Modelling the Relationships among Social Studies Learning Environment, Self-Efficacy, and Critical Thinking Disposition

This study aims to investigate the relationships among the features of learning environment (investigation, equity, and student cohesiveness) in social studies class, self-efficacy and critical thinking disposition (engagement, maturity and innovativeness) among middle school students. The study group consists of 422 students studying at five middle schools in one of the largest cities located in eastern part of Turkey. The research data was collected by using UF/EMI Critical Thinking Disposition Scale, "What is happening in this class?" Scale and the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire. Structural equation modelling (SEM) was performed by using LISREL 8.80 programme to test the hypothesized relationships among constructs. The results show that self-efficacy among students is higher in classroom environments where investigation is encouraged and equity among students is overseen. It is found that critical thinking disposition is higher in students with higher self-efficacy. Besides this, it is further observed that learning environment with investigation predicts all critical thinking dispositions positively whereas student cohesiveness predicts only maturity positively

Sosyal Bilgiler Öğrenme Ortamı, Özyeterlik ve Eleştirel Düşünme Eğilimi Arasındaki İlişkilerin Modellenmesişkilerin

Bu araştırmada ortaokul öğrencilerinin sosyal bilgiler dersindeki öğrenme ortamı özellikleri (araştırma-inceleme, eşitlik ve öğrenci yaklaşımı), özyeterlikleri ve eleştirel düşünme eğilimleri (katılım, bilişsel olgunluk ve yenilik) arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Araştırmanın çalışma grubunu, Türkiye’nin doğusunda bulunan büyük bir şehirdeki beş ortaokulda öğrenim görmekte olan toplam 422 öğrenci oluşturmaktadır. Araştırmanın verileri UF/EMI Eleştirel Düşünme Eğilim Ölçeği, “Bu Sınıfta Neler Oluyor?” Ölçeği ve Öğrenmede Güdüsel Stratejiler Anketi kullanılarak elde edilmiştir. LISREL 8.80 programı kullanılarak yapısal eşitlik modeli ile veriler analiz edilmiş ve değişkenler arasındaki önerilen ilişkiler test edilmiştir. Araştırmadan elde edilen sonuçlara göre, araştırma-incelemeye fırsat tanınan ve öğrenciler arasında eşitliğin gözetildiği sınıf ortamlarında öğrencilerin öz yeterliği daha yüksektir. Özyeterliği daha yüksek olan öğrencilerin de eleştirel düşünme eğilimlerinin daha yüksek düzeyde olduğu görülmüştür. Bunun yanı sıra, araştırma-inceleme öğrenme ortamının bütün eleştirel düşünme eğilimlerini pozitif yönde yordadığı, öğrenci yaklaşımının ise sadece bilişsel olgunluğu pozitif yönde yordadığı tespit edilmiştir.

Kaynakça

Afshar, H. S., Rahimi, A., & Rahimi, M. (2014). Instrumental motivation, critical thinking, autonomy and academic achievement of Iranian EFL learners. Issues in Educational Research, 24(3), 281-298.

Alt, D. (2015). Assessing the contribution of a constructivist learning environment to academic selfefficacy in higher education. Learning Environment Research, 18(1), 47-67.

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.

Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246.

Church, M.A., Elliot, A. J., & Gable, S. L. (2001). Perceptions of classroom environment, achievement goals, and achievement outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 43-54.

Dehghani, M., Jafari sani, H., Pakmehr, H., & Malekzadeh, A. (2011). Relationship between students' critical thinking and self-efficacy beliefs in Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran. Procedia Social and Behavior Sciences, 15, 2952-2955.

Diseth, A. (2011). Self-efficacy, goal orientations and learning strategies as mediators between preceding and subsequent academic achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 191-195.

Doğanay, A., & Yağcı, R. (2011). Evaluating activities which are performed by teachers in teaching social studies to the fifth grade students to improve their critical thinking skills. Journal of New World Sciences Academy, NWSA, 6(2), 1679-102.

Ertaş-Kılıç, H., & Şen, A. İ. (2014). Turkish adaptation study of UF/EMI critical thinking disposition instrument. Education and Science, 39(176), 1-12.

Ertaş, H. (2012). The effects of critical thinking education supported by out-of-school activities on critical thinking disposition and attitude toward physics course. Hacettepe University, Turkey.

Facino, P. A. (1990). Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction. Research findings and recommendations. American Philosophical Association, Newark, Delaware, 2-112.

Fahim, M., & Nasrollahi-Mouziraji, A. (2013). The relationship between Iranian efl students' self-efficacy beliefs and critical thinking ability. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(3), 538-543.

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E. & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design & evaluate research in education (8th Edt.). London: McGraw Hill.

Fraser, B. J., Fisher, D. L., & McRobbie, C. L. (1996). Development, validation, and use of personal and class forms of a new classroom environment instrument. New York: Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Association.

Halpern, D. F. (1998, April). Teaching critical thinking for transfer across domains: Dispositions, skills, structure training, and metacognitive monitoring. American Psychologist, 53(4), 449-455.

Halpern, D. F. (1999, Winter). Teaching for critical thinking: Helping students develop the skills and dispositions of a critical thinker. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 80, 69-74.

Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (2007). LISREL 8.80. Scientific Software International.

Kelloway, E. K. (1998). Using Lisrel for Structural Equation Modeling: A researcher's guide. CA: Sage.

Kim, H., Lee, E. K., & S. Y. (2015). Critical thinking disposition, self-efficacy, and stress of Korean nursing students. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 8(18), 1-5.

Kwan, Y. W., & Wong, A. F. L. (2015). Effects of the constructivist learning environment on students' critical thinking ability: cognitive and motivational variables as mediators. International Journal of Educational Research, 70, 68-79.

Lau, K. L., & Lee, J. (2008). Examining Hong Kong students' achievement goals and their relations with students' perceived classroom environment and strategy use. Educational Psychology, 28 (4), 357- 372.

McMillan, J. H. & Schumacher, S. (2014). Research in education: Evidence-based inquiry (7th Edition). London: Pearson.

Ministry of National Education (2005). İlköğretim sosyal bilgiler dersi öğretim programı ve kılavuzu. Ankara: Devlet Kitapları Müdürlüğü Basımevi.

Moore, L., Rudd, R., & Penfield, R. (2002). A factor analysis of the California critical thinking disposition inventory. Unpublished manuscript, University of Florida.

Pellas, N. (2014). The influence of computer self-efficacy, metacognitive self-regulation and self-esteem on student engagement in online learning programs: Evidence from the virtual world of Second Life. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 157-170.

Phan, H. P. (2009). Relations between goals, self-efficacy, critical thinking and deep processing strategies: A path analysis. Educational Psychology, 29(7), 777-799.

Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan, National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning.

Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2004). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling (2nd Ed.), Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Sungur, S. (2004). An implementation of problem based learning in high school biology courses. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.

Sungur, S., & Güngören, S. (2009). The role of classroom environment perceptions in self-regulated learning and science achievement. Elementary Education Online, 8(3), 883-900.

Sungur, S., & Şenler, B. (2010). Students' achievement goals in relation to academic motivation, competence expectancy, and classroom environment perceptions. Educational Research and Evaluation, 16(4), 303-324.

Taghva, F., Rezaei, N., Ghaderi, J., & Taghva, R. (2014). Studying the relationship between critical thinking skills and students' educational achievement (eghlid universities as case study). International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, 25, 18-25.

Tas, Y. (2016). The contribution of perceived classroom learning environment and motivation to student engagement in science. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 31(4), 557-577.

Telli, S., Cakiroglu, J., & den Brok, P. (2006). Turkish secondary education students' perceptions of their classroom learning environment and their attitude towards Biology. In D. L. Fisher & M. S. Khine (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to research on learning environments: world views (517-542). Singapore: World Scientific.

Wang, S. L., & Wu, P. Y. (2008). The role of feedback and self-efficacy on web-based learning: The social cognitive perspective. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1589-1598.

Wei, L.S., & Elias, H. (2011). Relationship between students' perceptions of classroom environment and their motivation ın learning English language. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1 (21), 240-250.

Yerdelen, S. (2013). Multilevel investigations of students' cognitive and affective learning outcomes and their relationships with perceived classroom learning environment and teacher effectiveness. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Middle East Technical University:

Zhang, L. F. (2003). Contributions of thinking styles to critical thinking dispositions. The Journal of Psychology, 137(6), 517-544.

Kaynak Göster