., Han, S. H., Kim, H. K., & Bang, H. (2015). Identifying user experience elements for people with disabilities. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Advances in Computer- Human Interactions, Pohang, Korea. Access Adress: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.681.7575&rep=rep1&type=p df
  • Merriam, S. B. (2013). Nitel araştırma desen ve uygulama için bir rehber [A guide to qualitative research design and practice]. (Çev: S. Turan). Ankara: Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
  • Mills, G. E., & Gay, L. R. (2016). Educational research competencies for analysis and applications. (11th Edition). Pearson.
  • Miles, M. B., Huberman A., M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. (3rd Edition). SAGE Publication.
  • Mutlu, M. E. (2015). e-Öğrenme standartlarında yeni yönelimler [New directions in e-Learning standards]. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(4), 8-35.
  • Okur, M. R., & Demir, M. (2019). Görme engelli öğrenenlerin eğitim yaşantısında karşılaştıkları sorunların belirlenmesi, açık ve uzaktan öğrenme alanı için çözüm yolları geliştirilmesi [Identifying the problems faced by visually impaired learners in their educational life, developing solutions for open and distance learning]. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(2), 49-62.
  • Özarslan, Y. (2016). Kullanıcı deneyimi ve tasarımının önemi [The importance of user experience and design]. H. Çalışkan ve M. R. Okur (Editörler), Kullanıcı deneyimi tasarımı (s. 2-17). Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  • Özgüç, C. S., & Cavkaytar, A. (2014). Teacher use of instructional technology in a special education school for students with intellectual disabilities: A Case Study. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 5(1), 51-65.
  • Park, K., Goh, T., & So, H. J. (2014). Toward accessible mobile application design: developing mobile application accessibility guidelines for people with visual impairment. 한국 HCI 학회 학술대회, 31-38.
  • Petrie, H., Hamilton, F., King, N., & Pavan, P. (2006, April). Remote usability evaluations with disabled people. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems (pp. 1133-1141). Montreal, Canada. Access Adress: https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/1124772.1124942
  • Rosa, J. R. D. S., & Valentim, N. M. C. (2020, October). Accessibility, usability and user experience design for visually impaired people: a systematic mapping study. In Proceedings of the 19th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-10). Access Adress: https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3424953.3426626
  • Santos, O. C., Couchet, J., & Boticario, J. G. (2009, July). Personalized e-learning and e-mentoring through user modelling and dynamic recommendations for the inclusion of disabled at work and education. In Ninth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (pp. 514-518), IEEE. Madrid, Spain. Access Adress: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5194291
  • Schrepp, M., Cota, M. P., Gonçalves, R., Hinderks, A., & Thomaschewski, J. (2017). Adaption of user experience questionnaires for different user groups. Universal Access in the Information Society, 16(3), 629-640.
  • Sönmez, H. (2016). Engelli öğrencilerin sayısal ve sembol içerikli bir dersteki başarılarının incelenmesi: Anadolu Üniversitesi Açıköğretim Sistemi örneği [Examining the success of students with disabilities in a numerical and symbolic course: Anadolu University Open Education System example]. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(4), 8-21.
  • Sözer, B., Özdamar, N., & Pilanci, H. (2020). Yabancı dil öğrenimi için hazırlanan e-öğrenme ortamlarına ilişkin kullanılabilirlik araştırmalarının incelenmesi [Examination of usability studies on e-learning environments prepared for foreign language learning]. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6(4), 174-207.
  • Şahin-İzmirli, Ö., Dönmez, O., & Kabakçı-Yurdakul, I. (2011). Üniversite Web Sayfalarının Gezinim Kolaylaştırıcıları Açısından İncelenmesi: Türkiye Örneklemi [Examining University Web Pages in Terms of Navigation Facilitators: The Sample of Turkey]. 5. Uluslararası Bilgisayar ve Öğretim Teknolojileri Sempozyumu. Fırat Üniversitesi, Elazığ.
  • Şenel, S. (2015). Görme engelli öğrencilerin üniversite giriş sınavı deneyimleri [University entrance exam experiences of visually impaired students]. Hacettepe Journal of Educational Research, 1(1), 1-17.
  • Tanyeri, U., & Tüfekçi, A. (2010, Kasım). Bir yükseköğretim uzaktan eğitim programının görme engellilerin kullanımı açısından değerlendirilmesi: GÜUEP örneği [Evaluation of a higher education distance education program in terms of the use of the visually impaired: GUUEP example]. In International Conference on New Trends in Education and Their Implications Antalya, Turkey. Access Adress: http://www.iconte.org/FileUpload/ks59689/File/254.pdf
  • Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2013). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri [Qualitative research methods in the social sciences]. (9. Baskı). Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  • YÖK (2021). Yükseköğretim Bilgi Yönetim Sistemi. Engelli Öğrenci Sayıları Raporu [Higher Education Information Management System. Disabled Student Numbers Report]. Erişim Adresi: https://istatistik.yok.gov.tr/
  • Yusril, A. N. (2020). E-accessibility analysis in user experience for people with disabilities. Indonesian Journal of Disability Studies, 7(1), 107-109.
Sakarya University Journal of Education-Cover
  • ISSN: 2146-7455
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 3 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2011
  • Yayıncı: Sakarya Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Examination of User Experiences and Needs for the Web Page and Learning Environment Used by Students with Special Needs in Open and Distance Learning: The Case of Anadolu University *

Gizem YILDIZ, Hakan KILINÇ, Muhammet Recep OKUR

Factors Affecting Future Expectations of 12. Grade Students’ Preparation for Higher Education in Schools*

Halime GÜNGÖR, Şefika Şule ERÇETİN

Group Moderation Assessment Model: An Example of an Open-Ended Mathematics Exam*

Emin AYDIN, Mithat TAKUNYACI

Yükseköğretime Hazırlanırken 12. Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Gelecek Beklentilerini Etkileyen Okulla İlgili Faktörler

Halime GÜNGÖR, Şefika Şule ERÇETİN

Sevda DOĞAN DOLAPÇIOĞLU, Ahmet DOĞANAY

Role of the Cognitive Research Trust Thinking Program in Developing Critical Thinking Skills*

Sevda DOĞAN DOLAPÇIOĞLU, Ahmet DOĞANAY

An Examination on Digital Literacy Level of Quran Course Teachers*

İsmail AKYÜZ

Açık ve Uzaktan Öğrenmede Özel Gereksinimli Öğrencilerin Kullandıkları Web Sayfası ve Öğrenme Ortamına Yönelik Kullanıcı Deneyimlerinin ve Gereksinimlerinin İncelenmesi: Anadolu Üniversitesi Örneği

Muhammet Recep OKUR, Hakan KILINÇ, Gizem YILDIZ

Üniversite Öğrencilerinde Nomofobinin Yordayıcıları Olarak Cinsiyet, Yaş ve Anksiyete

İbrahim TAŞ, Halime EKER

Eğitim Teknolojisi Araştırmalarındaki Konu Eğilimleri (2015-2020)

Özlem CANAN GÜNGÖREN, Zeliha DEMİR KAYMAK, Onur İŞBULAN, Bayram TOK, Fatma SAVAŞ, Sedef YILDIRIM, Nermin ELİBOL, Sedat TUFANÇLI, Elif ÇİVİ, İsa ÖZTÜRK