Park et-Devam et Sistemlerinin Türkiye'de Uygulanabilirliğine Yönelik Bir Kavramsal Model Önerisi

Kentsel yolculuk amaçlarının farklılaşmasının yanı sıra, yolculuk taleplerinde yaşanan artış, kentlerin büyüklüğüne bağlı olarak taşıt hareketliliğinin daha uzun mesafeler arasında yapılmasını gerekli kılmıştır. Farklı kent büyüklükleri, hızlı ulaşımın amaçlandığı günümüzde, özel otomobil kullanımı odaklı önlemlerin alınmasına neden olarak kentsel ulaşım ağını şekillendirmiştir. Her kentlinin farklı ulaşım talepleri, kentsel ulaşım sisteminde alternatif ulaşım türlerinin hizmete girmesini gerektirmiştir. Böylesi bir durumda, büyükşehir ya da küçük ve orta ölçekli her kentin ulaştırma altyapısının ve kentin ihtiyaçlarının göz önünde bulundurulduğu bir model üretilmesi ihtiyacı ortaya çıkmıştır. Bu model vasıtasıyla, kentin ulaşım yapısı çözümlenir, kentlinin değişen yolculuk taleplerine göre kurgulanacak ulaşım sistemi ve çeşitli ulaşım türleri arasında yolculuk yoğunluğuna göre nasıl seçim yapılacağına ilişkin öngörülerde bulunulur. Bu çalışma kapsamında, temelde Varlık-İlişki modeli olarak adlandırılan bir kavramsal model çerçevesi oluşturulmuştur. Bu kavramsal model, kentsel ulaşım sistemlerinin ve alternatif ulaşım türlerinin belirlenmesinde, teorik altyapıyı pratik uygulamaya dönüştüren kuramsal bir temel oluşturmayı amaçlamıştır. Bu çalışmada, Türkiye’de farklı nüfus büyüklüğüne sahip farklı boyutlarda kentler için alternatif bir ulaşım türü olan P+D sistemlerinin, kent merkezi çeperi ve kent bütününde konumlandırılmasında kurgulanan Varlık-İlişki modelinin üretildiği bir kavramsal model önerisi geliştirilmiştir.

A Conceptual Model Proposal for the Applicability of Park and Ride Systems in Turkey

In addition to the differentiation of urban travel objectives, the increase in travel demands made it necessary to make vehicle mobility between longer distances depending on the size of the cities. Different urban sizes have shaped the urban transportation network by taking measures focused on the use of private cars today, where rapid transportation is aimed. Different travel demands of each inhabitant required alternative modes of transportation to be put into service in the urban transportation system. In such a situation, the need to produce a model that takes into account the transportation infrastructure of the metropolitan or small and medium-sized city and the needs of the city has emerged. With this model, the transportation structure of the city is analyzed and forecasts are made regarding the transportation system to be designed according to the multiple journey demands of the city and how to choose among the various transportation types according to the travel density. In this study, a conceptual model framework, basically called the Entity-Relationship Model, has been created. This conceptual model aims to create a theoretical basis that transforms the theoretical infrastructure into practical application in determining urban transportation systems and alternative modes of transportation. In this study, for cities of different sizes with different population sizes in Turkey an alternative transportation modes with a P + D systems, town walls and the city a conceptual model is proposed for the production of remixed Entity-Relationship model in the positioning of the whole it has been developed.

PDF

___

Abrial, J.R. (1974). Data Semantics, Klimbie J.W. ve Koffemann K.L. (ed.) Database Management Systems, North-Holland, Amsterdam.
Anderson, M.P. ve Woessner, W.W. (1991). Applied Groundwater Modelling: Simulation of Flow and Advective Transport, Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
Balcı, O., Arthur J.D., ve Nance R.E, (2008). Accomplishing Reuse with a Simulation Conceptual Model, Winter Simulation Conference, (editörler: S. J. Mason, R. Hill, L. Moench, and O. Rose), New Jersey, ss.959- 965.
Banks, J., Carson, J.S., Nelson B.L. ve Nicol D.M., (2001). Discrete-Event System Simulation, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Borah, J.J. (2002). Conceptual Modeling- The Missing Link of Simulation Development, Spring Simulation Interoperability Workshop.
Borhan, M. N., İsmail, A., Rahmat, R. A., Amrak, K. (2011). Effect of Transport Policies to Shifting Private Car Users to Park and Ride in Putrajava-Malaysia. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Science, 5 (3), ss. 303-308.
Caltrans (2010). Park and Ride Program Resource Guide 2010. California Department of Transportation.
Chen P.P, (1976). The Entity-Relationship Model: Toward a Unified View of Data, ACM Digital Transactions on Database Systems 1 (1) ss. 9-37.
Chen P.P, Thalheim B., Wong L.Y. (2000). Future Directions of Conceptual Modeling, Louisiana State University, USA.
Chen P.P, (2001). Entity-Relationship Modeling: Historical Events, Future Trends, and Lessons Learned, Louisiana State University, USA.
Chen P.P, (2004). The Need for ER Databases and More, Marianne Winslett: Peter Chen Speaks Out on Paths to Fame, SIGMOD Record, 33 (1).
Clark W.R., Schmitz, R.A., (2001). When Modelers and Field Biologists Interact: Progress in Resource Science. Modeling in Natural Resource Management: Development, Interpretation, and Application. Washington DC: Island Press, ss.197-208.
Czejdo, B., Elmasri, R., Rusinkiewicz, M. Ve Embley, D, (1990). A Graphical Data Manipulation Language for an Extended Entity-Relationship Model, IEEE Computer Society, 23 (3) ss.26-35.
Davis, P.K. (1992). Generalizing Concepts and Methods of Verification, Validation and Accreditation (VV&A) for Military Simulations, Santa Monica, CA.
Embley, D W, Liddle, S W, Pastor, O, (2011) The Handbook of Conceptual Modelling: Theory, Practice and Research Challenges, D.W. Embley ve B. Thalheim (editörler), Springer.
FEDEP-Federation Development and Execution Process, (2003). IEEE 1516.3 Recommended Practice for High Level Architecture, IEEE Computer Society.
Fishwick, P.A. (1995). Simulation Model Design and Execution: Building Digital Worlds. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Furian, N, O’Sullivan M, Walker C, Vössner S, Neubacher D (2015). A Conceptual Modeling Framework for Discrete Event Simulation Using Hierarchical Control Structures, Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 56, ss.82-96.
Hamilton, S.H., ElSawah, S., Guillaume, J.H.A., Jakeman, A.J., Pierce, S.A., (2015). Integrated Assessment and Modelling: Overview and Synthesis of Salient Dimensions. Environmental Modeling Software. 64, ss.215-229.
Halpin, T., (2001). Chapter 8 - Entity-Relationship Modeling, Data Management Systems, San Diego: Academic Press, ss.313-348.
Harrington, J.L., (2016). Chapter 4 - Entities and Relationships, In Relational Database Design and Implementation, Boston: Morgan Kaufmann, ss.55-88.
Hillier F.S. ve Liberman G.J., (1995). Introduction to Mathematical Programming, İkinci Baskı, New York: McGraw-Hill.
Holguin-Veras, J, Reilley J. ve Aras-Vera F. (2012). New York City Park & Ride Study, Rensseleaer Polytechnic Institute, University Transportation Research, 2, 10.
JTA, (2009). P&R Study Final Draft, Jacksonville Transport Authority Regional Transportation Solutions, Reynolds Smith and Hill Inc.
Karagöz, N.A. ve Demirörs, O. (2005). Simülasyon Sistemleri İçin Kavramsal Model Geliştirmeye Model Tabanlı Bir Yaklaşım, USMOS-05, Ankara.
Karagöz N. ve Demirörs O. (2011) Conceptual Modeling Notations and Techniques, Conceptual Model. Discrete-Event Simulation, ss.179–209.
Kırmızı Z., Kolağasıoğlu M.Ş., Çalışkan F.T., (2012). Kentiçi Ulaşım Terimleri Sözlüğü, İstanbul: Cinius Yayınları.
Law A.M. ve Kelton W.D., (2000). Simulation Modelling and Analysis, Üçüncü Baskı, New York: McGraw-Hill.
Markowitz V. ve Shoshani A, (1992). Representing Extended Entity-Relationship Structures in Relational Databases: A Modular Approach, ACM Digital Transactions on Database Systems 17 (3) ss.423-464.
Mylopoulos J., (1992).Conceptual Modeling and Telos, Conceptual Modeling, Databases and CASE: An Integrated View of Information Systems Development, New York: Wiley, ss.49–68.
Pace, D.K. (1999). Conceptual Model Descriptions, Proceedings of the Simulation Interoperability, Workshop.
Pace, D.K. (2000). Conceptual Model Development for C4ISR Simulations, 5th International Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium, ss.24-26.
Patig, S. (2006). Evolution of Entity–Relationship Modelling, Data & Knowledge Engineering, (56) ss.122–138.
Robinson S, (2006). Conceptual Modeling for Simulation: Issues and Research Requirements, Proceedings of the 38th Conference on Winter Simulation, Winter Simulation Conference 2006, ss.792–800.
Robinson, S. (2008a). Conceptual Modeling for Simulation Part I: Definition and Requirements, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 59 (3) ss.278-290.
Robinson, S. (2008b). Conceptual Modelling for Simulation Part II: A Framework for Conceptual Modelling, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 59 (3) ss. 291–304.
Robinson, S. (2012) Tutorial: Choosing What to Model – Conceptual Modeling for Simulation, Winter Simulation Conference, ss.1–12.
Robinson, S. (2014). Simulation: The Practice of Model Development and Use. 2. Baskı. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Robinson, S., Arbez, G., Birta, L. G., Tolk, A., ve Wagner, G. (2015). Conceptual modeling: definition, purpose and benefits. 2015 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC), ss.2812-2826.
Rodrigue J. P, Comtois C. ve Slack B, (2006). The Geography of Transport Systems, Routhledge: New York: Taylor ve Francis Group.
Sargent, R.G. (1987). An Overview of Verification and Validation of Simulation Models, Winter Simulation Conference.
Simpson B. (2000) Two Reasons Why Park and Ride can Backfire, Highways&Transportation.
Spillar, R.J. (1997). Monograph 11:Park and Ride Planning and Design Guidelines, New York: Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas Inc.
Teorey T., Yang D. ve Fry J, (1986). A Logical Design Methodology for Relational Databases Using The Extended E-R model. ACM Computing Surveys, 18(2) ss.197-222.
Turnbull, K.F, Pratt, R.H, Evans IV J.E, ve Levinson H.S, (2004). TCRP Report 95: Traveler Response to Transportation System Changes Handbook, Chapter 3: Park-and-Ride/Pool-Traveler Response to Transportation System Changes. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C.
Vuchic, R. V. (2005). Urban Transit Operations, Planning and Economics, John Wiley and Sons Inc.
Yılmaz L. ve Ören T.I., (2004). A Conceptual Model for Reusable Simulations Within a Model-Simulator-Context Framework, Conference on Conceptual Modeling and Simulation, ss.28-31.
Zhang F., Ma Z.M. ve Cheng J., (2016). Enhanced Entity-Relationship Modeling With Description Logic, Knowledge-Based Systems, (93), ss.12– 32.
Zheng, J.G. (2010). Designing and Managing Data, Entity Relationship Diagram: Basics, Georgia State University.
Zhou, Y. ve Herath H.M.P.S.D. (2017). Evaluation of Alternative Conceptual Models for Groundwater Modelling, Geoscience Frontiers, 8, ss.437-443.
6 Aralık 2012 tarih ve 28489 Sayılı Resmi Gazete ’de yayınlanan 6360 Numaralı On Üç İlde Büyükşehir Belediyesi ve Yirmi Altı İlçe Kurulması İle Bazı Kanun ve Kanun Hükmünde Kararnamelerde Değişiklik Yapılmasına Dair Kanun.
14 Haziran 2014 tarih ve 29030 sayılı Resmi Gazetede yayınlanan Mekânsal Planlar Yapım Yönetmeliği.