Yeni gelişen planlama yaklaşımları çerçevesinde akıllı yerleşme kavramı ve temel ilkeleri

rtan nüfus, kentleşme oranı ve tüketim unsurları karşısında kentsel çevre, doğal çevre ve enerji sorunları büyümektedir. Aynı zamanda gelişen teknoloji ise kentsel yaşam ve kentsel tasarım sürecine yenilikler getirmektedir. Buna dayanarak 90’lı yıllardan itibaren, kentlerin doğa ve insan üzerinde bıraktıkları negatif izlerin minimuma indirilmesi, nüfus ve kentleşme baskısının kaldırılabilmesi, daha verimli, yaşanılır kentler için yeni planlama yaklaşımları ve çeşitli girişimler (yeşil kent, ekokent, yaşanabilir kent, dijital kent, akıllı kent girişimleri vb.) geliştirilmektedir. “Akıllı kent” birçok yaklaşımın temel niteliklerini içinde barındıran yeni gelişen bir kavram olarak öne çıkmaktadır. Henüz genelleşmiş net bir tanımı bulunmamakla birlikte farklı kentsel gelişme senaryoları kapsamında ele alınan bir niteleme olarak gündemdedir. Akıllı yerleşme kavramı temelinde kentlerin doğa ve insan için maksimum verimlilik sağlayacak şekilde yeniden yapılandırılması düşüncesini yansıtmaktadır. Bu çalışma akıllı yerleşme kavramının kapsamlı bir şekilde açıklanmasını, bu kapsamda geliştirilen güncel planlama yaklaşımı ve çeşitli girişimler çerçevesinde akıllı yerleşme ilkelerinin ortaya konmasını amaçlamaktadır.

The Concept of “smart settlement” and basic principles in the framework of new developing planning approaches

Urban environment, natural environment and energy requirements are growing in the face of increasing population, urbanization rates and consumption factors. At the same time, new technologies also bring innovation to urban life and process of urban design. Based on this, since the 1990s, new planning approaches and initiatives (greencity, ecocity, liveable city, digital city, smart city initiatives etc.) have been improved to mi- nimise the negative effects of cities on nature and humans, to reduce the pressure of population and urbanization and create effective and liveable cities. The term “Smart City” is a new, ever-developing concept. Although there is not a clear definition yet, it exists within different scenarios of urban develop- ment. The concept of “Smart Settlement” reflects the idea of urban reconstruction that makes cities better for humans and nature. The purpose of this study is to explain the smart settlement in a comprehensive manner and reveal the principles of smart settlement within the framework of the current planning approach and various initiatives.

___

  • 1. Beatley T. (2000) Green Urbanism, Washington DC, Island Press
  • 2. Blassingame L., 1998, “Sustainable cities: Oxymoron, Utopia or Inevitability?’, The Social Science Journal, Cilt:35, Sayı:1, s.1-13.
  • 3. Bongardt D., Breithaupt M., Creutzig F. (2002) “Beyond the Fossil City: Towards low Carbon Transport and Green Growth”, German Technical Cooperation (GTZ), 44. Bölüm.
  • 4. Caragliu, A. Nijkamp P. (2009) “Smart Cities in Europe”, Serie Research Memoranda 0048, VU University Amsterdam.
  • 5. Castineira F.G. vd. (2011) “Experiences inside the Ubiquitous Oulu Smart City”, IEEE Computer Society, Cilt 44, Sayı 6, s.48-55
  • 6. Ecocity Builders (EB) (2011) Internatıonal Ecocıty Framework And Standards, California, British Columbia Institute of Technology – School of Construction and the Environment.
  • 7. European Green Cities (EGC) (2001) Final Technical Report: European Green Cities - European Global Renewable Energy and environmentally responsible neighbourhoods and cities, Denmark, Cenergia Energy Consultants.
  • 8. European Commission (2010) Concerto: A Cıtıes’ Guıde To A Sustaınable Built Environment, Belçika, European Communities.
  • 9. Filion Y.R. (2008) “Impact of Urban Form on Energy Use in Water Distribution Systems”, Journal Of Infrastructure Systems, Cilt:14, Sayı: 4. s.337-346
  • 10. Giffinger R., Fertner C., Kramar H., Kalasek R., Milanović N.P., Meijers E. (2007) Final Report: Smart cities Ranking of European medium-sized cities, Vienna, Centre of Regi- onal Science (SRF), Vienna University of Technology
  • 11. Gouveia L.B. and Gouveia J.B. (2002) “Digital Cities: The Gaia Digital Approach”, IADIS International Conference, 13-15 November, Lisbon, s.340-344
  • 12. Hongjie X. ve Ming C. (2009) “Toward a Compact settle- ment”, A Sustainable Development way of Settlements for Chinese City”, International Conference on Management and Service Science, Wuhan, s. 1-5.
  • 13. Ishida T., Isbister K. (2000) “Digital Cities Technologies, Experiences, and Future Perspectives”, Berlin, Springer-Verlag.
  • 14. Jenks M., Burton E., Williams K. (1996) “The Compact City: A Sustainable Urban Form?”, London, Spon Press.
  • 15. Jia L. (2009) “Sptial Planning in Shenzhen to Built a Low Carbon City”, 45th ISOCARP Congress, Shenzhen, Urban Planning and Development Research Center. S.1-7
  • 16. Kracauer M. (2007) “Zero Energy Meets New Urbanism”, Boulder Green Buıldıng Journal, Spring-2007, s.28-31
  • 17. Leroy G. (2002) “Smart Growth for Cities: It’s a Union Thing”, Working USA, Cilt 6, Sayı 1, s.56-76.
  • 18. Lugaric, L. vd. (2010) “Smart City - Platform for Emergent Phenomena Power System Testbed Simulator”, Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference, Zagreb, Europe 2010 IEEE PES.
  • 19. Neal P. (2003) Urban Villages and the Making of Communities, London-New York, Spon Press.
  • 20. OECD (2009), A Technology Roadmap For The Communication On Investing İn The Development Of Low Carbon Technologies, Brussels, Commıssıon Of The European Communıtıes.
  • 21. Salzano, E. (1994) “Seven aims for the livable City”, Ed.: Suzanne H. Crowhurst Lennard, Sven von Ungern-Sternberg, Henry L. Lennard, Making Cities Livable, IMCL Conferences, s.18-21
  • 22. Smart Growth Network (SGN) (2001) “This is Smart Growth”, International City/County Management Association (ICMA) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Publication.
  • 23. Suzuki H. vd. (2010) Eco2 Cities: Ecological Cities as Economic Cities, Washington DC., The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank.
  • 24. The World Commission on Environment and Development (Brundtland Commission) (1987), “Our Common Future”, Oxford University Press.
  • 25. Timmer V., Seymoar N.K. (2006) The World Urban Forum 2006: The livable City, Vancouver, International Centre for Sustainable Cities.
  • 26. United Nations (2004) World Population to 2300, New York, Department of Economic and Social Affairs.
  • 27. Urban Task Force (UTF) (1999) Towards Urban Renaissance, London, Spon Press.
  • 28. Yazar K.H. (2007) “Sürdürülebilir Kentsel Gelişme Çerçevesinde Orta Ölçekli Kentlere Dönük Kent Planlama Yöntem Önerisi” Basılmamış Doktora Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi.
  • Internet Kaynakları
  • 1. Congress of the New Urbanism, (2001) “Charter of the New Urbanism”, http://www.cnu.org/sites/www. cnu.org/files/cnu_charter2010_0.pdf [Erişim Tarihi: 01.03.2013]
  • 2. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (2001) “What is Smarth Growth”, http://www.smartgrowth.org/why. php, [Erişim Tarihi: 01.03.2013]
  • 3. Cittaslow International Charter, http://www.cittaslow- turkiye.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=artic le&id=100&Itemid=468
  • 4. http://smartercities.nrdc.org/about, [Erişim tarihi : 07.11.2012]
  • 5. http://www.smart-cities.net/about_us.asp, [Erişim tarihi : 07.11.2012]
  • 6. http://cities.media.mit.edu/, [Erişim tarihi: 15.11.2012]
  • 7. http://www.urbanaudit.org/help.aspx, [Erişim tarihi: 17.08. 2012]
  • 8. http://setis.ec.europa.eu/ [Erişim Tarihi: 14.01.2012]
  • 9. http://amsterdamsmartcity.com/ [Erişim Tarihi:14.01.2013]