Invigorating industrial design materials and manufacturing education

Malzeme ve küçük üretimin endüstri ürünleri tasarımcıları için yaşamsal önemde olduğunu söylemek gerekir, çünkü malzemenin işlenmesi yoluyla sanal ürünler fiziksel gerçekliğe kavuşurlar. Tarihsel açıdan bakıldığında malzeme ve üretim eğitiminin mühendislik yaklaşımlarının egemenliğinde olduğu görülür; ne yazık ki bu yaklaşımlar da endüstri tasarımcılarının insan-merkezli kaygılarına uzak, aşırı teknoloji-odaklı bakışlara sahiptir. Örneğin ürün işlevi-randımanı temeline seslenen malzeme seçimi ortamı kurumsallaşmıştır; oysa ürün ifadesi-kişilik temelli bir malzeme seçiminin oldukça ilkel kaldığı gözlemlenebilir. Yakınlarda ortaya çıkan bir grup yeni araştırma endüstri amaçlı ürün üretimindeki malzeme seçimine insancıl bakışın ne olabileceğini sorguluyor. Bu araştırmalardaki ortak nokta, ürün farklılaşması, markalaşma ve diğer ticari zorunluklar gibi geniş bir beklenti yelpazesi içinde ve en az onlar kadar önemseyerek, malzemeyi kullanıcının ürünle olan estetik, anlamsal ve duygusal düzlemlerdeki deneyimini etkileyecek, biçimleyecek yolları tasarımcılar için arayıp ortaya çıkarmak. Bu yeni grup araştırmaya endüstriyel tasarım malzeme ve üretim eğitimine yeniden bakma eğilimi eşlik ediyor. Bu makale, günümüz ve geleceğin endüstriyel pratikleriyle daha rahat paralellikler krmay amaçlayan bir öğretimsel değişim örneğini sunmakta. Araştırma bulguları yayın taraması, tasarımcılarla yapılan söyleşi belgeleri ve ODTÜ Endüstri Ürunleri Bölümü’nde yapılan malzeme ve üretim eğitimini geliştirme-değerlendirme çalışmasına dayanmakta. Endüstriyel tasarım malzeme ve üretimi eğitimini canlandırmak üzere dört ele alış öneriliyor: a.Eğitim konuları yelpazesini ve karar verme bağlamlarını mesleki pratikler açısından yeniden ele gözden geçirmek; b. malzeme deneyimi üzerine, malzemenin özellikle duyumsal ve dokunulamaz-ölçülemez nitelikleri konusunda görüş geliştirmek, malzeme özelliklerini öğretirken teknik ve teknik-olmayan dilleri aynı anda kucaklamak; c. malzeme ve ürün örneklerini eğitim kaynakları olarak kullanmak ve özellikle ‘yaparak öğrenmek’ stratejilerindne yararlanmak; d. sistematik malzeme seçimi yöntemlerini malzemenin ‘yararcı’ ve ‘ifadeci’ kullanımı için kalıcı hale getirmeye çalışmak.

Endüstriyel tasarım malzeme ve üretimi eğitimini canlandırmak

Materials and manufacturing are vitally important subjects for industrial designers, being the means by which virtual products are turned to physical reality. Historically materials and manufacturing education has been dominated by engineering approaches, which often are too technical and poorly suited to the human-centred concerns of industrial designers. For example, materials selection for product function/performance is well established, but selection for product expression/personality is underdeveloped. Recently a body of new research has emerged taking a humanistic perspective to the selection of materials for industrially manufactured products. The common point is to articulate ways in which designers can use materials to affect people’s experiences of products on aesthetic, meaning and emotional levels, within a wider context of product differentiation, branding, and other commercial imperatives. Accompanying this new body of research is a need to examine implications for industrial design materials and manufacturing education. This article presents a case for pedagogical change, to achieve better alignment with current and future practices of industry. Research data were derived from literature reviews, analysis of interview data with designers, and a case study to develop and evaluate materials and manufacturing training on the undergraduate industrial design programme at Middle East Technical University, Turkey. Four educational initiatives are proposed to invigorate industrial design materials and manufacturing education: (i) echo professional practices regarding the range of subjects taught and the contexts for decision-making; (ii) develop understanding of materials experience, focusing especially on sensorial and intangible qualities of materials and embracing technical and non-technical languages to teach material properties; (iii) use material and product samples as teaching resources and consider adopting ‘learning through making’ strategies; and (iv) instil systematic material selection methods for both utilitarian and expressive uses of materials

___

  • ASHBY, M., BRECHET, Y., CEBON, D., SALVO, L. (2004) Selection Strategies for Materials and Processes, Materials and Design, 25 (1) 51-67.
  • ASHBY, M., JOHNSON, K. (2003) The Art of Materials Selection, Materials Today (December) 24-35.
  • ASHBY, M., JOHNSON, K. (2002) Materials and Design: The Art and Science of Materials Selection in Product Design, Butterworth-Heinmann, Oxford.
  • BAYAZIT, N. (2009) A History of Design Research at the Periphery: The Turkish Case, The Design Journal 12(3) 289-309.
  • BUNNELL, K. (2000) Designing Through Making, The Design Journal (3) 1-3.
  • CHRISTENSEN J. (1992) The Practical Importance of Materials, Colours and Finishes, Innovation, 11 (4) 26-9.
  • CONRAN, T. (1993) in Industrial Design: Reflection of a Century, ed. J. De Noblet, Flammarion/APCI, Paris.
  • CROSS, N. (2006) Designerly Ways of Knowing, Springer-Verlag, London.
  • DESMET, P., HEKKERT, P. (2007) Framework of Product Experience, International Journal of Design 1(1) 57-66.
  • DOORDAN, D. (2003) On Materials, Design Issues, 19 (4) 3-8.
  • EGGLESTON, J. (1998) Learning Through Making: A National Enquiry into The Value of Creative Practical Education in Britain, Crafts Council, London.
  • FERRANTE, M., SANTOS, S., CASTRO, J. de (2000) Materials Selection as an Interdisciplinary Technical Activity: Basic Methodology and Case Studies, Materials Research, 3 (2) 1-9.
  • FISCHMEISTER, H. (1989) Materials-Inspired Innovation in a world of Routine Design, Technovation, 9 (4) 309-19.
  • FULTON, J. (1992) Materials in Design and Technology, Design Council, London.
  • HODGSON, S., HARPER, J. (2004) Effective Use of Materials in The Design Process - More Than a Selection Problem, Proceedings of International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education, The Design Society, Stockholm; 593-601.
  • JEE, D., KANG, K. (2001) A Method for Optimal Material Selection Aided with Decision Making Theory, Materials and Design, 21(3) 199-206.
  • KARANA, E., HEKKERT, P., KANDACHAR, P. (2008) Material Considerations in Product Design: A Survey on Crucial Material Aspects Used By Product Designers, Materials and Design, 29 (6) 1081-9.
  • KARANA, E. (2009) Meanings of Materials, unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Faculty of Industrial Design Engineering, TUDelft.
  • KARANA, E., KESTEREN, I. van (2006) Material Effects: The Role of Materials in People’s Product Evaluations, Proceedings of International Conference on Design and Emotion, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenberg
  • KESTEREN, I. van (2008) Product Designers’ Information Needs in Materials Selection, Materials and Design, 29 (1) 133-45.
  • KESTEREN, I. van, STAPPERS, P., BRUIJN, J. de (2007) Materials in Product Selection: Tools for Including User-Interaction Aspects in Materials Selection, International Journal of Design, 1 (3) 41-55.
  • LAwSON, B. (1990) How Designers Think (2nd Edition), Architectural Press, London.
  • LAYTON, D. (1993) Technology’s Challenge to Science Education: Cathedral, Quarry or Company Store?, Open University Press, Buckingham.
  • LEFTERI, C. (2005) The Branding of Plastics - How Important is The Branding of a Material and How Far do Plastics Go in Helping to Define Brands, Proceedings of International Conference on the Art of Plastics Design, Paper 7, Rapra Technology Ltd, Shrewsbury.
  • LJUNGBERG, L., EDwARDS, K. (2003) Design, Materials Selection and Marketing of Successful Products, Materials and Design 24(7) 519-29.
  • MANZINI, E. (1986) The Material Of Invention, Arcadia, Milan.
  • MCDONAGH-PHILP, D., LEBBON, C. (2000) The Emotional Domain in Product Design, The Design Journal, 3 (3) 31-43.
  • MCLUNDIE, M. (2001) Building On Diversity: Crafting a Paradigm for Digital Design Environments, Digital Creativity, 1 (2) 109-11.
  • MIDDLETON, H. (2003) Some New Ideas on New Ideas: Creative, Inventive Thinking, Values and Design and Technology Education, Proceedings of PATT13: International Conference on Design and Technology Education Research, University of Glasgow, Glasgow; 165- 9.
  • MORRISON, G. (2007) Early Childhood Education Today, Pearson Prentice- Hall, New Jersey.
  • MYERSON, J. (1991) Technological Change and Industrial Design Education, CNAA, London.
  • NORMAN, E. (1999) Materials and Manufacturing within the Industrial Design and Technology Degree Programmes: Briefing Documents for a Review, internal report, Department of Design and Technology, Loughborough University.
  • NORMAN, E. (1998) The Nature of Technology for Design, International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 8 (1) 67-87.
  • NORMAN, E., BULLOCK, B., HALL, M. (1988) Materials for Product Design, Studies in Design Education Craft and Technology, 20 (3) 163-8.
  • PACE, S. (1997) Teaching Engineering Skills to Broad-Based Product Design Students, Proceedings of IMC14: Fourteenth Conference of the Irish Manufacturing Committee, Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Trinity College, Dublin; 637-45.
  • PEDGLEY, O. (2009) Influence of Stakeholders on Industrial Design Materials and Manufacturing Selection, International Journal of Design, 3 (1) 1-15.
  • PEDGLEY, O. (1999) Industrial Designers’ Attention to Materials and Manufacturing Processes: Analyses at Macroscopic and Microscopic Levels, PhD thesis, Department of Design and Technology, Loughborough University.
  • PEDGLEY, O., NORMAN, E. (2007) A Synopsis of Materials and Manufacturing Expertise for Trainee Industrial Designers, Proceedings of International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education, Hadleys Ltd, Basildon; 167-72.
  • ROGNOLI, V., LEVI, M. (2004) Emotions in Design Through Materials - An Expressive-Sensorial Atlas as a Project Tool for Design of Materials, Proceedings of International Conference on Design and Emotion, Department of Industrial Design, Middle East Technical University, Ankara.
  • SAPUAN, S. (2001) A Knowledge-Based System for Materials Selection in Mechanical Engineering Design, Materials and Design, 22 (8) 687-95.
  • SCALI, S., SHILLITO, A., wRIGHT, M. (2002) Thinking in Space: Concept Physical Models and the Call for New Digital Tools, Proceedings of Crafts in 20th Century, Edinburgh.
  • SCHIFFERSTEIN, H., HEKKERT, P., eds. (2008) Product Experience, Elsevier, San Diego.
  • SHILLITO, A., WRIGHT, M., GAULDIE, D. (2004) The TACITUS Experience: A New Spatial, Multi-Sensory Digital Interface Supporting Creativity, Proceedings of Pixel Raiders 2, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield.
  • SwEET, F. (1999) Surface Attention, Design Week, (15 January) 16-9.
  • ULRICH, K., EPPINGER, S. (1995) Product Design and Development, McGraw-Hill, New York.
  • VINCENTI, W. (1990) What Engineers Know and How They Know It: Analytical Studies from Aeronautical History, The John Hopkins University Press, London.
  • WORDLE (2010) available at: http://www.wordle.net (accessed 29.09.10).
  • ZUO, H., HOPE, T., JONES, M., CASTLE, P. (2004) Sensory Interaction with Materials, Design and Emotion: The Experience of Everyday Things, D. McDonagh et al., eds., Taylor and Francis, London; 223-7.