KOBİ'lerin Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluluk Rolü: Türkiye ve Polonya Örneği

Sosyal sorumluluk taşıyan uygulamaların önemi: Pazar, doğal çevre, toplum, çalışanlar büyüyor. İş sürdürülebilir kalkınma hedeflerinin uygulanmasında giderek daha fazla yer almaktadır. Makalenin amacı, Polonya ve Türkiye'deki küçük ve orta ölçekli işletmelerin girişimcilik alanında kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk konusu ile ilgili araştırma sonuçlarını sunmaktır. Yapılan araştırmanın ayrıntılı hedefleri şunlardır: - KOBİ sektöründen KSS konusunda girişimci bilgi düzeyi, - Ankete katılan işletmelerde KSS çözümlerinin uygulanmasına yaklaşımın (farklılıklar ve benzerlikler) tanınması. Araştırma, Polonya'daki KOBİ sektörünün Masovian voyvodalığında ve Türkiye’de Akdeniz bölgesindeki işletmelerini ele almıştır. Makale, her iki ülkenin tarihsel ve kültürel farklılıkları olan KSS strateji ilişkileri hakkında daha fazla araştırma yapılmasına yardımcı olacaktır. Girişimciler, stratejilerine özgü çözümlerini gittikçe daha çok uygulamakta ve böylece belirli faydalardan faydalanmaktadırlar. Bu konudaki çeşitli faktörler: markanın itibarını güçlendirmek, yetenekli çalışanları cezbetmek ve elde tutmak, verimliliği artırmak, toplumun beklentilerini karşılamak, doğal çevreyi korumak, yeni iş fırsatları yaratmak, şirkette piyasada artan güven, enerji tasarrufu, daha kaliteli insan sermayesi istihdamı, ekonomik sonuçların iyileştirilmesi.

The role corporate social responsibility of SMEs : Turkish and Poland Case

The importance of socially responsible practices in the area of: market, natural environment, society, employees is growing. Business is more and more involved in the implementation of sustainable development goals. The aim of the article is to present the results of research on the issue of corporate social responsibility in the field of entrepreneurship of small and medium enterprises in Poland and Turkey. The detailed objectives of the conducted research are: - the level of knowledge of entrepreneurs from the SME sector on CSR, - recognition of the approach (differences and similarities) to the implementation of CSR solutions in the surveyed enterprises. The research covered enterprises of the SME sector in Poland in the Masovian voivodeship  and Turkey in the Mediterranean region. The article is a contribution to further research on the relations of CSR strategies conditioned by the historical and cultural differences of both countries. In the SME sector, the strategy is still little known. Entrepreneurs are more and more often implementing CSR solutions specific to their strategies, thus benefiting from specific benefits. Factors such as: strengthening the brand's reputation, attracting and retaining talented employees, increasing efficiency, meeting society's expectations, protecting the natural environment, creating new business opportunities are highlighted. as: increased trust in the company on the market, energy saving, employment of better quality human capital, improvement of economic results.

___

  • Akgeyik, T. (2005). The human research management dimension of cor-porate social responsibility in Turkey: A survey. Journal of Aca-demic of Business and Economics,V,V/1, 26-33.
  • Akın, A. Yılmaz, İ. (2016). Drivers of corporate social responsibility dis-clasures: Evidence from Turkish Banking sector. Procedia Econom-ic and Finance, 38, 2-7.
  • Akmeşe, H. Çetin, H. Akmeşe, K. (2016). Corporate social responsibility: A Comperative analysis of tourism and finance sector of G8 countries. Procedia Economic and Finance, 39, 737-745.
  • Ararat, M. (2007). A development perspective for corporate social re-sponsibility: Case of Turkey. Access: www.researcgate.net/ pub-lication/228220716.
  • Aslan, Ş. Şendoğdu, A. (2012). The mediating role of corporate social responsibilty in ethical leaders effect on corporate ethicial values and behavior. Procedia Social and Behaviroal Science, 58, 693-702.
  • Atakan Duman, Ş. Özdora-Aksak, E. (2014). The role of corporate social responsibility in online identity constuction: An analysis of Tur-key’s banking sector. Public Relation Reviews, 40, 862-864.
  • Balaban, Ö. Cicioğlu, F. Okutan E. (2012). A survey aimed at role and importance of Nongovermental organization in the corporate so-cial responsibilies. Procedia Social and Behavioral Science, 58, 1174-1182.
  • Bazin M., Tapia, S.,(2014). Turcja geografia wschodzącej potęgi, Dialog, Warszawa 2014, s.128.
  • Drucker P,(1973). Management. Tasks, Responsibilities and Practices, Harper and Row, New Year 1973, chapter 3.
  • Envision 2030: 17 goals to transform the world for persons with disabilities, www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/envision2030.html [accessed May 05. 2018]
  • Ersoy, I. Akşehirli, Z. (2015). Effects of perception of corporate social responsibility an employer attractiveness. Research Journal of Business and Management, 2(4), 507-518.
  • FOB (2010). CSR in Poland, Managers of 500 / CSR leader, Warszawa, 2010.
  • Görkem, Ş.Y. (2014). Corporate communication in large scale organiza-tions in Turkey: Structure and responsibilities. Public Relation Re-views, 40. 859-861
  • Karaye, Y.İ. Ishak, Z. Che-Adam, N. (2014). The mediating affect of stakeholders influence capacity on the relationship between cor-porate social responsibility and coporate financial performance. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Science, 164. 528-534.
  • Özdora-Aksak, E. (2005). An analysis of Turkey’s telecominication sec-tor’s social responsibility practice online. Public Relation Review, 41, 365-369
  • Özdora-Aksak, E. Ferguson, M.A. Atakan-Duman, Ş. (2016). Corporate social responsibility and CSR fit as predictors of corporate repu-tation: A global perspective. Public Relation Review, 42, 79-81
  • Poroy-Arsoy, A. Arabacı Ö. Çiftçioğlu A. (2012). Corporate social re-sponsibility and financial performance relationship: The case of Turkey. The Journal of Accuanting and Finance Raport PARP (2011), Ocena stanu wdrażania standardów społecznej od-powiedzialności biznesu, Warszawa 2011.
  • Raport, Odpowiedzialny biznes w Polsce, za lata 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015,2016 Aktualizacja: 13.06.2016, 14:06
  • Robertson, D.C. (2009). Corporate social responsibility and different stages of economic development. Singapore, Turkey and Ethio-pia. Journal of Business Ethics. 88. 617-633
  • Rzeczpospolita, Publikacja: 13.06.2016, Na CSR firmy wydają coraz większe pieniądze. Korzystają na tym pracownicy i lokalne społeczności.
  • Selvi, Y. Wagner, E. Türel A. (2010). Corporate social responsibility in the time of financial Crises: Evidence from Turkey. Amales Universi-tation Apulensis Series Qeconomia 12 (1)
  • Stawicka E. (2015). Corporate Social responsibility in the SME sector. An analysis of the key aspects and pillars of developing the CSR strategy. In M. Rojek – Nowosielska, (Eds.). Social Responsibility of Organizations Directions of Changed (pp. 172). Publishing House of Wroclaw University of Economic, Wrocław.
  • Türker, D. (2008). How corporate social responsibility influence organi-zational commitment. Journal of Business Ethics. 89. 189-204.
  • Türker, D. (2009). Meosuring corporate social responsibilitiy. A scale development study. Journal of Business Ethics. 85. 411-427.
  • Yılmazdoğan, O.C. Seçilmiş, C. Çiçek, D. (2015). The effect of corporate social responsibility perception on tourism student intention to work in sector. Procedia
  • Economics and Finance. 23. 1340-1346. https://www.pkn.pl/informacje/ 2012/11/konferencja-dotyczaca-normy-pn-iso-26000
OPUS Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 2528-9527
  • Yayın Aralığı: Aylık
  • Yayıncı: ADAMOR Toplum Araştırmaları Merkezi