YARATICI DÜŞÜNME VE FIRSAT TANIMLAMA ESNASINDA GİRİŞİMCİLER VE GİRİŞİMCİ OLMAYANLARIN BEYİN AKTİVİTELERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Bu çalışmanın temel amacı, beyin temelli girişimcilik yaklaşımı (nörogirişimcilik) çerçevesinde girişimciliği açıklamaya çalışmaktır. Çalışmada, girişimcileri tanımlamak için sıklıkla kullanılan iki özellik olan yaratıcı düşünme ve fırsat tanımlama incelenmiştir. Araştırma verileri Elektroensefalografi (EEG) kullanılarak toplanmıştır. Araştırmanın örneklemini 35 katılımcı (girişimci ve girişimci olmayan) oluşturmaktadır. Araştırmada elde edilen veriler WINEEG ve SPSS programları kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Araştırmanın bulguları, yaratıcı düşünme ve fırsat tanımlama esnasında girişimcilerin ve girişimci olmayanların beyin aktiviteleri arasında farklılıklar olduğunu göstermektedir. Ayrıca özellikle fırsat tanımlama esnasında girişimcilerin beyinlerinde farklı sinir ağlarının kullanıldığı gözlemlenmiştir.

COMPARING BRAIN ACTIVITY OF ENTREPRENEURS AND NON-ENTREPRENEURS DURING CREATIVE THINKING AND OPPORTUNITY RECOGNITION

The main purpose of this study is to try to explain entrepreneurship within the framework of brain-based entrepreneurship approach (neuroentrepreneurship). In our study, we examined creative thinking and opportunity recognition, which are two characteristics that are frequently used to define entrepreneurs. Data were collected using Electroencephalography (EEG). The sample of the research consists of 35 participants (entrepreneurs and non-entrepreneurs). Research data were analyzed with WINEEG and SPSS programs. The findings of the research indicate that there are differences between the brain activity of entrepreneurs and non-entrepreneurs during creative thinking and opportunity recognition. In addition, it has been observed different neural networks in the brains of entrepreneurs, especially during opportunity recognition.

___

  • Amabile, T.M. (1997). Motivating creativity in organizations: On doing what you love and loving what you do. California Management Review, 40(1), 39-58. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165921
  • Andreasen, N. (2019). Yaratıcı beyin: Dehanın nörobilimi. (Çev: Güney, K.). (9. Baskı). Ankara: Akılçelen Kitaplar.
  • Arden, R., Chavez, R.S., Grazioplene, R. & Jung, R. E. (2010). Neuroimaging creativity: A psychometric view. Behavioural Brain Research, 214(2), 143-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2010.05.015
  • Ardichvili, A. & Cardozo, R. N. (2000). A model of the entrepreneurial opportunity recognition process. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 8(2), 103-119. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218495800000073
  • Ardichvili, A., Cardozo, R. & Ray, S. (2003). A theory of entrepreneurial opportunity identification and development. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 105–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(01)00068-4
  • Aydın, H. U. D. ve İrmiş, A. (2018). Girişimciliğe daha derinden bakmak: Nörogirişimcilik. S. Nart, Y. T. Yıldırım, (Ed.), Current debates in management and organization içinde (237-247). London: IJOPEC Publication.
  • Ballı, A. ve Aycı, A. (2021). Nörobilim yaklaşımıyla girişimcilikte farklı bir boyut: Nörogirişimcilik. Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, 22, 184-194. https://doi.org/10.31590/ejosat.849788
  • Baron, R. (1998). Cognitive mechanisms in entrepreneurship: why and when entrepreneurs think differently than other people. Journal of Business Venturing, 13, 275–294.
  • Baron, R. A. (2002). OB and entrepreneurship: the reciprocal benefits of closer conceptual links. Research in Organizational Behavior, 24, 225-269. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085(02)24007-1
  • Baron, R. A. (2007). Behavioral and cognitive factors in entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurs as the active element in new venture creation. Strategic Entreprenurship Journal, 1, 167-182. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.12
  • Baron, R. A. & Ensley, M. D. (2006). Opportunity recognition as the detection of meaningful patterns: evidence from comparisons of novice and experienced entrepreneurs. Management Science, 52(9), 1331–1344. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1060.0538
  • Bora, İ. ve Yeni, S.N. (2012). EEG Atlası. İstanbul: Nobel Tıp Kitabevleri.
  • Bygrave, W. D. (2010). The entrepreneurial process. In Bygrave, W.D. & Zacharakis, A. (Eds.). The portable MBA in entrepreneurship (1-26). (4. Edition). John Wiley & Sons.
  • Carter, R. (2013). Beyin kitabı. (Çev: Güney, K.) İstanbul: Alfa Yayınları.
  • Chell, E. (2013). Review of skill and the entrepreneurial process. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 19(1), 6-31. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552551311299233
  • Colosio, M., Bellavitis, C. & Gorin, A. A. (2017). Human psychophysiological and genetic approaches in neuroentrepreneurship. In Day, M., Boardman, M.C. & Krueger, N.F. (Eds.), Handbook of research methodologies and design in neuroentrepreneurship (54-93). Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Day, M. & Boardman, M. C. (2017). Entrepreneurial return on investment through a neuroentrepreneurship lens. In Day, M., Boardman, M.C. & Krueger, N.F. (Eds.), Handbook of research methodologies and design in neuroentrepreneurship (177-206). Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Dietrich, A. & Kanso, R. (2010). A review of EEG, ERP, and neuroimaging studies of creativity and insight. Psychological Bulletin, 136(5), 822–848. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019749
  • Drucker, P. (2017). İnovasyon ve girişimcilik uygulama ve ilkeler. (Çev: Gülfidan, İ.). İstanbul: Optimist Yayınları.
  • Eagleman, D. (2018). Beyin: Senin hikayen. (Çev: Arık Tozar, Z.). (12. Baskı). İstanbul: Domingo Yayınları.
  • Eckhardt, J. T. & Shane, S. (2010). An update to the individual-opportunity nexus. Acs, Z.J., Audretsch, D.B. (Eds.) Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research An Interdisciplinary Survey and Introduction (47-76). (2. Edition), New York: Springer.
  • Erdemir, C. (2000). Beyin kognisyon araştırmalarında kullanılan istatistiksel yöntemler. Karakaş, S., Aydın, H.,
  • Erdemir, C., Özesmi, Ç. (Ed.) Multidisipliner Yaklaşımda Beyin ve Kognisyon (50-60). Ankara: Çizgi Tıp Yayınevi.
  • Field, T. A., Jones, L. K. & Russell-Chapin, L. A. (2019). Nöro-Psikolojik Danışma: Beyin Temelli Klinik Yaklaşımlar. (Çev: Yorğun, V.). Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
  • Fillis, I., & Rentschler, R. (2010). The role of creativity in entrepreneurship. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 18(1), 49-81. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218495810000501
  • Fink, A., Grabner, R. H., Benedek, M., & Neubauer, A.C. (2006). Divergent thinking training is related to frontal electroencephalogram alpha synchronization. European Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 2241–2246. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.04751.x
  • Fink, A., & Neubauer, A.C. (2006). EEG alpha oscillations during the performance of verbal creativity tasks: differential effects of sex and verbal ıntelligence. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 62, 46–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2006.01.001
  • Gaglio, C. M. & Katz, J. A. (2001). The psychological basis of opportunity identification: entrepreneurial alertness. Small Business Economics, 16, 95-111. doi:10.1023/A:1011132102464
  • Gaglio, C. M. & Winter, S. (2017). Entrepreneurial alertness and opportunity identification: where are we now? In Brannback, M. & Carsrud, A.L. (Eds.) Revisiting the Entrepreneurial Mind Inside the Black Box: An Expanded Edition (339-358), Switzerland: Springer.
  • Gaglio, C.M. (2018). Opportunity identification: Review, critique, and suggested research directions. In Katz J. A. (Ed.), Advances in entrepreneurship, firm emergence and growth, Vol. 3, 139–202. Greenwich: JAI Press
  • Girişken, A. & Çakar, T. (2021). What is neuroentrepreneurship? The theoretical framework, critical evaluation and research program. OPUS–International Journal of Society Researches, 17(36), 2975-2991. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.840936.
  • Goldstein, E.B. (2013). Bilişsel Psikoloji. (Çev: Gündüz, O.). İstanbul: Kaknüs Yayınları.
  • Guillory, S., Boardman, M. C., & Day, M. (2017). A few words about what neuroentrepreneurship can and cannot help us with. Day, M., Boardman, M.C., Krueger, N.F. (Eds.) In Handbook of Research Methodologies and Design in Neuroentrepreneurship (285-292). Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Hatten, T. S. (2012). Small Business Management Entrepreneurship and Beyond. (5. Edition). Canada: South-Western Cengage Learning.
  • Heydari, M., Xiaohu, Z., Saeidi, M., Lai, K. K., & Yuxi, Z. (2020) Entrepreneurial Cognition and Effect on Neuro Entrepreneurship. Turismo: Estudos & Práticas (UERN) https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342392879_Entrepreneurial_Cognition_and_effect_on_Neuro_entrepreneurship.
  • Jauk, E., Benedek, M., & Neubauer, A. C. (2012). Tackling creativity at its roots: evidence for different patterns of EEG alpha activity related to convergent and divergent modes of task processing. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 84, 219–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2012.02.012
  • Kavanagh, P. F. & Hisrich, R. D. (2010). The relationship between the quality of the idea and the strategic potential of a new venture: a longitudinal study of five Irish campus companies. Managing Global Transitions, 8(3), 261-284.
  • Koellinger, P., Minniti, M. & Schade, C. (2007). ‘‘I think I can, I think I can’’: Overconfidence and entrepreneurial behavior. Journal of Economic Psychology 28, 502–527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2006.11.002
  • Korpysa, J. (2020). Neuroentrepreneurship a new paradigm in the management science. Procedia Computer Science, 176, 2605–2614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.09.309
  • Krueger, N. & Welpe, I. (2008). Experimental Entrepreneurship: A Research Prospectus and Workshop. Paper presented at the USASBE Conference, San Antonio, Texas. 10-13 January 2008.
  • Lahti, T., Halko, M., Karagözoğlu, N. & Wincent, J. (2018). Why and how do founding entrepreneurs’ bond with their ventures? Neural correlates of entrepreneurial and parental bonding. Journal of Business Venturing, 34(2), 368-388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.05.001
  • Laurerio-Martinez D., Canessa, N., Brusoni, S., Zollo, M., Hare, T., Alemanno, F. & Cappa, S. F. (2014). Frontopolar cortex and decision-making efficiency: Comparing brain activity of experts with different professional background during an exploration-exploitation task. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00927
  • Loue, C. & Baronet, J. (2012). Toward a new entrepreneurial skills and competencies framework: A qualitative and quantitative study. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 17(4), 455–477. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJESB.2012.050164
  • Lumpkin, G.T. & Lichtenstein, B.B. (2005). The role of organizational learning in the opportunity recognition process. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(4), 451-472. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00093.x
  • Malik, A. S. & Amin, H. U. (2017). Designing EEG experiments for studying the brain: design code and example datasets. India: Academic Press.
  • Marie De Carolis & D., Saparito, P. (2006). Social capital, cognition, and entrepreneurial opportunities: A theoretical framework. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(1), 41-56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00109.x
  • Martin de Holan, P. (2014). It’s all in your head: Why we need neuroentrepreneurship. Journal of Management Inquiry, 23(1), 93-97. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492613485913
  • Martin de Holan, P. & Couffe, C. (2017). Unpacking neuroentrepreneurship: conducting entrepreneurship research with EEG technologies. In Day, M., Boardman, M.C. & Krueger, N.F. (Eds.) Handbook of Research Methodologies and Design in Neuroentrepreneurship (94-119). Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Massaro, S., Drover, W., Cerf, M. & Hmiesleski, K. M. (2020). Using functional neuroimaging to advance entrepreneurial cognition research. Journal of Small Business Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2020.1824527
  • McMullen, J.S., Wood, M. S. & Palich, L. E. (2014). Entrepreneurial cognition and social cognitive neuroscience. In Mitchell, J. R., Mitchell, R. K. & Randolph-Seng, B. (Eds.) Handbook of Entrepreneurial Cognition (316-363). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/298095647_Entrepreneurial_cognition_and_social_cognitive_neuroscience
  • Moore, C. (1986, August). Understanding entrepreneurial behavior: A definition and model. Paper presented at the AOM Annual Meeting https://journals.aom.org/doi/abs/10.5465/ambpp.1986.4978712
  • Moore, C.B., McIntyre, N. H. & Lanivich, S. E. (2021) ADHD-Related neurodiversity and the entrepreneurial mindset. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 45(1), 64-91. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258719890986
  • Morris, M. H. (1998). Entrepreneurial intensity sustainable advantages for individuals, organizations, and societies. USA: Greenwood Publishing Group.
  • Morris, M.H., Kuratko, D.F., Schindehutte, M. & Spivack, A.J. (2011). Framing the entrepreneurial experience. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(1), 11-40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2011.00471.x
  • Mölle, M., Marshall, L., Lutzenberger, W., Pietrowsky, R., Fehm, H. L. & Born, J. (1996). Enhanced dynamic complexity in the human EEG during creative thinking. Neuroscience Letters, 208 (1), 61-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3940(96)12539-8
  • Mölle, M., Marshall, L., Wolf, B., Fehm, H. L. & Born, J. (1999). EEG complexity and performance measures of creative thinking. Psychophysiology, 36, 95–104. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0048577299961619
  • Nofal, A. M., Nicolaou, N. & Shane, S. (2021). The biology of entrepreneurship. In Gielnik, M. M., Cardon, M. S. & Frese, M. (Eds.) The Psychology of Entrepreneurship: New Perspectives (61-79), New York: Routledge.
  • Ortiz-Teran, E., Turrero, A., Santos, J.M., Bryant, P.T. & Ortiz, T. (2013). Brain cortical organization in entrepreneurs during a visual stroop decision task. Neuroscience and Neuroeconomics. https://doi.org/10.2147/NAN.S48243
  • Özesmi, Ç., Süer, C., Gölgeli, A., Aşçıoğlu, M., Dolu, N. & Yılmaz, A. (2000). Sinir sisteminin elektrofizyolojisi ve kayıt yöntemleri. Karakaş, S., Aydın, H., Erdemir, C., Özesmi, Ç. (Ed.) Multidisipliner Yaklaşımda Beyin ve Kognisyon içinde (1-11). Ankara: Çizgi Tıp Yayınevi.
  • Perez-Centeno, V. (2017a). Which tool should I use? Neuroscience technologies for brain-driven entrepreneurship researchers. In Day, M., Boardman, M.C. & Krueger, N.F. (Eds.) Handbook of Research Methodologies and Design in Neuroentrepreneurship (259-284). Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Perez-Centeno, V. (2017b). Brain-driven entrepreneurship research: A review and research agenda. In Day, M., Boardman, M.C. & Krueger, N.F. (Eds.) Handbook of Research Methodologies and Design in Neuroentrepreneurship (13-53). Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Perez-Centeno, V. (2017c). Experimental methodological principles for entrepreneurship research using neuroscience techniques. In Day, M., Boardman, M.C. & Krueger, N.F. (Eds.) Handbook of Research Methodologies and Design in Neuroentrepreneurship (150-173). Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Qin, X., Shepherd, D.A., Lin, D., Xie, S., Liang, X. & Lin, S. (2020). The dark side of entrepreneurs’ creativity: investigating how and when entrepreneurs’ creativity increases the favorability of potential opportunities that harm nature. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258720915582
  • Razumnikova, O. M. (2004). Gender differences in hemispheric organization during divergent thinking: An eeg investigation in human subjects. Neuroscience Letters, 362, 193-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2004.02.066
  • Shane, S., Drover, W., Clingingsmith, D. & Cerf, M. (2019). Founder passion, neural engagement and informal investor interest in startup pitches: An fMRI study. Journal of Business Venturing, 35 (4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2019.105949
  • Shane, S., Locke, E. A. & Collins, C. J. (2012). Entrepreneurial motivation. Human Resource Management Review, 13(2), 257-279. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-4822(03)00017-2
  • Shane, S. & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25 (1), 217-226. https://doi.org/10.2307/259271
  • Shaver, K. G., Schjoedt, L., Passarelli, A. & Reeck, C. (2017). The cognitive neuroscience of entrepreneurial risk: Conceptual and methodological challenges. In Day, M., Boardman, M.C., Krueger, N.F. (Eds.) Handbook of Research Methodologies and Design in Neuroentrepreneurship (207-240). Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Shaver, K. G. & Scott, L. R. (1991). Person, process, choice: The psychology of new venture creation, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 16 (2), 23-45.
  • Shemyakina, N. V. & Dan’ko, S. G. (2007). Changes in the power and coherence of the B2 EEG band in subjects performing creative tasks using emotionally significant and emotionally neutral words. Human Physiology, 33 (1), 20–26. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Natalia-Shemyakina/publication/227219411_Changes_in_the_power_and_coherence_of_the_b2_EEG_band_in_subjects_performing_creative_tasks_using_emotionally_significant_and_emotionally_neutral_words/links/00b7d526a24b05d3e4000000/Changes-in-the-power-and-coherence-of-the-b2-EEG-band-in-subjects-performing-creative-tasks-using-emotionally-significant-and-emotionally-neutral-words.pdf
  • Singh, R. P. & Ronch, J.L. (2011). Changing entrepreneurial cognitive processes with age: A conceptual discussion based on neuroscience. Journal of Marketing Development and Competitiveness, 5(6), 94-103.
  • Solso, R. L., Maclin, K. M. ve Maclin, O. H. (2018). Bilişsel Psikoloji. (Çev: Ayçiçeği-Dinn, A.). (8. Baskı). İstanbul: Bilge Yayınları.
  • Sternberg, R. J. & Lubart, T. I. (1996). Investing in creativity. American Psychologist, 51(7), 677-688.
  • Sud, A. (2017). A few words about entrepreneurial learning, training, and brain plasticity. In Day, M., Boardman, M.C. & Krueger, N.F. (Eds.) Handbook of Research Methodologies and Design in Neuroentrepreneurship (241-245). Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Tang, C., Byrge, C. & Zhou, J. (2018). Creativity perspective on entrepreneurship. In Turcan, R. V. & Fraser, N.M. (Eds.) The Palgrave Handbook of Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Entrepreneurship (81-102). Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Tang, J., Kacmar, M. & Busenitz, L. (2012). Entrepreneurial alertness in the pursuit of new opportunities. Journal of Business Venturing, 27, 77–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2010.07.001
  • Tanrıdağ, O. (2018). Beyin-Davranış İlişkileri Üzerine Konferanslar ve Dersler-II. İstanbul: Üsküdar Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  • Treffers, T. (2017). A few words about neuroexperimental designs for the study of emotions and cognitions in entrepreneurship. In Day, M., Boardman, M.C. & Krueger, N.F. (Eds.) Handbook of Research Methodologies and Design in Neuroentrepreneurship (246-258). Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Turanlı, G. (1994). Parsiyel Epilepsili Hastalarda Zemin Aktivitesinin Komputerize Yöntemle Analizi. (Yayımlanmamış uzmanlık tezi). Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Ankara.
  • Ward, M. K., Reeck, C. & Becker, W. (2017). A brief primer on using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in entrepreneurship research. In Day, M., Boardman, M.C. & Krueger, N.F. (Eds.) Handbook of Research Methodologies and Design in Neuroentrepreneurship (120-149). Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Whiting, B.G. (1988). Creativity and entrepreneurship: How do they relate? The Journal of Creative Behavior, 22(3), 178-183. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1988.tb00495.x
  • Yeşilyurt, E. (2020). Yaratıcılık ve yaratıcı düşünme: Tüm boyut ve paydaşlarıyla kapsayıcı bir derleme çalışması. OPUS-Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, 15(25), 3874-3915. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.662721
  • Zaro, M. A., Fagundes, L.C., Rochal, F.T. & Nunes, W.C. (2016). Cognitive brain mapping used in the study of entrepreneurial behavior – pilot test with the use of electroencephalogram - EEG during the process of identification of business opportunities. American Journal of Educational Research,4 (6), 472-478. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-4-6-5
Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 2149-1658
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 3 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

TURİZM SEKTÖRÜNDE BUMERANG YÖNETİCİLER: NEDEN GİTTİLER? NEDEN DÖNDÜLER?

Pınar ÇELİK ÇAYLAK, Nisa EKŞİLİ, Cenk TUFAN

COVID-19 SÜRECİNDE SEÇİLMİŞ ÜLKELERDE VE TÜRKİYE’DE KREDİ RİSKİNİN BELİRLEYİCİLERİ

Yağmur KAYA, Eda BALIKÇIOĞLU

YÜKSELEN EKONOMİLERDE ENERJİ ETKİNLİLİĞİNİ ETKİLEYEN FAKTÖRLER: KARMA MODELLER

Mustafa NAİMOĞLU, Mustafa AKAL, Çisem BEKTUR

COVID-19 HANEHALKI ÇEVRE ÖLÇEĞİ’NİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ: GEÇERLİLİK VE GÜVENİRLİK ÇALIŞMASI

Huriye İrem KALAYCI KIRLIOĞLU, Sibel Büşra ÇAKIN, Mehmet KIRLIOĞLU

TÜRKİYE'DE SICAK PARA HAREKETLERİ İLE BORSA GETİRİSİ VE LİKİDİTESİ ARASINDA ASİMETRİK VE NEDENSELLİK İLİŞKİNİN ANALİZİ

Tuncer YILMAZ

ÜÇ BOYUTLU MERMER KESME PROBLEMİ İÇİN BİR TAM SAYILI DOĞRUSAL PROGRAMLAMA MODELİ

Gokhan YİLMAZ, Yusuf ŞAHİN

YARATICI DÜŞÜNME VE FIRSAT TANIMLAMA ESNASINDA GİRİŞİMCİLER VE GİRİŞİMCİ OLMAYANLARIN BEYİN AKTİVİTELERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Hicran Utkun DİNCER AYDIN, Ayşe İRMİŞ, Burcu DEMİRKUNDAK

KRİPTO PARA FİYATLARININ LSTM VE GRU MODELLERİ İLE TAHMİNİ

Esranur DEMİRCİ, Meltem KARAATLI

MARKALARIN ALGILANAN SOSYAL MEDYA PAZARLAMA ÇALIŞMALARININ TÜKETİCİLERİN ÇEVRİMİÇİ FİKİR ARAMA VE İLETME DAVRANIŞLARI ÜZERİNE ETKİSİ

Nahit KÖKER, Cevat Sercan ÖZER

ÇOKLU YAPISAL KIRILMALAR ALTINDA ENFLASYON İLE ULUSLARARASI PETROL FİYATLARI İLİŞKİSİ: TÜRKİYE ÖRNEĞİ

Gökhan KARTAL