Kültürlerarası Duyarlılık Ölçeğinin Türkiye Yabancı Dil Öğrenme Ortamlarına ve Çocuklar için Uyarlanması ve Geçerliliğinin Sınanması

Kültürlerarasılık ve kültürlerarası iletişim yetisi, ikinci/yabancı dil öğrenmedeki önemli kavramlar olarak kabul edilmiştir. Özellikle, kültürlerarası duyarlılık, kültürlerarasılık ve kültürlerarası iletişim yetisi için gerekli bir önkoşul olarak tanınmaktadır. Kültürlerarası duyarlılığa artan ilgi ve teknolojiyle gelen globalleşme nedeniyle, etkili, güvenilir ve geçerli araçlar kullanarak farklı eğitimsel bağlamlarda bu kavramın araştırılması için daha fazla araştırmaya ihtiyaç duyulmaktadır. Bu kapsamda, bu çalışma farklı araştırma amaçları için kullanılabilmesi amacıyla iki güvenilir ve geçerli araç sunmak amacıyla iki çalışmayı birleştirmiştir. Birincisi, IS (Kültürlerarası Duyarlılık) ölçeğini Türkiye bağlamına uyarlamak ve geçerliliğini sınamaktır, ikincisi ise Türkiye dil öğrenimi bağlamındaki çocuklar için IS ölçeğin uyarlanması ve geçerliliğini sınamaktır. Birinci çalışmaya 122 yetişkin öğrenci dahil olurken, ikinci çalışmanın birinci kısmına 95 ikinci kısmına ise 115 çocuk dahil olmuştur. Bulgular, hem Türkçe versiyonun hem de basitleştirilmiş versiyonun oldukça yüksek güvenilirlik ve geçerliliğe sahip olduğunu göstermiştir. Doğrulayıcı faktör analizleri, Türkçe versiyonun daha iyi bir model olduğunu, ve basitleştirilmiş versiyonun da İngilizce ölçekten daha iyi modeli temsil ettiğini ispatlamıştır. Dolayısıyla, bu çalışma IS ölçeğinin hem Türkçe olarak hem de erken yaştaki öğrenciler için olan versiyonun, kültürlerarası araştırma bağlamlarında kullanılabilir olması dolayısıyla alana katkı sunan öneme sahiptir.

Adaptation and Validation of the Intercultural Sensitivity Scale to Turkish EFL Contexts and for Young Learners

Interculturality and intercultural communicative competence were accepted as significant concepts in second/foreign language learning. In particular, intercultural sensitivity (IS) has been regarded as a precondition for intercultural communicative competence and interculturality. Due to the increased interest in intercultural sensitivity and globalization through technology, more research was needed to explore the concept in different educational contexts with sound, reliable and valid instruments for different participant profiles. In this regard, this study merged two studies to provide two reliable and valid instruments for different research purposes. The objective of Study 1 was to translate and validate the IS scale in the Turkish EFL context, while the objective of Study 2 was to adapt and validate the Turkish version of the IS scale to be used for young English language learners in the Turkish EFL context. Study 1 included 122 language learners, while Study 2 included 95 young learners for the first round and 115 young learners for the second round. The findings revealed that both the Turkish version and the simplified version of the IS scale retained highly significant levels of reliability and validity. Confirmatory factor analyses indicated that the Turkish version represented a better model fit in the analysis and the simplified version represented a better model fit compared to the English version in the analysis. Hence, the study is significant with its contribution to the field through both the Turkish version of IS and IS scale for young learners, which can be used in crosscultural research contexts.

___

  • Alaei, M. M., & Nosrati, F. (2018). Research into EFL teachers’ intercultural communicative competence and intercultural sensitivity. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 47(2), 73-86.
  • Altan, M. Z. (2018). Intercultural sensitivity. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 46(1), 1-17.
  • Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1984). The effect of sampling error on convergence, improper solutions, and goodness-of-fit indices for maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis. Psychometrika, 49(2), 155–173.
  • Aydın, S., Harputlu, L., Savran Çelik, S., Uştuk, Ö., Güzel, S., & Genç, D. (2016). Adapting scale for children: A practical model for researchers. International Contemporary Educational Research Congress, Muğla, Turkey. https://doi.org/10.14527/9786053186380
  • Aydın, S., Harputlu, L., Uştuk, Ö., Çelik, Ş. S., & Güzel, S. (2021). Difficulties in collecting data from children aged 7–12. International Journal of Teacher Education and Professional Development (IJTEPD), 4(1), 89-101.
  • Bal, N. G. (2020). Intercultural sensitivity of EFL learners at a state university. Journal of Language Teaching and Learning, 10(2), 1-19.
  • Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., Rabasca, A., & Pastorelli, C. (2003). A questionnaire for measuring the Big Five in late childhood. Personality and Individual Differences, 34(4), 645–664.
  • Bennett, J. M. (2011). Developing intercultural competence for international education faculty and staff. In 2011 AIEA Conference Workshop, San Francisco, CA. (Vol. 25, p. 2018).
  • Bennett, M. J. (1986). A developmental approach to training for intercultural sensitivity. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 10(2), 179–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(86)90005-2
  • Bennett, M. J. (2004). Becoming interculturally competent. In J.S. Wurzel (Ed.), Toward multiculturalism: A reader in multicultural education (pp. 62-77). Newton, MA: Intercultural Resource Corporation.
  • Berry, J. W., Poortinga, Y. H., Breugelmans S. M., Chasiotis A., & Sam D. L. (2011). Cross-cultural psychology: Research and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Büyüköztürk, S. (2010). Data analysis handbook for social sciences. Ankara: Pegem Academy.
  • Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. Clevendon: Multilingual Matters.
  • Chen, G. M., & Starosta, W. J. (1996). Intercultural communication competence: A synthesis. Communication Yearbook, 19, 353-383.
  • Chen, G. M., & Starosta, W. J. (1998). A review of the concept of intercultural awareness. Communication Studies Faculty Publications.
  • Chen, G. M., & Starosta, W. J. (2000). The development and validation of the intercultural sensitivity scale. Human Communication, 3, 1–15.
  • Çiftçi, E. Y., & Gürbüz, N. (2019). Intercultural sensitivity orientations before
  • short-term study abroad: A qualitative study on prospective English language teachers. The Qualitative Report, 24(6), 1319-1337.
  • Çiftçi, E. Y., Karaman, A. C., & Daloğlu, A. (2020). ‘No one is superior to another: Tracing intercultural development in a year-long study abroad programme. The Language Learning Journal, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2020.1802770
  • Çiloğlan, F., & Bardakçı, M. (2019). The Relationship between Intercultural Sensitivity and English Language Achievement. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 15(3), 1204-1214.
  • Deardorff, D. K. (2006). Identification and Assessment of Intercultural Competence as a Student Outcome of Internationalization. Journal Studies in International Education, 10(3), 241-266.
  • Dong, Q., Day, D. K., & Collaço, M. C. (2008). Overcoming ethnocentrism through developing intercultural communication sensitivity and multiculturalism. Human Communication, 11(1), 27– 38.
  • Douglas, S. R., & Rosvold, M. (2018). Intercultural Communicative Competence and English for Academic Purposes: A Synthesis Review of the Scholarly Literature. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics Articles, 21(1), 23–42.
  • Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Eaton, P., & Willoughby, S. D. (2018). Confirmatory factor analysis applied to the Force Concept Inventory. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevphyseducres.14.010124
  • Erkuş, A., & Selvi, H. (2019). Psikolojide ölçme ve ölçek geliştirme III: Ölçek uyarlama ve norm geliştirme. Pegem Akademi, Ankara.
  • Garrett‐Rucks, P. (2014). Measuring instructed language learners’ IC development: Discrepancies between assessment models by Byram and Bennett. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 41, 181–191.
  • George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference 18.0 update (11th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon/Pearson.
  • Hammer, M. R., Bennett, M. J., & Wiseman, R. (2003). Measuring intercultural sensitivity: The intercultural development inventory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 27(4), 421–443.
  • Harmandaoğlu, E. (2013). Promoting intercultural competence of teacher trainees in English language departments via web 2.0 tools: A case study (Unpublished master’s thesis). Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling. Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 76−99). London: Sage.
  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424−453.
  • Kazazoğlu, S., & Ece, E. (2021). Exploring pre-service and novice EFL teachers’ intercultural sensitivity. Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language), 15(1), 76-89.
  • Munezane, Y. (2019). A new model of intercultural communicative competence: bridging language classrooms and intercultural communicative contexts. Studies in Higher Education, 1-18.
  • Peng, S. Y. (2006). A comparative perspective of intercultural sensitivity between college students and multinational employees in China. Multicultural perspectives, 8(3), 38-45.
  • Pingault, J. B., Falissard, B., Côté, S., & Berthoz, S. (2012). A new approach of personality and psychiatric disorders: a short version of the affective neuroscience personality scales. Public Library Of Science, 7(7), e41489.
  • Rantz, F., & Horan, P. (2005). Exploring intercultural awareness in the primary modern language classroom: The potential of the new model of European language portfolio developed by the Irish modern languages in primary schools initiative (MLPSI). Language and Intercultural Communication, 5(3–4), 209–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708470508668896
  • Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23–74.
  • Serçekuş, P., Vardar, O., & Başkale, H. (2020). The validity and reliability study of the Turkish vers ion of Assessment of Survivor Concerns (ASC) Scale. Journal of Psychiatric Nursing, 11(3), 220–227. https://doi.org/10.14744/phd.2020.63308
  • Sinicrope, C., Norris, J., & Watanabe, Y. (2007). Understanding and assessing intercultural competence: A summary of theory, research, and practice (Technical report for the foreign language program evaluation project). Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(1).
  • Stöber, J., & Joormann, J. (2001). A short form of the Worry Domains Questionnaire: Construction and factorial validation. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 119–126.
  • Tavil, M., & Söylemez, S. (2020). How to do research with young and very young learners? In H. H. Uysal (Ed.), Political, pedagogical and research insights into early language education (pp. 82–94). UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  • Tavsancil, E. (2002). Measurement of attitudes and data analysis with SPSS. Ankara: Nobel Publishing.
  • Üstün, E. (2011). Öğretmen Adaylarının Kültürlerarası Duyarlılık ve Etni kmerkezcilik Düzeylerini Etkileyen Etmenler. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi.
  • Wang, W., & Zhou, M. (2016). Validation of the short form of the Intercultural Sensitivity Scale (ISS-15). International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 55, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2016.08.002
  • Wilson, J. (2013). Exploring the past, present, and future of cultural competency research: the revision and expansion of the sociocultural adaptation construct. (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Victoria: University of Wellington.
  • Yirci, R., Karakose, T., Uygun, H., & Ozdemir, T. Y. (2016). Turkish adaptation of the Mentorship Effectiveness Scale: A validity and reliability study. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1440a
  • Zorba, M. G., & Çakır, A. (2019). A case study on intercultural awareness of lower secondary school students in Turkey. Novitas-ROYAL, 13(1), 62–83.