___

• Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N.G. (1999). Success of the attempts to ımprove science teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A Review of the Literature. Paper presented at the 5th International History, Philosophy and Science Teaching Conference, Como, Italy.
• Abell, S.K., & Bryan, L.A. (1997). Reconceptualizing the elementary science methods course using a reflection orientation. Journal of Science Teacher Education 8(3), 153-166.
• Akerson, V.L., Abd-El-khalick, F., & Lederman, N.G. (2000). Influence of a reflective explicit activity-based approach on elementary teachers' conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 37(4), 295-317.
• Aldridge, J., Taylor, P., & Chen, C.C. (1997). Development, validation and use of the Beliefs About Science and School Science Questionnaire. Paper presented at the National
• Association of Research in Science Teaching Annual Conference, USA Bell, R. L., & Lederman, N.G. (2003). Understandings of the nature of science and decision making on science and technology based ıssues. Science Education, 87, 352-377.
• Bentley, M. L., & Fleury, S.C. (1998). Of starting points and destinations: teacher education and the nature of science. In W. F. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education: rationales and strategies. Dordrecth: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
• Cakici, Y. (2001). Exploring upper primary level Turkish pupils' understanding of nutrition and digestion. Unpublished EdD thesis, University of Nottingham, Nottingham.
• Cimer, A. (2004). A study of Turkish biology teachers’ and students’ views of effective teaching for ımproving teaching in schools and teacher education. Unpublished EdD Thesis,University of Nottingham, Nottingham.
• Eichinger, D. C., Abell, S.K., & Dagher, Z.R. (1997). Developing a graduate level science education course on the nature of science. Science & Education, 6, 417-429.
• Gallagher, J. J. (1991). Prospective and practicing secondary school science teachers' knowledge and beliefs about the philosophy of science. Science Education, 75(1), 121- 133.
• Guo, C-J. (2007). Issues in science learning: An international perspective. In S. K. Abell & N.
• G. Lederman (Eds), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 227-256). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Hammrich, P.L. (1997). Confronting teacher candidates' conceptions of the nature of science. Journal of Science Teacher Education 8(2), 141-151.
• Irez, S. (2006). Are we prepared?: An assessment of preservice science teacher educators' beliefs about nature of science. Science Education, 90(6), 1113-1143.
• Irez, S. & Cakir, M. (2006). Critical reflective approach to teach the nature of science: a rationale and review of strategies. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 3(2), 19-35
• Jenkins, E. W. (1997). Scientific and technological literacy for citizenship: what can we learn from the research and other evidence. In S. Sjoberg and E. Kallerud (Eds.), Science, technology and citizenship: the public understanding of science and technology in science education and research policy. (pp. 29-50). Oslo: Norwegian Institute for Studies in Research and Higher Education.
• Kuhn, T. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Lainer, J.E., & Little J.W. (1986). Research in teacher education. In M.C. Wittrock (ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd edition). New York: Macmillan
• Lakatos, I. (1970). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In
• Lakatos, I. and Musgrave, A. (Eds), Criticism and the growth of knowledge,. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp.91-196
• Leavitt, H.B. (1991). Issues and problems in teacher education: An international handbook. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
• Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: a review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), 331-359.
• Lederman, N., Wade, P., & Bell, R.L. (1998). Assessing understanding of the nature of science: a historical perspective. In W. F. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education: rationales and strategies (pp. 331-350). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
• McComas, W. F., Clough, M.P., & Almozroa, H. (1998). The role and character of the nature of science in science education. In W. F. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education: rationales and strategies (pp. 3-39). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
• Meichtry, Y. J. (1999). The nature of science and scientific knowledge: ımplications for a preservice elementary methods course. Science & Education, 8, 273-286.
• Mellado, V. (1997). Pre-service teachers' classroom practice and their conceptions of the nature of science. Science & Education, 6, 331-354.
• Nott, M., & Wellington, J. (1998). Eliciting, interpreting and developing teachers' understandings of the nature of science. Science & Education, 7(6), 579-594. O'Hear, A. 1990. Introduction to the philosophy of science. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
• Ryder, J. (2001). Identifying science understanding for functional scientific literacy: ımplications for school science education. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), Seattle, WA.
• Summers, M. K. (1982). Philosophy of science in the science teacher education curriculum. European Journal of Science Education, 4(1), 19-27
• Tairab, H. H. (2001). Pre-Service teachers' views of the nature of science and technology before and after a science teaching methods course. Research in Education, 65, 81-87.
• Tobin, K., & McRobbie, C.J. (1997). Beliefs about the nature of science and the enacted science curriculum. Science & Education, 6, 355-371
• Turkmen, L., & Bonstetter, R. (1998). Inclusion of the nature of science in Turkish science education curriculum (K-11): As a different approach. Science Education International, 9(4), 15-19.