54-66 Aylık Çocuklarda Olumlu Sosyal Yalan Davranışı ile Zihin Kuramı ve Yönetici İşlevlerin Bağlantıları

Bu araştırmanın amacı olumlu sosyal yalan davranışının (beyaz yalan) zihin kuramı ve yönetici işlevlerle olan bağlantılarının 54-66 aylık çocuklarda incelenmesidir. Katılımcı grubu, İstanbul ilinde yer alan beş okul öncesi devlet ve özel eğitim kurumundaki 54-66 aylık (4.5 - 5.5 yaş) 96 çocuktan (54 erkek, 42 kız) oluşmaktadır. Çocukların olumlu sosyal yalan davranışı iyi resim-kötü resim görevi ve hayal kırıklığına uğratan hediye paradigması ile ölçülmüştür. Zihin kuramı ölçümünde görünüş gerçeklik görevi, beklenmedik içerik görevi ve beklenmedik yer değişikliği görevi; yönetici işlevlerin bileşenlerinden bilişsel esneklik ölçümünde boyut değiştirerek kart eşleme görevi, inhibisyonel kontrol ve çalışma belliği ölçümünde ise gündüz gece görevi kullanılmıştır. Sonuçta inhibisyonel kontrol ile hayal kırıklığına uğratan hediye paradigmasının takas aşaması arasındaki ilişki haricinde diğer değişkenler arasında anlamlı bir ilişki bulunamamıştır. Ayrıca çocukların olumlu sosyal yalan söyleme davranışlarını ölçmek amacıyla kullanılan iyi resim-kötü resim görevinde yalan söyleme oranları ile hayal kırıklığına uğratan hediye paradigmasındaki oranların oldukça farklı değerler aldığı gözlenmiştir. Katılımcılar küçük ve büyük çocuklar olarak iki ayrı yaş grubuna ayrıldığında -yaş kontrol edildiğinde- ise görece küçük çocuklarda (4.5 - 5 yaş) inhibisyonel kontrol ile iyi resim-kötü resim görevi arasında anlamlı bir ilişki görülmüştür. Büyük çocuklarda (5 - 5.5 yaş) ise yalan davranışı ile bilişsel becerilerin bağlantısı bulunmamışken uygulamacıya bağlı farklılığın bulunması sebebiyle motivasyonel faktörlerin olumlu sosyal yalan davranışında etkili olabileceği düşünülmektedir. Dolayısıyla bilişsel becerilerin küçük çocukların olumlu sosyal yalan davranışında hem gerekli hem de yeterli olduğu; fakat yaş arttıkça bilişsel becerilerin yeterli olmaktan çıkıp sosyal ve motivasyonel faktörlerin devreye girdiği yorumu yapılabilir.

The Relationships Between Children’s Prosocial-Lie Telling Behavior, Theory of Mind and Executive Functions in 54-66 Months

This research examined the relationship between prosocial lie-telling behavior, theory of mind, and executive functions in children aged 54–66 months. The sample consists of 96 children (54 boys, 42 girls) aged 54–66 months (4.5–5.5 years) enrolled at five public schools and private schools in Istanbul. The children’s prosocial lie-telling behavior is tested by the good and bad drawing task and the dissapointing gift paradigm. Two false belief tasks and one appearance-reality task were used to measure theory of mind (ToM). Along with the measures for theory of mind, working memory, cognitive flexibility, and inhitory control were measured by the dimensional change card sort (DCCS) and day-night Strooplike test, respectively. As a result, there was no significant differences between the children’s cognitive scores (ToM, DCCS, Stroop) and pro-social lying tasks. However, there were significant predictive relationships with the DCCS and the disappointing gift paradigm’s swap condition. When age was controlled, Stroop and prosocial lie-telling in the good and bad drawing task correlated significantly in young children. White-lie-telling scores are differentiated, according to researchers, in older children. Thus, it is thought that social and motivational factors may affects children’s prosocial behavior. In this study, the disappointing gifts paradigm and good and bad drawing tasks were used to measure children’s prosocial lie-telling behavior, and it was discovered that there were quite different values for children’s lying rates.

___

  • Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M., & Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind”? Cognition, 21, 37–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(85)90022-8
  • Bok, S. (1978). Lying: Moral choices in public and private life. New York, NY: Pantheon.
  • Broomfiel, K. A., Robinson, E. J., & Robinson, W. P. (2002). Children’s understanding about white lies. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20, 47–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/026151002166316
  • Carlson, S. M., Moses, L. J., & Hix, H. R. (1998). The role of inhibitory processes in young children’s difficulties with deception and false belief. Child Development, 69(3), 672–691. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1998.tb06236.x
  • Carlson, S. M., Moses, L. J., & Breton, C. (2002). How specific is the relation between executive function and theory of mind? Contributions of inhibitory control and working memory. Infant and Child Development, 11, 73–92.
  • Ceci, S. J., Burd, K. A., & Helm, R. K. (2015). Insight into children’s prosocial lies: Comment on warneken and orlins. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 33, 271–273.
  • Crivello, C., & Poulin-Dubois, D. (2018). Infants’ false belief understanding: a non-replication of the helping task. Cognitive Development, 46, 51–57. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.cogdev.2017.10.003
  • Evan, D. L., & Lee, K. (2013). Emergence of lying in very young children. Developmental Psychology, 49(10), 1958–1963. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0031409
  • Flavell, J. H., Flavell, E. R., & Green, F. L. (1983). Development of the appearance-reality distinction. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 95–120.
  • Frye, D., Zelazo, P. D., & Palfai, T. (1995). Theory of mind and rule-based reasoning. Cognitive Development, 10(4), 483–527.
  • Gathercole, S. (2008). Working memory. In J. Byrne & H. L. Roediger, III (Ed.), Cognitive Psychology of memory Vol. 2 of learning and memory: A comprehensive reference (ss. 33 –52). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
  • Gerstad, C. L., Hong, Y. L., & Diamond, A. (1994). The relationship between cognition and action: Performance of 3 ½-7 years old on a Stroop-like day-night test. Cognition, 53, 129–153. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)90068-X
  • Gombos, V. A. (2006). The cognition of deception: the role of executive processes in producing lies. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 132(3), 197–214.
  • Guttentag, R. E., Haith, M. M., Goodman, G. S., & Hauch, J. (1984). Semantic processing of unattended words by bilinguals: A test of the input switch mechanism. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 178–188.
  • Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (1988). Working memory, comprehension, and aging: A review and a new view. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 22, 193–225. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60041-9
  • Hsu, Y. K., & Cheung, H. (2013). Two mentalizing capacities and the understanding of two types of lie telling in children. Developmental Psychology, 49(9), 1650–1659. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0031128
  • Karakelle, S. (2012). Zihin kuramı gelişiminde kardeş etkisi: İkizler, tek kardeşliler ve tek çocukların karşılaştırılması. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 15(29), 43–52.
  • Kloo, D., Perner, J., Aichhorn, M., & Schmidhuber, N. (2010). Perspective taking and cognitive flexibility in the Dimensional Change Card Sorting (DCCS) task. Cognitive Delevopment, 25, 208–217. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.cogdev.2010.06.001
  • Lee, K. (2013). Little liars: development of verbal deception in children. Child Development Perspectives, 7(2), 91–96.
  • Lewis, M., Stanger, C., & Sullivan, M. W. (1989). Deception in 3-year-olds. Developmental Psychology, 25(3), 439–443.
  • Moore, C., & MacGillivray, S. (2004). Altruism, prudence, and theory of mind in preschoolers. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 103, 51–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cd.97
  • Perner, J., & Howes, D. (1992). “He thinks he knows”: And more developmental evidence against the simulation (role-taking) theory. Mind & Language, 7(1), 72–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.1992.tb00197.x
  • Perner, J., Leekam, S. R., & Wimmer, H. (1987). Three-year-olds’ difficulty with false belief: The case for a conceptual deficit. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 5(2), 125-137.
  • Pipe, M. E., & Wilson, J. C. (1994). Cues and secrects: Influences on children’s event report. Developmental Psychology, 30(4), 515–525. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.30.4.515
  • Polak, A., & Harris, P. L. (1999). Deception by young children following noncompliance. Developmental Psychology, 35(2), 561–568.
  • Popliger, M., Talwar, V., & Crossman, A. (2011). Predictors of children’s prosocial lie-telling: motivation, socialization variables, and moral understanding. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 110(3), 373–392. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2011.05.003
  • Reed, M. A., Pien, D. L., & Rothbart, M. K. (1984). Inhibitory self-control in preschool children. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 30(2), 131–147.
  • Saarni, C. (1984). An observational study of children’s attempts to monitor their expressive behavior. Child Development, 55, 1504–1513.
  • Sayar, F. ve Turan, F. (2012). Okuma gelişiminde üst dil farkındalığı, ses bilgisel süreçler ve bellek süreçlerinin etkisi: Kısa süreli bellek ve çalışma belleği. Özel Eğitim Dergisi, 13(2), 49–64.
  • Schneider, W., Schumann, R., & Sodian, B. (2005). Introduction and overview. In W. Schneider, R. Schumann-Hengsteler & B. Sodian (Ed.), Young children’s cognitive development (ss. 1–9). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Stuss, D. T. (2011). Functions of the frontal lobes: Relation to executive functions. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 17, 759–765.
  • Talwar, V., & Lee, K. (2002a). Development of lying to conceal a transgression: Children’s control of expressive behavior during verbal deception. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 26(5), 436–444.
  • Talwar, V., & Lee, K. (2002b). Emergence of white-lie telling in children between 3 and 7 years of age. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 48(2), 160–181. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/mpq.2002.0009
  • Talwar, V., Gordon, H. M., & Lee, K. (2007). Lying in the elementary school years: verbal deception and its relation to second-order belief understanding. Developmental Psychology, 43(3), 804–810.
  • Talwar, V., & Lee, K. (2008). Social and cognitive correlates of children’s lying behaviour. Child Development, 79(4), 866–881.
  • Talwar, V., Crossman, A., & Wyman, J. (2017). The role of executive functioning and theory of mind in children’s lies for another and for themselves. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 41, 126–135. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ecresq.2017.07.003
  • The Understood Team. (2017). 3 areas of excutive function. Erişim adresi: https://www.understood.org/en/learning-attention-issues/child-learning-disabilities/executive-functioning-issues/3-areas-of-executive-function.
  • Warneken, F., & Orlins, E. (2015). Children tell white lies to make others feel better. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 33, 259–270.
  • Wellman, H. M., Cross, D., & Watson, J. (2001). Meta-analysis of Theory-of-Mind development: the truth about false belief. Child Development, 70(4), 655–684. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00304
  • Wellman, H. M. (2002). Developing a theory of mind. In U. Goswami (Ed.), Blackwell handbook of childhood cognitive development (ss. 258–285). Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Williams, S. M., Kirmayer, M., Simon, T., & Talwar, V. (2013). Children’s antisocial and prosocial lies to familiar and unfamiliar adults. Infant and Child Development, 22, 430–438. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/icd.1802
  • Williams, S., Moore, K., Crossman, A. M., & Talwar, V. (2015). The role of executive functions and theory of mind in children’s prosocial lie-telling. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 141, 256–266. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jecp.2015.08.001
  • Xu, F., Bao, X., Fu, G., Talwar, V., & Lee, K. (2010). Lying and truth-telling in children: From concept to action. Child Development, 81(2), 581–596. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01417.x
  • Yağmurlu, B., Berument, S. K., & Çelimli, S. (2005). The role of institution and home contexts in theory of mind development. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 26(5), 521–537. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2005.06.004
  • Yıldız, T. (2013). Bir kelime neyi değiştirir? Boyut değiştirerek kart eşleme görevine kavramsal ağların etkisi. Nesne Psikoloji Dergisi, 1(1), 1–19.
  • Yıldız, T. ve Akbaş, T. (2017). Boyut değiştirerek eşleme görevinde boyutlar aynı objenin sıfatları olursa üç yaş çocuklarının performansı artar mı? Psikoloji Çalışmaları Dergisi, 37(2), 93–108.
  • Zelazo, P. D., Müller, U., Frye, D., & Marcovitch, S. (2003). The development of executivefunction in early childhood. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 68(3), 1–151.