TÜRKÇE VE ARAPÇA NEZAKET İFADELERİ: KARŞILAŞTIRMALI BİR İNCELEME

Bu araştırmanın amacı, Türkiye Türkçesi birinci dil konuşanlar ile Ürdün Arapçası birinci dil konuşanlar arasında güç, sosyal mesafe ve dayatma derecesi değişkenlerine bağlı olarak iki dili konuşanlar arasındaki doğrudanlık-dolaylılık stratejilerinin kullanımlarını ve nezaket eğilimlerini incelemektir. Araştırmada nitel araştırma modeli kullanılmıştır. Araştırmanın örneklemini Türkçe ve Arapça evreninden seçilen, birinci dil olarak Türkiye Türkçesi konuşan 50 ve Ürdün Arapçası konuşan 49 lisans düzeyindeki öğrenci oluşturmaktadır. Araştırmanın verileri Türkiye'de ve Ürdün'de bir Söylem Tamamlama Testi ile gerçekleştirilen anket vasıtasıyla elde edilmiştir. Veriler Sosyal Bilimler için İstatistiksel Paket (SPSS) kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir

Turkish and Arabic Polite Expressions: A Comparative Review

The purpose of this research is to examine the politeness tendencies and usage of directness-indirectness strategies depending on power, social distance and degree of imposition variables, among people who speak Turkey Turkish as first language and people speaking Jordanian Arabic as their mother tongue. Sample of the research is comprised by undergraduate level, 50 first Turkey Turkish speaker and 49 first Jordanian Arabic speaker students who are selected from universe of Turkish and Arabic. Research data was obtained via a questionnaire performed with a Discourse Completion Test in Turkey and Jordan. Data was analysed by using a Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS)

PDF

___

Abuarrah, S., Lochtman, K and Lutjerhams, M. (2013) Cross Cultural Pragmatics Requests' Use of Strategy and Level of Directness in Palestinian Arabic and British English. An-Najah Univ. Journal fo Research (Humanities), 27(5).
Al-Ali, M. N. and Alawneh, R. (2010). Linguistic Mitigating Devices In American and Jordanian Undergraduate Students' Requests. Intercultural Pragmatics, 7(2), 311-339.
Aldhulaee, M. T. (2011). Request Mitigating Devices in Australian English and Iraqi Arabic: A comparative study. A Research Paper. Deakin University School of Education Faculty of Arts and Education.
Alfattah, M.H.A. and Ravindranath, B.K. (2009). Politeness Strategies in Yemeni Arabic Requests. Language in India Strength for Today and Bright Hope for Tomorrow, 9, 23-42.
Al-Marrani, Y.M.A ve Sazalie, A.B. (2010). Polite Request Strategies by Male Speakers of Yemeni Arabic in Male-Male Interaction and Male-Female Interaction. The International Journal of Language Society andCulture, 30, 63-80.
Aubed, M.M. (2012). Polite Requests in English and Arabic: A Comperative Study. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(5), 916-922.
Austin, J.L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Blum-Kulka, S. and Olshtain, E. (1984). Request and Apologies: A Cross-cultural Study of Speech Realization Patterns (CCSARP). Applied Linguistics. 5 (3). 196-213.
Blum-Kulka, S., House, J. and Kasper, G. (1989). Cross Cultural Pragmatics. Requests and Apologies. Norwood, NJ: Alex.
Brown, P. ve Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Campsall, S. (2013). Glossary http://www.englishbiz.co.uk/grammar/main_files/definitionsn- z.htmadresinden 6 Mayıs 2013 tarihinde alınmıştır. Terms.
Crystal, D. (2008). A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics. (6.Baskı). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Demirezen, M. (1991). Pragmatics and Language Teaching. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 6, 281-287.
Dervişcemaloğlu, B. (2013) Pragmatik ve Söz Edimleri http://www.ege- edebiyat.org/modules.php?name=Downloads&d_op=getit&lid=56 ve adresinden 27 Nisan 2013 tarihinde alınmıştır.
Dihhudâ, A. (1956/ h.1258-1334). Luğatnâme-yi Dihhudâ, 13. Cilt. Tahran: http://www.loghatnaameh.org/dehkhodaworddetail- 665e91a8c02f40b8932d20739eb30e6b-fa.html Aralık 2013 tarihinde alınmıştır. Tahran ve adresinden 10
Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: essays on face-to-face behavior. Chicago: Aldine Pub. Co.
Grice, P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole, and J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts (pp. 41-58).
Hickey, L. ve Orta, I.V. (2013). Politeness As Deference: A Pragmatic View. http://rodin.uca.es/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10498/8733/18228392.p df?sequence=1adresinden 2 Mayıs 2013 tarihinde alınmıştır.
Işık-Güler, H. (2008). Metapragmatics of (Im)politeness In Turkish: An Exploratory Emic Investigation, Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü. Ankara.
İbn Manzûr. (1993). Lisânu'l-'Arab.(3. Baskı, I. Cilt). Beyrut: Dâru İhya'i't-Turasi'l Arabî-Mu'essesetu't-Târîhi'l Arabî.
Leech, G. (1983). The Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.
Levinson, S.C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge Univesity Press.
Morris, C. H. (1938). Foundations of the Theory of Signs. In O. Neurath, R. Carnap and C. Morris (Eds.). In International Encyclopedia of United Science, 2:1, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Ogiermann, E. (2009). On Apologising in Negative and Positive Politeness Cultures. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Ruhi, Ş. (2006). Politeness in Compliment Responses: A Perspective From http://elanguage.net/journals/index.php/pragmatics/article/downloa d/502/431.. adresinden 25 Nisan 2013 tarihinde alınmıştır. Turkish.
Searle, J.R. (1979 [1975a]). A Taxonomy of Illocutionary Acts, in Searle (1979), 1-29 (originally published 1975).
Tawalbeh, A. and Al-Oqaily, E. (2012). In-directness and Politeness in American and Arabic Requests: A Cross-Cultural Comparison. Asian Social Science. 8(10). 85-98.
Thomas, J. (1995). Meaning in interaction: an introduction to pragmatics. London: Longman.
Umar, A. (2004). Request Strategies as Used by Advanced Arab Learners of English as a Foreign Language. Umm Al-Qura University Journal of Educational & Social Sciences & Humanities, 16(1).
Verschueren, J. (1999). Understanding Pragmatics. London: Arnold. Yule, G. (2010). The Study of Language. (Fourth Edition).
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.