___

• Acemoğlu, D., & Pischke, S. (2001). Changes in the wage structure, family income, and children’s education. European Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 45, 890-904.
• Adıgüzel, A., & Karadaş, H. (2013) Ortaöğretim öğrencilerinin okula ilişkin tutumlarının devamsızlık ve okul başarıları arasındaki ilişki. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 10(1), 49-66
• Alva, S. A. (1991). Academic invulnerability among Mexican-American students: The importance of protective resources and appraisals. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 13(1), 18-34.
• Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D.W. (1984). The effect of sampling error on convergence, improper solutions, and goodness-of-fit indices for maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis. Psychometrika, 49, 155-173.
• Arastaman, G., & Balcı, A. (2013). Lise öğrencilerinin yılmazlık algılarının çeşitli değişkenler açısından incelenmesi. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 13(2), 915-928.
• Arnold, P. F. (2003). Characteristics of families and schools that foster academic resilience: Insights gained from the national education longitudinal study 1988-1994. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Florida State University, Miami.
• Baker, D., Goesling, B., & LeTendre, G. (2002), socioeconomic status, school quality and national economic development: A cross-national analysis of the ‘Heyneman-Loxley effect’ on mathematics and science achievement. Comparative Education Review, 46(3), 291-312.
• Benard, B. (1997). Turning it around for all youth: From risk to resilience. New York: ERIC Clearinghouse on Urban Education.
• Bentler, P. M., & Chou, C. (1987). Practical issues in structural modeling. Sociological Methods and Research, 16, 78–117.
• Borman, G. D., & Overman, L. T. (2004). Academic resilience in mathematics among poor and minority students. The Elementary School Journal, 104(3), 177-195.
• Brackenreed, D. (2010). Resilience and risk. International Education Studies, 3(3), 111-121.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010).Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı (12. baskı). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
• Ceylan, E. (2009). PISA 2006 sonuçlarına göre Türkiye’de fen okuryazarlığında düşük ve yüksek performans gösteren okullar arasındaki farklar. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 4(2), 55-75.
• Cheng, S. T., & Chan, A. C. M. (2003). The development of a brief measure of school attitude. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63(6), 1060-1070.
• Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2000). Assessing extreme and acquiscence response sets in crosscultural research using structural equations modeling. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31(2) 187-212.
• Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing MI. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 235-55.
• Chevalier, A., & Lanot, G. (2002). The relative effect of family characteristics and financial situation on educational achievement. Education Economics, 10(2), 165-181.
• Collins, M. L., & Lanza, S. T. (2010). Latent class and latent transition analysis. USA: Wiley Series.
• Davis-Kean, P. E. (2005). The influence of parent education and family income on child achievement: The indirect role of parental expectation and the home environment. Journal of Family Psychology, 19(2), 294-304.
• Demir, İ., Kılıç, S., & Ünal, H. (2010). Effects of students and schools characteristics on mathematics achievement: Findings from PISA 2006. Procedia Social and Behavioral Science, 2, 3099–3103.
• Dinçer, M. A., & Oral, I. (2013). Türkiye’de devlet liselerinde akademik dirençlilik profili. İstanbul: ERG yayınları.
• Dünya Bankası (2011). Türkiye’de temel eğitimde kalite ve eşitliğin geliştirilmesi: Zorluklar ve seçenekler. (Rapor No. 54131-TR).
• ERG. (2014). Türkiye’de eğitim sisteminde eşitlik ve akademik başarı araştırma raporu ve analizi. İstanbul: Eğitim Reformu Girişimi.
• Fallon, M. C. (2010). School factors that promote academic resilience in urban Latino high school students. Unpublished doctoral thesis. Loyola University, Chicago
• Ferguson, R. F. (1998). Teachers' perceptions and expectations and the black-white test score gap. In C. Jencks & M. Phillips (Eds.), The black-white test score gap (pp. 273-317). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
• Ford, D. Y., & Ill, J. H. (2008). Perceptions and attitudes of black students toward school, achievement and other educational variables. Child Development, 67(3), 1141-1152.
• Foster, T. A. (2013). An exploration of academic resilience among rural students living in poverty. Unpublished doctoral thesis. Piedmont College, Georgia.
• Gizir, C., & Aydın, G. (2009), Protective factors contributing to the academic resilience of students living in poverty in Turkey, Professional School Counselling, 13(1), 38-49.
• Gonzalez, R., & Padilla, A. M. (1997). The academic resilience of Mexican American high school student. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 19(3), 301-317.
• Gujarati, D. N. (2004). Basic econometric. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies.
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In R. Hoyle (Eds). Structural equation modeling: Concepst, issues and application (pp. 76-99). Thousand Oasks: Sage Publications.
• Jackson, D. L. (2001). Sample size and number of parameter estimates in maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis: A Monte Carlo investigation. Structural Equation Modeling, 8, 205-223
• Johnson, B. (2008). Teacher-student relationships which promote resilience at school: Amicro-level analysis of students’ views. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 36(4), 385-398.
• Johnson, R. M. (2000). Gender differences in mathematics performance. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA, USA.
• Joreskog, K., & Sorbom, D. (2001). LISREL 8: User’s reference guide. USA: Scientific Software International.
• Karasar, N. (2009). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi: Kavramlar, ilkeler, teknikler. Ankara: 3A Araştırma Eğitim Danışmanlık Ltd.
• Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: The Guilford Press.
• Konstantopoulos, S. (2006). Effects of teachers on minority and disadvantaged students’ achievement in the early grades. The Elementary School Journal, 110(1), 91-113.
• Köse, R. M. (2007). Aile sosyoekonomik ve demografik özellikleri ile okul ve özel dershanenin liselere giriş sınavına katılan öğrencilerin akademik başarıları üzerine etkileri. Eğitim Bilim Toplum Dergisi, 17(5). 46-77.
• Krei, M. S. (1998). Intensifying the barriers: The problem of inequitable teacher allocation in low-income urban schools. Urban Education, 33(1), 71–94.
• Krovetz, M. (1999). Fostering resiliency. Thrust for Educational Leadership, 28, 28-31.
• Lamb, S., & Fullarton, S. (2002). Classroom and school factors affecting mathematics achievement: A comparative study of Australia and the United States using TIMMS. Australian Journal of Education, 46(2), 154-171.
• Langford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2002). Teacher sorting and the plight of urban schools: A descriptive analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(1), 37–62.
• Lee, J., & Stankov, L. (2013). Higher-order structure of noncognitive constructs and prediction of PISA 2003 mathematics achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 26, 119–130.
• Linnakyla, P., & Malin, A. (2008). Finnish students' school engagement profiles in the light of PISA 2003. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 52(6), 583-602.
• Maddox, S. L., & Prinz, R. J. (2003). School bonding in children and adolescents: Conceptualization, assessment, and associated variables. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 6, 31-49.
• Malindi, M. J., & Machenjedze, N. (2012). The role of school engagement in strengthening resilience among male street children. South African Journal of Psychology, 42(1), 71-81.
• Masten, A. S. (2001). Ordinary magic: Resilience processes in development. American Psychologist, 56(3), 227-238
• MEB (2015). PISA 2012 Türkiye ulusal nihai raporu. Ankara: EARGED.
• Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis, and factorial invariance. Pyschometrika, 58, 525-543.
• Morales, E. E. (2008). The resilient mind: The psychology of academic resilience. The Educational Forum, 72, 152–167.
• Muthen, L. K., & Muthen, B. O. (2002). How to use a Monte Carlo study to decide on sample size and determine power. Structural Equation Modeling, 4, 599-620.
• Norman, E. (2000). Introduction: The strengths perspective and resiliency enhancement-a natural partnership. In E. Norman (Eds.), Resiliency enhancement (p.1-16). New York: Columbia University Press.
• Odden, A., & Picus, L. O. (2000). School finance: A policy perspective. New York: McGraw Hill.
• OECD. (2003). Student engagement at school: A sense of belonging and participation, results from PISA 2000. OECD Publishing.
• OECD. (2007). PISA 2006 science competencies for tomorrow’s World. OECD Publishing.
• OECD. (2011). Against the odds: Disadvantaged students who succeed in school.
• OECD Publishing.
• OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 results: (Volume I). OECD Publishing.
• Orfield, G. (2004). Dropouts in America: Confronting the graduation rate crisis. Cambridge MA: Harvard Education Press.
• Önder, E. (2012). İlköğretimde öğrenci başarısında okullar arası eşitsizliklerin analizi. Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi, Ankara: Gazi Üniversitesi.
• Peker, M., & Mirasyedioğlu, Ş. (2003). Lise 2. sınıf öğrencilerinin matematik dersine yönelik tutumları ve başarıları arasındaki ilişki. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 14, 157-166.
• Raykov, T., & Marcoulides, G. A. (2006).A first course in structural equation modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Steenkamp, E. M., & Baumgartner, H. (1998). Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research. The Journal of Consumer Research, 25(1), 78- 90
• Stevens, P. J. (2009). Applied multivariate statistiscs fort the social sciences. New York: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.
• Şimşek, Ö. F. (2007). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesine giriş: Temel ilkeler ve lisrel uygulamaları. Ankara: Ekinoks Yayınları.
• Şirin, S. (2005). Socio-economic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research. Review of Educational Research, 75(3), 417-53.
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
• Tanaka, J. S. (1987). How big is big enough?: Sample size and goodness of fit in structural equation models with latent variables. Child Development, 58, 134-146.
• Tansel, A. (2002). Determinants of school attainment of boys and girls in Turkey: Individual, household and community factors. Economics of Education Review, 21(5), 455-470.
• Tapia, M., & Marsh, G. E. (2000). Effect of gender, achievement in mathematics, and ethnicity on attitudes toward mathematics. Annual Meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association. Bowling Green, Kentucky.
• Tatar, M. (2006). Okul ve öğretmenin öğrenci başarısı üzerindeki etkisi. Milli Eğitim, 171, 156- 166.
• Tiet, Q. Q., & Huizinga, D. (2002). Dimensions of the construct of resilience and adaptation among inner city youth. Journal of Adolescent Research, 17, 260-276.
• Toland, J., & Carrigan, D. (2011). Educational psychology and resilience: New concept, new opportunities. School Psychology International, 32(1), 95-106.
• Ungar, M., & Liebenberg, L. (2013). Ethnocultural factors, resilience, and school engagement. School Psychology International, 34(5), 514-526.
• Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (1998). A summary of the ıssues underlying measurement equivalence and their implications for ınterpreting group differences. Research Methods Forum, 3, 1-10.
• Wasonga, T. (2002). Gender effects on perceptions of external assets, development of resilience and academic achievement: Perpetuation theory approach. Gender Issues, 20(4), 43-54.
• Waxman, H. C., Padron, Y. N. Shin, J. Y., & Rivera, H. H. (2008). Closing the achievement gap within reading and mathematics classrooms by fostering Hispanic students’ educational resilience. International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering, 2(4), 429-439.
• Werner, E., & Smith, R. (1992). Overcoming the odds: High-risk children from birth to adulthood. New York: Cornell University Press.
• Weston, R., & Gore, JR, P. A. (2006). A brief guide to structural equation modeling. The Counceling Psychologist. 34(5), 719-751.
• Widaman, K. F., & Reise, S. P. (1997). Exploring the measurement invariance of psychological instruments: Applications in substance use domain. In K. J. Bryant, M. Windle, & S. G. West (Eds.), The science of prevention: Methodological advances from alcohol and substance abuse research (pp.281-324). Washington: American Psychological Association
• Wu, D. A., Li, Z., & Zumbo, B. D. (2007). Decoding the meaning of factorial invariance and updating the practice of multi-group confirmatory factor analysis: A demonstration with TIMSS data. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 12(3), 1-26.
• Yavuz, H. Ç. (2015). Ekonomik bakımdan dezavantajlı öğrencilerin akademik yılmazlık düzeylerinin bazı koruyucu faktörler açısından incelenmesi. Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi.
• Yenilmez, K., & Özabacı, N. Ş. (2003). Yatılı öğretmen okulu öğrencilerinin matematik ile ilgili tutumları ve matematik kaygı düzeyleri arasındaki ilişki üzerine bir araştırma. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 14, 132–146.
• Yılmaz-Fındık, L., & Kavak, Y. (2013). Türkiye’deki sosyoekonomik açıdan dezavantajlı öğrencilerin PISA 2009 başarılarının değerlendirilmesi. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 19(2), 249-273.