Thomas Hobbes and International Relations: An Assessment

Bu makale Hobbes’un realist yorumlamalarını revize etmeyi amaçlıyor. Hobbes’un Uluslararası İlişkiler literatüründe yaygın şekilde kabullenildiği gibi bir realist kavramsallaştırmaya yakın olmadığı savunulmaktadır. Hobbes’un insan, doğa hali, devletin oluşumu ve tabii hukuk analizleri dikkate alınınca; uluslararası ilişkiler algısının daimi bir çatışma durumundan çok, çatışan çıkarların uzlaşması haline ve dolayısıyla da ittifaklara ve dayanışmaya yer veren bir nitelik arzettiği gösterilmektedir.

Thomas Hobbes ve Uluslararası İlişkiler: Bir Değerlendirme

This article attempts to provide a correction to the exclusive realist interpretations of Thomas Hobbes. It makes the point that Hobbes is not as close to a realist understanding of international relations as it has been prevalently held. Given Hobbes’s conception of man and the state of nature, the formation of Leviathan and the law of nature, it is here argued that Hobbes gives us a perception of international relations which is not always conflictual and comprises the adjustments of conflicting interests, leading to the possibility of alliances and cooperation in international relations.

___

  • ARON, R. (1973), Peace and War, New York: Anchor Press.
  • BEITZ, C. (1979), Political Theory and International Relations, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • BERKI, R. N. (1981), On Political Realism, London: J. M. Dent and Sons.
  • BROWN, K. C. (ed), (1965), Hobbes Studies, London: Basic Blackwell.
  • BULL, H. (1981), ‘Hobbes and International Anarchy’, Social Research, 48 (4), 717-738.
  • CARR, E. H. (1964), The Twenty Years’ Crisis, 1919-1939, New York: Harper Torch Books.
  • FORDE, S. (1992), ‘Classical Realism’, in Terry Nardin and David R. Mapel (eds.), Traditions of International Ethics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • FORSYTH, M. (1979), ‘Thomas Hobbes and the External Relations of States’, British Journal of International Studies, 5 (3), 196-209.
  • FORSYTH, M. (1988), ‘Thomas Hobbes: Leviathan’ M. Forsyth and M. Keens-Soper (eds), The Political Classics: A Guide to the Essential Texts from Plato to Rousseau, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • GAUTHIER, D. P. (1969), The Logic of Leviathan: The Moral and Political Theory of T. Hobbes, Oxford: Clarendon Press
  • HANSON, D. W. (1984), ‘Thomas Hobbes’s ‘High-way to Peace’’, International Organization, 38 (2), 329-354.
  • HELLER, M. A. (1980), ‘The Use and Abuse of Hobbes: The State of Nature in International Relations’, Polity, 13 (1), 21-32.
  • HOBBES, T. (1651/1983), Leviathan, London: J. M. Dent and Sons. ————(1640/1969), Elements of Law Natural and Politic, ed. by Ferdinand Tönnies, second edition, London: ————(1642/1836-45), De Cive: Philosophical Rudiments Concerning Government and Society, in The English Works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury, ed. by Sir William Molesworth, 11 vols. London: J. Bohn. ————(1680/1969), Behemoth, or the Long Parliament, ed. by Ferdinand Tönnies, New York: Barnes and Noble.
  • HOFFMAN, S. (1981), Duties Beyond Borders, Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.
  • KANT, I. (1969), Eternal Peace, translated by C. J. Fredrich, in his Inevitable Peace, New York: Greenwood Press.
  • KEGLEY, C. W. and WITTKOPF, E. R. (1995), World Politics: Trend and Transformation, fifth edition, New York: St. Martin’s Press.
  • MACPHERSON, C. B. (1964), The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism: Hobbes to Locke, London: Oxford University Press. ————(1965), ‘Hobbes’s Bourgeois Man’, in K. C. Brown (ed), Hobbes Studies, London: Basic Blackwell.
  • MORGENTHAU, H. J. (1960), Politics Among Nations, third edition, New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
  • NAVARI, C. (1982), ‘Hobbes and the ‘Hobbesian Tradition’ in International Thought’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 11 (3), 203-222.
  • PLATO (1964), Laws, trans. A.E.Taylor, in The Collected Dialogues of Plato, ed. by Edith Hamilton and Huntington Cairns, New York: Pantheon Books.
  • ROUSSEAU, J. J. (1970) ‘Abstract of the Abbe de Saint-Pierre’s Project for Perpetual Peace’, and ‘Judgement on Saint-Pierre’s Project for Perpetual Peace’, in M.G. Forsyth, et all, (eds.), The Theory of International Relations: Selected Texts from Gentilli to Treitschke, London: G. Allen and Unwin.
  • STRAUSS, Leo (1952), The Political Philosophy of Hobbes: Its Basis and Genesis Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • STRAUSS, Leo (1965), ‘On the Spirit of Hobbes’s Political Philosophy’, in K. C. Brown (ed), Hobbes Studies, London: Basic Blackwell.
  • THOMAS, K. (1965), ‘The Social Origins of Hobbes’s Political Thought’, in K. C. Brown (ed), Hobbes Studies, London: Basic Blackwell.
  • THUCYDIDES, (1910), History of the Peloponnessian War, trans. R. Crawley, London: J. M. Dent and Sons.
  • VINCENT, R. J. (1981), ‘The Hobbesian Tradition in Twentieth Century International Thought’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 10 (2), 91-101.
  • WALTZ, K. N. (1979), Theory of International Politics, Reading: Addison-Wesley.
  • WALZER, M. (1977), Just and Unjust Wars, New York, Basic Books
  • WARRENDER, H. (1957), The Political Philosophy of Hobbes: His Theory of Obligation, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • WIGHT, M. (1966), ‘Western Values in International Relations’, in H. Butterfield and M. Wight (eds), Diplomatic Investigations, London: G. Allen and Unwin.————(1991), International Theory: The Three Traditions, ed. by B. Porter and G. Wight, Leicester: Leicester University Press